Sue Moreau Manager, Multimodal Planning & Operations Outreach Division Bureau of Planning MaineDOT 1 Peter Schauer Associates

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Strategic National Stockpile (SNS): What it means to you! Jacquelyn Roberson, RN, BSN Maine CDC Michael Radke, RRT, A.S., B.S. Portland Public Health.
Advertisements

Greater Minnesota Transit Investment Plan PAC December 14, 2010.
An Orthoimagery Program for ME GeoLibrary Geospatial Work Group.
The National Household Travel Survey Heather Contrino US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, Office of Highway Policy Information.
ANYBODY CAN RIDE! Examples of successful rural transit programs and practices elsewhere in the United States.
Diversion Alert. Prescription Monitoring Program Trends among Individuals Arrested in Maine for Trafficking Prescription Drugs, 2014 Christina Holt, MD,
Eastern Maine Transportation Collaborative: Health Services Initiative Research Findings and Recommendations Presented by the UMaine Center on Aging Dr.
The Current State and Future of the Regional Multi-Modal Travel Demand Forecasting Model.
MAINE LiDAR ACQUISITION UPDATE CFRU ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING Wells Conference Center University of Maine, Orono October 29, 2014.
Transportation Development How do we get rubber on the road? …..and other burning questions.
TCRP Project J-6, Task 71 Rural Transit Achievements: Assessing the Outcomes of Increased SAFETEA-LU Funding for Rural Transit INTERIM FINDINGS – TOWN.
National Conference on Rural Public and Intercity Transportation October 21, 2008.
11 American Community Survey Summary Data Products.
Maine Rail Transit Coalition Portland Maine Mailto: "Build Trains not Lanes" Expanding Passenger Rail in.
Your Community by the Numbers Accessing the most current and relevant Census data Alexandra Barker Data Dissemination Specialist U.S Census Bureau New.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration Region IV Introduction to FTA Grant Programs.
Resources Materials Lead Dust Testing Points of Contact.
Public Transportation & Persons With Special Transportation Needs House Transportation Committee February 12, 2013 Tom Hingson Transportation Services.
County-to-County Worker Flow Map Journeys To and From Hampden MA.
White House Conference on Aging Transportation Policy Committee Testimony January 8, 2005 Looking Forward… Growing Older Public Transportation: Providing.
NON-TRADITIONAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES WHEN ONE SIZE DOES NOT FIT ALL:
Transportation Coordination & Federal Transportation Administration Programs Marianne Freed, MSW/LSW Office of Transit Ohio Department of Transportation.
Rural Transit Need and Demand Workshop 1.  A.T. Stoddard, PhD, PE ◦ Principal - LSC Transportation Consultants  Corey Pitts, AICP ◦ Transportation Planner.
Westbrook High School November 1, 2012 RECLASSIFICATION Community Forum.
State Board of Corrections An Overview of Public Law 2008 Chapter 653.
2010 JJAG Annual Report Detention, Economic, and Education Data Juvenile Justice Data for 2010 by County and Region.
Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Study Overview and Initial Existing Conditions September 2011 In association with: LSA Design and Public Solutions.
January Utah Statewide Household Travel Study Study overview and results.
Enhancing the Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Access and Use of Targeted Transportation Funds August 17, 2015.
Arizona Rural Transit Needs Study Arizona Department of Transportation Public Transportation Division November 2007.
Student versus Non-Student Data: (Census Special Tabulation #137) Selected Summary File 3 Data for Tompkins County, NY.
National Household Travel Survey Statewide Applications Heather Contrino Travel Surveys Team Lead Federal Highway Administration Office of Highway Policy.
SKAGIT-ISLAND HSTP Skagit-Island HSTP Committee Meeting #3 August 6, 2014.
MPO/RPC Directors Meeting Asadur Rahman Lead Worker-Traffic Forecasting Section, BPED, July 28, 2015.
May 30, 2008 Community Integration Commission 1 DRPT Initiatives on Transportation Services For Older Adults, People With Disabilities.
SAFETEA-LU Elderly & Persons with Disabilities (5310) Job Access Reverse Commute (5316) New Freedom (5317)
