Mark Clampin (GSFC) John Stansberry (STScI)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 FGS Guider CDR – April 19, 2007 © Copyright 2007 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada Subject to Controlled Goods Regulations of Canada FGS Guider.
Advertisements

DHS/DFS description, JWST Informal Monthly, November 2003 Sivaramakrishnan Co-phasing JWST during commissioning using Dispersed Hartmann Sensing or Dispersed.
Towards Creation of a JWST Astrometric Reference Field: Calibration of HST/ACS Absolute Scale and Rotation Roeland van der Marel Jay Anderson, Colin Cox,
James Webb Space Telescope and its Instruments George Rieke (MIRI Expert) & Marcia Rieke (NIRCam Expert) Steward Observatory, University of Arizona The.
James Webb Space Telescope and its Instruments John Stansberry Steward Observatory, University of Arizona The First Light in the Universe: Discovering.
Technical Performance Measures Module Space Systems Engineering, version 1.0 SOURCE INFORMATION: The material contained in this lecture was developed.
A Preliminary Cycle 1 Calibration Plan for the JWST Science Instruments James Muzerolle.
1 TIPS 4/18/2013 Status of JWST/ISIM Test Program Scott Friedman TIPS/JIM April 18, 2013.
6e-1 Science Data Products Daryl Swade DMS Systems Engineer S&OC System Design Review #1.
Fine Guidance Sensor 2010 HST Calibration Work Shop Ed Nelan Barbara McArthur STScI.
Printed by ACS 2 Gyro Mode Data Analysis Cheryl Pavlovsky, Marco Sirianni, Ken Sembach, ACS Instrument Team and the 2 Gyro Mode Team.
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE.
20a - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Attitude Control System (ACS) Eric Holmes, Code 591 Joe Garrick, Code 595 Jim Simpson, Code 596 NASA/GSFC August.
3D SLAM for Omni-directional Camera
Data Management Subsystem Jeff Valenti (STScI). DMS Context PRDS - Project Reference Database PPS - Proposal and Planning OSS - Operations Scripts FOS.
MG 1/10/01 1 PCS SMOV-3B Review Objectives Overview Activity Descriptions Requirements.
N A S A G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R I n s t r u m e n t S y n t h e s i s a n d A n a l y s i s L a b o r a t o r y Earth Atmosphere.
1 Description and Benefits of JWST Commanding Operations Concept TIPS/JIM Meeting 17 July 2003 Vicki Balzano.
A Search for Earth-size Planets Borucki – Page 1 Roger Hunter (Ames Research Center) & Kepler Team March 26, 2010.
6/11/2012 Building on NEAT concept - M. Gai - INAF-OATo 1 Building on NEAT concept M. Gai – INAF-OATo (a) Extension of science case (b) Payload implementation.
JWST NIRSpec Dithering Strategies (and a Cross-SI View) Jason Tumlinson JIM / TIPS Oct 15, 2009.
NIRSpec Operations Concept Michael Regan(STScI), Jeff Valenti (STScI) Wolfram Freduling(ECF), Harald Kuntschner(ECF), Robert Fosbury (ECF)
High Precision Astrometry and Parallax from Spatial Scanning Part 2 Adam Riess and Stefano Casertano.
JWST Calibration Error Budget Jerry Kriss. 15 March 20072/14 JWST Flux & Wavelength Calibration Requirements SR-20: JWST shall be capable of achieving.
The Active Optics System S. Thomas and the AO team.
Two-Gyro Science Impact and Observer Information Ken Sembach STUC Meeting 18-November November-2004.
Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB
1 JWST Functional Flow Diagrams and Schematic Block Diagrams.
Kailash C. Sahu NIRCam: Status Update 1m Cold, space-facing side
MIRI Dither Patterns Christine H Chen. Dithering Goals 1.Mitigate the effect of bad pixels 2.Obtain sub-pixel sampling 3.Self-calibrate data if changing.
1 Space Telescope Science Institute JWST S&OC JWST S&OC Contract Peter Stockman TIPS March 20, 2003.
START NICMOS COOLING SYSTEM ACTIVITY SUMMARY. 1/25/01Ken Pulkkinen2 START NCS ACTIVITY Applicable SMOV Requirements: J NICMOS Cooling System.
PVPhotFlux PACS Photometer photometric calibration MPIA PACS Commissioning and PV Phase Plan Review 21 st – 22 nd January 2009, MPE Garching Markus Nielbock.
Science Concept for Additional Functionality in the Mosaic Planning Tool Jeff Valenti.
FGS Astrometry in 2 Gyro Mode E. P. Nelan STScI B. E. McArthur McDonald Observatory, U. of Texas.
Transiting Exoplanet Working Group Nikole K. Lewis STScI 10/20/2015.
JWST Time-Series Pipeline Nikole K. Lewis STScI. Data Pipeline for Transiting Exoplanets The foundation for the Spitzer and Hubble data pipelines were.
Overview, Spectrometer Products and Processing Philosophy Phil Appleton on Behalf of PACS Team PACS IFU Spectrometer.
The INS NIRCam Team.
NIRISS and Transit Spectroscopy (What you should know before observing with NIRISS) Loïc Albert for the NIRISS Team Enabling Transiting Exoplanet Science.
1 Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite Daryl Swade Archive Team Meeting June 16, 2014.
APT Overview for Transiting Exoplanet Proposals Chris Moriarty – APT Developer.
1 John Nousek & David Burrows (Penn State University) Alberto Moretti (Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera) X-Ray Telescope (XRT): Performance after Five.
NIRISS NRM bad pixel tolerance analysis David Lafrenière 2012 February 21.
NIRISS Science Team Meeting Oct 2015 NIRISS Activities in CV3 André Martel.
Tracing the JWST Proposal from User Interface to Commanding of an Instrument Margaret Meixner & WIT Balzano, Robinson & CMD.
Introduction: Goals for JWST Transit Meeting C. Beichman Jonathan Lunine March 11, 2014.
Single Object Spectroscopy and Time Series Observations with NIRSpec
JWST-MIRIM (The MIRI Imager)
NIRSpec Time Series Observations
JWST Science Policy & Science Parallels
Commissioning is 6 very busy months
Observing Strategies and Constraints
Imaging with the James Webb Space Telescope
JWST Pipeline Overview
Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy with JWST NIRCam
JWST NIRCam Time Series Observations
Bill Blair JWST Project Scientist for User Support STScI/JHU
Detectors of JWST Near IR Instruments
JWST Overheads Jeff Valenti S&OC Mission Scientist
ESAC 2017 JWST Workshop JWST User Documentation Hands on experience
Summary Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy Jeff Valenti JWST Mission Scientist Space Telescope Science Institute.
GPI Astrometric Calibration
Science Policies and Timeline
Motivation for a 95% Guide Star Acquisition Probability with JWST
Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB
Detector Parameters Marco Sirianni - ESA.
How to implement coordinated parallels
Launch and On-orbit Checkout
Instrument Commissioning SDO SOWG - January 18-19, 2007 Purpose/Goal:
Presentation transcript:

Mark Clampin (GSFC) John Stansberry (STScI) JWST Operations Mark Clampin (GSFC) John Stansberry (STScI)

JWST Observatory Status

Image Quality 150 nm @ NIRCam focal plane: 2 mm diffraction limit Note: performance specified to short wavelength cameras WFE budget contributors include: OTE, ISIM, Instrument (including stability), jitter & pointing Sampling is an issue (see talks tomorrow) NIRCam pixel size (l < 2.3 mm): 32 mas/pixel NIRSpec pixel size (l > 2.4 mm): 100 mas/pixel l/D (0.7 mm) ~ 22 mas MIRI pixel size (imaging/prism): 110 mas/pixel l/D (5.0 mm) ~ 0.16 mas Contrubuting factors Image stability

Image Quality: MIrrors

Diffraction Limited: Strehl > 0.8 (WFE ≤ 150 nm) Image Quality Diffraction Limited: Strehl > 0.8 (WFE ≤ 150 nm) F115W F200W F444W F070W Log Scale Linear Scale

OTE Thermal Stability: I Primary concern for transit spectroscopy/imaging is the stability of the image from observation to observation and over time JWST will be a very stable telescope Function of thermal timescales for observatory elements Req.: Sets Wavefront Sensing & Control (WFSC) cadence of 14 days Most important for short wavelength instruments

OTE Thermal Stability: II Note that requirement is determined against the worst case Slew from cold-soak to hot-soak with 14 day hold Facilitates relatively simple computing case for complex models ➠

OTE Thermal Stability: III For a real-world science operations Design Reference Missions contain a distribution of pointing durations and sun-angles e.g. typical pointings ~103 secs WFE drift driven by the observations in long duration pointing tail Typical WFE drift over 14 days will be < requirement Studies by Gersh-Range et al. and JWST thermal team Further options exist for WFE drift mitigation via scheduling Phase curves on same targets over several days will cause most significant WFE drift

Wavefront Sensing & Control Wavefront Sensing and Control Measured every two days: Issue for phase curve observations? Fine-tuned every 14 days Cadence for WFS&C will be reviewed during commissioning Observatory Project Science is planning thermal-slew test during commissioning Slew over pre-determined angle Monitor drift in image quality over several days Correlates thermal models and thermal measurements Feeds into Cycle 1 Science

Image Motion Current Image Motion Requirement: OBS‑2031 The RMS of the difference between the "offset- adjusted image position" and its mean (for an observation period of up to 10,000 seconds) shall be less than or equal to the values shown below (per axis) over any 15 second interval of fine guidance. Science Instrument IM Allocation (mas) NIRCam 6.6 NIRSpec 6.7 MIRI 7.4 NIRISS 6.8

Reaction Wheels JWST has 6 reaction wheels Reaction wheels control momentum in order to orient telescope Solar radiation pressure on sunshield is a major factor for momentum management of JWST Using push-through algorithm for zero-crossing events Vendor: Rockwell Collins Deutschland GBMH (Formerly Teldix): Heritage 11 yrs - Chandra, 8 yrs - EOS Aqua and 6 yrs - Aura 12+ years on Life test unit (MSFC)

