(Real time MPC) Prepared by : Kamal Reza Varhoushi December – 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
3.6 Support Vector Machines
Advertisements

ECG Signal processing (2)
SCIP Optimization Suite

Various Regularization Methods in Computer Vision Min-Gyu Park Computer Vision Lab. School of Information and Communications GIST.
Kinematic Synthesis of Robotic Manipulators from Task Descriptions June 2003 By: Tarek Sobh, Daniel Toundykov.
Dragan Jovicic Harvinder Singh
Support Vector Machines Elena Mokshyna Odessa 2014.
1 Optimization Algorithms on a Quantum Computer A New Paradigm for Technical Computing Richard H. Warren, PhD Optimization.
Separating Hyperplanes
IAAC International Symposium in Systems & Control, 7-8 October 2013, Technion, Haifa, Israel P-O Gutman: Constrained control of uncertain linear time-invariant.
Support Vector Machines
280 SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION The System Identification Problem is to estimate a model of a system based on input-output data. Basic Configuration continuous.
Feasibility, uncertainty and interpolation J. A. Rossiter (Sheffield, UK)
Dual Problem of Linear Program subject to Primal LP Dual LP subject to ※ All duality theorems hold and work perfectly!
Support Vector Classification (Linearly Separable Case, Primal) The hyperplanethat solves the minimization problem: realizes the maximal margin hyperplane.
Proximal Support Vector Machine Classifiers KDD 2001 San Francisco August 26-29, 2001 Glenn Fung & Olvi Mangasarian Data Mining Institute University of.
Classification Problem 2-Category Linearly Separable Case A- A+ Malignant Benign.
Reformulated - SVR as a Constrained Minimization Problem subject to n+1+2m variables and 2m constrains minimization problem Enlarge the problem size and.
Computational Methods for Management and Economics Carla Gomes
Model Predictive Controller Emad Ali Chemical Engineering Department King Saud University.
Extracting Semistructured Information from the Web J. Hammer, H. Garcia-Molina, J. Cho, R. Aranha, A. Crespo from Stanford University Presented by: Wei.
Overall Objectives of Model Predictive Control
Overview of Model Predictive Control in Buildings
Incremental Support Vector Machine Classification Second SIAM International Conference on Data Mining Arlington, Virginia, April 11-13, 2002 Glenn Fung.
Computational Stochastic Optimization: Bridging communities October 25, 2012 Warren Powell CASTLE Laboratory Princeton University
Bertini: A software package for numerical algebraic geometry Developed by: Dan Bates Jon Hauenstein Andrew Sommese Charles Wampler.
Book Adaptive control -astrom and witten mark
Machine Learning Seminar: Support Vector Regression Presented by: Heng Ji 10/08/03.
Chapter © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or.
Proximal Support Vector Machine Classifiers KDD 2001 San Francisco August 26-29, 2001 Glenn Fung & Olvi Mangasarian Data Mining Institute University of.
1 (CHAPTER 5 Con’t) Modeling and Analysis. 2 Heuristic Programming Cuts the search Gets satisfactory solutions more quickly and less expensively Finds.
1 The Dual in Linear Programming In LP the solution for the profit- maximizing combination of outputs automatically determines the input amounts that must.
Advanced Operations Research Models Instructor: Dr. A. Seifi Teaching Assistant: Golbarg Kazemi 1.
ITC Research Computing Support Using Matlab Effectively By: Ed Hall Research Computing Support Center Phone: Φ Fax:
The Software Development Process
1 Iterative Integer Programming Formulation for Robust Resource Allocation in Dynamic Real-Time Systems Sethavidh Gertphol and Viktor K. Prasanna University.
Chapter 20 1 Overall Objectives of Model Predictive Control 1.Prevent violations of input and output constraints. 2.Drive some output variables to their.
1 System Planning 2013 Lecture 7: Optimization Appendix A Contents: –General about optimization –Formulating optimization problems –Linear Programming.
SIMULINK-Tutorial 1 Class ECES-304 Presented by : Shubham Bhat.
1  The Problem: Consider a two class task with ω 1, ω 2   LINEAR CLASSIFIERS.
Lecture 25: Implementation Complicating factors Control design without a model Implementation of control algorithms ME 431, Lecture 25.
Approximation Algorithms Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Drexel University.
Linear Programming and Applications
1 Chapter 20 Model Predictive Control Model Predictive Control (MPC) – regulatory controls that use an explicit dynamic model of the response of process.
1 The Software Development Process ► Systems analysis ► Systems design ► Implementation ► Testing ► Documentation ► Evaluation ► Maintenance.
 Definition Definition  Algorithmic Representation of Computer Functions Algorithmic Representation of Computer Functions  Algorithm Description Algorithm.
Lecture notes for Stat 231: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning 1. Stat 231. A.L. Yuille. Fall 2004 Linear Separation and Margins. Non-Separable and.
Linear Programming Chapter 9. Interior Point Methods  Three major variants  Affine scaling algorithm - easy concept, good performance  Potential.
Multi-Objective Optimization for Topology Control in Hybrid FSO/RF Networks Jaime Llorca December 8, 2004.
Support Vector Machine: An Introduction. (C) by Yu Hen Hu 2 Linear Hyper-plane Classifier For x in the side of o : w T x + b  0; d = +1; For.
TU/e Algorithms (2IL15) – Lecture 12 1 Linear Programming.
Parametric Quadratic Optimization Oleksandr Romanko Joint work with Alireza Ghaffari Hadigheh and Tamás Terlaky McMaster University January 19, 2004.
TU/e Algorithms (2IL15) – Lecture 12 1 Linear Programming.
Introduction to Computer Programming Concepts M. Uyguroğlu R. Uyguroğlu.
Chapter 20 Model Predictive Control (MPC) from Seborg, Edgar, Mellichamp, Process Dynamics and Control, 2nd Ed 1 rev. 2.1 of May 4, 2016.
Energy System Control with Deep Neural Networks
Geometrical intuition behind the dual problem
Overall Objectives of Model Predictive Control
سمینار درس کنترل پیش بین
Learning to Program in Python
Chapter 6. Large Scale Optimization
Multi-Objective Optimization for Topology Control in Hybrid FSO/RF Networks Jaime Llorca December 8, 2004.
دانشگاه صنعتي اميركبير
Lecture 18. SVM (II): Non-separable Cases
Presented By: Darlene Banta
ACHIEVEMENT DESCRIPTION
Chapter 6. Large Scale Optimization
Constraints.
Presentation transcript:

(Real time MPC) Prepared by : Kamal Reza Varhoushi December – 2011

The philosophy behind MPC

Manipulated variables : u(k-1) Controlled variables : y(k) The model of sys used to prediction The critical step of the predictive control

open-loop optimization problem

practical disadvantage of MPC

Robust MPC The uncertainty representation Polytopic Uncertainty Structured Feedback Uncertainty

Real time MPC For each MPC problem, we need to solve an optimization problem for each sampling. So MPC limited to applications with slow dynamics (sampling time in seconds or minutes). A well-known technique for implementing fast MPC is to compute the entire control law offline (explicit MPC), in which case the online controller can be implemented as a lookup table. The control action is then implemented online in the form of a lookup table. The major drawback here is that the number of entries in the table can grow exponentially with the horizon, state, and input dimensions, so that “explicit MPC” can only be applied reliably to small problems (where the state dimension is no more than around five). So this method is not applicable for more complex problems.

The new methods for fast MPC, develops by professor Boyd research group in Stanford university. These methods are based on combination of MPC with automatic code generation.

This report describe the capabilities and implementation of CVXGEN software package. CVXGEN takes a high level description of a convex optimization family, and automatically generate flat, library-free C code that can be compiled into high speed custom solver for the problem family

The main disadvantages of CVXGEN are: 1. It reduced to quadratic programming(QPs) 2. It is suitable for small and medium size problems

Problem statement energy storage system that can be charged or discharged from a source with varying energy price. A simple example is a battery connected to a power grid The goal is to alternate between charging and discharging in order to maximize the average revenue

Let first introduce problem variables and parameters:

the energy price at time t denote discourage excessive charging and discharging time horizon T=50

The easiest way to use this interface is via the ‘Matlab’ screen in CVXGEN's online interface, Go to the website “ and create new project, then impose your project data’s to the blank spaces shown in windowwww.cvxgen.com

The second step is creating custom C codes for using in Matlab : Download and extract the ‘cvxgen.zip’ archive for your problem. This will create a subdirectory called CVXGEN. Inside the cvxgen/ folder in Matlab, call make_csolve. This will use the mex command to compile and build your custom solver and creates a csolve.mex* file.

As shown in figures, the variation of uc and ud between max and min values, determine this agreement that process has been done in optimal way.

CVXGEN implementation Once the problem is in canonical form, we use a standard primal dual interior point method to find the solution we introduce slack variables to solve equivalent problem

we find analytically the solution of the pair of primal and dual problems: For duality formulation :

Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions Each of the primal and dual algorithms require two solves with the so-called KKT matrix to find the solution (L) for the system KL = R.

Thank you