Introductions Introduction to TCAG Federal Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Responsible for long-term planning for all modes of surface transportation.
Transit Coordination Plan 2012 Southwest Missouri Council of Governments.
Metro Cities Transportation Policy Committee August 10, 2015 Overview of Minnesota Highway and Transit Finance.
SAFETEA-LU The Transportation Reauthorization Bill passed in 2005 Added New Federal Transit Administration Programs Revised some existing programs Final.
Economic Development, Planning & Tourism 1 General Description General Description Past Effort Past Effort Current Effort Current Effort Next Steps Next.
National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Presented by Connie Soper, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates October 14, 2011 NATIONAL CAPITAL.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 16, 2009.
Cost-Effective Accessible Transportation Alternatives in Rural Areas: Examples from the US Transed 2012 Delhi, India September 17-21, 2012.
Maine Broadband Planning Project— Objective: Increase broadband uptake in a focused and measurable way. 5 October 2010 The Sewall Team: James.
Transportation Regional Assessment & Penobscot Narrows Plan Presented by Jim Fisher Hancock County Planning Commission Machias, October 4, 2005 Bucksport,
The Story Behind Maine’s Stormwater Campaign Barb Welch Maine Department of Environmental Protection.
Eastern Equine Encephalitis in Maine, Sara Robinson, MPH 1, Charles Lubelczyk 2, Lee Kantar 3 1 Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention.
HD Presented in. For: Today Sunrise:: AM Sunset:: PM Hours Of Daylight:TomorrowSunrise::AM Sunset:: PM Hours Of Daylight: Almanac.
1 The American Community Survey An Update Pamela Klein American Community Survey Office Washington Metropolitan Council on Governments Cooperative Forecasting.
American Community Survey (ACS) 1 Oregon State Data Center Meeting Portland State University April 14,
Butte Silver Bow Transportation Development Plan Update Lisa Ballard, P.E. Barb Beck Kimberly Brown 1.
Introduction Sue Moreau Manager, Multimodal Planning Division
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 15, 2009.
Travel and Tourism in Maine 2000 Visitor Study Prepared for the: Maine Office of Tourism July 18, 2001 Top-Line Results.
Morgan County Transit Discussion UTA Corporate Staff Presentation November 19, 2013.
Regional Public Transportation Service Plan Proposal for the Texas Panhandle.
1 TPB Responses to FAMPO Policies on Allocating and Sharing of Regional Transit Funds Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board Item 14 Ronald.
Travel Ambassador Program A train the trainer workshop.
LEEDS & GRENVILLE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT.
Programs & Services Integrated with Chapter 712 Funding Law Programs & Services Integrated with Chapter 712 Funding Law Essential Joint Standing Committee.
© 2004 by David T. Olson Sample - Not for Public Use1 A Sample Presentation of The State of the Church in the New England States and Metro Areas
Title Evaluating the potential for Bus Rapid Transit and MnPASS Express Lanes in the southwest metro Investigating options for improved bus service between.
Human Service Transportation Plan (HSTP) Champaign Urbana Workshop 9/18/12 1.
ITS Coordination Tools: Perspectives from a Rural California Region Pam Couch, Executive Director Modoc Transportation - Alturas, CA
INFORMATION SERVICESPopulation Technical Advisory Committee Copyright © 2010 Population Technical Advisory Committee Roles and Responsibilities January.
Maine’s Health Care Grant October, 2011 Project Update.
and Transportation Impacts
Regional Smart Mobility Assessment
The New Maine Regional Library System
Presentation transcript:

Sue Moreau Manager, Multimodal Planning & Operations Outreach Division Bureau of Planning MaineDOT 1 Peter Schauer Associates

1:00 PM Introductions Review of Agenda Review Telephone and Rider Surveys Review Demand and Unmet Demand Progress Report 3:30 PM Adjourn

 Telephone and Rider Survey (See Meeting Minutes for Summary of Presentation)

 Demand and Unmet Demand

Key Points : Formulas and approaches vary Overview by region (8) Further refinement by county, urbanized area, small urban area and provider service area.

