C. 4 Lawyer's Duty of Confidentiality1 Professional Responsibility Ch. 4 The Lawyer’s Duty of Confidentiality Ch. 4 The Lawyer’s Duty of Confidentiality.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Electronic Discovery Guidelines Meet and Confer - General definition. a requirement of courts that before certain types of motions and/or petitions will.
Advertisements

92 S.W.3d 419 (Tex. 2002) Megan Marquardt November 22, 2010
LEGAL 101 – Two Favourite Concepts: 1.Without Prejudice and 2.Client Legal Privilege THINK.CHANGE.DO.
John Steele, Attorney at Law
1 WHAT CAN I DO ABOUT OPPOSING COUNSEL TALKING TO OUR EMPLOYEES? James H. Gilliam BrownWinick 666 Grand Avenue, Suite 2000 Des Moines, IA Telephone:
Beating Back the Assault Scott O’Connell Nixon Peabody Boston, MA Manchester, NH Attorney Client Privilege.
 Two Privileges; Different Purposes ◦ Attorney-Client Privilege ◦ Attorney Work Product Privilege ◦ Implicit assumption: “privilege and work product.
© The McCoy Law Firm 2012 James McCoy The McCoy Law Firm Coit Rd., Ste. 560 Dallas, Texas (214)
© 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Attorney Advertising The Global Law Firm for Israeli Companies Dispute Resolution in the United States.
1 As of April 2014 Proposed Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP)
E-Discovery New Rules of Civil Procedure Presented by Lucy Isaki January 23, 2007.
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Litigation and Procedure Discovery: Overview and Interrogatories Litigation and Procedure.
Freedom of Information Act Exemption 5. Exemption 5 Threshold “Inter-agency or intra-agency memorandums or letters which would not be available by law.
Ethical Issues in Data Security Breach Cases Presented by Robert J. Scott Scott & Scott, LLP
Confidentiality A Defining Duty. What are sources of confidentiality obligations? Constitutional law Disciplinary rules Fiduciary responsibility Court.
Week Duty to keep quiet, not talk about cases By product of Fiduciary Duty 2. Right not to be forced to testify about communications --Statutory.
BELMONT UNIVERSITY AMERICAN INN OF COURT SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 PRESENTED BY KRISANN HODGES DEPUTY CHIEF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL - LITIGATION BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL.
COUNSEL: ETHICS TRAINING IS FOR YOU, TOO! Presentation to the SACRS Attorney Breakout November 12, 2008 Harvey L. Leiderman & Jeffrey R. Rieger.
PRIVILEGE A general overview David Musker, EPA R G C Jenkins, London.
Privilege, Privacy, and Waiver. Privilege Attorney/Client In the law of evidence, a client's privilege to refuse to disclose, and to prevent any other.
D E N V E R L A S V E G A S O R A N G E C O U N T Y P H O E N I X S A L T L A K E C I T Y T U C S O N Nevada Ethics Update for In-House Counsel Cynthia.
Welcome to Class INTRODUCTION TO LEGAL TECHNOLOGY.
Evidence Professor Cioffi 3/15/2011 – 3/16/2011.
Professional Responsibility Law 115 Wed., Oct. 17.
1 Best Practices in Legal Holds Effectively Managing the e-Discovery Process and Associated Costs.
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Interviewing & Investigation LAW-123 Introduction to Interviewing and Investigating.
Scott F. Johnson Maureen MacFarlane.  Attorneys have a myriad of ethical obligations  This presentation covers some of those obligations and considers.
1 Sixth National HIPAA Summit The Health Lawyer as Business Associate March 28, 2003 Session VI 3:00 pm Gerald E. DeLoss, Esquire Barnwell Whaley Patterson.
Legal Ethics for Social Services Attorneys Institute of Government 2006.
© 2003 Rule 1.9. Duties to Former Clients (a) A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person.
John B. Pegram Fish & Richardson P.C. International harmonization of Attorney-Client privilege 1 © AIPLA 2015.
AIPLA Annual Meeting 2014 Corporate Breakfast Stephen E. Bondura Dority & Manning, P.A. October 23, 2014 Preserving Privilege in Prosecution Matters 1.
