INTRODUCTION TO FEDERAL HIGHWAY FUNDING AND ELIGIBILITY Mike Morrow Field Operations Engineer (503) 587-4708 Mike Morrow(Field Operations Engineer)503-5874708Mike.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
State Aid Programs An Introduction to: Local Bridge Replacement Program Local Road Improvement.
Advertisements

State Aid Programs Legislative Issues - Bonding Local Bridge Replacement Program Local Road Improvement Township Sign Replacement Program.
Transportation Programs Supporting You Scott Johnson Federal Highway Administration Office of Federal Lands Highway.
I-4 Ultimate with Lanes Project Central Florida 1 May 21, 2013.
North Dakota Association of County Engineers 2015 Annual Conference January 22, 2015 FHWA Update.
FINANCIAL PLAN AND FINANCIAL CONSTRAINT FOR FTIPS AND FSTIP FINANCIAL PLAN AND REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS 2013 FTIP/FSTIP WORKSHOP January 17, 2012 Wade Hobbs,
Update on Historic Bridges MaryAnn Naber Federal Highway Administration June 17, 2008.
Nicholas Finch Local Programs Engineer Federal Highway Administration Preview of Federal-aid 101 Authorization Overview: Where we are! Where are we headed?
Operations / ITS Provisions in SAFETEA-LU What’s in There and What’s Not Jeff Lindley Operations / ITS Discipline Meeting August 16, 2005.
MAP-21 Overview and Programmatic Impacts February 4, 2013 Serge Phillips MnDOT Federal Relations Koryn Zewers.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users P. L SAFETEA-LU.
PROPOSITION 1 AND SELECTED TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS IN TARRANT COUNTY SOUTHEAST TARRANT TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP OCTOBER 8, 2014.
1 The Development of Federal Surface Transportation Authorization Legislation Jim Kolb Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure U.S. House of Representatives.
Jack Basso Director of Program Finance and Management American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Audit Subcommittee Meeting Phoenix,
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users SAFETEA-LU Key Safety Provisions Federal Highway Administration.
MAP-21: Bridges and Structures Moderated By Joey Hartmann Team Leader, Office of Bridge Technology Federal Highway Administration HIBT Webinar on MAP-21.
Funding the Future of Our Transportation Infrastructure Juva Barber Executive Director.
Funding Levels Similar funding levels to the Transportation Enhancement Activities under SAFETEA-LU: FY 2013: $808,760,000 FY 2014: $819,900,000 Total.
Statewide Local Agency Project Delivery Conference SAFETEA-LU: Earmarks and Federal Programs Relating to Local Agencies Travis Brouwer ODOT Federal Affairs.
THE FUTURE OF TRANSPORTATION FUNDING AN ALDOT PERSPECTIVE December 3, 2014.
Fiscal Years Outlook Preliminary Six-Year Financial Plan and Six-Year Improvement Plan Strategy John W. Lawson, Chief Financial Officer Reta.
State and Federal Funding Programs for Local Agency Projects Alan Lively Local Government Section Project Delivery Specialist.
2012 FTIP/FSTIP Workshop Project Selection Process.
SAFETEA-LU Highlights Roger Petzold Office of Interstate and Border Planning Federal Highway Administration Transportation Border Working Group Nov. 9,
FY 2012 President’s Budget Released February 14, 2011.
Jeff Shelley, P.E. Project Delivery Team Leader FHWA, Alabama Division 9500 Wynlakes Place Montgomery, AL (334) Fax: (334) Mail.
Distribution Guided by State Law Surface Transportation Program (STP) Surface Transportation Program (STP) Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Improvement.
The Regional Forum for Transportation Planning. Southwestern Pennsylvania 10 Counties >7,000 square miles 2.66 million citizens 548 municipalities 132.
Highway Program Financing July Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment.
Ron Hall Tribal Technical Assistance Program Colorado State University
KEY PROVISIONS OF THE DRIVE* ACT H.R. 22, as passed by the Senate on July 30, 2015 *Developing a Reliable and Innovative Vision for the Economy Thomas.
MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY MAP-21 Volusia TPO TCC & CAC Presentation – August 21, 2012.
U.S./Canada Transportation Border Working group April 9, 2014 Roger Petzold Office of Planning Federal Highway Administration.
MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY MAP-21 Volusia TPO Board Presentation September 25, 2012.
Tolling and Pricing Opportunities Under the Federal-aid Highway Program January 2006.
Use the 5 core federal aid programs to fund training and workforce development. FUNDING LOCAL PUBLIC AGENCY TRAINING AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT THROUGH.
Local Government Section Welcome Marty Andersen ODOT Local Government Section 355 Capitol Street NE, Rm. 326 Salem, Oregon Ph:
Financial Planning Session E-1 The Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process.
INTRODUCTION TO FEDERAL HIGHWAY FUNDING AND ELIGIBILITY Steve Baumann Financial Specialist (503) Mike Morrow(Field Operations Engineer) Mike.
SAFETEA-LU Operations, ITS, and Freight Provisions Jeffrey F. Paniati Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
SAFETEA-LU Operations, ITS, and Freight Provisions Jeffrey A. Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
Module Funding Sources, Requirements, and Opportunities Identify, access, and share funding to support road safety initiatives.
Nelson Castellanos Federal Highway Administration March 12, 2013.
Highway Program Structure Highway Recommendations Neil Pedersen Chair, ASC Highway Legislative Team Vice Chair, AASHTO Standing Committee on Highways Administrator,
Central Kentucky Regional Policy Group Juva Barber Executive Director.
HIGHWAY TRUST FUND National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission April 2007.
HIGHWAY TRUST FUND. HOW ARE PUBLIC PROJECTS FUNDED? General Fund Generated by general revenues Bonds Usually by referenda User Fees Pay as you go.
SAFETEA-LU Operations, ITS, and Freight Provisions Jeffrey F. Paniati Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Key Provisions Jeff Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
Action 2020 Training Local Context August 15, 2012.
IFTA Annual Business Meeting Virginia Beach, VA August 17, 2011 Federal Highway Administration.
Virginia Transportation Finance A Primer Presented by: Tom Boyd VDOT Asst Commissioner for Finance.
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century TEA-21 Prepared by Iowa Department of Transportation September 1998.
November 8, MAP-21 themes 2 Strengthens America’s highway and public transportation systems Creates jobs and supports economic growth Supports the.
O hio C ontractors A ssociation Jana Cassidy Administrator, Budget & Forecasting October 2015.
Leveraging Financial Resources Federal Highway Administration Funding Shana V. Baker Office of Metropolitan Planning Federal Highway Administration
Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST Act) Association of MPOs 444 N Capitol St., NW Suite345 Washington, DC
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Provisions Jeff Lindley Director of the Office of Transportation Management Office of Operations Federal Highway.
Federal-Aid Funding County Highway Accountants Conference May 10, 2007 zpowerpoint/ProjManagersCriticalIssuesBOB Feb07.ppt.
Division of Budgets January 25, 2012 Budget and Allocation Capacity Update Presented to the California Transportation Commission Tab 13.
Winton Emmett, Chief Project Implementation North January, 2016 Division of Local Assistance John Hoole, Chief Project Implementation South.
Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST Act) April 7, 2016.
FUNDING AVAILABILITY & SAFETY PROGRAMS 3//21/2013.
TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Financial Planning and Fiscal Constraint Requirement MAG Regional Council February 24, 2010.
Nevada Transportation Conference
Transit Citizen Leadership Academy: Federal Perspective
Regional Transit Formula Fund Policies Section 5307/5340 – Urbanized Formula Fund Section 5337 – State of Good Repair Section 5339 – Bus and Bus Facilities.
AASHTO Committee on Funding & Finance
BASICS of HIGHWAY PROGRAM FINANCING
Surface Transportation Reauthorization: Corridors and Borders
Presentation transcript:

INTRODUCTION TO FEDERAL HIGHWAY FUNDING AND ELIGIBILITY Mike Morrow Field Operations Engineer (503) Mike Morrow(Field Operations Engineer) Mike Morrow(Field Operations Engineer)

EXPECTATIONS How the FAHP is financed Legislation Apportionment formulas Major funding requirements Discretionary – Earmarked funds

Characteristics of the Federal-Aid Highway Program  State Administered, Federal Stewardship  Funding tied to specific “systems”  Requires States to have Highway Agency or locals to have responsible individual  States/locals pay for routine maintenance  Matching requirements  Reimbursable program  Contract authority

Review and approve state/local proposals Develop regulations and guidance Promulgate standards Provide technical assistance Distribute line of credit Reimburse States their eligible expenses State DOT Apportionment or Allocation Federal, State and Local Relationship Federal Responsibilities

Federal, State and Local Relationship State and Local Responsibilities  Conceive, prioritize, plan, design, and construct, and projects  Maintain and operate highways

Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Effient Transportation Equity Act –A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU)  Highways, highway safety, transit  5-year legislation  Signed into law August 10, 2005 (P. L )  $244 billion authorized over 5 years  (12% increase over TEA-21)  Highways - $193 billion  Transit - $51 billion

Contract Authority Unobligated Balances Appropriations Act (annual) Obligation Limitation Liquidating cash from HTF Authorization Act (SAFETEA-LU) Distribution of funds Total funds available Obligation of funds Reimbursement

Distribution of Funds  Distributed by formula specified in law  Distributed on October 1  Withdrawn only by law  All eligible States are recipients  No method specified in law  Distributed throughout year  Can be withdrawn by administrative action  Only some States are recipients Apportionments (STP, NHS, Bridge, CMAQ, etc.) Allocations (Bridge Discretionary, Scenic Byways, COF, etc.)