 Urbanized Area: Designated by the U.S. Bureau of the Census as having a population of 50,000 or more. There are 4 such areas in Maine:  Bangor/Brewer Area  Lewiston-Auburn Area  Portland Area (now classified as a TMA-Transportation Management area under MAP 21)  Kittery Area  Rural Area: All non-urbanized areas3

TCRP Report 161 Methods for Forecasting Demand and Quantifying Need for Rural Passenger Transportation: Final Workbook Transit Cooperative Research Program Washington, D.C. 2013

Persons residing in households owning no automobile: Derived from Census (American Community Survey five- year estimates, , File B08201). Key question: How much transit service would be needed to fully address the mobility needs of transit dependent persons?

Number of Households having no vehicle X mobility Gap What is the Mobility Gap? Number of trips/household/day in a household with one vehicle (5.0) minus number of trips/household/day with no vehicle (3.3) = 1.7 Mobility Gap of 1.7 is an estimate for New England.

Number of no-vehicle households: 2,472 Daily mobility need: (2,472) x 1.7 = 4,202 trips Annual Mobility Need = 4,202 trips x 300 = 1,260,600 trips.

 Quote from page 17 of the TCRP Report: “In the testing of these suggested methodologies with a number of rural transit agencies, it was found that, at best, only about 20% of the mobility gap trip-based need was met.”

 The following approach was developed in consultation with the Metropolitan Planning Organizations of Maine’s urbanized areas.  The mobility gap is based on the 2009 National Household Travel Survey, Federal Highway Administration. 10 trips/day for all-vehicle households 4.8 trips/day for no-vehicle households = gap of 5.2 trips/day/no-vehicle household  Includes trips by all modes.  PACTS uses a different methodology, but the mobility gap is roughly the same (5.02).

 Number of trips provided includes total of transit and MaineCare trips.  Trip data includes fixed route, flex route and MaineCare (agency vehicle, volunteers, friend and family).  Includes only land-based transit (ferry trips not included)  Seasonal service data not included  Intercity trips included in county of origin  Trip data taken from Locally Coordinated Transit Plans and municipal ride reports from providers.

 County Annual Need = 1,260,600 Trips  Caribou, Houlton, Presque Isle Annual Need = 642,600 Trips = 51% of county need.  In FY 2012, ARTS provided 278,172 trips, which was 22% of need.

 Hancock County Annual Need = 705,330 Trips  Ellsworth and Bucksport Annual Need = 229,800 trips or 33% of County need.  In FY 2012, Downeast Transportation and Washington Hancock Community Agency provided 115,027 trips, or 16% of county need.

 Washington County Annual Need = 594,600 Trips.  Calais, Eastport, Lubec and Machias Annual Need = 282,600 trips or 48% of County need.  In FY 2012, WHCA and West’s provided 81,317 trips, which was 14% of Washington County need.

 Penobscot County urbanized area (UZA) includes Bangor, Brewer, parts of Hampden, Old Town, Orono, Veazie (roughly coincides with Community Connector service area).  UZA has 3,112 no vehicle households, or 63% of County total of 4,943 no-vehicle households  UZA need is 4,854,700 trips (based on daily mobility gap of 5.2).  In FY 2012, Community Connector, Penquis and Cyr provided 1,185,163 trips in UZA, or 24% of need.

 Remainder of Penobscot County Annual Need for rural (non-urbanized) portion of county = 933,900 trips.  Millinocket Annual = 126,600 trips, or 14% of need for rural portion of County.  In FY 2012, Penquis provided 238,444 trips in remainder of Penobscot County, which was 26% of rural county need.

 Piscataquis County Annual Need = 276,930 trips.  In FY 2012, Penquis provided 43,502 trips, or 16% of need. No Small Urban Areas in County.