Spatial Scanning Options Moving Target Requirement: When commanded, the ACS shall compensate for the apparent motion of a moving target which exhibits an angular velocity between 0 and 30 mas/sec with respect to a guide star that remains within a single Fine Guidance Sensor field of view Upper limit to rate ~ 60 mas/sec Sine or repeating pattern would be required across FOV HST-like scan could be accomplished at higher rates using slews employed for small angle maneuvers Not operating under fine guide: jitter ~ 16 mas FSW change for slew patterns would have to be added, together with ground support

Calibration Options Is it possible to calibrate the structure of detector pixels on-orbit to facilitate jitter decorrelation for science instruments Added option for Fine Steering Mirror (FSM) to step a star around a detector pixel under fine guidance Known as FSM-offsets Small-angle maneuvers use reaction wheels and are limited in precision FSM offsets have precision of few mas and allow an image to be stepped around a single pixel to map out pixel response functions Efficient small angle dithering Especially useful for MIRI where ground-calibration is not feasible

JWST Exposure Nomenclature

JWST MULTIACCUM Patterns

Data Rate and Storage JWST Solid state recorder (SSR) daily limit 57.5 GB/day for science data (NOTE: on-board compression doesn’t work…) Ensures downlink can keep up w/ data production H2RG data rates (continuous readout, i.e. upper limit) Full-frame/stripe-mode readout (4 parallel outputs per detector) : 0.8 MB/sec/detector Subarray-mode readout (single output per detector) 0.4 MB/sec/detector NIRCam is the only real potential problem 2 detectors full-frame : 138 GB/day (2.4x allocation) 2 detectors subarray : 35 GB/day (w/in allocation for observations < 1.7 days) Detector resets reduce these rates somewhat

Max Uninterrupted Exposure Duration Four basic limits High-gain antenna re-pointing Nominally requires visits to be < 9000 seconds duration Nominally occurs during visit breaks PROPOSAL: Allow transits to observe through HGA re- pointings Momentum unloads (cadence could be ~doubled by momentum biasing) Worst-case: 5 day cadence Off-Nominal: 10 day cadence Nominal: 25 day cadence

Max Uninterrupted Exposure Duration Four basic limits (continued) Max # integrations = 2^16 = 65536 (ASIC hardware limit) Max exposure durations for integrations with 2 frames per ramp: Full-frame: 586 hrs (32.2 sec/integration) 64 x 64 subarray: 2.7 hrs (148 msec/integration) 2048 x 64 stripe: 18.6 hrs (1.02 sec/integration) 2048 x 64 subarray: 73.1 hrs (4.02 sec/integration) Wavefront Sensing (2-day cadence) WFS visits can presumably be shifted +/- a day 7 WFS visits (nominal) between control activities

High-gain Antenna Proposal HGA re-pointing is the most severe constraint on exposure length HGA re-pointing causes small, short disturbances < 70 mas pointing disturbance < 1 min disturbance duration FGS will remain in fine-guide through the disturbance There is some flexibility in specifying timing of HGA re-points HGA Ops Proposal for Exoplanet Transits: Allow exoplanet observations to continue through HGA re-points Small effects on photometry may result, but probably better than stopping and restarting exposures (data gaps; response drifts) This mitigates data-volume issues because data can be downlinked ~as it is acquired

Event-driven Operations Fixed-time constraints are allowed ‘PHASE’ constraint allows any of several transits for a given system to be observed at a specified orbital phase (scheduling flexibility) Start of exposures uncertain to 5 minutes Timeline Scenarios (TBR – checking w/ Wayne Kinzel) Failed visit(s) prior to transit Over-long visit(s) prior to transit

Observation Planning Requirements for APT implementation are under discussion Coronagraphy ‘super-template’ concept one possibility APT holder with special qualities Allows organization of, and application of special constraints to, groups of normal observing templates Could flag observations as, e.g.: Allowed to proceed through HGA re-points Allowed to use 2-detector mode (NIRCam) Could group observations of a target, e.g.: Single folder for multi-band, multi-instrument observations of one target Multiple events to increase SNR

Exposure Time Calculator No dedicated exoplanet ETC is in the works Normal SNR predictions on host star can be used to estimate detection limits for transit signatures There is currently no additional knowledge available to enable a more precise ETC implementation

What time is it? Time (UTC) flows from ground  JWST S/C  ISIM  Science Data S/C clock stable to < 2 sec / 40 hours (14 ppm) S/C clock corrected every contact (~12 hr nominal contact interval) Accuracy requirement < 0.5 sec Correction is applied gradually, not as a jump ISIM tags data w/ time last pixel in a group gets read out Data groups get ‘stacked’ before delivery to SSR Only the time tag for the last group in a stack is retained on the SSR FITSWRITER reconstructs time for individual groups Frame-time algorithms from instrument teams Precision probably ≤ 30 msec