Todd Walter Stanford University

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
International Civil Aviation Organization
Advertisements

UTS:Faculty of Engineering and IT International Leaders in Practice-Based Education The 16th Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications 31 Oct. - 3 Nov.
FAA’s Plan for the Future Use of GPS Briefed By: Kanwaljit S. Sandhoo (MITRE/CAASD) 8th European CGSIC/IISC Meeting, Prague December 2-3, 1999.
1 CAR/SAM ATN GNSS SEMINAR VARADERO, CUBA May 8, 2002 Barry Billmann Federal Aviation Administration Presentation GNSS 3.2.
M. Gende 1,2, C. Brunini 1,2, F. Azpilicueta 1,2 Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina 1 CONICET, Argentina 2 La Plata Ionospheric Model as a tool.
Loran Integrity Performance Panel Loran Integrity & Performance Panel (LORIPP) Per Enge, Stanford University, November 2003 Based on the work of: Federal.
Ohio University Russ College of Engineering and Technology School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Avionics Engineering Center Ranjeet Shetty.
Introductory Comments. Selected Background Constellation (Currently ~29 on orbit) –Average Age on orbit about 9 years –IIF #1 not yet through Thermal.
Aviation Benefits of GNSS Augmentation Workshop on "GNSS Applications for Human Benefit and Development“ Prague, Czech Republic September 2010 Jeffrey.
Space Weather influence on satellite based navigation and precise positioning R. Warnant, S. Lejeune, M. Bavier Royal Observatory of Belgium Avenue Circulaire,
GPS - Global Positioning System Presented By Brindha Narayanan.
Workshop EGNOS KRAKÓW GNSS RECEIVER TESTING TECHNIQUES IN A LABORATORY ENVIRONMENT Institute of Radar Technology Military University of Technology.
Absolute Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (ARAIM)
Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) E. Douglas Aguilar CAPT, USAF.
GTECH 201 Session 08 GPS.
27 June 2000IAIN/ION Meeting1 Practical Implementation Considerations in the Detection of GPS Satellite Signal Failure A. J. Van Dierendonck, AJ Systems.
有朋自远方来,不亦乐乎 ! “How happy we are, to meet friends from afar!” - Confucius Welcome to Stanford!
Ground-Based Altimetry Using a Single- Receiver Single-Frequency GNSS Phase Ambiguity Resolution Technique G. Stienne* S. Reboul J.-B. Choquel M. Benjelloun.
GPS Status and Modernization Capt Damon Smith PNT Requirements Division Air Force Space Command "This briefing is for information only. No US Government.
EE 570: Location and Navigation: Theory & Practice The Global Positioning System (GPS) Thursday 11 April 2013 NMT EE 570: Location and Navigation: Theory.
Know the Earth…Show the Way NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Approved for Public Release NGA Case # NGA’s Role in GPS Barbara Wiley.
13/06/13 H. Rho Slide 1 Geodetic Research Laboratory Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick Evaluation of Precise.
Satellite-Based Augmentation Systems (SBAS) Combined Performance
Aviation Considerations for Multi-Constellation GNSS Leo Eldredge, GNSS Group Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) December 2008 Federal Aviation Administration.
0 Arctic Navigation Grace Xingxin Gao Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Stanford University.
© 2005 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. WAAS Integrity Risks: Fault Tree, “Threats”, and Assertions James (JP) Fernow 21 June 2005.
Aviation Benefits of GNSS Augmentation Workshop on the Applications of GNSS Chisinau, Moldova May 2010 Jeffrey Auerbach Advisor on GNSS Affairs Office.
Signal Deformation Proposal R. Eric Phelts, Gabriel Wong, Todd Walter, Per Enge Stanford University IWG 26 February 5-7, 2014.
Pg 1 of 12 AGI GPS Signal Simulation & Visualization Oct 11, 2005 Curtis Hay Spirent Federal Systems.
SVY 207: Lecture 4 GPS Description and Signal Structure
Introduction to the Global Positioning System Introduction to the Global Positioning System Pre-Work GPS for Fire Management