 Kennebec County Annual Need = 2,131,290 trips.  Kennebec Explorer Service Area Annual Need: Augusta, Hallowell, Gardiner, Waterville, Winslow = 1,449,600 trips, or 68% of county need.  In FY 2012, KVCAP provided 210,215 rides in Kennebec Explorer service area, which was 15% of need.

 Remainder of Kennebec County Annual Need (exclusive of Kennebec Explorer area) = 600,690 trips  In FY 2012, KVCAP provided 98,653 trips, or 16% of need.

 Somerset County Annual Need = 766,540 trips  Skowhegan Annual Need = 262,800 trips, or 34% of County need.  In FY 2012, KVCAP provided 136,829 trips, or 18% of total county need.

 Knox County Annual Need = 532,440 trips.  Rockland Annual Need = 213,600 trips, or 40% of County need.  In FY 2012, Coastal Trans provided 37,166 trips, or 7% of the annual county need.

 Lincoln County Annual Need = 191,250 trips.  In FY 2012, Coastal Trans provided 23,178 trips, or 12% of the annual county need.

 Sagadahoc County Annual Need = 486,000 trips.  Bath Annual Need = 318,900 trips, or 66% of county need.  In FY 2012, Coastal Trans provided 14,055 trips in Bath, and Bath City Bus provided 13,661, for a total of 27,716 trips, or 9% of the City’s needs.  Remainder of Sagadahoc County. In FY 2012 in the rest of the county, Coastal Trans provided 12,791 trips, or 8% of the remaining need.

 Waldo County Annual Need = 540,000 trips.  Belfast = 104,700 trips, or 19% of county need.  In FY 2014, Waldo Community Action Partners (WCAP) provided 29,847 trips in Belfast, which was 29% of the City’s needs.  IN FY 2012, WCAP provided 85,162 trips in the remainder of the County, which was 20% of the need.

 Cumberland County  Portland UZA includes Cape Elizabeth, Portland, South Portland, Westbrook, and parts of Cumberland, Falmouth, Freeport, Gorham, North Yarmouth, Scarborough, Windham and Yarmouth (also Biddeford, Saco and Old Orchard Beach – profiled under Region 8).  UZA has 8,130 no vehicle households, or 86% of County total of 9,448 no-vehicle households.  UZA need is 12,195,000 annual trips (based on daily mobility gap of 5.0).

 METRO service area (Portland, Westbrook, Falmouth) Annual Need = 9,600,000 trips.  In FY 2012, METRO provided 1,464,643 trips, or 15% of service area need (RTP trips not included in this total).  Note: Portland has 5,478 no-vehicle households (58% of County total of 9,448).  South Portland Bus Service area, the annual need is 964,500 trips.  In FY 2012, South Portland Bus Service provided 247,370, or 26% of the City’s needs (RTP trips not included in this total).

 Brunswick Annual Need = 1,281,000 trips.  In FY 2012, Coastal Trans provided 26,722 trips, or 2% of the need.

 Androscoggin County  Lewiston-Auburn urbanized area (UZA) includes Lewiston, Auburn, Lisbon and parts of Sabattus.  UZA has 3,856 no vehicle households, or 89% of County total of 4,329 no-vehicle households.  UZA need is 5,784,000 annual trips (based on daily mobility gap of 5.0).

 Citylink service area. Lewiston/Auburn has 3,470 no vehicle households, or 80% of County total of 4,329 no-vehicle households.  In Lewiston and Auburn, the annual need is 5,205,000 trips.  In FY 2012, Citylink, Western Maine Transportation Services (WMTS) and Community Concepts provided 572,490 trips in Lewiston/Auburn, or 11% of the annual need.  Remainder of Androscoggin County, Annual Need = 241,200 trips.  In FY 2012, Community Concepts and WMTS provided 69,065 trips in the rural portion of Androscoggin County, or 29% of need.

