Third International Mathematics and Science Study What does the study show? What does analysis of the data show later (NCES study 2003)? Watch video clips.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Shifts and Implications for Math Instruction Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Shifts and Implications.
Advertisements

Performance Assessment
Professional Development on the Instructional Shift of Focus Lets Focus on Focus.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Rigor
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Rigor Grade 2 Overview.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Rigor Grade 5.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Rigor
Kindergarten Instructional Shifts-Focus. Why Common Core? Initiated by the National Governors Association (NGA) and Council of Chief State School Officers.
CCSS Mathematics Instructional Shifts 2 nd Grade Overview.
First Grade Common Core State Standards Instructional Shifts: FOCUS.
2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Revised Training (Grades 6-12)
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Functions A Close Look at Grade 9 Module.
A mile wide and a foot deep vs. A foot wide and a mile deep
Mathematics and Science Indicators: Deciding on Measures that Matter Val Plisko National Center for Education Statistics 14th Annual Management Information.
Why this Research? 1.High School graduates are facing increased need for high degree of literacy, including the capacity to comprehend texts, but comprehension.
TIMSS VIDEO STUDY OF 8 th GRADE MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE TEACHING Please pick up two handouts!
The Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Common Core Development Initially 48 states and three territories signed on As of November 29, 2010,
Highlights from PIRLS and TIMSS 2011 Jack Buckley National Center for Education Statistics Washington, DC December 11, 2012.
Common Core State Standards Focus on Math Training Module II.
Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematical Success
NCTM’s Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making.
Part III. The Substance of Policy Analysis and Comparative Education Research Comparative Pedagogy.
Principles of Powerful Teaching and Learning for Social Studies
Chapter 3 Teaching Through Problem Solving
Principles of High Quality Assessment
ELEMENTARY MATH AND SCIENCE. The STAAR in Our Future: Math and Science Readiness/Supporting Think-Pair-Share Exploring Readiness Standards: Curriculum.
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
K–8 Session 3: Exploring the Domain Progressions in Grades K–8 Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.
Instructional Shifts for Mathematics. achievethecore.org 2 Instructional Shifts in Mathematics 1.Focus: Focus strongly where the Standards focus. 2.Coherence:
1 UTeach Professional Development Courses. 2 UTS Step 1 Early exposure to classroom environment (can be as early as a student’s first semester)
Three Shifts of the Alaska Mathematics Standards.
Philomath School District Board of Directors Work Session May 10, 2012.
K-12 Mathematics Common Core State Standards. Take 5 minutes to read the Introduction. Popcorn out one thing that is confirmed for you.
Mathematics Shift 1: Focus What the Student Does…What the Teacher Does…What the Principal Does… Spend more time thinking and working on.
Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition
2 nd Mathematics Meeting Wednesday, November 16 Agenda.
Adapted from Engageny.org. What the Student Does… What the Teacher Does… What the Principal Does… Spend more time thinking and working on fewer concepts.
Cutler Middle School February 4, 2014 Cutler Middle School February 4, 2014.
Railside High School Study
Research and Instructional Practices National Math Panel Meeting Stanford, CA November 6, 2006 James Hiebert, University of Delaware.
Common Core State Standards: The Shifts and their Implications Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
1. Principles Equity Curriculum Teaching 3 Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality mathematics programs.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Study Group 7 - High School Math (Algebra 1 & 2, Geometry) Welcome Back! Let’s.
District Learning Day August 5, 2015
Math & Science Collaborative Analyzing Mathematical Tasks and the Mathematical Task Framework.
+ College and Career Readiness. December present 46 of 50 states adopt Common Core Common Core State Standards.
+ Operations and Algebraic Thinking Success Implementing CCSS for K-2 Math Day 2.
Developing and Using Meaningful Math Tasks The Key to Math Common Core Take a moment to record on a sticky: What is a meaningful Math Task?
Presented by: Shawna Howard Research Professor: Andres Garcia, Ed.D
The Relationship between Elementary Teachers’ Beliefs and Teaching Mathematics through Problem Solving Misfer AlSalouli May 31, 2005.
Connecticut Algebra One for All
Developing and Using Meaningful Math Tasks The Key to Math Common Core Take a moment to record on a sticky: What is a meaningful Math Task?
Common Core Confessions of a Math Teacher. So, what is this Common Core thing all about? The standards define the knowledge and skills students should.
Using a Model Teaching Activity to Help Teachers Learn to Use Comparison in Algebra Kristie J. Newton, Temple University Jon R. Star, Nataliia Perova Harvard.
Mathematics in the Common Core 6 instructional shifts cassandra sponseller director of teaching and learning.
Developing Leaders in Effective Teaching Diane J. Briars President National Council of Teachers of Mathematics 2015 NCTM Minneapolis Regional.
Gayle Y. Thieman, Ed.D. PRINCIPLES OF POWERFUL TEACHING AND LEARNING In Social Studies.
Assessment without levels. Why remove levels?  levels were used as thresholds and teaching became focused on getting pupils across the next threshold.
Ayoub Kafyulilo DUCE Challenges and Opportunities of Integrating ICT in Education.
Program Design and Implementation – Problem Solving as a Process for Teaching Mathematics - Exploring relationships between participants’ teaching and.
Messages from Ofsted. Ofsted expects … … teachers to use their subject and pedagogical expertise to provide high quality teaching and curricular experiences.
Common Core State Standards: Myths vs. Facts
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 6
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 1
Fractions A Vertical Look 3-8.
Reflecting on Practice: Making Connections that Support Learning
Math Standards Math 120—Algorithms for Arithmetic
Math Shifts Focus Coherence Rigor
Lesson 8: Analyze an Argument
Presentation transcript:

Third International Mathematics and Science Study What does the study show? What does analysis of the data show later (NCES study 2003)? Watch video clips of classrooms - what types of teaching and learning are in effect? Stephen Hegedus, Department of Mathematics MTH310 - Spring 2006

From Attaining Exellence: A TIMSS Resource Kit, US DoE TIMSS ANSWERS THESE QUESTIONS: Are U.S. curricula and expectations as demanding as those of other nations? How does U.S. classroom instruction compare with that of other countries? Do U.S. teachers receive as much support in their efforts to teach students as their colleagues in other nations? Are U.S. students as focused on their studies as their international counterparts?