1 EFFECTIVE IN-HOUSE COMMUNICATIONS AND PRESERVING THE PRIVILEGES Presented By: John Eldridge Haynes and Boone, LLP (713) and Chris Chaffin BMC.
P ROTECTING Y OUR C LIENT ’ S C ONFIDENTIAL I NFORMATION : ESI, P RIVILEGE, AND FRE 502 ABA Center For Professional Responsibility 41st Annual National.
Rules of Discovery and Privileged Communications Court Systems and Practices.
Investigating & Preserving Evidence in Data Security Incidents Robert J. Scott Scott & Scott, LLP
Privacy, Confidentiality and Duty to Warn in School Guidance Services March 2006 Disclaimer - While the information in these slides are designed to reflect.
Attorney-Client Privilege and Privacy Considerations Between US Corporations & Foreign Affiliates General Counsel Conference, Washington, D.C. October.
Discovery III Expert Witness Disclosure And Discovery Motions & Sanctions.
1 Can You Keep A Secret? How the Attorney- Client and Self-Evaluative Privileges Can Apply to Your Compliance Practice Pamela J. Grimm
E-Discovery: Understanding the 2006 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure amendments, continuing complaints, and speculation about more rule changes to come.
Attorney-Client Privilege Issues
Mon. Nov. 26. Work Product “Privilege” A witness, X, who is friendly to the D was interviewed by P’s attorney and a statement was drawn up Is there any.
The Challenge of Rule 26(f) Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer July 15, 2011.
Material Covered in Assignment 4-1: The Attorney-Client Privilege A. Rationale for the Attorney-Client Privilege (p. 318) B. Criteria for Attorney-Client.
Metadata – A Summary of Important Concepts and Opinions.
Chapter Three Confidentiality In this chapter, you will learn about: Basic principles of confidentiality The attorney-client privilege and the difference.
John Steele, Attorney at Law. 2 Confidentiality 3 Topics 1. Definitions 2. Comparison 3. ABA Approach 1. Rule; Exceptions; Other rules 4. California.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION DISCOVERY OVERVIEW.
ETHICS: CONFIDENTIALITY OF IFTA DATA IFTA ATTORNEYS’ SECTION MEETING October 7, :30-10:00 a.m. Jim Clark Motor Carrier Services Attorney Indiana.
Session 8 Confidentiality and disclosure. 1 Contents Part 1: Introduction Part 2: The duty of confidentiality Part 3: The duty of disclosure Part 4: Confidentiality.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 17 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 4, 2002.
Title of Presentation Technology and the Attorney-Client Relationship: Risks and Opportunities Jay Glunt, Ogletree DeakinsJohn Unice, Covestro LLC Jennifer.
© Sara M. Taylor 2002 Rules of Discovery  State  Federal.
2015 Hon. Michael Williamson, M.D. Fla. Maria Ellena Chavez-Ruark, Saul Ewing LLP Prof. Laurie L. Levenson, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles Joint Defense,
Privilege, Privacy, Waiver & Ethical Considerations.
Electronic Discovery Guidelines FRCP 26(f) mandates that parties “meaningfully meet and confer” to consider the nature of their respective claims and defenses.
Legal Ethics: Seminar 3  Quiz 2 Review  Questions  Confidentiality  Attorney-Client Privilege  Exceptions  Work Product Doctrine  Inadvertent Disclosure.
1 Ethical Lawyering Spring 2006 Class 8. 2 Rest. 68 Except as otherwise provided in this Restatement, the attorney-client privilege may be invoked as.
Section 285 Litigation Ethics Conflicts of Interest Prosecution Bars Grab bag
The Applicability of Patent-Agent Privilege After In re Queen’s University at Kingston Presented by Rachel Perry © 2016 Workman Nydegger.
The Paralegal Professional
Tues., Nov. 11.
Candor and Truthfulness in the Age of Fake News and Alternative Facts
Bonnie Weiss McLeod Cooley LLP
Rules of Discovery and Privileged Communications
Klomparens & Youmans LLP
What is a Privilege? A privilege is a relationship between a witness and the subject of potential testimony (whether that subject be a person or something.
Sadi R. Antonmattei-Goitia Sullo & Sullo, LLP February 16, 2019
Presentation transcript:

C. 4 Lawyer's Duty of Confidentiality1 Professional Responsibility Ch. 4 The Lawyer’s Duty of Confidentiality Ch. 4 The Lawyer’s Duty of Confidentiality Disclosure and Waiver Disclosure and Waiver George W. Conk George W. Conk Adjunct Professor of Law & Senior Fellow Adjunct Professor of Law & Senior Fellow Stein Center for Law & Ethics Stein Center for Law & Ethics Room 409 Room

A barrier to discovery Not a rule of evidence Work-Product Privilege C. 4 Lawyer's Duty of Confidentiality2

Work-product privilege (N.J.) (c) … a party may obtain discovery of documents…and tangible things (c) … a party may obtain discovery of documents…and tangible things prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial by or for another party (or its agent) prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial by or for another party (or its agent) only upon a showing of substantial need of the materials in the preparation of the case and only upon a showing of substantial need of the materials in the preparation of the case and is unable without undue hardship to obtain the substantial equivalent of the materials by other means. is unable without undue hardship to obtain the substantial equivalent of the materials by other means. C. 4 Lawyer's Duty of Confidentiality3

Work-product privilege (N.J.) The court shall protect against disclosure of the mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, or legal theories of an attorney or other representative of a party concerning the litigation. The court shall protect against disclosure of the mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, or legal theories of an attorney or other representative of a party concerning the litigation. C. 4 Lawyer's Duty of Confidentiality4

Keeping secrets The attorney client privilege C. 4 Lawyer's Duty of Confidentiality5

Evidentiary Privileges – FRE 501 Common law privilege law governs “as interpreted in the light of reason and experience” by courts of the U.S. Common law privilege law governs “as interpreted in the light of reason and experience” by courts of the U.S. - except as modified by Constitution, federal statute, or Rules of Supreme Court - except as modified by Constitution, federal statute, or Rules of Supreme Court If state substantive law applies, state law of privilege governs If state substantive law applies, state law of privilege governs C. 4 Lawyer's Duty of Confidentiality6

In re New York Renu p. 325 Report of special master Is the communication privileged? Disclosures to non-lawyer agents of the representation C. 4 Lawyer's Duty of Confidentiality7

Renu Moisture-Loc Two chains Two chains 1) Corp and Exec to CEO, General Counsel and Hill & Knowlton PR firm Denied 1) Corp and Exec to CEO, General Counsel and Hill & Knowlton PR firm Denied 2) Corp exec to CEO re need to seek legal advice from GC Sustained 2) Corp exec to CEO re need to seek legal advice from GC Sustained 3) Hill and Knowlton suggest mechanism for redemption of defective items Denied 3) Hill and Knowlton suggest mechanism for redemption of defective items Denied C. 4 Lawyer's Duty of Confidentiality8

Privilege is in derogation of search for truth 1) Party asserting privilege has the burden of proof 1) Party asserting privilege has the burden of proof 2) Is a communication between attorney and advice-seeking client or 2) Is a communication between attorney and advice-seeking client or 3) Is attorney work product (notes, impressions, legal theories – not facts) 3) Is attorney work product (notes, impressions, legal theories – not facts) 4) Has not been disclosed to a stranger to the representation 4) Has not been disclosed to a stranger to the representation C. 4 Lawyer's Duty of Confidentiality9

