© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability 2009 1 CENTER FOR TAX AND BUDGET ACCOUNTABILITY 70 E. Lake Street Suite 1700 Chicago, Illinois 60601 direct:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Dismal Economy Heather Boushey Center for Economic and Policy Research 8 April 2005.
Advertisements

The Long-Term Squeeze on Municipal Finances Massachusetts Association of School Business Officials Michael J. Widmer, President Massachusetts Taxpayers.
Amy Blouin, Executive Director The Missouri Budget Project Andrew Nicholas Center on Budget & Policy Priorities The State.
FISCAL ACCOUNTABILITY OF STATE GOVERNMENT Presentation Prepared for the Appropriations Committee and the Finance, Revenue, and Bonding Committee by the.
© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability CENTER FOR TAX AND BUDGET ACCOUNTABILITY 70 E. Lake Street Suite 1700 Chicago, Illinois direct:
S TATE B UDGET U PDATE More Big Challenges Ahead October 2014.
Georgia Budget Crisis: The Hole Gets Deeper Alan Essig Executive Director Georgia Budget & Policy Institute November 13, 2009.
Robert Ricketts Frank M. Burke Chair in Taxation October 2010.
Presented by: Ralph M. Martire, Executive Director For: Taskforce on Social Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Enterprise The John Marshall Law School 315.
The School Finance Outlook for and Beyond Legislative Revenue Office April 2010.
How Illinois Compares Nationally 5 th largest population (1) 5 th highest personal income (1) 27 th largest GNP in the World (ahead of Sweden, Belgium,
America’s National Debt and Long-Term Outlook An Overview of the Challenge and the Implications for Young People March 2009.
1 America’s National Debt. 2 Important Concepts What’s the difference between deficits and debt? Deficits: The annual imbalance between revenues and spending.
Employment Projections -- General Information
U.S. Department of Labor Assistant Secretary William E. Spriggs Office of Policy July 25, NAACP Convention: Labor Workshop Labor Market Outlook.
Florida The Economy, Taxes and Results - A Balanced Approach is Needed Presentation to the National Association of Social Workers - Florida John Hall Florida.
Financial Plan Overview Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor Robert L. Megna, Director of the Budget July 2011 New York State Division of the Budget.
Social Security Includes a number of government programs designed to insure stability in income and standard of living Programs in Social Security: 1.Old.
Time for a Turnaround: Facing Fiscal Reality in New York State Citizens Budget Commission.
How Illinois Compares Nationally 5 th largest population (1) 5 th highest personal income (1) 12 th highest personal income per student (1) 48 th in combined.
Building a Stronger North Carolina: A Legislative Briefing and Call to Action 2014.
The Better Texas Family Budgets: Building the Case for Better Jobs, Better Education, Better Opportunities Frances Deviney, Ph.D. Texas Kids Count Director.
5 th largest population (1) 5 th highest personal income (1) 12 th highest personal income per student (1) 48 th in combined state and local tax burden.
1. Community Colleges: Definition and National Trends.
Chapter 11 Public Finance in Texas. The Budget The state constitution requires that the legislature operate within a balanced budget. The Texas budget.
Introduction to School Finance Main source for the content Odden and Picus, School Finance, 4 th edition.
Building a Stronger North Carolina: A Legislative Briefing and Call to Action 2014.
Pearson Education, Inc., Longman © 2006 Chapter 13 Economic Policymaking American Government: Policy & Politics, Eighth Edition TANNAHILL.
The Federal Budget and Social Security. Introduction Key Terms – Budget – A financial plan for the use of money, personnel, and property. – Balanced Budget.
© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability CENTER FOR TAX AND BUDGET ACCOUNTABILITY 70 E. Lake Street Suite 1700 Chicago, Illinois direct:
© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability CENTER FOR TAX AND BUDGET ACCOUNTABILITY 70 E. Lake Street Suite 1700 Chicago, Illinois direct:
A Few Facts 1.Federal spending in FY 2000 and 2001 as a percent of GDP is the lowest since Federal government spending (not including social security,
Michigan Association of Counties Traverse City, September 19 th, 2011.
CENTER FOR TAX AND BUDGET ACCOUNTABILITY 70 E. Lake Street Suite 1700 Chicago, Illinois direct: Prepared.
JANUARY 9, 2014 Economic Policy. Fiscal Policy Spending and taxing decisions made by the government The annual federal budget is the basis of fiscal policy.
Deficit Spending and Public Debt
All About the Money: The State Budget One Voice: A Collaborative for Health and Human Services September 30, 2004 Eva De Luna Castro, Budget Analyst
Forum on Fiscal Integrity August 3rd, 2010 J. Thomas Johnson, President Taxpayers’ Federation of Illinois (217) Illinois Fiscal.
NESTOA September 16, 2011 Scott Pattison Executive Director National Association of State Budget Officers 444 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 642 Washington,
The Economy and Budget: Minnesota and the Nation Legislative Conference January 12, 2011 Scott Pattison Executive Director National Association of State.
State Fiscal Outlook: Minnesota and the Nation ONE MINNESOTA January 25, 2012 Scott Pattison Executive Director National Association of State Budget Officers.
Report on the Economic Crisis: Initial Impact on Hospitals November 2008.
State Fiscal Outlook NABE December 15, 2009 Scott Pattison Executive Director National Association of State Budget Officers 444 North Capitol Street, NW,
© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability CENTER FOR TAX AND BUDGET ACCOUNTABILITY 70 E. Lake Street Suite 1700 Chicago, Illinois direct:
A Fair and Simple Tax System for Our Future: A Progressive Approach to Tax Reform January 2005.
Timebanking and Poverty: Creating Abundance in a Challenged Economy.
School Finance 101 Presented by Thomas E. White Michigan School Business Officials October 2004.
The Economy and Budget: Minnesota and the Nation Legislative Conference February 10, 2010 Scott Pattison Executive Director National Association of State.
© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability CENTER FOR TAX AND BUDGET ACCOUNTABILITY 70 E. Lake Street Suite 1700 Chicago, Illinois direct:
Middle Management Scott Pattison Executive Director NASBO April 15, 2015.
© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability CENTER FOR TAX AND BUDGET ACCOUNTABILITY 70 E. Lake Street Suite 1700 Chicago, Illinois direct:
Executive Office for Administration and Finance State House Rooms 373 & 272 Boston, MA FY2012 Budget Hearings Slide Presentation For The Executive.
State Fiscal Outlook NAMM Washington, DC May 11, 2010 Brian Sigritz Director of State Fiscal Studies National Association of State Budget Officers 444.
Fiscal Policy: Fixing an Economy’s Health What is Fiscal Policy? The use of Government policies in order to stabilize the Business Cycle.
Fiscal Policy: Fixing an Economy’s Health Points to Remember  Prior to the Great Depression (1930’s) economists believed that the best way to stabilize.
East Lansing Public Schools Financial Strategies Past, Present and Future.
Finance and Fiscal Policy Chapter 13. Learning Objectives 13.1 Assess the fairness of Texas’s budgeting and taxing policies. 13.2Describe the sources.
“The Big Tax Swap, 2008 to 2016” Who has benefited? Who has paid? And what we can do about it. Statewide Assembly May 2 nd, 2016.
FY 2012 General Fund 5-Year Forecast Presentation to the Board of County Commissioners Multnomah County Budget Office November 9, 2010.
4th Annual Budget Breakfast, 23 February 2017 presented by
Presentation for Connecticut Alliance for Basic Human Needs 11/18/2016
The People’s Game Show $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 The Rich & The Poor
Illinois’ Significant Disinvestment in Higher Education
Introductions A little bit about my background: Michigan Native
League of Women Voters Illinois Issues Briefing
Lunch & Learn, 15 February 2017 presented by
A SHARED OPPORTUNITY AGENDA
The School Finance Outlook for and Beyond
The Big Picture about Kids Texas Center for the Judiciary F
The crisis of low-wage jobs and a solution for Cook County
Presentation transcript:

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability CENTER FOR TAX AND BUDGET ACCOUNTABILITY 70 E. Lake Street Suite 1700 Chicago, Illinois direct: The Illinois Economy and the State Budget For: Tuesday, April 28, 2009; 2:00 pm Illinois Association of County Board Members and Commissioners Crown Plaza Springfield 3000 S. Dirksen Parkway, Springfield, IL Presented by: Ralph Martire Executive Director

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability The Starting Point: Illinois State Government is in the worst fiscal crisis since the Great Depression the backlog of unpaid bills was almost $2 billion as of Payment cycle is 48 days Comptroller Hynes notes both are record highs for midpoint of a fiscal year NOT SINCE FDR

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability GRF Expenditures by Category, Category FY 1995 Actual FY 1995 CPI Adjuste d to FY2006 FY 2006 Enacted $ Difference Betwee n 1995 Adj'd for CPI & 2006 Enacte d FY 1995 ECI Adjuste d to FY2006 $ Difference Betwee n 1995 Adj'd for ECI & 2006 Enacte d General Revenue Fund$17,302.0$22,613.7$24,406.4$1,792.7$24,776.5-$370.1 Education$3,656.0$4,778.4$6,123.0$1,344.6$5,235.4$887.6 Health Care$4,319.0$5,644.9$7,034.0$1,389.1$6,184.8$849.2 Pension$519.0$678.3$938.4$260.1$743.2$195.2 All public services except Health Care, Education and Pensions$8,808.0$11,512.1$10,311.0-$1,201.1$12,613.1-$2,302.1 **Notes: Health care includes Medicaid and state employee health insurance Sources: State of Illinois' Traditional Budgetary Financial Reports and Fiscal Focus Illinois' FY2006 Budget National Association of State Budget Officers Comptroller Fiscal Focus, January 1997 CPI and ECI based on Bureau of Labor Statistics

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability Illinois State & Local Revenue In 2005 (the most recent national comparison available), state and local revenue came from the following sources: PROPERTY TAX38% SALES TAX17% EXCISE TAX17% INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX16.2% OTHER 7.4% CORPORATE INCOME TAX 4.4% SOURCE: Federal Tax Administrators Data PROPERTY TAX RELIANCE A SNAPSHOT OF WHAT IS

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability This makes Illinois the 6 th most reliant state on property tax revenue in the nation. Illinois is more reliant on property taxes than Florida, Nevada, Tennessee, Alaska, South Dakota, Washington and Wyoming – which also don’t have income taxes. PROPERTY TAX RELIANCE

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability WHY – EDUCATION Illinois ranks 49 th out of 50 states in the portion of education funding covered by state – versus local – revenue  just 28% of the cost. Illinois is the most reliant state on property taxes to fund schools in the nation. (National Education Association Data) PROPERTY TAX RELIANCE

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability THE BURDEN IS TOUGH All data inflation adjusted to 2008 Income Data: US Department of Census Property Tax Data: IL Department of Revenue

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability The Context: BIG ‘N RICH In 2007, Illinois ranked fifth nationally with a Gross State Product in excess of $609 billion. That would be the 27 th largest economy of any nation in the world- greater than Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Colombia, Belgium, Sweden, Greece, Ireland, Portugal, Norway and Nigeria, to name a few. ILLINOIS’ ECONOMY IS LARGE

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability Illinois GDP Growth Lags THE ILLINOIS ECONOMY Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, US Dept. of Commerce

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability Between 1990 and January 1, 2008, Illinois lost 27% - 249,000 - of its manufacturing industry jobs. This loss was worse than both the Midwest (-23.2%) and the Nation (-23.9%). Illinois lost another 243,000 jobs overall from December December MANUFACTURING DECLINE

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability  All job growth in Illinois came in the service sector.  For the most part, service sector jobs that pay less than manufacturing  On average, most of these service jobs pay 29% less than the manufacturing jobs they replace LOW-END SERVICE JOBS GROW For over two decades now:

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability EMPLOYER-PROVIDED BENEFITS  Employer-provided health insurance benefits have been steadily declining in Illinois since  By 2006, over 40% of the workforce didn’t have employer provided insurance  Hispanics especially hard hit–over 57% do not have employer- provided insurance  TODAY, 27% of the Illinois population is either on Medicaid or uninsured

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability In 1981, 55.6% of the state’s workers were covered by private sector employer-provided pension plans. By 2007, only 43.8% of the workforce had private retirement benefits. PENSION EROSION

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability Why the Economic Problems? –NOT TAX BURDEN OR WASTEFUL SPENDING Illinois ’ total state AND local tax burden, as a percentage of personal income ranks only 45 th in the nation. The second lowest tax burden in the Midwest to Missouri (Missouri is all of one-tenth of one percent lower). Illinois also ranks only 42 nd in spending among the states ILLINOIS IS LOW TAX OVERALL

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability Education now matters more than ever to economic prosperity:  unemployment rates are highest for those with the least education.  Wages are also tied to education levels. EXHIBIT “A” IS EDUCATION

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability Impact of Education on Wages In real (2006) dollars, between 1980 and 2006, only those with at least a college degree experienced any gain in hourly income, with growth of 14.3%  Real median hourly wages for all other education categories declined  Less than a high school diploma fell by 28.7%  Only a high school education declined 8.7%  Some college but no degree declined 4.3%  You gotta learn to earn! WAGE DIFFERENCES

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability Wages for Minorities lag Whites Real wages for Whites increased modestly between 1980 and 2007, but :  The White-Hispanic wage gap is larger in amount, but increased by a smaller percentage, growing from $3.82 in 1980 to $5.34 in 2007, an increase of 39.7% over 1980  Real wages for African-Americans declined. The hourly wage gap between Whites and African- Americans grew from $1.52 in 1980 to $3.44 in 2007, an increase of 126.3% over 1980 WAGE DIFFERENCES

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability Still Separate....  Illinois is the third most segregated state in K-12 education for blacks  82% of black children attend majority/minority schools  90% of white children attend virtually all white schools (*Source: 2006 Education Trust study on segregation) SEGREGATION

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability Still Unequal  Minority school districts start out with $1,154 less per child to spend on education  That’s the second worst gap in the nation (*Source: 2006 Education Trust study on segregation) SEGREGATION

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability Current Basis for Foundation Level The Illinois state “Foundation Level” is the minimum per child guaranteed expenditure for K-12 Does NOT include: poverty, special ed, transportation, etc. For FY2008: $5,734 – but not tied to any measurable standard K-12 FUNDING

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability Education Funding Advisory Board (“EFAB”) Change basis to a measurable outcome standard, predicated on costs and test results Foundation Level should be at least $7,330 (after adjusting for inflation) Total cost: $1.8 billion EFAB

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability Equalized Assessed Valuation (EAV) is a proxy for a school district’s local property wealth available to be taxed. The average EAV of flat grant districts is more than 5 times greater than foundation-formula districts. SCHOOL DISTRICT TYPE “2007 Illinois Report Card”

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability MONEY MATTERS “2007 Illinois Report Card”

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability Total and Instructional Spending Differentials  On average, Flat Grant districts spend $4186 more in total per pupil spending than Foundation Formula school districts.  When it comes to instructional expenses, Flat Grant districts spend $2324 more per student on average than do Foundation Formula districts. MONEY MATTERS “2007 Illinois Report Card”

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability YEAH, $ DOES APPEAR TO MATTER *Linear regression is a statistical analysis that shows the correlation of two or more variables, in this case, how per-pupil expenditures correspond to ISAT test scores. The regression line (heavy red) represents the predicted test score results a school district should obtain, given a specific level of instructional expenditure.

