For OMA distribution only. Trademarks may be registered and are the property of their respective owners © 2015 Medtronic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 10188475DOC_1A.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
William C. Cushman, MD, FACP, FAHA Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Memphis, TN For The ACCORD Study Group.
Advertisements

Rethinking Lower Blood Pressure Goals for Diabetic Patients with Coronary Artery Disease – Findings from the INternational VErapamil SR – Trandolapril.
Randall M. Zusman, MD Associate Professor of Medicine
Robert W. Harrison, MD; Richard C. Becker, MD; Thomas L. Ortel, MD, PhD; Maragatha Kuchibhatla, PhD; Stephen H. Boyle, PhD; Zainab Samad, MD; Eric J. Velazquez,
For OMA distribution only. Trademarks may be registered and are the property of their respective owners © 2015 Medtronic, Inc. All Rights Reserved DOC_1A.
Reduction in office blood pressure after renal denervation in a large real world patient population with uncontrolled hypertension: interim 12-month results.
Trademarks may be registered and are the property of their respective owners. Today’s discussion may regard information or indications not evaluated by.
PubMed was searched for randomized clinical trials published between 2007 and 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) Trials were included if.
On behalf of the TRILOGY ACS Investigators Prasugrel versus clopidogrel for patients with unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Renal artery denervation for treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apnea and resistant hypertension: Results from the Global SYMPLICITY Registry.
Steffen Desch Thomas Okon, Diana Heinemann, Konrad Kulle, Karoline Röhnert, Melanie Sonnabend, Martin Petzold, Ulrike Müller, Gerhard Schuler, Ingo Eitel,
The safety and long-term effect of renal artery denervation on blood pressure and renal function in real world patients with uncontrolled hypertension.
Efficacy of Low-Dose Aspirin Therapy for the Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Events in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: The Japanese Primary Prevention.
Effect of High-dose Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker (ARB) Monotherapy versus ARB plus Calcium Channel Blocker Combination on Cardiovascular Events in Japanese.
Trademarks may be registered and are the property of their respective owners. A reminder that this is a discussion of SYMPLICITY trial results and their.
6 / 5 / RENAL DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED INTO 3 GROUPS BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (GFR) ALLHAT.
on behalf of the INVEST Investigators
Blood Pressure Control By Randomized Drug Group In ALLHAT William C. Cushman, Charles E. Ford, Paula T. Einhorn, Jackson T. Wright, Jr., Richard A. Preston,
How Much AF is Too Much AF? Do I Initiate Anticoagulation Based on AF Detected on Device Monitoring? Kenneth W. Mahaffey, MD, FACC Professor of Medicine,
Is It the Achieved Blood Pressure or Specific Medications that Make a Difference in Outcome, or Is the Question Moot? William C. Cushman, MD Professor,
Systolic hypertension not an isolated problem Michael Weber, MD Professor of Medicine Associate Dean Downstate College of Medicine State University of.
Definitions and classification of office blood pressure levels (mmHg) Modified by ESC Guidelines 2013 CARDIOcheckAPP.
1 Antihypertensive Trial Outcome Differences: Diuretic vs. Calcium Channel Blocker Compared to participants assigned to the diuretic, those assigned to.
Managing Patients Who Cannot Take Anticoagulants Kenneth W. Mahaffey, MD, FACC Professor of Medicine, Cardiology Faculty Associate Director, DCRI Director,
Hypertension Family Medicine Specialist CME October 15-17, 2012 Pakse.
A Controlled Trial of Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension
ALLHAT 6/5/ CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (3 GROUPS by GFR)
Heart rate in heart failure: Heart rate in heart failure: risk marker or risk factor? A subanalysis of the SHIFT trial on behalf of the Investigators M.
Long-term Cardiovascular Effects of 4.9 Years of Intensive Blood Pressure Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk.
6/5/ CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (4 GROUPS by GFR) ALLHAT.
For OMA distribution only. © 2014 Medtronic, Inc. All rights reserved DOC_1A 03/14 Stent Thrombosis Following Implantation of the Endeavor ™ Zotarolimus-Eluting.
Reduction in Ischemic Events with Ticagrelor in Diabetic Patients from the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial Deepak L. Bhatt, MD, MPH, Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH, Sameer.
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Impact of Renal Denervation on 24-Hour Ambulatory.
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Renal Denervation in Moderate Treatment-Resistant.
Journal Club February 7, 2014 Sadie T. Velásquez, MD.
Trademarks may be registered and are the property of their respective owners. A reminder that this is a discussion of SYMPLICITY trial results and their.
PRECISION-ABPM Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Celecoxib Integrated Safety versus Ibuprofen Or Naproxen Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement Trial.
Dr John Cox Diabetes in Primary Care Conference Cork
Meeting of the Balkan Excellent Centers
Prairie Cardiovascular, Springfield, IL US
From ESH 2016 | LB 3: Davide Agnoletti, MD
Investigation of catheter-based renal denervation in patients with uncontrolled hypertension in the absence of antihypertensive medications: Three-month.
Thomas F. Lüscher, FESC, FAHA, FRCP
Baseline characteristics and effectiveness results
Catheter-based Renal Denervation with the Symplicity System Provides Safe and Durable Blood Pressure Reduction out to Three Years Horst Sievert1, Henry.
Eoin O’Brien, DSc, MD, Eamon Dolan, MD, FRCPI  Clinical Therapeutics 
Blood Pressure and Age in Controlling Hypertension
Critical Appraisal of the Current Ongoing Study Designs
From ESH 2016 | POS 7D: Jan Rosa, MD
Renal Denervation Next Steps
Elevated Circulating Levels of Inflammatory Markers in
Jan B. Pietzsch1, Benjamin P. Geisler1, Murray D. Esler 2
From ESH 2016 | POS 3C: Luiz Aparecido Bortolotto, MD, PhD
Renal Denervation for Non-Hypertensive Indications
SYMPLICITY HTN-3: A Prospective, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial of Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients with Refractory Hypertension: Post Hoc.
Neuro-Hormonal vs Structural Hypertension why they require different approaches Paul A. Sobotka Chief Medical Officer Rox Medical, Inc.
Copyright © 2007 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
United States Preventive Services Task Force: Recommendations for ABPM
Isolated Systolic Hypertension: An Update After SPRINT
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes
with type 2 diabetes without heart failure?
Progress and Promise in RAAS Blockade
Effects of Combination Lipid Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD)
Lipid-Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): Results in the Subgroup of Patients with Diabetes Peter S. Sever, Bjorn Dahlöf, Neil Poulter, Hans Wedel, for the.
Table of Contents Why Do We Treat Hypertension? Recommendation 5
Volume 377, Issue 9771, Pages (March 2011)
Clinician Referral Training
DENERHTN Trial design: Patients with resistant hypertension were randomized to renal denervation plus standardized stepped-care antihypertensive treatment.
Isolated Systolic Hypertension: An Update After SPRINT
Causes and predictors of short, intermediate and long-term mortality in patients with coronary artery disease M. Zeitouni, N. Procopi, O. Barthélémy, Q.
Presentation transcript:

For OMA distribution only. Trademarks may be registered and are the property of their respective owners © 2015 Medtronic, Inc. All Rights Reserved DOC_1A 3/15 Reduced Blood Pressure Lowering Effect of Catheter-Based Renal Denervation in Patients with Isolated Systolic Hypertension: Data from Pooled SYMPLICITY HTN Trials Felix Mahfoud*, George L. Bakris, Deepak L. Bhatt, Murray D Esler, David E. Kandzari, Kazuomi Kario, Henry Krum, Giuseppe Mancia, Ashok Seth, Michael A. Weber, Robert Whitbourn, Michael Boehm *Universitätskliniken des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Germany

For OMA distribution only. Trademarks may be registered and are the property of their respective owners © 2015 Medtronic, Inc. All Rights Reserved DOC_1A 3/15 Author Disclosures Ashok Seth, M.B.B.S., F.A.C.C.CONSULTANT FEES/HONORARIA - Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Medicines Company, Medtronic, Meril life sciences. David E. Kandzari, MD, F.A.C.C.CONSULTANT FEES/HONORARIA - Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Micell Technologies, Thoratec. Deepak L. Bhatt, MD, MPH, F.A.C.C. CONSULTANT FEES/HONORARIA - Elsevier Practice Update Cardiology; RESEARCH/RESEARCH GRANTS - Amarin, Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Ethicon, FlowCo, Forest Laboratories, Ischemix, Inc, PLx Pharma, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Takeda, The Medicines Company; OTHER - Belvoir Publications, Cardax, Clinical Cardiology, HMP communications, Journal of Invasive Cardiology, Medscape Cardiology, Regado Biosciences, Slack Publications/Cardiology Research Foundation, WebMD. Felix Mahfoud, M.D.Nothing to Disclose George L. Bakris, M.D.CONSULTANT FEES/HONORARIA - AbbVie, Vascular Dynamic, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Takeda, DSI, Boeringher-Ingelheim, MedTronic, Relypsa, Bayer. Giuseppe Mancia, M.D.Nothing to Disclose Kazuomi Kario, M.D., Ph.D, F.A.C.C. CONSULTANT FEES/HONORARIA - Astellas Pharma Inc., AstraZeneca K.K., Bayer Yakuhin Ltd., Boehringer Ingelheim Japan Inc., Bristol-Myers K.K., Daiichi Sankyo Company, Limited., GlaxoSmithKline K.K., Kowa Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd., Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation., Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Pfizer Japan Inc., Roche Diagnostics K.K., Sanofi K.K., SANWA KAGAKU KENKYUSHO CO.,LTD., Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited., Terumo corporation. Michael Boehm, MDCONSULTANT FEES/HONORARIA - Astra Zeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Medtronic, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier; RESEARCH/RESEARCH GRANTS - Astra Zeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Medtronic, Servier; SPEAKER’S BUREAU - Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Berlin-Chemie, Daiichi-Sankyo, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, St Jude, Medtronic. Michael A. Weber, M.D., F.A.C.C. CONSULTANT FEES/HONORARIA - Boston Scientific, MEDTRONIC, Novartis, Recor; SPEAKER’S BUREAU - Arbor Murray D Esler, M.B.B.S., Ph.D.CONSULTANT FEES/HONORARIA - Medtronic/Ardian; RESEARCH/RESEARCH GRANTS - Medtronic/Ardian Robert WhitbournNothing to Disclose

For OMA distribution only. Trademarks may be registered and are the property of their respective owners © 2015 Medtronic, Inc. All Rights Reserved DOC_1A 3/15 Abstract Background: Catheter-based renal artery denervation (RDN) has been shown to significantly lower blood pressure (BP) in certain patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH; systolic BP [SBP] ≥140 mm Hg and diastolic BP<90 mmHg) are at higher risk for stroke and coronary events. Methods: Pooled data from denervated patients in SYMPLICITY HTN-3 and the Global SYMPLICITY Registry were used to compare baseline characteristics and SBP change at 6 months between patients with ISH and those with combined systo-diastolic hypertension (CH). Results: A total of 538 patients had ISH and 793 patients had CH. Patients with ISH were significantly older than those with CH (65 years vs 55 years), had more type 2 diabetes mellitus (52.4% vs 34.3%) and a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (71.3 vs 78.6 ml/min/1.73m2); all p< Baseline office and 24-hour ambulatory BP was 166/78 ± 16/8 mmHg and 152/77 ± 15/10 mmHg, respectively for the ISH group and 177/104 ± 20/12 mmHg and 161/95 ± 17/12 mmHg, respectively for the CH group. Both the office and ambulatory BP changes were significantly less pronounced in ISH compared with CH, even when adjusted for differences in baseline SBP. Conclusions: Patients with ISH and CH appear to exhibit a reduction in SBP after RDN but this effect seems less pronounced in the ISH group

For OMA distribution only. Trademarks may be registered and are the property of their respective owners © 2015 Medtronic, Inc. All Rights Reserved DOC_1A 3/15 Background Catheter-based renal artery denervation (RDN) has been shown to significantly lower blood pressure (BP) in certain patients with uncontrolled hypertension. However, information on the treatment effect in different types of hypertension is largely unknown. Patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH; systolic BP [SBP] ≥140 mm Hg and diastolic BP<90 mm Hg) are at higher risk for stroke and coronary events. A recent study comparing the effect of RDN in patients with ISH and patients with combined systo-diastolic hypertension (CH), indicated that the magnitude of office and ambulatory BP reduction was less pronounced in the patients with ISH. 1 The current analysis aims to further evaluate the BP-lowering effect of RDN in patients with ISH compared to patients with CH, using data from the SYMPLICITY HTN-3 and Global SYMPLICITY Registry (GSR) studies. 1 Ewen, S et al. Hypertension. Online ahead of print October 20, doi: /HYPERTENSIONAHA