 Franklin County Annual Need = 410,100 trips.  Farmington Annual Need = 191,700 trips, or 47% of county need.  In FY 2012, Community Concepts and WMTS provided 90,833 trips, or 22% of need.

 Oxford County Annual Need = 772,800 trips.  Rumford Annual Need = 220,800 trips, or 29% of County need.  In FY 2012, Community Concepts and WMTS provided 28,258 trips in Rumford, which was 13% of Rumford’s needs.  In FY 2012, Community Concepts and Western Maine Transportation Services provided 178,367 trips in the County, or 23% of the need.

 York County  ShuttleBus service area. Biddeford, Saco, Old Orchard Beach (part of Portland UZA) have 1,679 no-vehicle households, or 42% of the county total (3,981).  Biddeford, Saco, OOB Annual need = 2,619,300 trips.  In FY 2012, ShuttleBus and York County Community Action Corporation (YCCAC) provided 381,421 trips in the three communities, which was 15% of the need.

 The Kittery Area UZA includes parts of Berwick, Eliot, Lebanon, Kittery and South Berwick. The UZA has 505 no-vehicle households, or 13% of the county total.  UZA Annual Need = 787,800 trips.  Sanford Annual Need = 367,200 trips. In FY 2012, YCCAC provided 111,386 trips, which was 30% of the need.

 Remainder of York County. In the remainder of York County, Annual Need = 549,300 trips.  In FY 2012, YCCAC provided 90,264 trips to this area (exclusive of UZA towns and Sanford), which was 16% of the need.

Reg.County or Area%Reg.County or Area% 1Aroostook22%5Waldo20% 2Hancock16%5Cumber. - Metro15% 2Washington14%6Cumber. SPBS26% 3Penobscot UZA24%6Cumb. Brunswick2% 3Penobscot Rural26%6Cumber- rural 3Piscataquis16%7Andro. Citylink11% 4Kennebec Explorer15%7Andro. Rural29% 4Kennebec Rural16%7Franklin22% 4Somerset18%7Oxford23% 5Knox7%8York ShuttleBus15% 5Lincoln12%8York Sanford30% 5Sagadahoc -Bath9%8York Rural16% 5Sagadahoc Rural8%

 Need is one thing, but how much transit will the general public use in rural areas?  TCRP Report has a formula for estimating that in rural areas:  Trips/year =  2.2 x population 60 and over  x mobility limited population  x residents in households with no vehicle

 American Community Survey tables  B08201 (Household Size by Vehicles Available  B01001 Sex by Age  S1810 Disability Characteristics  Locally Coordinated Transit Plans  Provider municipal Ride reports

Reg.System% of Demand Met 2Downeast Transportation27% (149% with JARC) 4Kennebec Explorer158% 5Bath City Bus187% 6Brunswick Explorer177% 8Sanford Transit110%

Reg. County or Area% of general public demand met 1Aroostook83% 2Hancock & Washington15% 3Penobscot, Piscataquis excl. of Community Connector area 3% 4Kennebec & Somerset excl. of Kennebec Explorer 2% 5Knox, Lincoln, Sagadahoc exclusive of Bath 46% 5Waldo County36% 6Cumberland excl. of Metro, S Portland, Brundswick 29% 7Androscoggin, Franklin, Oxford excl. of Lewiston-Auburn 12% 8York excl. of ShuttleBus area, Sanford transit 4% (67% with WAVE)

A technical memorandum will be prepared describing the cost to bring all MaineDOT funded services up to a Maine standard as determined by discovery of the best performing services for each service type. The relative percentage of demand met by applying higher level of productivity of the services will be described.

MaineDOT Strategic Transit Plan 2025 February 2014 – January 2015 Meetings and Critical Activities ( hard copy )

45 Conceptual Tasks MaineDOT Strategic Transit Plan Peter Schauer Associates

 April 8, :00 AM - Noon  DOT Room 216  Progress Report  Report on Rider Survey  Refinement of Inventory of Services and Demand