NEGOTIATING YOUR FUTURE. NEGOTIATING IS A BIT LIKE BREATHING. YOU DON’T HAVE TO DO IT, BUT THE ALTERNATIVES AREN’T VERY ATTRACTIVE. NEGOTIATION IS THE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Basic Negotiating Skills
Advertisements

Why is it important to deal with and resolve conflicts?
Procedural justice and a constructive approach to negotiating with stakeholders Jill Howieson.
Mentoring Awareness Workshop
Tarak Bahadur KC, PhD Negotiation Skills Negotiation Skills Tarak Bahadur KC, PhD
1 Negotiating Leadership: A Better Life through Conflict Jeff Hoffman Mary Kluz February 28, 2013.
Negotiating for Win-Win Interest-Based Negotiation CASFAA Conference, 2008 Anaheim, CA Presented by Natasha Kobrinsky Pepperdine University Graziadio School.
Working with the Feelings of Parents and Caregivers
Conferences: Facilitate Change Conflict Problem Solving Negotiation.
Negotiating and Resolving Conflict. How often do you negotiate? Often Seldom Never.
Difficult Conversations in the Workplace Rea Freeland Ron Placone.
Negotiation Skills Tulasi Sharan Sigdel Dy. Director of Studies
MODULE 23 CONFLICT AND NEGOTIATION
Sally’s Negotiation Dynamics
The Nature of Negotiation
1-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved 5 th Edition PPT.
International negotiation
Negotiation & Conflict Management Class 1 John D. Blair, PhD
Cultural Differences Gender Differences Interview Tips: Before, During, and After.
 Eli Broad Graduate School of Management, 2005 Negotiating for Results John T. Delaney October 21, 2005.
1 Conflict and Negotiation Class 9 OBHR E-110 Christina Finegold and Linda Miklas.
Influencing: Power, Politics, Networking and Negotiation
Strategic Staffing Chapter 1
Strategy And Tactics of Integrative Negotiation
Mahesh Sharma, MPA, ICMA-CM, MASCE City Administrator City of Raytown
Negotiation in Project Management David S. Maurer, PMP, LTC, USA (Ret.) PMI – 13 December 2005.
D ecreasing P atient-Provider C onflict University of Utah Dialysis Program.
Slide 1 INTEREST BASED PROCESS OD Mod 3 Intervention.
Overview. Books like “Winning through Intimidation” May get a better deal some of the time. Damage Relationships Miss creative agreements Make a deadlock.
June 13, 2008 Neos Mini-Conference Kathryn Arbuckle John A. Weir Memorial Law Library/ Association of Academic Staff University of Alberta Let’s Make a.
Jay A. Hewlin, Esq.. Overview  Identifying The Truth About Negotiations  Some Negotiation Statistics  Strategies for Negotiating Salary  Resources.
Building Relationships
NIH Office of the Ombudsman Center for Cooperative Resolution NEGOTIATION TRAINING WORKSHOP NIH Office of the Ombudsman/ Center for Cooperative Resolution.
Communication Skills Personal Commitment Programs or Services Interaction Processes Context.
Resolving Education Disputes Scott F. Johnson. About Me Professor of Law at Concord Law School Hearing Officer with NH Dept. of Education NHEdLaw, LLC.
Now What….. I want the last remaining orange and so do you.
A Model Workplace: Critical Conversations August 6, 2013.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Negotiation Professor Robert W. Cullen Fall 2007 Week 4.
Negotiation Professor Robert W. Cullen Fall 2007.
Resolving Special Education Disputes Scott F. Johnson.
Introduction Negotiation is something that everyone does, almost daily 1-1.
Maximizing Interests Through Negotiation Leadership in the Trial Courts/District Court Philip L. Lee Results Leadership Group, LLC
What is conflict negotiation Communication designed to anticipate, contain, and resolve disputes so that the parties reach mutually acceptable solutions.
HUH?!? WHAT?!? Techniques and tips to communicate and negotiate effectively as a GAL.
Moral Reasoning Part II 3/8/2012. Learning Objectives Use knowledge and analyses of social problems to evaluate public policy, and to suggest policy alternatives,
6 Steps for Resolving Conflicts STEP 1. Begin the Process Calmly approach the person you are having the conflict with, and explain to them that you have.
HECMA Program Friendships and Peer Pressure Ms. Sandra Gorman.
Interest-Based Bargaining.  Interest-based bargaining involves parties in a collaborative effort to jointly meet each other’s needs and satisfy mutual.
Leadership & Teamwork. QUALITIES OF A GOOD TEAM Shared Vision Roles and Responsibilities well defined Good Communication Trust, Confidentiality, and Respect.
1 CHAPTER FOUR Negotiation: Strategy and Planning.
1 Integrative negotiations Multiple issues Differing strengths of preference Differing interests Future relationship Multiple alternatives.
NEGOTIATION SKILLS Suwarn Kumar Singh Sudip Tripathee.
Influencing: Power, Politics, Networking, and Negotiation
Slide 1 INTEREST BASED STRATEGIES OD Mod 3 Intervention.
Dealing with Conflict Relationships. What is Conflict? Conflict is a disagreement or struggle between two or more people. It happens in ALL relationships,
Resolving Education Disputes Scott F. Johnson. About Me Professor of Law at Concord Law School Hearing Officer with NH Dept. of Education NHEdLaw, LLC.
The Nature of Negotiation McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Women and Negotiation Patricia M. Gallagher, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Professor Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering Drexel University.
1 Managing Interpersonal Conflicts Looking Out, Looking In 12 th Edition  Chapter Summary The Nature of Conflict Conflict Styles Conflict in Relational.
WHAT IS NEGOTIATION Negotiation is the process by which we search for terms to obtain what we want from somebody who wants something from us.
Conflict Management Technique
Competencies in Intercultural Group Communications Dealing with Conflict Communication Styles Based on Face Management Meeting and Decision Making Leadership.
Difficult Conversations and the Art of Negotiation Wednesday 11 th November Based on work by the Harvard Negotiation Project and by David Armstrong.
CONFLICT RESOLUTION.
Use Negotiation to Manage Conflict
Negotiation Skills Binod Kumar Bista Shilu Pradhan.
Negotiation.
Sally’s Negotiation Dynamics
Negotiation skills.
Presentation transcript:

NEGOTIATING YOUR FUTURE

NEGOTIATING IS A BIT LIKE BREATHING. YOU DON’T HAVE TO DO IT, BUT THE ALTERNATIVES AREN’T VERY ATTRACTIVE. NEGOTIATION IS THE DAILY GIVE AND TAKE OF SOCIAL INTERACTIONS

NEGOTIATION IS AN INTERDEPENDENT PROCESS, WHEREIN DECISION MAKERS ARE ADVOCATES.

DID YOU GET THE PART ABOUT IT BEING INTERDEPENDENT ?

CREATE SOMETHING NEW WHICH NEITHER PARTY COULD DO ON THEIR OWN. RESOLVE PROBLEMS OR DISPUTES BETWEEN PARTIES.

POINT WHERE PARTIES ARE WILLING TO FOREGO: POSSIBILITY OF GAINING MORE OR GIVING LESS, FOR THE CERTAINTY OF WHAT IS BEING OFFERED.

NEGOTIATORS ARE MADE NOT BORN

WHAT CAN’T BE TAUGHT ATTITUDE ABOUT NEGOTIATION INNATE RISK AVERSION

 SHORT & LONG TERM EFFECT ON PARTIES RELATIONSHIP  WILL APPROACH CAUSE LOSS OF TRUST  WILL APPROACH CHANGE WAY DEALS / PROBLEMS HANDLED IN FUTURE  WILL RELATIONSHIP SURVIVE OUTCOME OF DEAL.

WOMEN DON’T ASK NEGOTIATION AND THE GENDER DIVIDE LINDA BABCOCK PROFESSOR OF ECONOMICS, CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC POLICY & MANAGEMENT

 GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY PROFESSOR OF SOCIOLINQUISTICS.  AUTHOR OF YOU JUST DON’T UNDERSTAND, NY TIMES BESTSELLER FOR 4 YEARS  LEADING PROPONENT OF DIFFERENCE VS. DOMINANCE THEORY

WE ARE SIMPLY TALKING ABOUT DIFFERENCES. NOT GOOD VS. EVIL, ONE BETTER THAN THE OTHER.

CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY MBA PROGRAM GRADUATES CAREER SERVICES MANDATORY PRESENTATION STRONGLY ADVISING GRADUATING STUDENTS TO NEGOTIATE THEIR JOB OFFERS

JOB OFFERS STARTING SALARIES MEN WERE 7.6 % HIGHER THAN WOMEN. 7% OF WOMEN NEGOTIATED THEIR SALARY OFFER 57% (8X) OF MEN NEGOTIATED THEIR SALARY OFFER

 ALL STUDENTS WHO NEGOTIATED STARTING SALARY INCREASED IT BY 7.4 %  SUGGESTING SALARY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN WOULD HAVE BEEN ELIMINATED IF EQUAL NUMBER OF WOMEN NEGOTIATED

 “BEFORE WE DECIDE TO NEGOTIATE WE MUST BE DISSATISFIED  NEED TO BELIEVE SOMETHING ELSE—MORE MONEY, A BETTER TITLE, A DIFFERENT DIVISION OF HOUSEHOLD CHORES—WOULD MAKE US HAPPIER IF STATUS QUO OK THEN WHY ASK FOR MORE? IRONICALLY, THIS TURNS OUT TO BE A BIG PROBLEM FOR WOMEN: BEING SATISFIED WITH LESS.”

 MEN INITIATE NEGOTIATION 3-4 TIMES AS OFTEN  MEN ACTIVE APPROACH TO GETTING WHAT THEY WANT BY ASKING.  MEN AND WOMEN DESCRIBE NEGOTIATION DIFFERENTLY.

A PROFESSIONAL WOMEN WHO ROUTINELY NEGOTIATES HER SALARY WILL EARN OVER $1 MILLION MORE THAN ACCEPTING WHAT’S OFFERED GAP IN WOMEN’S SALARIES AT AGE 30 OF $11K EQUALS $1.6 MILLION AT RETIREMENT

 WOMEN PREDICT STARTING SALARIES 3-32% LOWER THAN MEN.  WOMENS PREDICTIONS CAREER PEAK SALARIES 23-35% LOWER THAN MEN.  IF YOU BELIEVE LESS IS AVAILABLE YOU WILL COME AWAY WITH LESS.  WOMEN’S EARNINGS RELATIVE TO MEN’S HAS STAGNATED AT 73%.

 APPLICANTS WITH IDENTICAL EXPERIENCE & PERFORMANCE RECORDS BUT DIFFERENT SALARY HISTORIES RATED DIFFERENTLY BY EMPLOYERS.  BETTER COMPENSATION RECORD ASSUMES BETTER PERFORMANCE  EMPLOYERS RESPECT CANDIDATES FOR PUSHING TO GET PAID WHAT THEY FEEL THEY ARE WORTH.

 ASK YOURSELF “IF I DON’T MAKE THIS DEAL THEN...  KEEP BATNA IN MIND, DON’T LET EMOTIONS OVERWHELM  BE AWARE OF OTHERS BEST ALTERNATIVE

 PREPARE, YOU MUST  ALTERNATIVES, YOU MUST HAVE  REACTING, ALWAYS AVOID PEOPLE--PROBLEM, SEPARATION YOU MUST

 METICULOUS PLANNING,  EFFECTIVE STRATEGIZING,  AND, ALL AROUND PREPARATON  OTHERWISE, RESULTS OCCUR MORE BY CHANCE THAN NEGOTIATOR EFFORT.

 DILEMMA OF TRUST: HOW MUCH TO BELIEVE WHAT OTHER HAS TO SAY. ACTING IN YOUR BEST INTEREST?  DILEMMA OF HONESTY: HOW MUCH TO TELL THE OTHER PERSON.  ONE CAN ONLY MANAGE THESE DILEMMAS NOT ELIMINATE THEM.

 METICULOUS PLANNING,  EFFECTIVE STRATEGIZING,  AND, ALL AROUND PREPARATON  OTHERWISE, RESULTS OCCUR MORE BY CHANCE THAN NEGOTIATOR EFFORT.

