Subsidized Guardianship Permanency Initiative. SG Introduction Focuses on improving permanency outcomes for children in out-of-home care through a comprehensive.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Indiana IV-E Waiver Original Demonstration 1998 – 2002 Informal Extension 2002 – 2005 Current Extension
Advertisements

Expedited Family Reunification Project
Title IV-E Guardianship Assistance Program (GAP) Liliana Hernandez, Childrens Bureau Child Welfare Program Specialist September 2010.
Illinois Guardianship Assistance Waiver and GAP Implementation September 15, 2010.
1 Definitions and Examples of Practices vs. Services in Child Welfare The Service Array Process The National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational.
Community Based Care in Florida and the IV-E Waiver.
First National Conference on Substance Abuse, Child Welfare and the Dependency Court Improving the Child Welfare System’s Response to Families Affected.
1 North Dakota Children and Family Services Review Paul Ronningen, Division Director Don Snyder, Permanency Unit Manager.
Yes No Is the student 18 years old or older? ? Surrogate Parent Decision-Making Flowchart.
Planning With Youth in Transition Tips, Tools and Techniques.
Child Welfare Services Family centered services to achieve well- being through ensuring self-sufficiency, support, safety, and permanence. Dual tracks-
PERMANENCY PLANNING. Permanency Planning  How is it defined?  What does it mean for parents? For children?
Return to Parent (Reunification) AdoptionPLC Fit and Willing Relative APPLA
Adoption S 10A of the Children and Young Persons (care and Protection) Act S46(2)(B) of the Adoption Act.
White Earth Indian Child Welfare Initiative 2010
How do McLean County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? McLean County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement23350%
How do Peoria County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Peoria County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement19235%
C hildren and F amily Research Center University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign School of Social Work TM Mark Testa & Leslie Cohen January 2005 Family.
1 Agency/Court Collaboration in the CFSR: ENGAGING COURTS AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM The National Child Welfare Resource Center For Organizational Improvement.
Minnesota and Wisconsin CHIPS processes
Increasing Child Welfare Permanency Options: The Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment Program Daniel Webster, MSW, PhD University of California, Berkeley.
Findings From the Initial Child and Family Service Reviews
WELCOME!. INTRODUCTIONS Name Office Location? Program Area Just the Basics…We’ll be getting more info next.
Mission: Protect the Vulnerable, Promote Strong and Economically Self- Sufficient Families, and Advance Personal and Family Recovery and Resiliency. Charlie.
Next Generation Child Welfare Traineeship Program September Colloquium Presentation Friday, September 11, 2009 Whitney M. Young, Jr. School of Social Work.
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
FTMs and Foster Care Policy Kenny A: FTMs are to be held within 3-9 days after a child comes into care Held to make any key decisions regarding placement.
An introduction to for Caregivers. The Alliance for Child Welfare Excellence is Washington’s first comprehensive statewide training partnership dedicated.
1 Child Welfare Improvement Overview House Appropriations Subcommittee Kathryne O’Grady, Deputy Director Michigan Department of Human Services September.
Memo Series Overview  Requirements  Frequently Asked Questions  Reports  Reporting to the Federal Government Did Wisconsin Make the target.
Wisconsin Indian Child Welfare Act November 5, 2009.
AB490 + San Francisco County’s Interagency Agreement.
Data Quality Initiative-Update May 14, Data Quality Initiative The eWiSACWIS Data Quality Initiative will support counties, the BMCW and the Special.
Children in Care. What is a Corporate Parent? Either through agreement with their parents, or through court proceedings, children might come to be cared.
June Release 3.2 June 23 rd, Person Management Workers will no longer receive an unnecessary pop-up when editing an address on the Person.
940: Concurrent Planning for Resource Parents. The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center Learning Objectives Participants will be able to: Define.
SSIS as a Case Management Tool Nan Beman Anne Broskoff.
1 Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare Report to the Community January 13, 2006 Jan. – Dec Progress summary of 2005  Safety  Permanence  Well-Being.
DIAKON Lutheran Social Ministries/Family Design Resources Tools That Work Conference 11/03 Implementing Best Practice Standards in Permanency Planning.
Implementing Fully Every Tool in the Child Welfare Toolbox Chuck Johnson President and CEO National Council For Adoption.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
Permanency Planning From Day One. Every child is born with the beautiful potential to become wonderful human beings who experience love, joy, growth and.
Administration for Children and Families Children’s Bureau Fostering Connections Implementation Support & Resources CAPTA 2010 – Highlights.
PL THE PREVENTING SEX TRAFFICKING AND STRENGTHENING FAMILIES ACT WASHINGTON STATE'S RESPONSE TO THE PREVENTING SEX TRAFFICKING AND STRENGTHENING.
Georgia Georgia’s Lead Agency Plan Georgia 2 KVC Behavioral Healthcare The lead agency in the North East Region of Kansas and Metro Kansas City, Kansas.
Understanding Applicable Laws in Child Protection and Child Welfare Cases: Presentation at TCAP Tribal Courts Conference – Minneapolis August 20, 2015.
Race and Child Welfare: Exits from the Child Welfare System Brenda Jones Harden, Ph.D. University of Maryland College Park Research Synthesis on Child.
Kamala H. Shugar Assistant Attorney in Charge Oregon Department of Justice Child Advocacy Section.
Child In Need of Care (CINC) Code Guardians ad litem Nuts and Bolts October 2015.
1 CHILDREN SAFE AND THRIVING WITH FOREVER FAMILIES, SOONER DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES Isabel Blanco, Deputy Director of Field Operations September.
11/28/12 1 CALIFORNIA FOSTERING CONNECTIONS TO SUCCESS ACT Version 2.0 Assembly Bill 12.
Case Planning Jeopardy! Tick-Tock The Main Course It’s the Law Practice Paradise GO TO FINAL OUTCOMES JEOPARDY!
Family Assessment Response. Welcome & Introduction Introduce yourself to the group: 1.Name 2.Work location 3.Work title 4.What is it about FAR that brought.
Georgia DFCS Outcome- Based Permanency Initiative A Proposal to Introduce Performance- Based Contracting and Partner for CFSR Success.
Provincial Permanency Data Results for DFNAs and CFSAs Prepared by Service Analysis Branch May 27, 2009.
Closing the Gap for Skipped- Generation Households.
Federal Updates on Kinship Care
Completing the circle: concurrent planning and the use of Family Finding, Blended perspective meetings, and family group decision making processes.
Hon. Karen R. Carroll February 12, 2018
Presented by Hill Country CASA
The Current State of Foster Care in Virginia
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
Foster Care Updates and Issues
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services January 23, 2015
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
DIVISION E—HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES EXTENDERS
Foster Care to 21 Carl E. Ayers, MSW
Florida’s New Guardianship Assistance Program
Review of Title IV-E Waiver Opportunity
Presentation transcript:

Subsidized Guardianship Permanency Initiative

SG Introduction Focuses on improving permanency outcomes for children in out-of-home care through a comprehensive Guardianship Permanency Initiative that promotes guardianship as a permanency option, the use of relatives as permanency resources, and family-based permanency planning for children.

SG Introduction Is consistent with the purposes of Titles IV- B and IV- E of the Social Security Act in providing child welfare services, including preserving the safety of children, protecting the rights of children and their families; and ensuring permanency for children in placement. Will be cost neutral to the state and federal governments for the duration of the waiver period. Will not impact the eligibility of children and families for other benefits.

SG Implementation The subsidized guardianship program will be initially implemented in Milwaukee County, where child welfare services are operated by the DCFS Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare. The waiver includes the potential for expansion of the subsidized guardianship program to other areas of the state during the course of the five-year waiver period.

SG Evaluation/Reporting The demonstration will be independently evaluated to determine the effectiveness of the program, including using random assignment as a basis for conducting the evaluation. Costs for the demonstration project will be tracked using a federally-approved method for computing cost neutrality. Costs for the demonstration project will be reported in accordance with federal waiver requirements.

SG Design The Guardianship Permanency Initiative is designed to promote the utilization of guardianship as a permanency outcome by providing a financial subsidy equivalent to foster care payments to those caretakers willing to become permanent legal guardians for children in out-of-home care. By making guardianship a financially viable option, the Initiative will allow a more comprehensive, family-friendly approach to permanency planning for those children for whom reunification is not possible. The Initiative will focus on increased permanency for children placed with relatives through both adoption and guardianship to ensure that children do not remain in the child welfare service system solely for payment reasons. By achieving permanency for these children, the Initiative will allow case manager staff and the courts to concentrate on other cases, allowing more effort to be focused on cases with greater challenges to permanency.

SG Principles Improving permanency outcomes for children and families through more effective permanency planning that is family-focused. Promoting the use of relatives as foster care placement resources. Ensuring the safety and well being of children through permanent placements with caring adults whom will raise the children to adulthood. Providing services to families in ways that address the needs of children but minimizes the public child welfare involvement in the lives of families. Operating the guardianship subsidy program in a manner similar to the adoption assistance program.

