The Process to Guardianship.  A guardianship is a Court supervised procedure where the Court gives one person the legal authority to make personal or.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Confidentiality, Consent and Data Protection Elizabeth M Robertson Deputy Medical Director Grampian University Hospitals Trust.
Advertisements

Filing for Conservatorship
Guardianship in Pennsylvania Robin Resnick Disability Rights Network of Pennsylvania 1315 Walnut Street, Suite 500 Philadelphia, PA
Who needs a Welfare Guardian? Sue Sue Gates Senor Researcher Donald Beasley Institute P O Box 6189 Dunedin.
HIPAA Privacy Rule Training
The Work of the Missouri Guardianship Statutory Reform Task Force.
CONSERVATORSHIPS AND ALTERNATIVES. What is a Conservatorship? An individual or agency is appointed by the court to be responsible for a person. An individual.
Yes No Is the student 18 years old or older? ? Surrogate Parent Decision-Making Flowchart.
John Fillbrandt Minnesota Department of Human Services June 21, 20110
PREPARED BY KIM ALLSHOUSE, MSW, MA Private Guardianship for Adults with Developmental Disability.
Guardian Ad Litems in Guardianship Proceedings Vida E. Cruz Staff Attorney Illinois Disability Association
Guardianship and Power of Attorney: The Myths and the Facts
Options in Decision Making Authority Presented by Barbara J. Byram
Guardianship: Do you know the secret?
UNDERSTANDING WILLS, TRUST, & GUARDIANSHIP TEXT QUESTIONS TO:
GUARDIANSHIP IN UTAH Legal Terms and Procedures. HOW DO I KNOW IF MY FAMILY MEMBER NEEDS GUARDIANSHIP? These questions are directly from the Utah Protective.
BY JOAN SACRAMENTO, MSW, JD, LF PINAL COUNTY PUBLIC FIDUCIARY POWER OF ATTORNEY vs. GUARDIAN AND CONSERVATOR.
Neglected Adults Eastern Health Community Supports Program.
Bobby Carter Criminal Court Thirtieth Judicial at Memphis.
Who Must Comply? When is a patient authorization NOT required?  As needed for the protection of federal and state elective constitutional officers and.
The Basics of Nursing Homes. What is a nursing home? Facility that provides 24 hour care Staffed by licensed nursing professionals Residents may receive.
What is a Guardian? National Guardianship Association
Guardianship Proceedings in North Carolina for Persons with Developmental Disabilities Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities UNC School of.
UTAH: Thinking About Adult Guardianship? Presentation by Donna L. Russell, MS SSW NMG Salt Lake Community College Center for Innovation July 21, 2014.
Is Guardianship the Only Option? A Discussion about Guardianship and the Many Alternatives Hillary J. Dunn, Esq. Disability Law Center.
Duties of the Conservator Conservator of the Person Conservator of the Estate.
The Eligibility Determination Process Kathleen Murphy, Ph.D. Director of Eligibility Connecticut Department of Developmental Services 1.
Division of Developmental Disabilities Eligibility Determination for Adults and Children with Intellectual and Related Developmental Disabilities Gwen.
Handling a CHIPS Case in FCPC Tribal Court Law Day April 30, 2015.
Chapter 5 Section 504 and the Americans with Disabilities Act Jacob, Decker, & Hartshorne 1.
ADVANCE DIRECTIVES PLANNING FOR MEDICAL CARE IN THE EVENT OF LOSS OF DECISION-MAKING ABILITY.
Medical Law and Ethics Lesson 4: Medical Ethics
Implementation of the Mental Health Act 2007 Section 12(2) Approved Doctors.
ALL WALES PROCEDURES FOR PROTECTION OF VULNERABLE ADULTS.
ASSESSING AN ADULT’S CAPACITY TO CONSENT.
Syed & Quinn Ltd 09/10/2015 Syed & Quinn Ltd
1 Support needs of guardians and attorneys in Scotland Jan Killeen, Public Policy Director, Alzheimer Scotland.
THE MENTAL CAPACITY ACT WHY THE ACT? No existing legal framework to protect incapacitated people Only safeguards relate to money & assets Incapacity.
Choice and Control in my life Round table Discussion on legal Capacity legislation Belfast, 26 th November Betreuungsgesetz of 1992 – the German Example.
1 SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES Amy C. O’Hara, Esq. Littman Krooks LLP
GUARDIANSHIP REFORMS 2015 WHAT’S NEW! Richard LaVallo Legal Director Disability Rights Texas 1.
“Competency, Guardianship, Surrogate Decision-Making and the Transition Experience” April 9, 2012 Presented by Michelle Wilder-Baker Adult Protective Services.
Consent & Vulnerable Adults Aim: To provide an opportunity for Primary Care Staff to explore issues related to consent & vulnerable adults.
Caring for Aging Adults Everybody depends on me now…
Westminster Homeless Health Co-ordination project 02/02/2016
Mental Capacity Act and DoLS. Aim – Mental Capacity Act You will: Know what is covered by the MCA Understand the principles of the Act Understand what.
BASICS OF ESTATE PLANNING AND PROBATE Margie Connolly, Attorney at Law MARGARET McCULLOUGH CONNOLLY, PLLC Sugar Land TX Mmconnollylaw.com.
Hospital Records.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
Adult Protective Services: Reporting Elder Abuse Policy, Practice, and Communication Robert Wallace Adult Services Program Manager June 2015.
UNITS 4:3-4:4 Patients’ Rights and Legal Directives for Health Care.
Ray Ward Estate planning involving persons with a disability.
William T. Catterton, P.C. Attorney at Law Law Offices of William T. Catterton Wells Fargo Bank Building 6707 Brentwood Stair Road Suite 210 Fort Worth,
Consent & Capacity: A Case Study Adam R. Little PENNY KARYG “Let me explain the nose job
Minnesota Department of Human Services Age and Disabilities Odyssey June 18, 2013.
Guardianship “The Court has the power to place total control of a person’s affairs in the hands of another. This great power creates the opportunity for.
JoHn Lafond and Deb feinen
The Changing World of Guardianships
Great Expectations: Alternatives to Guardianship
Guardianship or Power of Attorney
Rules of Superintendence Applicable to Guardianships
SURROGATE DECISION-MAKING AND GUARDIANSHIPS Presented by: Community Health Law Project Erika Kerber, Esq. – Director of Litigation at Law and Disability.
Mental health Act, 1987.
From Dementia Skilled Improving Practice NES/SSSC 2011
PROTECTING THE ELDERLY
? Surrogate Parent Decision-Making Flowchart
Legislative update 83rd Legislature
Disclaimer Opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the speaker and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Virginia Department for Aging.
Jill Hanley, Public Administrator, St. Louis City
And what you can do about it.
Presentation transcript:

The Process to Guardianship

 A guardianship is a Court supervised procedure where the Court gives one person the legal authority to make personal or financial decisions for a person who can no longer make such decisions for himself or herself.

 Probate Court or Project Amistad receive a referral from:  Hospitals  Nursing facilities  Community (family or friends)  Adult Protective Services  El Paso State Supportive Living Center

 Application for Guardianship  Filed by a licensed attorney  A certificate of medical examination must be filed with the application for guardianship  Citation service is rendered to the Proposed Ward  The Court appoints an attorney ad litem  Relatives (when applicable) of the proposed ward must receive statutory notice of the application  Attorney ad litem and court investigator visit with the Proposed Ward  Hearing is set  Guardianship case is heard by appointed Judge

 Guardianship of the Person  Guardianship of the Estate  Guardianship of the Person and Estate Guardians Duties and Responsibilities Placement Medical Financial

 Guardians must secure adequate placement for the Ward  Secure a least restrictive placement  Facilities MUST be licensed by  Facility MUST be well-maintained and safe

 Guardians must assure that the Ward is receiving adequate health care.  Guardians must secure health care insurance  Medicare  Medicaid ▪ Exercise ETHICAL decisions regarding the health care of the Ward. Always keeping in mind what is the BEST INTEREST OF THE WARD.

 Guardians MUST secure financial income for the Ward  Social Security Benefits  VA pension (when applicable)  Retirement funds (when applicable)  Guardians MUST provide competent management of the property and income.  Guardians MUST exercise intelligence, prudence, and diligence and AVOID self- interest.