 SEVEN-ELEMENTS APPROACH FOR PRE- NEGOTIATION PREPARATION. A FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING AND ANALYZING NEGOTIATION. ELEMENTS INCLUDE INTERESTS, LEGITIMACY, RELATIONSHIPS, ALTERNATIVES, OPTIONS, COMMITMENTS, AND COMMUNICATION.

PARTIES AND ISSUES: NOT SEPARATELY STATED AS ONE OF THE SEVEN ELEMENTS. IMPORTANT TO KNOW: STAKEHOLDERS; DECISION MAKERS. 1. RELATIONSHIP: NEGOTIATION IS INTERACTIVE. IT IS IMPORTANT WHEN WE NEED CONSENT OF OTHERS TO ACHIEVE OUR ENDS, WHEN WE CAN MEET OUR ENDS BETTER BY INVOLVING OTHERS, OR WHEN UNILATERAL MEANS ARE NOT MORALLY, SOCIALLY, OR POLITICALLY ACCEPTABLE.

2. INTERESTS: UNDERLYING DRIVERS OF THE NEGOTIATION. WHAT IS IMPORTANT TO YOU & WHY ? IMPORTANT TO THEM & WHY? 3. ALTERNATIVES: THINGS YOU CAN PURSUE AWAY FROM THE TABLE. IT IS ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND YOUR BEST ALTERNATIVE TO A NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT OR BATNA 4. COMMUNICATION: LISTENING MORE THAN YOU TALK. UNDERSTANDING THEM AND HAVING THEM UNDERSTAND YOU.

5. OPTIONS: TANGIBLE STEPS THAT SERVE INTERESTS AND CAN BE PART OF AN AGREEMENT (BRAINSTORMING) 6. LEGITIMACY: SOURCES OF JUSTIFICATION SUCH AS LEGAL STANDARDS OR PRECEDENTS, PROFESSIONAL NORMS, MARKET VALUE, SOCIAL OR ECONOMIC STANDARDS 7. COMMITMENT: HOW DO WE GUARANTEE WE BOTH WILL FOLLOW THROUGH ON OUR AGREEMENT

PROCESS AS IMPORTANT AS OUTCOME ASKING FOR A RAISE

ACHIEVING ONE’S GOALS IN NEGOTIATION WHILE HONORING VALUES, YOURS AND THEIRS AND MAINTAINING RELATIONSHIP

INFORMATION ASYMMETRIES  ONE PARTY HAS INFORMATION OTHER DOESN’T STRATEGIC OPPORTUNISM  NEITHER NEGOTIATOR KNOWS HOW FAR IT MIGHT BE POSSIBLE TO PUSH THE OTHER.

TO ANSWER YOU MUST KNOW: 1. HOW ACCURATE AND COMPLETE IS YOUR INFORMATION ? 2. OPPONENT’S STYLE ? 3. NEGOTIATION CULTURE ? 4. NEED TO REACH AGREEMENT? 5. YOUR/THEIR ALTERNATIVES ?

 PSYCHOLOGICAL ANXIETY RESULTING FROM CONTRADICTION BETWEEN SIMULTANEOUSLY HELD BELIEFS  OUR BRAINS DON’T LIKE MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE THOUGHTS AND WILL WORK HARD TO REMOVE CONFLICT.

1. IDENTIFY & DEFINE PROBLEM* 2. UNDERSTANDING PROBLEM BY UNCOVERING INTERESTS 3. GENERATE MUTUALLY BENEFICIAL SOLUTIONS 4. EVALUATE AGAINST OBJECTIVE CRITERIA AND SELECT *SEPARATE PEOPLE FROM PROBLEM

 POSITION IS SOMETHING YOU DECIDED AS END GOAL.  INTEREST IS WHAT CAUSED YOU TO DECIDE ON POSITION I.E., INTERESTS CREATE POSITIONS INTERESTS CREATE POSITIONS  DETERMINE INTERESTS ASKING “WHY” AND “WHY NOT” QUESTIONS WITHOUT USING THOSE WORDS.

 WHAT DO I WANT ?  WHY DO I WANT “IT” ?  WHAT ABOUT IT IS IMPORTANT ?  HOW WILL ACHIEVING IT HELP ME?  WHAT HAPPENS IF I DON’T ACHIEVE IT ?