A Program of Spaulding for Children in Partnership with The University of Texas at Austin, The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, and The University of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
Advertisements

Scaling-Up Early Childhood Intervention Literacy Learning Practices Maurice McInerney, Ph.D. American Institutes for Research Presentation prepared for.
Successfully Implementing Evidence-Based Programs for Children and Families in North Carolina A Presentation for the Family Impact Seminar Michelle Hughes,
Broward’s Infrastructure Design to Guide and Sustain Permanency for Young Foster Children (BRIDGES)
Research Insights from the Family Home Program: An Adaptation of the Teaching-Family Model at Boys Town Daniel L. Daly and Ronald W. Thompson EUSARF 2014/
Center for Innovative the Begun Center for Violence Prevention Research and Education 1.
Family Services Division THE FAMILY CENTERED PRACTICE MODEL.
Community Based Care in Florida and the IV-E Waiver.
Prevention and Early Intervention. PEI’s Function and Purpose Texas Family Code Sec PREVENTION AND EARLY INTERVENTION SERVICES DIVISION. "Prevention.
1 A Program funded through a five-year cooperative agreement with Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Children’s.
Challenging middle schools Presentation by Houston A+ Challenge.
The Massachusetts Early Childhood Linkage Initiative (MECLI) John A. Lippitt, Ph.D. Jack P. Shonkoff, M.D. Institute for Child, Youth, and Family Policy.
CW/MH Learning Collaborative First Statewide Leadership Convening Lessons Learned from the Readiness Assessment Tools Lisa Conradi, PsyD Project Co-Investigator.
St. Louis County Public Health and Human Services Foster Care System Changes: Moving Into the Future.
NRCOI March 5th Conference Call
1 Lessons Learned about the Service Array from the First Round of Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs) The Service Array Process National Child Welfare.
1 THE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES REVIEW (CFSR) PRACTICE PRINCIPLES: Critical Principles for Assessing and Enhancing the Service Array The Service Array.
A Program of Spaulding for Children in Partnership with The University of Texas at Austin, The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, and The University of.
Allianceforchildwelfare.org Adoptions.
Overview of the Child Welfare System International Center for Innovation in Domestic Violence Practice (ICIDVP)
FosterEd: Santa Cruz County Judge Denine Guy, Superior Court of Ca., Santa Cruz County, Juvenile Division Mark Holguin, Family and Children’s Services.
Oregon’s Community-Involved Approach to Differential Response Implementation.
SUN Initiative Update Shawn Hoffman-Bram Sept 25, 2008.
BUILDING CAPACITY FOR UNIVERSAL PREVENTION THROUGH STATE-NONPROFIT-UNIVERSITY- SCHOOL SYSTEM PARTNERSHIPS Philip J. Leaf, Ph.D. Johns Hopkins University.
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
An Introduction Prepared by Bonnie Paris November 8, 2013.
Systems Change to Achieve Permanency Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Arlington, Texas April 15, 2009.
Kirkpatrick model of evaluation to assess public health workforce preparedness training American Public Health Association November 5, 2013 Boston, MA.
Wisconsin Educational Collaboration for Youth in Foster Care John Elliott Hilary Shager April 25 th, 2013.
Ashley Howell.  Children's Administration works with children and families to identify their needs and develop a plan for services which support families.
WELCOME Pre Kindergarten and Early Education Policy Luncheon April 29 th, 2014.
Participants Adoption Study 109 (83%) of 133 WSU Cooperative Extension county chairs, faculty, and program staff responded to survey Dissemination & Implementation.
KENTUCKY YOUTH FIRST Grant Period August July
National Parent Leadership Development Project for ICCs and the A.P.P.L.E. Project Models of Parent Leadership Development.
+ Jennifer Miller, ChildFocus Melissa Devlin, FFTA Brian Lynch, Children’s Community Programs Sue Miklos, The Bair Foundation Child Welfare Peer Kinship.
Early Childhood Mental Health Consultation Early interventions with very young children (birth to 6 years of age) at risk of experiencing serious emotional.
940: Concurrent Planning for Resource Parents. The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center Learning Objectives Participants will be able to: Define.
Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Quarterly Meeting – October 21, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on.
Systems of Care Philosophy: A Native Perspective on the National Initiative Andy Hunt, MSW NICWA Director of Community Development for Children’s Mental.
Children’s Mental Health Reform Overview: North Sound Mental Health Administration Prepared by Julie de Losada, M.S./CMHS
V Technical Assistance Center on Social Emotional Intervention (TACSEI)
A New Approach to Servicing Families.  Introduction to the practice of kinship care specific to A Second Chance Inc.  An Overview of how kinship care.
Re-affirm DCFS’ role of surrogate parent Early identification and treatment of trauma Anticipate child development needs Recognize emotional attachments.
Lori Clarke Convergent Horizons February 6, 2015.
Project KEEP: San Diego 1. Evidenced Based Practice  Best Research Evidence  Best Clinical Experience  Consistent with Family/Client Values  “The.
Good Start, Grow Smart Inter-American Symposium Understanding the State of the Art in Early Childhood Education and Care: The First Three Years of Life.
1 Executive Summary of the Strategic Plan and Proposed Action Steps January 2013 Healthy, Safe, Smart and Strong 1.
Educating Youth in Foster Care Shanna McBride and Angela Griffin, M.Ed.
FOSTER CARE SERVICES Replicating Hope for Children Prepared by Wes Salsbury Foster Care Replication Committee.
1 DHS Board Meeting Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program Overview Mark Washington Division of Family and Children Services August 18, 2010.
1 A Multi Level Approach to Implementation of the National CLAS Standards: Theme 1 Governance, Leadership & Workforce P. Qasimah Boston, Dr.Ph Florida.
The PDA Center is funded by the US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Stories from the Field and from our Consumers Building.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: April 30, 2014 Presented by: U.S. Departments.
Responding to Children in Vulnerable Families Christine Gibson and Helen Francis.
1 A Program funded through a five-year cooperative agreement with Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Children’s.
1 This project was supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under.
Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.
CT’s DCF-Head Start Partnership Working Together to Serve Vulnerable Families & Support the Development of At-Risk Children Presenters: Rudy Brooks Former.
DCF Initiatives to Prevent and Intervene in Youth Homelessness
Kate Lyon, MA, James Bell Associates, Inc.
Policy & Advocacy Platform April 24, 2017
Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act: New Opportunities for Federal Funding for Child Welfare Key Questions and Considerations.
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Youth Advisory Council
Evaluating Your Home Visiting Program
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
Wraparound Oregon Designing a coordinated service system for children, youth and their families.
Texas Inclusion Activities Overview
The Norwalk Story: How one community is using the Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ®) to build a system for developmental screening for young children.
Children Services Committee Meeting
Presentation transcript:

A Program of Spaulding for Children in Partnership with The University of Texas at Austin, The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, and The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill NATIONAL QUALITY IMPROVEMENT CENTER FOR ADOPTION/GUARDIANSHIP SUPPORT AND PRESERVATION (QIC-AG)

2 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT Funded through the Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Children’s Bureau, Grant #90CO The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the funders, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. This information is in the public domain. Readers are encouraged to copy and share it but please credit Spaulding for Children.

 Spaulding for Children  Lead Contact: Melinda Lis  The University of Texas at Austin  Lead Contact: Dr. Rowena Fong  The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee  Lead Contact: Dr. Nancy Rolock  The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill  Lead Contact: Dr. Mark Testa 3 QIC-AG PARTNERSHIP

 Build evidence for promising pre-permanence and post- permanency services and supports, which, after establishing their efficacy, can be replicated or adapted in other child welfare systems.  Disseminate knowledge of effective practice models to achieve long-term, stable permanency for children awaiting adoptive and guardianship homes and post-adoption and guardianship. 4 QIC-AG GOALS

 Select six to eight sites to work with to implement the goals of the cooperative agreement.  Increase the capacity in selected sites by creating a sustainable continuum of care from pre-permanence to post- permanence.  Increase awareness of the need for all systems to create a continuum of care that extends from pre to post permanence.  Conduct rigorous evaluation of interventions so we can establish what works (and does not work), and replicate effective models of practice. 5 QIC-AG GOALS

 Increased post-permanency stability  Improved behavioral health for children  Improved child and family well-being 6 EXPECTED LONG-TERM OUTCOMES

Child welfare agencies should provide a continuum of services that promote permanency, stability and support for children and their families. These services and supports should begin when children first encounter a child welfare system and continue through post-permanence.  Pre-Permanence  Services and supports that prepare children and their families should begin as early in the child welfare process as possible...not after signs of difficulty have already started.  Post-Adoption or Guardianship  We need to better understand the needs of families after adoption and guardianship so that we can better equip them pre-permanency and better support them post-permanence. We also need the ability to track children after legal permanence to understand their strengths and risk factors. 7 CONTINUUM OF SERVICES AND SUPPORTS

8 “The new catch phrase is 'adoption-competency' but what does that really mean? I need services that help me understand the impact trauma has on my children and how I can change my parenting paradigm to effectively meet their needs. As an adoptive parent, it is difficult to meet the children's complex needs and almost impossible if you don’t know what services to look for or who to call for help.” – Quote from an adoptive parent ADOPTION-COMPETENCY