 Annual Reports  A guardian of the person is required to file a guardian of the person report each year concerning the Ward’s mental and physical condition.  A guardian of the estate is required to file an annual account stating all receipts, disbursements, cash on hand and assets being administered.  Failure to file either of these reports may lead to fines and/or removal  Court Visitor Program  Each statutory probate court assigns a court visitor to visit with the Ward and report his or her findings to the Court.

Thank you for your time.

 In the Matter of the Guardianship of  _____________________________________,  an Alleged Incapacitated Person  For Court Use Only  Court Assigned:__________________   The purpose of this certificate is to enable the Court to determine whether the individual identified above  is incapacitated according to the legal definition, and whether a guardian should be appointed to care for  him or her.   DEFINITION OF INCAPACITY  For purposes of this certificate, an "Incapacitated Person" is “an adult individual who, because of a  physical or mental condition, is substantially unable to provide food, clothing or shelter for himself or  herself, to care for the individual's own physical health, or to manage the individual's own financial  affairs.” Texas Probate Code § 601(14).   GENERAL INFORMATION  Proposed Ward’s Name ________________________________________________________________________  Date of Birth _________________________________ Age___________ Gender.. M.. F  Current Location of Ward: ______________________________________________________________________   Physician’s Name _______________________________________________ Phone: (______)______________  Office Address _______________________________________________________________________  _______________________________________________________________________  .. YES.. NO--I am a physician currently licensed to practice in the State of Texas.  I have been the doctor for the Proposed Ward since _______________________________  I last examined the Proposed Ward on ____________________________, 20_______ at: .. a Medical facility.. the Proposed Ward's residence .. Other: _________________________________________________________________ .. YES.. NO--The Proposed Ward is under my continuing treatment. .. YES.. NO--Prior to the examination, I informed the Proposed Ward that communications with me  would not be privileged. .. YES.. NO--A mini-mental status exam was given. If “YES,” please attach a copy.  =============================================================================================  Based upon my last examination of the Proposed Ward, I provide the following information:  1. EVALUATION OF THE PROPOSED WARD’S PHYSICAL CONDITION  Physical Diagnosis: __________________________________________________________________________  Conditions underlying diagnosis: ______________________________________________________________  a. Prognosis: ________________________________________________________________  b. Severity:.. Mild.. Moderate.. Severe  c. Treatment: ________________________________________________________________   2. EVALUATION OF THE PROPOSED WARD’S MENTAL FUNCTION  Mental Diagnosis: ___________________________________________________________________________  Conditions underlying diagnosis: ______________________________________________________________  a. Prognosis: ________________________________________________________________  b. Severity:.. Mild.. Moderate.. Severe  c. Treatment: ________________________________________________________________ .. YES.. NO---A summary of Proposed Ward’s medical history is attached (if reasonably available). .. YES.. NO---Would the Proposed Ward benefit from supports and services that would allow the  individual to live in the least restrictive setting? .. YES.. NO---Does this mental diagnosis include dementia?  2. EVALUATION OF THE PROPOSED WARD’S MENTAL FUNCTION, continued .. YES.. NO---Would the Proposed Ward benefit from placement in a secured facility for the elderly  or a secured nursing facility that specializes in the care and treatment of people with  dementia? .. YES.. NO---Would the Proposed Ward benefit from medications appropriate to the care and  treatment of dementia? .. YES.. NO---Does the Proposed Ward have sufficient capacity to give informed consent to the  administration of dementia medications?   3. DECISION MAKING  Alertness, Attention, and Deficits  Alertness:.. Alert.. Lethargic.. Stupor  Proposed Ward is oriented to the following (check all that apply): .. Person.. Time.. Place.. Situation   In my opinion, the ability of the Proposed Ward to make or communicate responsible decisions  concerning himself or herself is affected by the Proposed Ward’s deficits and abilities as indicated:  Deficit(s) (check all that apply):.. Short-term memory.. Long-term memory.. Immediate recall .. YES.. NO---Able to understand or communicate (verbally or otherwise) .. YES.. NO---Able to recognize familiar objects and persons .. YES.. NO---Able to perform simple calculations .. YES.. NO---Able to reason logically .. YES.. NO---Able to grasp abstract aspects of his or her situation or to interpret