From Attaining Exellence: A TIMSS Resource Kit, US DoE How do our BEST 8th graders stack up? % in world’s top 10%

From Attaining Exellence: A TIMSS Resource Kit, US DoE EIGHTH-GRADE CURRICULA The eighth-grade mathematics curricula in Japan and Germany focus on algebra and geometry, while U.S. curricula still include considerable arithmetic. Topic coverage in U.S. eighth-grade mathematics classes is not as focused as in Germany and Japan (although in science, topic coverage may be similar to other countries in degree of focus). U.S. curricula are defined locally, whereas the curricula of most other nations are established nationally.

From Attaining Exellence: A TIMSS Resource Kit, US DoE EIGHTH-GRADE MATHEMATICS TEACHING What we teach in eighth-grade mathematics, most other countries teach in the seventh. The content of U.S. Eighth-grade mathematics lessons require less high-level thought than classes in Germany and Japan. The typical goal of a U.S. eighth-grade mathematics teacher is to teach students how to do something. The typical goal of a Japanese teacher is to help students understand mathematical concepts.

From Attaining Exellence: A TIMSS Resource Kit, US DoE Teachers’ Lives Unlike U.S. teachers, new Japanese and German teachers receive long-term structured apprenticeships in their profession. Japanese teachers have more opportunities to discuss teaching-related issues than so U.S. teachers. U.S. teachers have more college education than those in all but few TIMSS countries. Students diversity and poor discipline are challenges not only for U.S. teachers, but for their German colleagues as well.

From Attaining Exellence: A TIMSS Resource Kit, US DoE Students’ Lives Eighth-grade students of different abilities are typically divided into different classrooms in the United States and different schools in Germany. In Japan, no ability grouping is practiced. In the United States, students in higher level mathematics classes study different material than do students in lower level classes. In Germany and Japan, all students study the same material, although in Germany, lower level classes study it with less depth and rigor. Japanese eighth graders are preparing for a high- stakes examination to enter high school.

From Attaining Exellence: A TIMSS Resource Kit, US DoE Rethinking Common Beliefs- We Know the Problem Is NOT: TIME -- U.S. eighth-graders have more hours of instruction in mathematics and science that students in Japan or Germany, HOMEWORK -- U.S. students do as much or more. TV -- Japanese students watch as much TV, yet do better in school.

From Attaining Exellence: A TIMSS Resource Kit, US DoE Investment In TIMSS Provides objective assessment of where we stand in comparison to other countries. Shows aspects of U.S. education that deserve attention. Helps states and localities reflect on :world- class” education.

Procedural Complexity In NCES 2003 report on Seven countries in TIMSS1999: The complexity of the mathematics presented in the lessons is an important feature of the mathematics but it is difficult to define and code reliably. The complexity of a problem depends on a number of factors, including the experience and capability of the student. One kind of complexity that can be defined independent of the student is procedural complexity—the number of steps it takes to solve a problem using a common solution method. The mathematics problem analysis group developed a scheme for coding procedural complexity and analyzed every problem worked on or assigned during each eighth-grade mathematics lesson (independent and concurrent problems). Problems were sorted into low, moderate, or high complexity according to the following definitions:

Low complexity: Solving the problem, using conventional procedures, requires four or fewer decisions by the students (decisions could be considered small steps) The problem contains no sub-problems, or tasks embedded in larger problems that could themselves be coded as problems. ° Example: Solve the equation: 2x + 7 = 2. Moderate complexity: Solving the problem, using conventional procedures, requires more than four decisions by the students and can contain one sub-problem ° Example: Solve the set of equations for x and y: 2y = 3x - 4; 2x + y = 5. High complexity: Solving the problem, using conventional procedures, requires more than four decisions by the students and contains two or more sub-problems

Role of Mathematical Reasoning

How is Mathematical Reasoning developed? Focus on many or similarly related problems Broader problem-solving situations Unrelated problems lead to fragmented lessons

Broader Pedagogical Traits All countries introduced topics through problem solving. Japan and the Netherlands provided two comparatively distinct learning environments for students as defined by a few basic organizational features: Japanese eighth-grade mathematics lessons focused on presenting new content through solving a few problems, mostly as a whole class, with each problem requiring a considerable length of time In Dutch lessons, private work played a more central role, with eighth- grade students spending a larger percentage of time working on a set of problems, either reviewing old homework or starting on newly assigned homework. In these different structures, the teacher, the written curriculum materials, and the students would seem to play quite different roles.

Conclusion So if TIMSS is assessing complex problem- procedures which are procedurally defined then we have excellent benchmarks, If we are after the development of deep, conceptual problem-solving then we need to look further as the studies do show very different classroom cultures and pedagogies that have a direct impact on student performance.