 Services need to be provided early.  Interventions targeting adoptive or guardianship homes nearing disruption and dissolution are often provided too late.  Services should target the earliest sign of difficulty.  Preparation should begin prior to finalization and equip families with the capacity to weather unexpected difficulties and seek services and supports.  Identify families most at risk.  Research has shown predictors of post-permanency instability that can be assessed to determine which families to target for post permanency instability.  Regular check-ins can identify families most at risk of instability and in need of services.  Services should be evidence-supported.  Appropriate services should be culturally-responsive models that are tested to determine their effectiveness and can be replicated with fidelity.  Well-conducted RCTs measure important outcomes and distinguish services that produce sizable effects from those that do not. 9 THEORY OF CHANGE

 Target Group 1: Children awaiting an adoptive or guardianship placement, or children that are in an identified adoptive/guardianship home but the placement has not resulted in a finalization for a significant period of time due to the challenging mental health, emotional, or behavioral issues of the children.  Target Group 2: Children and their adoptive or guardianship families who have already finalized the adoption or guardianship and for whom stabilization may be threatened. The children in this target group may have been adopted through the child welfare system or by domestic or international private agency involvement. 10 TARGET POPULATIONS TO BE SERVED

11 QIC-AG TEAMING STRUCTURE

12 ADVISORY BOARD  Dr. Mark F. Testa Advisory Board Chair University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill  Mary Bissell Child Focus  Dr. Veenod Chulani Orlando Health  Hope Cooper True North Group  Dr. Joseph Crumbley  April Curtis Be Strong Families  Dr. Angelique Day Wayne State University  Kathy Deserly  Heather Forbes Beyond Consequences Institute  Frank Garrott Gladney Center for Adoption  Deborah Gray Nurturing Attachments  John Johnson Tennessee Department of Children's Services  Robert Johnson Annuity Company  Joe Kroll North American Council on Adoptable Children  Shaun Lane Hephzibah Children's Association  Judge Cindy Lederman Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida  Dr. Sharon McDaniel A Second Chance  Hollee McGinnis  Kathleen McNaught American Bar Association Center on Children and the Law  Dr. Avidan Milevsky Kutztown University of Pennsylvania  Dr. Peter Pecora University of Washington and Casey Family Programs  Dr. Bruce Perry ChildTrauma Academy  Russell Pretz  Dr. Scott Ryan The University of Texas at Arlington  Dr. Gina Samuels University of Chicago  Karyn Schimmels Camp to Belong  Michael Shaver Children's Home Society of Florida  Dr. Kristen S. Slack The University of Wisconsin-Madison  Pam Wolf Harmony Family Center

 Six to eight sites (state, county or tribal child welfare system) will be selected to take part in a national project designed to promote permanency and improve adoption and guardianship preservation and support.  Sites will work in partnership with the QIC-AG to implement and evaluate a continuum of services that support the permanence and stability of children and youth in adoptive and guardianship homes.  Sites will receive resources, technical assistance and support over a four year period. 13 SITE SELECTION

14 SITE SELECTION Children Bureau’s Guidelines:  Two or three of the sites with greater than 10,000 children in substitute care.  At least one site with fewer than 5,000 children in substitute care.  Urban and rural jurisdictions  Binding work agreements will govern the relationships between sites and the QIC-AG, and must be executed with state or county public child welfare agencies or tribes. Sites will be selected in late spring/early summer 2015.

 Sites will be identified through self referral, general outreach and preliminary research.  Preliminary conversations will take place with sites to discuss the collaboration including: detailed discussion of the initiative, benefits of being a selected site, site specific programs, services, and capacity currently in place, and in need of development.  After the initial assessment, sites will be identified to participate in the full assessment process. This process will focus on obtaining foundational knowledge of each site’s continuum of care and readiness to participate in this initiative. 15 OVERVIEW OF SELECTION PROCESS

16 IMPLEMENTATION & EVALUATION STEPS

Spaulding for Children and all of its partners are excited to be part of this critical initiative. We believe that the knowledge gained from the initiative will help child welfare agencies across the nation redefine their systems so that they provide a continuum of services that promote permanence and stability for children in custody and provides stability and support for children and families post-permanence. 17 “Post permanency supports are critical to the stability and well-being of adoptive families. My husband and I love our adopted child but she came to us having experienced a lot of trauma which will take years and many resources to heal.”- Jennifer, Adoptive Parent

Sites that are interested in obtaining more information about this initiative should contact Melinda Lis at: or FOLLOW UP