Minimum Guarantee State’s share of apportionments and high priority projects will be not less than 92% of the State’s share of its contributions to the Highway Account of the Highway Trust Fund: State apportionments* US apportionments State contributions US contributions 92% >=>= Guaranteed Return on Contributions * Includes High Priority Projects

Types of Penalties  Transfer Apportionments (serious)  Open Container  Repeat Offenders (Section 164)  Withhold Apportionments (very serious)  Minimum Drinking Age  Zero BAC Tolerance  Withhold Project Approval (most serious)  Maintenance of Federal-aid Projects

Federal Lands Emergency Relief 100% Federal Share Interstate Maintenance 90% Matching Share NHS STP Bridge CMAQ 80% Matching Share

State submits FHWA sends State pays contractor voucher to FHWA to Treasury Treasurer wires money to State Contractor does work State pays LPA State submits voucher to FHWA FHWA sends to Treasury Treasurer wires money to State LPA pays Contractor Time ActionsActions Reimbursement

Rate of Liquidating Cash How fast obligated funds become expended % by Year Number of years until expenditure

 State Request, Federal Approval  Commits State’s Line of Credit  Commits Federal Government to Reimburse State  Based on Estimates  Protects Funds from Lapsing  Traditional Point of Budgetary Control Obligations

Obligation Limitation (Obligation Ceiling) What is it? Who does it? Why?  A budgetary mechanism to control Federal spending  Congress -- through legislation  To be responsive to current budget policies

Contents of FHWA Budget  Obligation Limitation  General Operating Expense Obligation Limitation  Liquidating Cash Amount  Budget Authority (permission to obligate)  Revenue Aligned Budget Authority (RABA) amount

Highway Trust Fund SAFETEA-LU of 2005  Extended authorization for FY  Extended HTF through FY 2011  (Woops – Missed the target here a little bit  )  Congress added six billion with hopes of getting through 2009

Federal Gasoline Tax Effective October 1, cents 0.1 cent In cents per gallon cents2.86 cents Highway Account Mass Transit Account L.U.S.T. Trust Fund

Federal Diesel Tax Effective October 1, cents 0.1 cent In cents per gallon cents 2.86 cents Highway Account Mass Transit Account L.U.S.T. Trust Fund

Highway Trust Fund Income Gasoline - $17.6 B Diesel - $7.0 B Truck Sales - $3.3 B Truck Use - $0.9 B Tires - $0.4 B Other - $0.01 B Total = $30.3 B Gasohol - $1.1 B

Functional Classification Eligibility for Federal Financial Assistance IneligibleEligible Local - 76% Interstate - 1% (Included in NHS %) NHS - 4% Other - 20% Out of 3.9 million miles of roads in the U.S., less than 1 million miles are eligible for federal financial assistance.

Authorizations Highway, Highway Safety, and Rail Programs Total = $193 B IM - $25.2 B NHS - $30.5 B Bridge - $21.6 B STP - $32.5 B CMAQ - $8.6 B Fed Lands - $4.3 B High Priority Projects - $14.8 B Minimum Guarantee $37.8 B Highway Safety - $5.0 B Research - $2.2 B Appalachia - $2.3 B Other/Admin - $8.1 B

General Eligibility Roadways eligible for Federal-aid funding: publicly owned and open to public be functional classified higher than rural minor collectors or local roadways meet the requirements of the specific Federal funding program

General Categories of Federal-aid Funds  Interstate Maintenance (IM)  National Highway System (NHS)  Surface Transportation Program (STP)  Highway Bridge Program  Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality (CMAQ)  Emergency Relief  Discretionary Programs  Earmarked Projects

Interstate Maintenance Types of Work Eligible  4R’s (Resurfacing, Restoration, Rehabilitation, and Reconstruction)  Bridges, Interchanges and Overcrossings on Existing Interstate  Safety, ITS, and Operations  Preventive Maintenance (Scheduled Activities)  HOV, auxiliary lanes, truck climbing (not new through lanes)

Interstate Maintenance State Distributions  33-1/3%: Interstate lane miles (%)  33-1/3%: VMT on Interstate (%)  33-1/3%: HTF contributions (%) attributable to commercial vehicles

