Stream Monitoring in Loudoun County David Ward, Water Resources Engineer Department of Building and Development, Department of Building and Development,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Virginia Non-Agency Monitoring Program Overview of How VADEQ Incorporates Submitted Data.
Advertisements

TMDL Development Mainstem Monongahela River Watershed May 14, 2014.
Fecal Colform Bacteria Contamination during Rain Events in Sayler’s Creek, Virginia Blake N. Robertson Senior Honors Research Under the Supervision of.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions Third Generation Watershed Management Plan.
James Beckley. Virginia and DEQ Virginia has > 52,255 miles of rivers and streams 116,364 acres of significant lakes and reservoirs 2,684 square miles.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Imperial River: Water Quality Status and Basin Management Action Plan.
Adem.alabama.gov Incorporating NPS Intensive Surveys into ADEM’s Monitoring Strategy Southeastern Water Pollution Biologists’ Association Meeting Lake.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Status Report on Catoctin Creek - A Scenic River Darrell Schwalm Loudoun Watershed Watch.
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) TMDL Assessment ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
Community-based Education K-12 students serving as a resource for meeting community needs.
Catoctin TMDL Project Proposal for New Initiatives to Loudoun Watershed Management Stakeholders Steering Committee Loudoun Watershed Watch Data Compilation.
David Ward Loudoun Watershed Watch/Loudoun Wildlife Conservancy July 27, 2009.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Watershed Assessment 2015 Strategic Monitoring in the Florida Keys DEAR- Water Quality Assessment Program.
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Presented by Insert your name, title, and district Lower Hudson Coalition of Conservation Districts Volunteer Streamwalk Program Developed by the Westchester.
USGS Water Resource Monitoring and Assessment Activities Salinity and other topics presented to the Garfield County Energy Advisory Board Dec. 1, 2005.
Rogue Basin Water Quality Implementation Plans Greg Stabach, Natural Resources Project Manager Rogue Valley Council of Governments.
Loudoun Watershed Watch “ Restoring Loudoun Streams” LCSA Water Forum Presented by: Darrell Schwalm Loudoun Watershed Watch Loudoun Wildlife Conservancy.
Catoctin Creek: A Stream in Distress Catoctin Watershed Project A Partnership of County and Citizen Organizations.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
TMDLs on the Clearwater River Fecal Coliform Impairment of the Trout Stream Portion of the Clearwater River By Corey Hanson Water Quality Coordinator Red.
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program (SWQM)
Stream Monitoring Locations March 6, 2011 Banshee Reeks.
Red Lake Watershed District Water Quality Monitoring.
David Ward Goose Creek Association Forum March 24, 2010.
Dr. Matt Helmers Assistant Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer Dept. of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Iowa State University How is.
Loudoun County Water Resources Monitoring Presented to Loudoun Valley High School May 9, 2012 David Ward and Scott Sandberg Loudoun County Department of.
DEQ Water Supply Planning Integrating Monitoring, Modeling, and Scientific Study with Adaptive Management and Planning.
By Mary Waters, Texas Stream Team. Outline  About the Arroyo Colorado  Basic information (geography)  History  Major uses  Water quality summary.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water-Quality Monitoring: Data Collection and Analysis Strategies for Designing Program.