Introduction Dual Frequency SBAS = The solution for Ionosphere:
New Satellite Capabilities and Existing Opportunities Bill Kuo 1 and Chris Velden 2 1 National Center for Atmospheric Research 2 University of Wisconsin.
Page 1 SQM: SBAS Workshop ZETA ASSOCIATES 21 June 2005.
SBAS and GBAS Integrity for Non- Aviation Users: Moving Away from "Specific Risk" ION ITM 2011San Diego, CA. 25 January 2011 Sam Pullen, Todd Walter, and.
FAA GNSS Evolutionary Architecture Study
Integrity Overview Todd Walter Stanford University Bruce DeCleene FAA
10/7/ Innovative Solutions International Satellite Navigation Division ION NTM 01 Capabilities of the WAAS and EGNOS For Time Transfer SBAS, an Alternate.
GPS: Global Positioning System  The Geographer’s best friend!  You can say with confidence… “I’m not lost!, I’m never lost!”* *Of course, where everybody.
How Does GPS Work ?. Objectives To Describe: The 3 components of the Global Positioning System How position is obtaining from a radio timing signal Obtaining.
High Accuracy Nationwide Differential Global Positioning System (HA-NDGPS) UPDATE Jim Arnold September, 2009.
WAAS Test Program Overview & In-service Monitoring Tom McHugh, ATO-P (ACB-430) DOT/FAA W.J.H. Technical Center WAAS Technical Director
Spazio ZeroUno Cell Broadcast Forum Plenary, Milan, May 28-29th 2002 Andrea Ghirardini Business Development Spazio ZeroUno An efficient and effective method.
Shankar Ramakrishnan, Jiyun Lee, Sam Pullen and Per Enge
NAVSTAR GPS Mike Mickelson KD8DZ 08 Dec GPS BASICS.
T. Sakai, T, Yoshihara, S. Saito, K. Matsunaga, and K. Hoshinoo, ENRI T. Walter, Stanford University T. Sakai, T, Yoshihara, S. Saito, K. Matsunaga, and.
Airborne GPS Positioning with cm-Level Precisions at Hundreds of km Ranges Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey Silver Spring, MD National Geodetic.
Ionospheric Integrity Lessons from the WIPP Todd Walter Stanford University Todd Walter Stanford University
Introduction To Localization Techniques (GPS)
Present and Future of China Satellite-Based Augmentation System China Satellite Navigation Office February 2014.
The Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) Todd Walter Stanford University Todd Walter Stanford University
© 2014 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. SBAS IWG #26 Meeting Delhi, India 5-7 February 2014 Roland Lejeune RTCA SC-159 Working Group 2 Summary.
Global Positioning System Overview
Presented by: Technical contributions from: THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GEODESY AND PRECISE POINT POSITIONING.
Constructing a Continuous Phase Time History from TDMA Signals for Opportunistic Navigation Ken Pesyna, Zak Kassas, Todd Humphreys IEEE/ION PLANS Conference,
Key RO Advances Observation –Lower tropospheric penetration (open loop / demodulation) –Larger number of profiles (rising & setting) –Detailed precision.
EE 495 Modern Navigation Systems
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 Modes of GPS Positioning Aim of this lecture: –To review and compare methods of static positioning, and introduce methods for kinematic.
SVN-49 / PRN-01 Lessons Learned International Committee on GNSS (ICG-4) Working Group A Saint Petersburg, Russia 15 September 2009 Colonel David B. Goldstein,
AXK/JPL SBAS Training at Stanford University, October 27-30, 2003 Satellite Based Augmentation Systems Brazilian Ionosphere Group Training at Stanford.
GPS Modernization & WAAS
THE METHOD OF GNSS POSITIONING AVAILABILITY CONTROL FOR TRANSPORTATION APPLICATIONS Prof. Dr. Eng. Demyanov V.V, Assistant lecturer Likhota R.V. Irkutsk.
S. Datta-Barua, Illinois Institute of Technology G. S. Bust, JHUAPL
GPS - Global Positioning System
EE 495 Modern Navigation Systems
Agenda Item 6 GNSS Development Status and Future Work Eric Chatre, EC/ESA Rapporteur Technical WG, GNSS Panel Thank you… Good morning… I am ... and.
Todd Walter Stanford University
Loran Integrity & Performance Panel (LORIPP)
Performance requirements update
International Civil Aviation Organization
Presentation transcript:

Todd Walter Stanford University http://waas.stanford.edu ARAIM Threat List Todd Walter Stanford University http://waas.stanford.edu

Threats Threats are used to describe feared events that may prevent a GNSS system from safely operating Categorized by sources and effects Signal-in-space Propagation environment User environment Quantitative values often are implementation specific

Scope of Threat Nominal Narrow fault Wide fault Ultra-wide fault Fault-free but imperfect Always present on all satellites, but may vary over time, location, etc. Narrow fault Affects each satellite independently Wide fault Fault that can affect multiple satellites within a constellation Ultra-wide fault Fault that can affect many satellites across all constellations

Wide & Ultra-Wide Threats Earth Orientation Prediction Parameters (EOPPs) are used to convert orbit estimates from an Earth Centered Inertial (ECI) to the ECEF frame They are very slowly changing They are determined by international bodies If incorrect, they produce a consistent, but erroneous position error Other faults at the control center could affect multiple satellites A satellite design flaws could manifest to affect many satellites at once

Threat Table 1-Clock and Ephemeris 2-Signal Deformation   Nominal Narrow fault Wide fault 1-Clock and Ephemeris Orbit/clock estimation and prediction and broadcast limits Includes clock runoffs, bad ephemeris, unflagged maneuvers Erroneous EOPP, inadequate manned ops, ground-inherent failures 2-Signal Deformation Nominal differences in signals due to RF components, filters, and antennas waveform distortion Failures in satellite payload signal generation components. Faulted signal model as described in ICAO N/A 3-Code-Carrier Incoherence e.g. incoherence observed in IIF L5 signal or GEO L1 signals 4-IFB Delay differences in satellite payload signal paths Incorrect estimation or erroneous uploads 5-Satellite Antenna Bias Look-angle dependent biases caused at satellite antennas 6-Ionospheric Nominal ionosphere error (after applying SBAS corrections) Ionospheric disturbances and scintillation 7-Tropospheric Nominal troposphere error (after applying SBAS MOPS model) 8-Receiver Noise and Multipath Nominal noise and multipath terms in airborne model e.g.: receiver tracking failure or multipath from onboard reflector e.g.: receiver tracking multiple failure or multipath from onboard reflectors

References Walter, T., Enge, P., and DeCleene, B., “Integrity Lessons from the WAAS Integrity Performance Panel (WIPP),” Proceedings of the 2003 National Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation, Anaheim, CA, January 2003, pp. 183-194. Jefferson, D. C. and Bar-Sever, Y. E., “Accuracy and Consistency of GPS Broadcast Ephemeris Data,” in Proceeding of ION GPS-2000, Salt Lake City, UT, September 2000. Warren, D. L. M. and Raquet, J. F., “Broadcast vs Precise GPS Ephemerides: A Historical Perspective,” Proceedings of the 2002 National Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation, San Diego, CA, January 2002, pp. 733-741. Creel, T., Dorsey, A. J., Mendicki, P. J., Little, J., Mach, R. G., Renfro, B. A., “Summary of Accuracy Improvements from the GPS Legacy Accuracy Improvement Initiative (L-AII),” Proceedings of the 20th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2007), Fort Worth, TX, September 2007, pp. 2481-2498. Heng, L., Gao, G. X., Walter, T., Enge, P., “Statistical Characterization of GPS Signal-In-Space Errors,” Proceedings of the 2011 International Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation, San Diego, CA, January 2011, pp. 312-319. Hansen, A., Walter, T., Lawrence, D., and Enge, P., “GPS Satellite Clock Event of SV#27 and Its Impact on Augmented Navigation Systems,” in proceedings of ION GPS-98, Nashville, TN, September 1998.

