1 Intuitive Irrationality: Reasons for Unreason. 2 Epistemology Branch of philosophy focused on how people acquire knowledge about the world Descriptive.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
C81COG: Cognitive Psychology 1 PROBABILISTIC REASONING Dr. Alastair D. Smith Room B22 – School of Psychology
Advertisements

Biases, Brains, and Decision Making. Lawyers are Lousy Decision-Makers.
Thinking.
Day 2 Evolution of Decision-Making.  Tversky and Kahneman, 1974  Heuristics – general rules of thumb, or habits  Generally result in decent estimates.
Misconceptions and Fallacies Concerning Probability Assessments.
1 st lecture Probabilities and Prospect Theory. Probabilities In a text over 10 standard novel-pages, how many 7-letter words are of the form: 1._ _ _.
Decision making and economics. Economic theories Economic theories provide normative standards Expected value Expected utility Specialized branches like.
Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 11 – Judgment & Decision-Making.
© POSbase 2005 The Conjunction Fallacy Please read the following scenario: (by Tversky & Kahneman, 1983)Tversky & Kahneman, 1983 Linda is 31 years old,
Fallacies in Probability Judgment Yuval Shahar M.D., Ph.D. Judgment and Decision Making in Information Systems.
Thinking, Deciding and Problem Solving
Reasoning What is the difference between deductive and inductive reasoning? What are heuristics, and how do we use them? How do we reason about categories?
Running Experiments with Amazon Mechanical-Turk Gabriele Paolacci, Jesse Chandler, Jesse Chandler Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 5, No. 5, August 2010.
PROBABILITY Uses of Probability Reasoning about Probability Three Probability Rules The Binomial Distribution.
Solved the Maze? Start at phil’s house. At first, you can only make right turns through the maze. Each time you cross the red zigzag sign (under Carl’s.
Or Why We’re Not Really As Rational As We’d Like to Believe.
Heuristics and Biases. Normative Model Bayes rule tells you how you should reason with probabilities – it is a normative model But do people reason like.
The Psychology of Security ….a work in progress Bruce Schneier DIMACS Workshop on Information Security Economics Rutgers University 18 January 2007.
Decision-making II judging the likelihood of events.
Example #1 (Bransford & Johnson, 1973)  “The procedure is quite simple. First, you arrange things into different groups. Of course, one pile may be sufficient,
Reasoning with Uncertainty. Often, we want to reason from observable information to unobservable information We want to calculate how our prior beliefs.
Inductive Reasoning Bayes Rule. Urn problem (1) A B A die throw determines from which urn to select balls. For outcomes 1,2, and 3, balls are picked from.
Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 10 – Reasoning & Decision-Making August 21, 2003.
Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Companies
Heuristics & Biases. Bayes Rule Prior Beliefs Evidence Posterior Probability.
Decision Making. Test Yourself: Decision Making and the Availability Heuristic 1) Which is a more likely cause of death in the United States: being killed.
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. What is Perception? Perception: The process of recognizing and understanding others By understanding.
Today’s Topic Do you believe in free will? Why or why not?
Good thinking or gut feeling
Decision making Making decisions Optimal decisions Violations of rationality.
Decision Making choice… maximizing utility framing effects
Psychology 100 Chapter 8 Part III Thinking & Intelligence.
Chapter 10 Thinking.
ACCURACY AND INACCURACY IN MEMORY AND COGNITION. Accuracy and Inaccuracy in Memory and Cognition Learning Objectives: 1.Outline the variables that can.
+ Cognition. + Cognition: Thinking All the mental activities associated with thinking, knowing, remembering, and communicating.
RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS Special Lectures University of Kuwait Richard Wilson Mallinckrodt Professor of Physics Harvard University January 13th, 14th and.
Lecture 15 – Decision making 1 Decision making occurs when you have several alternatives and you choose among them. There are two characteristics of good.
FIN 614: Financial Management Larry Schrenk, Instructor.
Perception, Cognition, and Emotion in Negotiation
Human Cognitive Processes: psyc 345 Ch. 13 Reasoning and Decision Making Takashi Yamauchi © Takashi Yamauchi (Dept. of Psychology, Texas A&M University)
Judgement Judgement We change our opinion of the likelihood of something in light of new information. Example:  Do you think.
Psychology 485 March 23,  Intro & Definitions Why learn about probabilities and risk?  What is learned? Expected Utility Prospect Theory Scalar.
PSY 323 – Cognition Chapter 13: Judgment, Decisions & Reasoning.
Thinking. Cognition Another term for thinking, knowing and remembering Maybe by studying the way we think, we can eventually think better. Does the way.
Exercise 2-6: Ecological fallacy. Exercise 2-7: Regression artefact: Lord’s paradox.
1 DECISION MAKING Suppose your patient (from the Brazilian rainforest) has tested positive for a rare but serious disease. Treatment exists but is risky.
Representativeness Heuristic Then: Framing Effects Psychology 355: Cognitive Psychology Instructor: John Miyamoto 6/2 /2015: Lecture 10-2 This Powerpoint.
Decision Making. Reasoning & Problem Solving A. Two Classes of Reasoning I. Deductive Reasoning II. Inductive Reasoning.
5 MARCH 2015 TOK LECTURE TRUTH: TNML. ECONOMICS  ECONOMISTS HAVE A VERY SHAKY RELATIONSHIP WITH TRUTH.  AT THE HEART OF THE FINANCIAL CRISIS OF 2008.
Inductive reasoning problems … … … … ?? ?? 1210 Need.
CHS AP Psychology Unit 7 Part II: Cognition Essential Task 7.3: Identify decision making techniques (compensatory models, representativeness heuristics,
Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 10 – Reasoning & Decision-Making.
Probability Judgments: Overview I  Heuristics and Basis:  Availabilty heuristic  Representativeness heuristic.  Anchoring and Adjustment.
A. Judgment Heuristics Definition: Rule of thumb; quick decision guide When are heuristics used? - When making intuitive judgments about relative likelihoods.
Behavioral Finance Biases Feb 23 Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Heuristics and Biases Thomas R. Stewart, Ph.D. Center for Policy Research Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy University at Albany State University.
The Representativeness Heuristic then: Risk Attitude and Framing Effects Psychology 355: Cognitive Psychology Instructor: John Miyamoto 6/1/2016: Lecture.
Exercise 2-7: Regression artefact: Lord’s paradox
Unit 7 Part II: Cognition
PSY 323 – Cognition Chapter 13: Judgment, Decisions & Reasoning.
Skepticism and Empiricism in Psychology
1st: Representativeness Heuristic and Conjunction Errors 2nd: Risk Attitude and Framing Effects Psychology 355:
These slides are preview slides
Psychology of Security
Do Now What are some things that influence your decisions?
Thinking.
Do Now What are some things that influence your decisions?
Thinking.
Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
HEURISTICS.
Presentation transcript:

1 Intuitive Irrationality: Reasons for Unreason

2 Epistemology Branch of philosophy focused on how people acquire knowledge about the world Descriptive Descriptive Theories Describe what people actually do when making judgments and decisions PrescriptiveNormative Prescriptive or Normative Theories Describe how people should make judgments and decisions

3 Example: Normative Theory Expected Utility Theory Choose between two games: Game A: Game A: You have a 20% chance of winning $10 You have an 80% chance of winning nothing Game B: Game B: You have a 10% chance of wining $50 You have a 90% chance of winning nothing

4 Example: Normative Theory Expected Utility Theory Two dimensions of choice Probability of winning (p) Value of outcome (v) EUT = (p)(v) So, game A EUT: $2, game B EUT: $5

5 Example: Normative Theory Choose between two games: Game A: Game A: You have a 1% chance of winning $1000 You have a 99% chance of winning nothing Game B: Game B: You have a 100% chance of wining $5 Game A EUT: $10 Game B EUT: $5

6 Framing Effects Imagine Madison is preparing for an outbreak of an unusual disease that is expected to kill 600 people. Two programs have been proposed: If they adopt Program A, 200 people will be saved. If they adopt Program B, there is a 1/3 chance that 600 people will be saved, and a 2/3 chance that none will be saved.

7 Framing Effects Imagine Madison is preparing for an outbreak of an unusual disease that is expected to kill 600 people. Two programs have been proposed: If they adopt Program C, 400 people will die. If they adopt Program D, there is a 1/3 chance that nobody will die, and a 2/3 chance that 600 will die.

8 Framing Effects Program A is identical to Program C! Program B is the same as Program D! Why the difference? The way the problem is framed greatly affects decisions People are risk-averse when thinking about gains People are risk-seeking when thinking about losses

9 Judgment Heuristics shortcuts Mental shortcuts that people use to make various judgments, like: The frequency of past events The probability that something will happen The chances that some fact is true Dangerousness and risk

10 Why do people use heuristics? Cognitive misers Time constraints Missing information

11 Why do people use heuristics? The use of heuristics is not in itself irrational or illogical Heuristics are adaptive shortcuts HOWEVER! Sometimes heuristics lead us to wrong judgments and false beliefs

12 Availability Heuristic Judging the frequency, probability, likelihood of an event according to how easily examples come to mind more available Whatever is more available in memory will be more likely to be used in judgments

13 The problem with availability unrelated How easily things come to mind are influenced by things unrelated to how it works in the real world Salience, e.g., occurrences rather than nonoccurences Vividness Recency Individual interests and experiences

14 Representativeness Heuristic Judging the frequency, likelihood, probability of an event according to how much it resembles or is similar to its group Problem: Fails to consider other factors that drive the actual frequencies or chances of that event

15 Linda is 31 years old, single, outspoken and very bright. She majored in philosophy. As a student, she was deeply concerned with issues of discrimination and social justice, and also participated in anti-nuclear demonstrations. Which is more likely? Linda is a bank teller Linda is a bank teller and is active in the feminist movement.

16 Conjunction Fallacy Occurs when people believe that a conjunction of two properties can occur more often than either of the properties alone There cannot be more red apples than there are just apples! There cannot be more feminist bank tellers than there are either feminists or bank tellers!

17 Base-Rate Fallacy Base Rate: Likelihood of a particular event When given no additional information, people generally use the base rate correctly HOWEVER, when people have more information, they tend to ignore the base rate

18 In a room there are 70 lawyers and 30 engineers. Jack is a 45 year old man. He is married with four children. He is generally conservative, careful, and ambitious. He shows no interest in political and social issues and spends most of his time on his many hobbies, which include carpentry, sailing, and mathematical puzzles. Which is more likely? Jack is an engineer Jack is a lawyer

19 The Confirmation Bias Tendency to seek information consistent with our expectations and discount information inconsistent with our expectations Self-fulfilling prophecy Behavioral confirmation