idiomatic  expressions or proverbs .. YES.. NO---Able to break complex tasks down into simple steps and carry them out .. YES.. NO---The Proposed Ward’s periods of impairment from the deficits indicated above (if any)  vary substantially in frequency, severity, or duration   In my opinion, the Proposed Ward is able to make or communicate responsible decisions concerning  himself or herself regarding the following:  A. Business and Managerial Matters; Financial Matters .. YES.. NO---Contract and incur obligations; handle a bank account; apply for, consent to and  receive governmental benefits and services; accept employment; hire employees; sue  and defend on lawsuits; make gifts of real or personal property? .. YES.. NO---If “YES,” should amount deposited in any such bank account be limited? .. YES.. NO---Execute a Durable Power of Attorney? .. YES.. NO---Execute a Health Care Power of Attorney?  B. Personal Living Decisions .. YES.. NO---Determine own residence? .. YES.. NO---Safely operate a motor vehicle? .. YES.. NO---Vote in a public election? .. YES.. NO---Make decisions regarding marriage?  C. Medical Decision-Making .. YES.. NO---Consent to medical, dental, psychological, and psychiatric treatment? .. YES.. NO---Administer own medications on a daily basis?  D. Daily Life Activities  Administer to daily life activities (e.g., bathing, grooming, dressing, walking toileting): .. YES, independently.. YES, with assistance.. NO, requires total care  4. DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY .. YES.. NO---Does the Proposed Ward have developmental disability?  If “YES,” is the disability a result of the following? (Check all that apply) .. YES.. NO---Mental retardation? .. YES.. NO---Autism? .. YES.. NO---Static Encephalopathy? .. YES.. NO---Cerebral Palsy? .. YES.. NO---Down’s Syndrome? .. YES.. NO---Other? Please Explain __________________________________________________   DETERMINATION OF MENTAL RETARDATION  The court may not grant an application to create a guardianship if the basis for the Proposed Ward’s  incapacity is mental retardation unless a Determination of Mental Retardation is made. A Determination of  Mental Retardation (Texas Health and Safety Code § ) requires that the determination be based on an  interview with the Proposed Ward and on a professional assessment.   The assessment, at a minimum, must include:  1) a measure of the Proposed Ward’s intellectual functioning;  2) a determination of the Proposed Ward’s adaptive behavior level; and  3) evidence of origination during the Proposed Ward’s developmental period.   As a physician, you may use a previous assessment, social history, or relevant record from a school district,  another physician, a psychologist, a public agency, or a private agency if you determine that the previous  assessment, social history, or record is valid.  1. What is your assessment of the Proposed Ward’s level of intellectual functioning and adaptive behavior? .. Mild (IQ of to approx. 70).. Moderate (IQ of to 50-55) .. Severe (IQ of to 35-40).. Profound (IQ below 20-25)   2... Yes.. No--Is there evidence that the mental retardation originated during the Proposed Ward’s  developmental period?   5. EVALUATION OF CAPACITY .. YES.. NO---Based on the information above, it is my opinion that the Proposed Ward is  incapacitated according to the definition given at the top of page 1.  If “YES,” please indicate the level of incapacity .. PARTIAL.. TOTAL   If you answered “YES” to any of the questions regarding decision-making in Section 3 (previous page)  and believe the Proposed Ward is totally incapacitated, please explain: ____________________________  __________________________________________________________________________________________   If you answered “NO” to all of the questions regarding decision-making in Section 3 (previous page) and  believe the Proposed Ward is partially incapacitated, please explain: ______________________________  __________________________________________________________________________________________  6. ABILITY TO ATTEND COURT HEARING  If a hearing on an application for the appointment of a guardian is scheduled in court: .. YES.. NO---The Proposed Ward would be able to attend, understand, and participate in the  hearing. .. YES.. NO---Because of his or her incapacities, it would not be advisable for the Proposed Ward to  appear at a Court hearing because the Proposed Ward would not be able to  understand or participate in the hearing. .. YES.. NO---Does any current medication taken by the Proposed Ward affect the demeanor of the  Proposed Ward or his or her ability to participate fully in a court proceeding   7. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OF BENEFIT TO THE COURT  If you have additional information concerning the Proposed Ward that you believe the Court should be  aware of or other concerns about the Proposed Ward that are not included above, please explain:  __________________________________________________________________________________________   ________________________________________ ________________________________  Physician's Signature Date   ________________________________________  Physician's Name Printed