References Shank, C. M. and Lavrakas, J. “GPS Integrity: An MCS Perspective,” in Proceeding of ION GPS-1993, Salt Lake City, UT, September 1993. Rivers, M. H., “2 SOPS Anomaly Resolution on an Aging Constellation,” Proceedings of the 13th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GPS 2000), Salt Lake City, UT, September 2000, pp. 2547-2550. Gratton, L., Pramanik, R., Tang, H., Pervan, B., “Ephemeris Failure Rate Analysis and its Impact on Category I LAAS Integrity,” Proceedings of the 20th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2007), Fort Worth, TX, September 2007, pp. 386-394. Heng, L., Gao, G. X., Walter, T., Enge, P., “GPS Signal-in-Space Anomalies in the Last Decade: Data Mining of 400,000,000 GPS Navigation Messages,” Proceedings of the 23rd International Technical Meeting of The Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2010), Portland, OR, September 2010, pp. 3115-3122. Phelts, R.E., Walter, T., Enge, P., “Characterizing Nominal Analog Signal Deformation on GNSS Signals,” Proceedings of the 22nd International Technical Meeting of The Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2009), Savannah, GA, September 2009, pp. 1343-1350. [13] Wong, G., Phelts, R.E., Walter, T., and Enge, P., “Bounding Errors Caused by Nominal GNSS Signal Deformations,” Proceedings of the 24th International Technical Meeting of The Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2011), Portland, OR, September 2011.

References Hsu, P. H., Chiu, T., Golubev, Y., and Phelts, R.E. “Test Results for the WAAS Signal Quality Monitor,” Proceedings of IEEE/ION PLANS 2008, Monterey, CA, May 2008, pp. 263-270. Gordon, S., Sherrell, C., Potter, B.J., “WAAS Offline Monitoring,” Proceedings of the 23rd International Technical Meeting of The Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2010), Portland, OR, September 2010, pp. 2021-2030. Montenbruck, O., Hauschild, A., Steigenberger, P., and Langley, R. B., “Three’s the Challenge,” GPS World, July, 2010 Walter, T., et al. “Robust Detection of Ionospheric Irregularities,” in NAVIGATION, Journal of the Institute of Navigation, vol. 48, no. 2, Summer 2001. Klobuchar, J., et al., “Ionospheric Issues for a SBAS in the Equatorial Region,” in proceedings of the 10th International Ionospheric Effects Symposium, Alexandria, VA, May, 2002. Rajagopal, S., Walter, T., Datta-Barua, S., Blanch, J., and Sakai, T., “Correlation Structure of the Equatorial Ionosphere,” Proceedings of the 2004 National Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation, San Diego, CA, January 2004, pp. 542-550.

References Datta-Barua, S., Walter, T., Pullen, S., Luo, M., and Enge, P., “Using WAAS Ionospheric Data to Estimate LAAS Short Baseline Gradients,” in Proceeding of ION NTM, San Diego, CA, January, 2002. Datta-Barua, S., Lee, J., Pullen, S., Luo, M., Ene, A., Qiu, D., Zhang G., and Enge, P., “Ionospheric Threat Parameterization for Local Area GPS-Based Aircraft Landing Systems,” AIAA Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 47, No. 4, Jul. 2010, pp. 1141-1151. Sparks, L., et al., “The WAAS Ionospheric Threat Model,” in Proceedings of the International Beacon Satellite Symposium, Boston, June, 2001. Walter, T., Rajagopal, S., Datta-Barua, S., and Blanch, J., “Protecting Against Unsampled Ionospheric Threats,” in proceedings of Beacon Satellite Symposium, Trieste, Italy, October 2004. Collins, J. P. and Langley, R. B., “The residual tropospheric propagation delay: How bad can it get?,” in proceedings of ION GPS-98, Nashville, TN, September 1998. Shallberg, K., Shloss, P., Altshuler, E., and Tahmazyan, L., “WAAS Measurement Processing, Reducing the Effects of Multipath,” in Proceeding of ION GPS-2001, Salt Lake City, UT, September 2001.

References Shallberg, K. and Sheng, F., “WAAS Measurement Processing; Current Design and Potential Improvements,” Proceedings of IEEE/ION PLANS 2008, Monterey, CA, May 2008, pp. 253-262. Shallberg, K. and Grabowski, J., “Considerations for Characterizing Antenna Induced Range Errors,” Proceedings of the 15th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GPS 2002), Portland, OR, September 2002, pp. 809-815. Haines, B., Bar-Sever, Y., Bertiger, W., Byun, S., Desai S., and Hajj, G., “GPS Antenna Phase Center Variations: New Perspectives From the GRACE Mission,” Dynamic Planet 2005, Cairns, Australia. Wilson, B., Yinger, C., Feess, W., and Shank, C., “New and Improved - The Broadcast Interfrequency Biases,” GPS World Magazine, August, 1999