For OMA distribution only. Trademarks may be registered and are the property of their respective owners © 2015 Medtronic, Inc. All Rights Reserved DOC_1A 3/15 Methods For this post-hoc analysis, all patients from the SYMPLICITY HTN-3 Study were pooled with the patients from GSR who had a baseline office-based SBP ≥140 mm Hg while receiving at least 3 antihypertensive medications of different classes. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: – The ISH group included all patients with a baseline office SBP ≥140 mm Hg and office DBP <90 mm Hg. – The CH group included all patients with a baseline office SBP ≥140 mm Hg and office DBP ≥90 mm Hg. Changes in BP levels at 6 months relative to baseline by office BP and ambulatory BP measurements (ABPM) were compared between the ISH and CH groups. TrialISHCH HTN GSR (OSBP>140 mm Hg) Total538793

For OMA distribution only. Trademarks may be registered and are the property of their respective owners © 2015 Medtronic, Inc. All Rights Reserved DOC_1A 3/15 Results Patient Baseline Characteristics % or mean ± SD CH N=793 ISH N=538 P-value Age, years55.38 ± ± 10.04< Male sex BMI, kg/m ± ± History of diabetes mellitus, type < History of coronary artery disease History of obstructive sleep apnea History of stroke eGFR, ml/min/1.73m ± ± 22.9< Heart Rate, bpm73.2 ± ± 11.1< Pulse Pressure74.7 ± ± 17.1<0.001 Office systolic blood pressure178.8 ± ± 16.1< Office diastolic blood pressure104.0 ± ± 8.1< hour systolic blood pressure160.8 ± ± 15.5< hour diastolic blood pressure95.0 ± ± 10.3< 0.001

For OMA distribution only. Trademarks may be registered and are the property of their respective owners © 2015 Medtronic, Inc. All Rights Reserved DOC_1A 3/15 Antihypertensive Medications at Baseline % or mean ± SD CH (n=783) ISH (n=535) P-value No. of anti-hypertensive medication classes 4.62 ± ± ACE inhibitors Angiotensin receptor blockers Calcium channel blockers Diuretics Aldosterone antagonists Alpha 2 Agonist Direct renin inhibitors Beta blockers Alpha-adrenergic blocker < Direct-acting vasodilators

For OMA distribution only. Trademarks may be registered and are the property of their respective owners © 2015 Medtronic, Inc. All Rights Reserved DOC_1A 3/15 RDN n= (-12.42, -2.01) P=0.007 Sham (-11.83, 6.00) P=0.52 n=121 BL SBP Age Heart rate P-values are unadjusted n=125n=48 Change in blood pressure (mm Hg) Office Systolic BP Change at 6 Months HTN-3

For OMA distribution only. Trademarks may be registered and are the property of their respective owners © 2015 Medtronic, Inc. All Rights Reserved DOC_1A 3/ (-11.84, -5.13) P<0.001 BL SBP Age 5665 Heart rate P-value is unadjusted Change in blood pressure (mm Hg) n=379n=304 Office Systolic BP Change at 6 Months GSR

For OMA distribution only. Trademarks may be registered and are the property of their respective owners © 2015 Medtronic, Inc. All Rights Reserved DOC_1A 3/15 P<0.001 Adjusted P=0.031 n=680n= [-10.6, -5.3] Office Systolic BP Change at 6 Months Pooled Dataset Change in blood pressure (mm Hg) BL SBP Age 5665 Heart rate

For OMA distribution only. Trademarks may be registered and are the property of their respective owners © 2015 Medtronic, Inc. All Rights Reserved DOC_1A 3/15 P<0.001 Adjusted P=0.013 n=467n= (-6.3, -1.7) Ambulatory Systolic BP Change at 6 Months Pooled Dataset Change in blood pressure (mm Hg)

For OMA distribution only. Trademarks may be registered and are the property of their respective owners © 2015 Medtronic, Inc. All Rights Reserved DOC_1A 3/15 Conclusions Both patients with CH as well as ISH appear to exhibit a reduction in systolic BP after RDN, however this BP-lowering effect seems less pronounced in the ISH group.