Applying Auction Settlement to Restructuring Credit Events December 2, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 CRITICAL TAX ISSUES IN TODAYS HOUSING TAX CREDIT TRANSACTIONS: DEFERRED DEVELOPMENT FEES San Francisco, California July 24-25, 2008 Molly R. Bryson.
Advertisements

Transaction Leg Convention AConvention BConvention C Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Combination Table Z Combination Table Y Combination Table X Main.
Definition of Firm Energy and Interruptible Transmission Two Issues Causing Problems for Business in the Western Interconnection.
© 2013 Rockwell Publishing Washington Real Estate Practices Lesson 8: Contingent Transactions.
2-105(1) "Goods" means all things (including specially manufactured goods) which are movable at the time of identification to the contract for sale other.
EMIR reporting - Are you ready?
New EU Rules on Derivatives Trading The EMIR Reporting Technical Standards Victoria Cooley OTC Derivatives & Post Trade Policy Financial Conduct Authority.
Jennifer Marshall, Partner 12 February 2008 The Future of Corporate Insolvency Law.
ISDA ® The New CDS Landscape Auction Settlement International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ISDA ® Copyright © 2009 International Swaps and Derivatives.
© 2013 Sri U-Thong Limited. All rights reserved. This presentation has been prepared by Sri U-Thong Limited and its holding company (collectively, “Sri.
© Allen & Overy ICM: FOA InfoNet: Potential impact of the break-up of the Euro Richard Tredgett and Damian Carolan 8 February 2012.
1 CDS on ABS Documentation American Securitization Forum Sunset Seminar-CDS of ABS March 8, 2006 John J. McGreevy Director and Senior Counsel Merrill Lynch.
2 Breakout Session # 410 JAMES H. GILL, Technical Advisor, Space & Missile Systems Center, USAF Date April 16, 2008 Time 13:30 – 14:30 Working At Risk.
NORDRESS Consortium Agreement highlights. All participating institutions have signed the CA This presentation gives a brief overview of the main items.
Meltdown? Recent developments in Insolvency Law Jennifer Marshall and Susan Hazledine.
Investment banks: where do you fit into the REACH equation? Breakfast seminar - 17 September 2008 CO-# v1-Banking_briefing.PPT.
© Allen & Overy Order out of Chaos? The Proposed Financial Institution Resolution Regime.
© Allen & Overy Costs of International Arbitration.
© 2008 Pearson Education Canada13.1 Chapter 13 Hedging with Financial Derivatives.
Patty Bartlett Logan County Treasurer / Public Trustee.
Copyright © 2001 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill /Irwin Chapter Ten Derivative Securities Markets.
© Allen & Overy Yacine Francis The 10 Point Guide to International Arbitration in Cyprus.
1 GETTING PAID BY YOUR FOREIGN BUYER Presented By Nellie Smith Vice President Global Trade Services.
Article 27 of the Energy Charter Treaty: the role of State–to–State dispute resolution Ad hoc arbitration under ECT Article 27 and potential relevance.
Structured Transaction Overview. FDIC serves as an equity partner in its Receivership capacity for a single or multiple institution transaction. Joint.
CH1 INTERNATIONAL TRADE CONTRACTS
Financial Instruments
© 2008 Pearson Education Canada13.1 Chapter 13 Hedging with Financial Derivatives.
Mortgage Credit Events & Floating Rate Payment Events Document Usage restricted to ISDA/FpML Working Group 10 July 2007.
The Treatment of “Spare / Sterilised” Capacity – follow up Draft for discussion purposes only.
1 29thNovember 2010 Restructuring Events Anglo Irish TIW Support DTCC Deriv/SERV A. Byatt.
 If the Servicer evaluates the Borrower and determines that the Borrower is eligible for a HAFA Short Sale  The Servicer must comply with the following.
Formation of the Contract ----How the UCC changes the common law.
Paola Lucantoni Financial Market Law and Regulation.
© Allen & Overy Sue Edgar, Information Professional Sarah Fahy, Global Head of Libraries, A&O LLP Delivering value.
Some local difficulties – managing merger control in retail transactions Alison Berridge 19 March 2009.
ISDA ® 2009 ISDA CREDIT DERIVATIVES DETERMINATIONS COMMITTEES AND AUCTION SETTLEMENT CDS PROTOCOL International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.
© Allen & Overy Dr Johannes Bruski AbdulAziz AlGasim Structuring Family Businesses A Step by Step Process.
SPS policy – Information Presentation Presentation to ROS June 16, 2004.
International Trade Regulations: the Law of the WTO Professor Mohammad F. A. Nsour Class 3 1.
Mod 166 Review Group Incremental Exit Capacity at New and Existing Exit Points.
NUR FATIN BINTI RAJUNA What is letter of credit ? A letter of credit (L/C) is a signed instrument embodying an undertaking by the banker of a.
© Allen & Overy 2015 * Dewi Hamwijk Secured Transactions Regime for Access to Finance 2nd Competitiveness Forum Suriname, March 11, 2015.
© Allen & Overy 2015 Transparency in your supply chains Impact of the Modern Slavery Act 11 November 2015.
Implementation of Trades and Transfers National Grid NTS 5 th June 2008.
1 Commodity Agreements Sugar, Coffee, Cocoa, Coconut New York, May 2004 Lynne Moorhouse.
© Allen & Overy April 2015 Katia Manhaeve - Catherine Di Lorenzo The Internet of Things.
ENGINEER Engineer Duties: Carry out the duties assigned in the contract.Carry out the duties assigned in the contract. Engineer's staff shall include qualified.
© Allen & Overy 2016 GMP reconciliation and rectification PMI Administration seminar, 29 February 2016 Geraldine Brassett, PASA and Helen Powell, Allen.
Introduction of Credit Default Swaps R N Kar Reserve Bank of India.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.1 CHAPTER 32 Market for Credit Risk Transfer Vehicles: Credit Derivatives and Collateralized.
1 © Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. All rights reserved. Member SIPC ( ). Electronic Trading The Charles Schwab Corporation (Schwab) provides services.
» Students who meet the passing standard on STAAR must still meet all promotion requirements outlined in the district policy. We will review.
IPSAS 29:FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS. Introduction IPSAS 29 prescribes recognition and Measurement principles for financial instruments and is primarily drawn.
Presented by Mathew Hough Ansonia Federation President March 24, 2016.
Michael H. Lieberman Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
IEEE 802 Rules Update November 2012 meeting
EPA CONTRACT TEMPLATE Overview
EPA SUBCONTRACT TEMPLATE Overview September 2017
ACH Basics for Businesses
First Collective Agreements
Intel: Back to the Future?
Taking a stroll through a term
Risk Management with Financial Derivatives
Handling offers.
Types of loan facilities and the LMA
Transmission Workgroup 6th March 2014
Structuring Family Businesses
© 2013 Sri U-Thong Limited. All rights reserved
GMPs: a route to reconciliation
Presentation transcript:

Applying Auction Settlement to Restructuring Credit Events December 2, 2010

Background  Restructuring under the 2003 ISDA Credit Derivatives Definitions  Mod R  Mod Mod R  Old R  Mod R  Restructuring Maturity Limitation Date  Fully Transferable Obligation  Mod Mod R  Modified Restructuring Maturity Limitation Date  Conditionally Transferable Obligation  Old R  No maturity limitations or additional restrictions on Deliverable Obligations

The Auction Problem – What can be valued?  Restructuring Maturity Limitation Date/ Modified Restructuring Maturity Limitation Date  Limitations based upon Scheduled Termination Date of relevant Transaction  Mod R – RMLD earlier of (a) 2.5 years following the Restructuring Date and (b) latest final maturity date of any Restructured Bond or Loan. Never earlier than Scheduled Termination Date.  Mod Mod R – MRMLD later of (a) Scheduled Termination Date and (b) either (i) 5 years following the Restructuring Date for Restructured Bond or Loan or (ii) 2.5 years following the Restructuring Date for all other Deliverable Obligations  What is deliverable for a Transaction with one Scheduled Termination Date may not be deliverable for a Transaction with a different Scheduled Termination Date  Auction methodology requires a single list of Deliverable Obligations

The Auction Solution for Mod R/Mod Mod R  Multiple Auctions to be held for each Restructuring  Allocate Transactions to Maturity Buckets by reference to Scheduled Termination Date  8 Maturity Buckets – each Maturity Bucket runs from the Restructuring Date to the IMM Roll Date occurring on or immediately following the dates below:  2.5 yr (5 yr for a Restructured Bond or Loan under Mod Mod R)  5 yr  7.5 yr  10 yr  12.5 yr  15 yr  20 yr  Seller (30 yr)  For Mod R only, there may be an additional (pre-2.5 yr) Maturity Bucket  Seller triggered Transactions all go to the 30 yr Maturity Bucket (except Seller MMR Trades)

Maturity Buckets  A Transaction is allocated to a Maturity Bucket if the Scheduled Termination Date of the relevant Transaction occurs on or prior to the Maturity Bucket End Date of the relevant Maturity Bucket (and after the Maturity Bucket End Date of any shorter dated Maturity Bucket) – subject to Rounding Down Convention  The relevant DC will determine whether or not to hold an Auction for Transactions assigned to a Maturity Bucket, based upon DTCC trade data  The relevant DC will generate lists of Deliverable Obligations for each Maturity Bucket whenever one or more Auctions will be held  The Maturity Bucket concept will apply in all circumstances, including where the relevant DC is not asked to determine whether a Restructuring has occurred

Deliverable Obligation Lists  A Deliverable Obligation will be assigned to a Maturity Bucket if its final maturity date is on or prior to the Maturity Bucket End Date  Exception: Mod Mod R 5 yr Maturity Bucket  Restructured Bonds or Loans with a final maturity date up to 5 yrs after the Restructuring Date will be deliverable to settle a Transaction with a Scheduled Termination Date occurring 2.5 yrs or less after the Restructuring Date  All Deliverable Obligations assigned to a Maturity Bucket will be “deliverable” for purposes of Maturity Buckets with longer dated Maturity Bucket End Dates