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability “IL State Report Cards” LOW INCOME

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability The percentage of students meeting or exceeding ISAT standards in the districts with the lowest levels of poverty is markedly different from those districts with the highest levels of poverty. MONEY MATTERS “2007 Illinois Report Card”

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability RACE MATTERS

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability RACE MATTERS

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability HIGHER ED INVESTMENTS

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability Governor Quinn faces: the Great Recession; a hugely inequitable education funding system, and a big deficit:

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability Federal Bailout is No Panacea One time revenue – not replaceable after being spent Provides temporary budget relief of about $7B over 2 years, as follows: K-12 education; $1.66 B Medicaid - $2.9 B (over 2 years) Other Education - $1.9 B (over 2 years, spec. ed, poverty, modernization, higher ed) The rest for job training, food stamps, emergency shelter, etc. FEDERAL BAILOUT

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability One-time help ― And a Cliff ARRA

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability If the bailout gets spent and the revenue is not replaced by state tax reform, the deficit comes back – worse – in two short years HEY, BIG SPENDER

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability Governor Quinn Proposes: Raising the personal income tax from 3% to 4.5%; Increasing the personal/dependent exemption to $6,000; Raising the corporate income tax rate from 4.8% to 7.2%; Cutting public employee pension funding by $2.846B (over two years); Other spending cuts of $1.459B

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability What’s Missing??? Sustainability Education Funding Reform More Targeted Relief

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability STATE BUDGET

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability THE RAMP

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability REAL PROBLEM: What About Revenue Growth $$$$$$$$ NEW $$$ ?

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability  NOT SO MUCH

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability FAIR  PROGRESSIVE RESPONSIVE  TO MODERN ECONOMY STABLE  DURING POOR ECONOMIES EFFICIENT  DOESN ’ T DISTORT PRIVATE MARKETS ELEMENTS OF A SOUND AND FAIR FISCAL SYSTEM WHAT SHOULD BE: BUT ISN’T

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability STRUCTURAL DEFICIT *Adjusts solely for historic rates of inflation and population growth, and assumes normal economic growth. WHICH CREATES:

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability SB750 is designed to:  Be sound tax policy for the modern, capitalist economy  Make tax burden fairer, by making it more progressive―the bottom 60% of income earners won’t pay more in taxes after SB750 passes  Improve school funding by  Raising the foundation level  Enhancing special education funding  Targeting $300M in additional funds to struggling schools  Investing $300M more per year in higher education  Eliminate the Unfunded Pension Liability  Provide progressive property tax relief statewide, that effectively helps struggling communities while reducing fixed costs for business  Keep Illinois’ status as a low tax state SB750

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability THIS HELPS STATE & LOCAL Revenue Source $ in Millions Quinn At 4.5% and 7.2% SB750 At 5% and 8% Individual Income Tax (net of refund fund) $4,713$6,739 LGDF$0$673 Personal Exemption Cost$1,789$0 Total Personal Income$2,453$6,066 Corporate Income Tax (net of refund fund) $756$1,100 LGDF$0$110 Total Corporate Income$756$990 Total Personal and Corporate Income to State (minus refund fund and Personal Exemption) $3,209$7,056 Source: Center for Tax and Budget Accountability calculation based on final FY2009 revenue assumptions by the Illinois Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability.

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability % 5% % 50.20% 93.4% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100 % Bottom 60% Next 20% Top 20% Top 15% Top 1% Income Growth in the United States (Real 1999 Dollars) *Source U.S. Census Data Percent Change INCOME INEQUALITY Fair? Responsive?

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability State & Local Tax Burden as a Percentage of Income REGRESSIVE Fair? Responsive?

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability INCOME TAX INCREASE 3%  5% 3%  2%=5% 2/3=67% *Note, corporate rate goes up from 4.8% to 8%, but ― overall corporate tax burden goes down! SB750

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability SALES TAX BASE

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability This will also generate about $590 million* annually for local governments! (*COGFA Estimate) ALL BENEFIT

© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability For More Information: Center for Tax and Budget Accountability Ralph M. Martire Executive Director (312) Chrissy A. Mancini Director of Budget and Policy Analysis (312) Yerik Kaslow Research Associate (312) Further Information