SG Expansion The Title IV-E waiver request includes the potential to expand the Guardianship Permanency Initiative to other areas of Wisconsin. The guardianship program will be of interest to counties statewide serving children placed with relatives and may be of particular benefit in achieving permanency for certain populations, such as Native American Indian children. Using the initial experience in Milwaukee to develop the guardianship program, expansion will be based on the interest of other counties to participate in the program and the feasibility of expanding the program to other counties. Factors affecting the feasibility of expansion will include reaching an agreement between the State and counties regarding financial responsibility for guardianship payments and counties agreeing to participate in the program evaluation required by the Title IV-E waiver.

SG Statutes/Process Current Wisconsin law provides for two types of guardianship for children. Under Chapter 48 Wis. Stats., known as the Children Code, permanent legal guardianship can be awarded under s to relatives of children who have been placed with the relatives to protect the children from abuse and neglect. The Guardianship Permanency Initiative focuses on s guardianships for children in out-of-home care, including children in both licensed foster care and court-ordered Kinship Care. While Chapter 880 guardianship is used with some child welfare cases, Chapter 880 guardianship is not a permanency outcome and thus is outside the scope of the Guardianship Permanency Initiative.

SG Statutes/Process (cont.) State law under Chapter 48 will be revised as part of the Guardianship Permanency Initiative to clarify the nature of s guardianship as a permanency outcome and to allow the payment of guardianship subsidies. Guardianship will be awarded with permanence for children as the utmost concern so guardianships will not be easily disrupted. The guardianship process will include thoroughly educating caretakers about the responsibilities of guardianship and the differences between adoption and guardianship. The guardianship process will include discussions of contingency arrangements to ensure that children will be cared for in the event that the guardian dies or becomes incapacitated before the children reach adulthood.

SG Statutes/Process (cont.) As part of the state legislation, s guardianship will be expanded to allow persons other than relatives to become guardians. This change will allow extended family members and family friends who do not meet the statutory definition of a relative to be guardians under s The expansion of s will be applied narrowly and relatives will continue to be the primary focus for guardianships.

SG Increased Permanency Guardianship will be promoted as a permanency option to achieve higher rates of permanency for children in stable foster care placements, primarily placements with relatives. Guardianship will be pursued only for children for whom reunification with the biological parents has been actively pursued and ruled out as a permanency option. Under the initiative, guardianship will typically be presented concurrently with adoption and other alternative permanency options to assist caretakers to understand the full range of options available and pursue the option that best addresses the needs and circumstances of the particular children. Adoption and other alternative permanency goals will not have to be formally ruled out before pursuing guardianship to avoid unnecessarily extending the stay in foster care. In many cases, guardianship will be considered as a concurrent permanency goal. Adoption will be thoroughly considered, however, before pursuing guardianship.

SG Eligibility Under the guardianship program, eligibility for guardianship subsidy payments will be limited to children who have been in licensed out-of-home care for a minimum of one year. Exceptions will be made to the one-year period for children for whom reasonable efforts at reunification are not required. The one-year period will ensure that reunification is actively pursued for children and ruled out as a permanency option before proceeding to guardianship. The one-year requirement will apply to the overall foster care episode, not the child's current placement. For a caretaker to be approved as guardian, the child will need to have been successfully placed with the caretaker for several months to demonstrate the stability of the placement.

SG Outcomes Fewer children remaining in foster care on a long- term basis. Increased rates of permanency for guardianship and adoption. Increased use of relatives as placement resources. Fewer disrupted placements of children. No increase in subsequent reports of abuse or neglect. Reduced administrative costs for case management services.

SG and eWiSACWIS The Subsidized Guardianship (SG) functionality in eWiSACWIS tracks children that are a part of the IV-E Waiver program. These children are currently a part of a family case and are generally placed in an out of home placement with a relative. Once the decision has been made to place the child in a Subsidized Guardianship placement the following is completed: SG Agreement via Create > Placement > Subsidized Guardianship Agreement. Legal Action, Legal Status, Court Documents, Case Notes, etc… Program assignment of 'Subsidized Guardianship' for the child via Utilities > Program Assignment. Child is deactivated from the biological family case for reason of ‘SG’ (similar to how a child is deactivated from a case for reason of ‘TPR’). From the Maintain Case page: select the De-Activate link for the child who is to be deactivated for Subsidized Guardianship. On the Participant Status page, select ‘Subsidized Guardianship’ in the Reason field. The Effective Date field will populate with the date entered in the Date of Agreement field on the Subsidized Agreement. Once a child is deactivated, an overnight system batch will end the current Out of Home placement in the family case, create a Subsidized Guardianship type of In-Home Service in the SG case and assign the case to the Default State SG worker.

What does it look like?

SG - Agreement

SG - Program Assignment

SG - Maintain Case

SG - Deactivate