`Kovel doctrine’ Disclosure to non-lawyers is protected IF 1) Communication’s predominant purpose is to seek legal advice 1) Communication’s predominant purpose is to seek legal advice 2) Disclosure limited to those with “need to know” advice of counsel 2) Disclosure limited to those with “need to know” advice of counsel 3) State privilege law applies in diversity or FTCA case 3) State privilege law applies in diversity or FTCA case 4) Communication to non lawyer must be necessary to promote the lawyer’s effectiveness 4) Communication to non lawyer must be necessary to promote the lawyer’s effectiveness C. 4 Lawyer's Duty of Confidentiality10

Is communication with a PR firm `necessary to the representation? 1) NO “a media campaign is not a litigation strategy” Haugh v. Schroder (2003) 1) NO “a media campaign is not a litigation strategy” Haugh v. Schroder (2003) 2) Foreign language – company needed help from PR firm Copper Market Anti-trust Lit (2001) 2) Foreign language – company needed help from PR firm Copper Market Anti-trust Lit (2001) 3) PR firm helped counsel “create an atmosphere” to influence prosecutor In Re. G.J. (2003) 3) PR firm helped counsel “create an atmosphere” to influence prosecutor In Re. G.J. (2003) 4) NY – waiver unless disclosure “absolutely necessary” to lawyer’s services 4) NY – waiver unless disclosure “absolutely necessary” to lawyer’s services C. 4 Lawyer's Duty of Confidentiality11

U.S. v. Hatcher (2003) p. 330 Because the inmates and their lawyers were aware that the conversations were being recorded they had no reasonable expectation of privacy Because the inmates and their lawyers were aware that the conversations were being recorded they had no reasonable expectation of privacy C. 4 Lawyer's Duty of Confidentiality12

Losing an existing right of confidentiality Waiver of the privilege C. 4 Lawyer's Duty of Confidentiality13

Development of F.R. Evid,. 502 – limitations on waiver of privilege Pre-rule case law: Pre-rule case law: 1) only intentional disclosure is a waiver 1) only intentional disclosure is a waiver 2) careless disclosure and no retrieval = waiver 2) careless disclosure and no retrieval = waiver 3) any inadvertent disclosure is a waiver 3) any inadvertent disclosure is a waiver C. 4 Lawyer's Duty of Confidentiality14

Fed. R. Evid. 502 Disclosure of communications or information covered by Attorney Client and Work Product Privileges a) Communication in a federal proceeding or to a federal office or agency a) Communication in a federal proceeding or to a federal office or agency b) Inadvertent disclosure b) Inadvertent disclosure c) In a state proceeding c) In a state proceeding d) Federal court order - may limit waiver d) Federal court order - may limit waiver e) party agreement - binds only parties unless incorporated in a court order e) party agreement - binds only parties unless incorporated in a court order C. 4 Lawyer's Duty of Confidentiality15

FRE 502 Inadvertent Disclosure not a waiver if the disclosure is inadvertent; the disclosure is inadvertent; the holder of the privilege or protection took reasonable steps to prevent disclosure; and the holder of the privilege or protection took reasonable steps to prevent disclosure; and the holder promptly took reasonable steps to rectify the error, including (if applicable) following Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). the holder promptly took reasonable steps to rectify the error, including (if applicable) following Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). C. 4 Lawyer's Duty of Confidentiality16

FRCP 25(b)(5)(B) (B) Information Produced. If information produced in discovery is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial preparation material, the party making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. (B) Information Produced. If information produced in discovery is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial preparation material, the party making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. C. 4 Lawyer's Duty of Confidentiality17

FRCP 25(b)(5)(B) After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; C. 4 Lawyer's Duty of Confidentiality18

FRCP 25(b)(5)(B) must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The producing party must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The producing party must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. C. 4 Lawyer's Duty of Confidentiality19