SELLING YOUR DOCTORAL RESEARCH PROGRAMME Dr. Chris Burton & Steph Dolben Graduate School College of Health and Behavioural Sciences.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QAA Research Teaching Linkages: Enhancing Graduate Attributes Theme Linda Juleff, QAA Steering Group Representative.
Advertisements

How do I know that my work is PhD level? Professor Chris Park Director, The Graduate School.
Pedagogic Research The Nature of Cross-Cultural Teaching and Learning
Introducing the Researcher Development Framework (RDF) Gill Johnston, University of Sussex.
Appraisal of Literature. Task 4 The task requires that you:  Obtain a piece of literature from a journal, book or internet source. The literature should.
A N G L I A R U S K I N U N I V E R S I T Y A Professional Doctorate in the Built Environment Ian Frame 5 th December 2007 Forum for the Built Environment.
Research Supervisor Training Programme Obligations of the Supervisor.
Preparing for the Transfer John S.A. Edwards, PhD., Dr honoris causa (Örebro University, Sweden) Professor of Foodservice Foodservice and Applied Nutrition.
Dr Jim Briggs Masterliness Not got an MSc myself; BA DPhil; been teaching masters students for 18 years.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style 02/05/20151 Assurance of Doctoral Learning through Interim and End Goal Assessments:
1 Graduates’ Attributes : EMF, EUR-ACE and Federal Educational Standards Alexander I. Chuchalin, Chair of the RAEE Accreditation Board Graduates’ Attributes.
Professor Stanley Marshall Makuza Dean, School of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Chinhoyi University of Technology.
Masters Level Assessment of Teaching and Learning C r e a t i v i t y without  What should we do?
CB330005S Review and Planning UND: April 2007.
California English Language Development Test Review of the Test Composition.
WHAT TO EXPECT FROM JUDGES AND HOW TO PREPARE FOR JUDGING DAY. Preparing for the Judges.
Research Examiner Training Programme Examining the Thesis.
Research as inquiry Models, approaches and conceptions Vicky Davies 1Based on a presentation by L Norton March 2013.
Preparing for the Oral Examination Dr Hilary Burgess Reader in Education School of Education University of Leicester.
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
Confirmation of Candidature Writing the research proposal Helen Thursby.
The Elevator Pitch Birmingham Education Foundation,
Preparing for the PH.D. Viva – An Oral Examination Dr. Tamara O’Connor Student Learning Development Student Counselling Service.
Ph.D. Viva and Oral Defence Preparation
Reliability & Validity Qualitative Research Methods.
G RADUATE S CHOOL L ETTERS OF I NTENT Caitlin Henke, MA Career Development Facilitator Career Services.
Advanced Research Methodology
National Frameworks of Qualifications, and the UK Experience Dr Robin Humphrey Director of Research Postgraduate Training Faculty of Humanities and Social.
Writing a literature review Dr Cheryl Lange. Integral aspects of academic work.
Dr. MaLinda Hill Advanced English C1-A Designing Essays, Research Papers, Business Reports and Reflective Statements.
‘Positively defined learning outcomes’ Harriet Barnes Standards, Quality and Enhancement 19 June 2015.
Dr. Lai Fong Chiu Senior Research Fellow Institute of Health Sciences and Public Health Research University of Leeds Critical Engagement The Community.
Faculty of Health and Social Care Introducing STUDY for international students.
Note to evaluator… The overall purpose of this presentation is to guide evaluators through the completion of step 7 of the UFE checklist and to “level.
1 The proposed UK computing masters benchmark 5th TEMPUS JEP Meeting Belgrade April 26/27.
The Engineering Doctorate (EngD) Developing Leaders for Tomorrow with Industry Prof Patrick Godfrey.
GRADUATE STUDIES: STUDENTS’ OBLIGATIONS AND EXPECTATIONS By Dr. Michael Wainaina Associate Dean, Graduate School.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
1 Analysing the contributions of fellowships to industrial development November 2010 Johannes Dobinger, UNIDO Evaluation Group.
EngageNY.org The Common Core Implications for Teacher Educators.
INTRODUCTION TO GRADUATE STUDIES AND WRITING. Mailing List Subscription Post
Graduate studies - Master of Pharmacy (MPharm) 1 st and 2 nd cycle integrated, 5 yrs, 10 semesters, 300 ECTS-credits 1 Integrated master's degrees qualifications.
Masters Level Modules Ros Ollin School of Education and Professional Development University of Huddersfield.
Professional Doctorates at The University of Northampton.
Innovation in research: reflections on a 20 year career! Kevin Ward Professor of Human Geography and Director of External Relations and Social Responsibility,
DCU Student Learning Critical Thinking for Undergrads.
This was developed as part of the Scottish Government’s Better Community Engagement Programme.
PEER Module 4: Research & Evaluation Questions
PSY 219 – Academic Writing in Psychology Fall Çağ University Faculty of Arts and Sciences Department of Psychology Inst. Nilay Avcı Week 9.
How to measure the impact of R&D on SD ? Laurence Esterle, MD, PhD Cermes and Ifris France Cyprus, 16 – 17 October L. ESTERLE Linking science and.
Case Studies and Review Week 4 NJ Kang. 5) Studying Cases Case study is a strategy for doing research which involves an empirical investigation of a particular.
Paper III Qualitative research methodology. Objective 1.2 Explain strengths and limitations of a qualitative approach to research?
How To Write Thesis Proposal Pishtiwan Abdulla. What is Master Thesis proposal? Master’s thesis proposal is a kind of a draft written with the purpose.
Greenbush. An informed citizen possesses the knowledge needed to understand contemporary political, economic, and social issues. A thoughtful citizen.
Planning for and Attending an Important Meeting Advanced Social Communication High School: Lesson Seven.
Extended response questions can be broken down into parts so that you can better understand what you are being asked to do. It is important to identify.
Managing Corporate Reputation Sarah Williams Senior Examiner December 2013 / March 2014 Assignment Brief.
Equipping the Next Generation for Active Engagement in Science EngagingScience.eu שילוב נושאים סוציו-מדעיים ואתיים בלימודי מדע ד"ר יעל שורץ, אתי דגן ואמיל.
High quality Doctoral programmes
Dr Susan Smith, Leeds Beckett University
Albanian Qualification Framework Warsaw – September 2016
Ph.D. Viva and Oral Defence Preparation
MSc in Social Research Methods
The UKPSF and the HEA Fellowship scheme
Welcome to Keele University
Reviewing the literature: Critical thinking and making an intervention
Managing the Supervisory relationship and Support
Questions Peter Prowse.
OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010
Presentation transcript:

SELLING YOUR DOCTORAL RESEARCH PROGRAMME Dr. Chris Burton & Steph Dolben Graduate School College of Health and Behavioural Sciences

PhD Award Benchmarks (BU) acquisition and understanding of a substantial body of knowledge which is at the forefront of an academic discipline or area of professional practice an ability to conceptualise, design and implement a research project and to adjust the project design in response to unforeseen problems, and a detailed understanding of applicable techniques for research and advanced academic enquiry an ability to create and interpret new knowledge through original research or other advanced scholarship. The work must be at the forefront of the discipline, of a quality to satisfy peer review, and must merit publication

Create new knowledge? Looking at ‘something’ through a new lens – e.g. applying new theory to it, applying new methodologies. Testing interventions / strategies / approaches in (very) different contexts than previously tested.

Continued… Developing a new framework, or theory about a phenomenon – or revising an existing one. Discovering a new way of doing something – e.g. interventions, and methods. New insights! even if tiny

What is unlikely to make for a new contribution Re-cycling existing knowledge Re-evaluating an established intervention Question[s] – being evaluated in a slightly different context Localised research, which doesn’t pay attention to the wider context

Telling the story - key ingredients stated gap in knowledge explicit research questions conceptual framework explicit research design appropriate methodology 'correct' fieldwork clear/concise presentation engagement with theory coherent argument research questions answered, and conceptual conclusions contribution to knowledge Trafford, V and Leshem, S (2008) Stepping Stones to Achieving your Doctorate, Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Elevator pitches An elevator pitch is a short speech: One day you accidently meet someone in the elevator with whom you desperately wanted to meet for quite some time. He is there in front of you while the elevator goes to their 10 th floor office. This is your golden opportunity to impress! You make the most of it in 60 seconds and they make more time for you in their office….

Some key features Engaging in content and style Maximum impact Other tactics?

Selling the PhD…. The importance of the question ◦ Why is it worth asking this question? ◦ Has it been asked, and answered before? The significance of the findings ◦ Why do these findings matter? ◦ Why should anyone care about these findings? What are the implications of the findings ◦ For theory, for the evidence base, for practice/policy How might the findings be limited ◦ i.e. their generalisability/theoretical transferability

Individual work Think about how you would describe your PhD contribution to three important ‘stakeholder’ groups: Someone you meet at a Dinner Party Fellow students (in other subjects) Experts / Examiners

Work in pairs Try out each conversation with each other. Reflect back on: ◦ What did you hear in each elevator conversation? ◦ What was convincing and why? ◦ What was not clear?

Group activity Randomly, select a workshop participant and request a particular elevator conversation That participant can then pick the next participant at random, and so on…..