John Harrington, ACOG February 26, 2015 THE AQUIFER IN REVIEW.
Citizen Outreach in Loudoun County, Virginia Source Water Protection Webcast Communication, Regulatory, and Non- Regulatory Tools March 22, 2006 Presented.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Catoctin Creek TMDL Implementation Plan Development June 24, 2004.
HearneNWQMCMay06 1 A Review of Water Management Institutions in The Red River of the North Basin Robert R. Hearne Department of Agribusiness and Applied.
Pine and Mill Creek E. coli Stakeholder Meeting Pine and Mill Creek E. coli Stakeholder Meeting Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Water Bureau.
The Meadows Center Texas Stream Team Prepared in cooperation with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and U.S. EPA. The preparation of this presentation.
Staci Goodwin Senior TMDL Project Manager Office of Water Quality
Bacteria and Dissolved Oxygen Total Mass Daily Load Development for the Atascosa River Jessica L. Watts.
Reducing Nutrient Loads from the Opequon Creek Watershed Project Team Meeting Oct 19, 2007 Chesapeake Bay Targeted Watersheds Grant Program.
Regional Integrated Science Projects - Opequon Creek/Shenandoah River Basins Agencies Involved – USGS Water, Geology, GIO/ Geography, and Biology Disciplines,
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM’s Monitoring Summary Reports Alabama – Tombigbee CWP Stakeholders Meeting Montgomery, Alabama 3 February 2010 Lisa Huff – ADEM Field.
TMDLs on the Clearwater River Fecal Coliform Impairment of the Trout Stream Portion of the Clearwater River By Corey Hanson Water Quality Coordinator Red.
State of the Streams Loudoun County: 2005 Loudoun Strategic Watershed Management Planning Conference February 23, 2006 Presented by: Darrell Schwalm Loudoun.
Ch. 1: “Watersheds and Wetlands” Lesson 1.5: “Factors That Affect Wetlands and Watersheds” Part 2.
STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.
Session Chair:David Ward, Loudoun Watershed Watch Panelists:Gem Bingol, Piedmont Environmental Council Joe Ivers, PhD, Virginia Waters and Wetlands, Inc.
Water Quality Investigations How Does Land-Use Impact Water Quality? Mitigating Water Quality – Current Issues July 9, 2015 Jim Kipp, Associate Director.
Watershed Monitoring *Background Watershed Stewardship Plan-2004 Gap Projects IRWMP-Dec Policies SFEI study-2007 Joint TC/WC meeting-June 2010 *Proposed.
Commonwealth of Virginia TMDL Program Update Citizen for Water Quality Annual Summit September 22, 2001.
Eric Ferguson King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks November 4, 2015 Existing Conditions Assessment.
IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE Rice County Local Water Management Plan BOARD PRESENTATION JUNE 16, 2015.
CHRIS ZADAK AND RACHEL OLMANSON, METR0-ST. CROIX WATERSHED UNIT WATERSHED RESTORATION AND PROTECTION STRATEGY.
Watershed Management Plan Summary of 2014 Activities/Progress Presented by: Matthew Bennett, MS December 2014.
Mary Apostolico Potomac Watershed Manager. Current Authorities for TMDL Process Federal Clean Water Act, § 303(d) - TMDL List & TMDL Development §303(e)
Dave Clark and Michael Kasch
Project Schedule Final SWIM Plans GEBF Funding Request
Total Maximum Daily Loads Development for Holdens Creek and Tributaries, and Pettit Branch Public Meeting March 26, 2008.
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
Total Maximum Daily Loads of Fecal Coliform for the Restricted Shellfish Harvesting/Growing Areas of the Pocomoke River in the Lower Pocomoke River Basin.
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
303(d) List March 9, 2016 WQC Jeff Manning, DWR
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Presentation transcript:

Stream Monitoring in Loudoun County David Ward, Water Resources Engineer Department of Building and Development, Department of Building and Development, Water Resources Team Loudoun County, Virginia For Goose Creek Association “State of the Creek” Middleburg, VA March 12, 2009

Purpose  Summarize water resources programs and hydrologic monitoring  Highlight stream monitoring (citizens, government agencies such as Loudoun County, and Loudoun Soil and Water Conservation District)  Stream impairments (“Listing” by VA Dept Environmental Quality)

You are Here

Water Resources Programs  Water Resources Monitoring Program ( )  Strategic Watershed Management Solutions ( )  Comprehensive Watershed Management Program ( )  Wetlands Modeling ( )  Stream Assessment (2009)

Water Resources Monitoring Program (WRMP) TYPES OF DATA COLLECTED OR INCORPORATED:  Precipitation/Rainfall  Stream Stage & Discharge  Precipitation/Rainfall  Stream Stage & Discharge  Stream Water Quality  Groundwater Level  Stream Water Quality  Groundwater Level  Groundwater Quality  Stream Assessment  Groundwater Quality  Stream Assessment  Stream Monitoring  Stream Monitoring

Water Resources Monitoring Program (WRMP) DATA SOURCES: DATA SOURCES:  National Weather Service  U. S. Geological Survey  Dept. of Building & Development  Environmental Health permitting  Hydrogeologic studies for subdivision  VA DEQ  VA DEQ  Metro Wash. Council of Governments  Volunteer groups

Recent Streamflow in the Creeks Height of water in stream Flow rate in stream

Since 1966 Since 1910 Since 1972 Over 2.6 million stream flow readings, 15-minute in realtime

Obtained from USGS:

Six wells in Goose Creek and a third planned

Watershed Assessment  Comprehensive overlay analysis of watershed metrics including: imperviousness, water quality, population projections, karst, land use, forest, stormwater age, etc.  Goose Creek ranges from “maintain” in headwaters to “improve” in lower Goose Creek

Volunteer Stream Monitoring  Began in late 1990’s with Loudoun Soil and Water Conservation District, Loudoun Wildlife Conservancy, Audubon Naturalist and others.  In 2000 Stream Monitoring Project memorandum of understanding that was rebranded to Loudoun Watershed Watch.  Loudoun Watershed Watch partners monitored 249 times using ANS protocol.  Goose Creek Association monitored 272 times using VA SOS protocol.  In 2008 Loudoun Wildlife Conservancy changed to VA SOS protocol.

Water Quality Assessment and TMDLs  Every two years VA DEQ conducts Water Quality Assessment  Based on monitoring reaches of creek are assessed for criteria and if levels are exceeded, the reach is “listed” as being impaired  Once “listed”, DEQ is required to find out the source of the pollution and write a TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Load) report  After the source determination, DEQ may figure what can be done to correct in TMDL Implementation Plan  The Plan establishes the corrective action and funding  Based on the plan government (Dept Health and/or Dept Conservation & Recreation) oversee conducting the plan, often through Soil Water & Conservation District Monitor Assess “List” Impairment TMDL TMDL Implementation Plan Implement (Restoration) Monitor & Delist

VA DEQ Surface Water Quality  Ambient and trend stations for Chemical (N, P,Zn, Cu, pH, etc) and biological (E. Coli)  Over 44,000 measurements since early 70’s in Goose Creek watershed at 56 stations

Example: Monthly Median Total Phosphorus North Fork Goose Creek is often higher in fall, but are still below criteria

VA DEQ Benthic Monitoring  Benthic monitoring (Code name “ProbMon EDAS “)  More involved than VA SOS  Over 50 measurements in Goose Creek since 1994 at 14 stations and over 5,000 statewide

Subcategory 3 - Insufficient Data  Virginia 3A - No Data Available  Virginia 3B - Data Available But Insufficient Quantity  Virginia 3C - Citizen Monitoring Indicates Problem Waters Evaluated And Prioritized For Follow-Up Monitoring Waters Evaluated And Prioritized For Follow-Up Monitoring  Virginia 3D - Citizen Monitoring Indicates No Problems Goose Creek Data in 2008 Reference letter February 15, 2008 to Hazle Edens. 22 stations with 132 sample events Based on review of protocols and methods, dissolved oxygen, pH, temperature, and E. coli data are acceptable for VA Category 3C and 3D purposes. Dissolved oxygen was not accepted due to malfunctioning equipment.

New in 2008 – You can select which type of impairment: 1.Aquatic life (benthic-sediment) 2.Fish consumption 3.Public water supplies 4.Shellfish consumption 5.Recreation or swimming (bacteria) 6.Wildlife

Aquatic Life - Benthic Red  Impaired Green  Supporting (OK) Blue  No data Little River 98 North Fork Beaverdam Creek 08 Wancopin Creek 08 Goose Creek 98

David Ward