National Highway System Types of Work Eligible  Construction and 4R’s (NHS)  Operational Improvements (NHS)  Safety Improvements (NHS)  Transportation Planning (23 USC 134 &135)

National Highway System Types of Work Eligible  Highway research and technology transfer Chapter 5 of Title 23, USC  Traffic monitoring, management and control facilities/programs, ITS,  Carpool, vanpool,

State Distribution National Highway System  25 %: Lane Miles (principal arterials)  35%: VMT (principal arterials)  30%: Diesel Fuel (used on highways)  10%: Lane Miles/Population (lane miles on principal arterials, population in Oregon)

NHS Map for Oregon l aps/or/or_oregon.pdf aps/or/or_oregon.pdf

Surface Transportation Program (STP) State Distribution  25%: Lane miles on Federal Aid Highway System (%)  40%: VMT on FAH (%)  35%: HTF contributions (%)

Surface Transportation Program Types of Work Eligible  Title 23, U.S.C. & Chapter 53,Title 49, U.S.C. eligible  Construction, 4R, operational improvements (FAH System & Off-System Bridges).  STP set-a-sides: Transportation enhancements (10%)

Highway Bridge Program (HBP) State Distribution Formula based on each states relative share of costs to repair or replace deficient highway bridges (on & off the Federal-aid Highway System)

Highway Bridge Program (HBP) Types of Work Eligible  Structure carries highway traffic  Is at least 20 foot clear span length (abutment to abutment)  10 years since last major work  NOTE: At least 15% of HBP $ must be used off the Fed-aid Highway System (but on a public road). May apply for exception (Oregon Does).

Highway Bridge Program (HBP)  Replace structurally deficient or functionally obsolete bridge  To replace: Sufficiency Rating < 50  To rehab: Sufficiency Rating < 80  Restore the structural integrity

Highway Bridge Program (HBP)  Replace ferryboat operations (in existence on 1/1/84)  Painting, seismic retrofitting,anti-icing/ de-icing or scour counter-measures (on bridges)

Highway Bridge Program (HBP) Prior bridge criteria only apply to the use of HBP funding. If adequate need can be established other funding types may be used for bridge work.

CMAQ State Distribution Formula based on population within ozone & carbon monoxide (CO) non-attainment & maintenance areas, and severity of the areas air quality problems.

Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Eligible projects:  Projects with air quality benefits Ineligible projects:  Projects that add new capacity for SOV  Maintenance Projects

Discretionary  Division office authorization  Apply (subsequent FHWA approval)

Discretionary  Corridors & Borders  Innovative Bridge Research and Construction  National Historic Covered Bridge Program  Public Lands Highways  Ferry Boats  Scenic Byways  Transportation and Community and System Preservation Pilot Program (TCSP)  Highways for Life  Truck Parking, and Value Pricing

Discretionary INTERSTATE MAINTENANCE  4R on interstates  Construction  Funds are lost if not obligated 9/30  Can reapply following year

Discretionary Transportation and Community and System Preservation Program (TCSP)  Planning & Construction funds  Title 23  Title 49, chapter 53 Has been fully earmarked recently Unobligated funds can be returned next year

Discretionary SCENIC BYWAYS  National/State Scenic Byways  All-American Roads

Discretionary FERRY BOAT  Bridge/tunnel not feasible  Route must be a public road  Publicly owned or operated  State has control over fares

Discretionary NATIONAL HISTORIC COVERED BRIDGE PRESERVATION  National Register of Historic Places  Fire protection system installation  Vandal/arson alarm system  Relocate to a preservation site

Earmarked Funds  Law may define eligible activities  Reverts to program requirements  Written in law  Law makes funds available  Does NOT authorize project!!!  May have to apply (discretionary)  Needs FHWA authorization  May not get all of funds, or in one year!

LPA Advertising for Bids “THOU SHALT HAVE AN FHWA AUTHORIZATION IN THY HANDS PRIOR TO ADVERTISING FOR BIDS” (or spending any money)

Local Responsibilities and Expectations for LPA projects l Knowledge of Federal-aid requirements l ODOT/Local Partnership: early, continuous communication and coordination needed. l ODOT/LPA knowledge of what is happening on LPA projects (funding, work progress, inspections, etc)

Local Responsibilities and Expectations for LPA projects l ODOT provides oversight of Local Agencies and is not relieved of its responsibilities for LPA projects’ compliance with Federal regulations l Certification program allow LPAs to use their own procedure, forms, etc., but does not relieve them or ODOT of the responsibility to comply with all Federal and State regulations and laws