Rounding Down Convention  If a Transaction has been assigned to a Maturity Bucket that contains no Deliverable Obligations with a final maturity date occurring on or prior to the Scheduled Termination Date, then such Transaction will be reassigned to the appropriate earlier Maturity Bucket  Eg:Transaction ST Date : 8yrs away Assigned to 10yr Maturity Bucket Only 9yr Bonds and 4yr Bonds Transaction moved to 5yr Maturity Bucket – skips the 7.5yr Maturity Bucket

Requirement to trigger  Unlike other Credit Events, if the DC determines that there has been a Restructuring, the Event Determination Date will not occur automatically  Buyer and/or Seller retain the freedom to decide whether or not to trigger settlement following a Restructuring  Once a Credit Event Notice is sent the Credit Event Resolution Request Date will be the common Event Determination Date  In order to settle based upon the Auction, a Credit Event Notice must be effectively delivered on or prior to the Exercise Cut-off Date (COB on the 2 nd (Seller exercise) or 5 th (Buyer exercise) Business Day following publication of the Final List of Deliverable Obligations)  If both parties exercise prior to the relevant Exercise Cut-off Date, the Credit Event Notice delivered by Seller shall prevail

Decision to hold one or more Auctions  The DC will decide whether to hold an Auction for one or more Maturity Buckets based upon DTCC data of triggered Transactions  If 300 or more Transactions assigned to a Maturity Bucket are triggered, and 5 or more Dealer Members of the DC are party to such Transactions, then an Auction will automatically be held for such Maturity Bucket  The relevant DC may decide to hold an Auction for a Maturity Bucket, even if the 300/5 Criteria is not met  If no Auction is held for a Maturity Bucket, the Movement Option will apply to Transactions assigned to such Maturity Bucket

Movement Option  If no Auction is held for a Maturity Bucket:  Buyer can move a Transaction assigned to that Maturity Bucket down to the Maturity Bucket with the next earliest Maturity Bucket End Date for which an Auction is to be held  Seller can move the relevant Transaction to the 30yr Maturity Bucket, if there is an Auction for the 30yr Maturity Bucket  The Movement Option must be exercised within 4 Business Days of the Exercise Cut-off Date applicable to Buyer  Either Buyer or Seller may exercise the option  If both parties exercise the option, Buyer’s exercise will prevail for the purposes of determining the direction in which the Transaction will move  If the Movement Option is not exercised, the Transaction will settle in accordance with the Fallback Settlement Method (i.e. Cash or Physical Settlement), but will be subject to the Maturity Bucket limitations on what is deliverable if Buyer originally triggered

ISDA announces that a Restructuring has occurred and that one or more Auctions may be held Exercise Cut-off Date (Buyer exercise only) ISDA begins compiling lists of Deliverable Obligations for each Maturity Bucket ISDA publishes Final Lists of Deliverable Obligations, and announces the range of Scheduled Termination Dates applicable to each Maturity Bucket 1 Business Day Notice of Physical Settlement Date for RASTs and for CDS contracts in Maturity Buckets that don’t have Auctions Movement Option Deadline At Least 2 Business Days 4 Business Days 1 Business Day Timeline subject to amendment by 80% vote. 5 Business Days Auction Settlement following a Restructuring Auction Date/Auction Final PriceDetermination Date 1 Business Day ISDA publishes preliminary lists of Deliverable Obligations 3 Business Days ISDA publishes Initial Lists of Deliverable Obligations 2 Calendar Days ISDA publishes Supplemental Lists of Deliverable Obligations 5 Calendar Days ISDA announces which Maturity Buckets will have Auctions Cash Settlement of CDS contracts in Maturity Buckets that don’t have Auctions: Valuation Date – X Business Days, as specified in the Confirmation, after ISDA announces which Maturity Buckets will have Auctions 1 Business Day

Anglo Irish – Expedited Settlement of RASTs for Subordinated Bonds  Subordinated bonds due 2014 and 2016, subject to Exchange Offer (acceptance period closes at 4pm, 20 December 2010)  For the subordinated bonds to constitute Permissible Deliverable Obligations, settlement of the RAST must occur on an expedited basis (i.e. on T +1) so that the recipient of the subordinated bonds has the choice whether or not to accept the Exchange Offer  Recipient has 1 Business Day to effect a buy-in if subordinated bonds were specified in the NOPS but not delivered on or before T + 1  If Buyer does not deliver in time and the recipient is unable to effect a buy-in or does not do so, Buyer will be required to deliver a NOPS Amendment Notice replacing the subordinated bonds with senior bonds no later than T+3  If Buyer fails to deliver a NOPS Amendment Notice on or prior to T+3, Seller can deliver a notice to Buyer specifying senior bonds for Buyer to deliver

Questions? These are presentation slides only. The information within these slides does not constitute definitive advice and should not be used as the basis for giving definitive advice without checking the primary sources. Allen & Overy means Allen & Overy LLP and/or its affiliated undertakings. The term partner is used to refer to a member of Allen & Overy LLP or an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications or an individual with equivalent status in one of Allen & Overy LLP's affiliated undertakings.