Mechanics of the New Waiver Test Brett McCone Managing Director, KPMG LLP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
April 13, Matching Revenue Flows with the Populations Needs: The Experience in Maryland John M. Colmers VP, Health Care Transformation and Strategic.
Advertisements

Bundled Pricing Medicare’s New Payment Model
1 Performance Measurement Workgroup Meeting 3/17/2014 New All-Payer Model Monitoring Measures.
Maryland’s New All-Payer Model—A Journey Together.
Uncompensated Care Maryland AAHAM December 19, 2014.
Maryland’s Medicare Waiver What is it? How do we fit? Gayle Olano Hurt April 21, 2015 CMSA of the Chesapeake Annual Conference.
RHP 14 Learning Collaborative Midland Memorial Hospital July 18, 2014 Maureen Milligan THOT 1.
The New Health Care Landscape Medicare Waiver and ACOs Maryland Chapter, ACP John M. Colmers, VP Health Care Transformation and Strategic Planning Chair,
CareFirst’s White Paper on Annual Updates: The Annual Allowance Calculation A Proposed Process for Meeting the Dual Waiver Tests of the Demonstration CareFirst.
New All-Payer Model for Maryland Population-Based and Patient-Centered Payment and Care Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission December 2014.
1 Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission New All-Payer Model for Maryland Population-Based and Patient-Centered Payment Systems May 2014.
1 Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission New All-Payer Model for Maryland Population-Based and Patient-Centered Payment Systems.
Redirection of 1991 Realignment Los Angeles County.
Paying for Primary Care: Robert Graham Center Primary Care Forum Washington, DC Two CMS/CMMI payment experiments Jay Crosson March 25, 2014.
ARIZONA HEALTH CARE COST CONTAINMENT SYSTEM DRG Workgroup Meeting November 18, 2013.
Denials Management. Objectives To understand the types of denials. Describe the Appeal Process. Learn Denial Prevention strategies. Differentiate between.
ARIZONA HEALTH CARE COST CONTAINMENT SYSTEM DRG Workgroup Meeting December 17, 2013.
WASHINGTON STATE HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY WSHA Rebasing Task Force Meeting July 15, 2013.
Exhibit 1. Medicare Shared Savings Program: Year 1 Performance of Participating Accountable Care Organizations (2013) Source: Centers for Medicare and.
Leading Age Maryland Annual Conference 2015 Maryland Healthcare and Aging Services Intersections Workshop Session F Wednesday, April 22, :45 – 3:45.
Drug Medi-Cal (DMC) Organized Delivery System Wavier November 3,
DataBrief: Did you know… DataBrief Series ● March 2012 ● No. 28 Chronic Conditions and Rehospitalizations In 2009, Medicare beneficiaries with 5 or more.
Maryland's New Demonstration Waiver Michael B. Robbins, Senior Vice President April 28, 2015.
The Medicare Shared Savings Program
Revenue Cycle Management Medical Technology Acquisition and Assessment Team Members: Joseph Dixon, Michael Morotti, Mari Pirie-St. Pierre, David Robbins.
HealthChoice CY 2008 Rate Setting Update Maryland Medicaid Advisory Committee Meeting September 27, 2007.
Achieving High-Quality, Low Cost Care Amidst Payment System Reform
FY 2005 Indigent Care Trust Fund Disproportionate Share Hospital Program Presented to House Appropriations Health Subcommittee June 23, 2005.
Global Budget/Total Patient Revenue (GBR/TPR) Compliance
HSCRC Call for Papers Patrick Redmon, Ph.D. Director Berkeley Research Group, LLC January 31, 2014.
Chart 1.1: Total National Health Expenditures, 1980 – 2011 (1) Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary. Data released.
HSCRC Quality Initiatives: Maryland Hospital Acquired Conditions Program July 23, 2009 Dianne Feeney, HSCRC.
Medicare Waiver Year One A look at the changes to hospitals and Maryland’s health care environment.
ALTCI Actuarial Study — Final Results September 14, 2005.
1 A Risk Adjustment System for the Medicare Capitated ESRD Program.
1 Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission April 30, 2014 Data and Infrastructure Workgroup Draft Report on Data Requirements for Monitoring.
Understanding the Readmissions Reduction Program Kimberly Rask, MD PhD Medical Director Alliant | GMCF cover.
HSCRC Quality Initiatives: Maryland Hospital Acquired Conditions Program October 2, 2009 Dianne Feeney, HSCRC.
1 Update on New All-Payer Model Implementation Health Services Cost Review Commission.
Appendices. Appendix 1: Supplementary Data Tables Trends in the Overall Health Care Market.
CHAA Examination Preparation Encounter - Session III Pages University of Mississippi Medical Center.
Introduction The following chapter will review: –Overview –Model assumptions –The Cost Proposal & Evaluation –Payments methodology –Financial Incentives/Disincentives.
AAHAM Spring Meeting MHA UPDATE March 15, 2013 Anne Hubbard, Assistant Vice President, Financial Policy & Advocacy 1.
Improving Patient-Centered Care in Maryland—Hospital Global Budgets
Transforming Maryland’s Health Care & Engaging Communities Charles County Forum on Maryland’s All Payer System Transformation Carmela Coyle President &
How the Independence at Home Demonstration is Good for Home Care HCA Conference Call January 12, 2012.
Appendices. Appendix 1: Supplementary Data Tables Trends in the Overall Health Care Market.
Washington State Health Care Authority Hospital Payment Systems Redesign Overview February 26, 2013.
Medicaid Expansion New Issues and Regulations. Medicaid Expansion Map 2 Source: Medicaid & CHIP Monthly Applications, Eligibility Determinations and Enrollment.
Overview of Section 1115 Medicaid Demonstration Waivers Samantha Artiga Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured Kaiser Family Foundation For National.
1 Update on Medicare Data Collection & Analysis February 2016 Data contained in this document represent analyses prepared by HSCRC staff based on data.
Maryland Hospitals’ Payment Policy Environment. 2 About Me From This.... To This:
Copyright © 2010 SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Sense & Shape Health Care Demand Laura Squier Oct 17, 2011.
Maryland All-Payer Model, Hospital Global Budgets
Payment and Delivery System Reform in Medicare Alliance for Health Reform April 11, 2016 Cristina Boccuti, MA, MPP Associate Director, Program on Medicare.
Performance Measurement Workgroup 12/16/ Update on CMMI Waiver Target Metric  HSCRC and CMMI have agreed to Version 5 of readmission measure,
The Maryland Experience Cynthia H. Woodcock
Performance Measurement Workgroup
What’s Next for Maryland Hospitals HFMA Maryland Chapter
Impact of the AHCA on Medicaid
Supplementary Data Tables, Trends in Hospital Financing
Freddie L. Johnson, JD, MPA
The Maryland “Experiment” Evolution of Maryland’s Medicare Waiver
Year 1 of Maryland’s New Waiver: What Are We Learning?
Minnesota Health Care Spending and Cost Drivers
October 2, 2009 Dianne Feeney, HSCRC
System Improvement Provisions of the Affordable Care Act
Performance Measurement Workgroup
Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission April 30, 2014
Commonwealth of Virginia
Presentation transcript:

Mechanics of the New Waiver Test Brett McCone Managing Director, KPMG LLP

Discussion Overview Background Financial Targets Quality/Utilization Targets Proposed Terms Questions and Answers 2

Background On October 10, 2013, the State of Maryland applied to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) for a demonstration project to improve outcomes, to enhance patient experience and to control costs. The application was approved on January 10, 2014 The resulting All-Payer Model (“the Model”) shifts the focus from historic price per encounter controls to a focus on overall revenue growth, including price and use. 3

Background Under the historic model, hospitals in the State of Maryland received a “waiver” from Medicare’s Inpatient and Outpatient Prospective Payments Systems (IPPS and OPPS) so as long as Maryland’s Medicare payment per admission grew below the national average. –The historic Waiver Test compared growth rates in Medicare payment per admission since the CY1980 base period (33 years!) –Price per Admission = Limited controls on utilization required under the test (at least on admisions) –No provision for outpatient price measurement Maryland’s previous Waiver was codified in Section 1814(b)(3) of the Social Security Act (SSA) 4

Background The New Model includes the following provisions: –Annual all-payer, per capita, total hospital cost growth limited to 3.58% –Maryland’s Medicare per beneficiary total hospital cost growth rate must be below the national Medicare per beneficiary average, resulting in $330m of Medicare savings over five years –80% of Maryland hospital revenue shifted into global payment models by year 5 –Maryland’s Medicare per beneficiary total cost growth rate cannot exceed the national average by more than 1 percentage point, and must be “break even” with the national average by year 4. 5

Background The Model includes the following provisions (cont.): –Maryland will reduce its 30-day Medicare readmission rate to the national average in five years –Annual Potentially Preventable Complication (PPC) reduction of 6.89%, for a cumulative 5 year reduction of 30%. –Maryland will propose a model extension at the start of Year 4 –Waives Section 1814(b)(3) of the SSA: Maryland’s historic Waiver Test If the Model is not extended, or terminated early, Maryland hospitals will transition to the national Medicare payment systems. …yes, we are working without a net. 6

Financial Targets 7

Financial Targets: All-Payer Test All-payer per capita growth rate of 3.58% is the ten year average annual growth rate in Maryland Gross State Product (GSP) per capita (2002 – 2012) 3.58% is fixed cap for years 1-3. In years 4 and 5, Maryland may adjust the all-payer cap for more recently available GSP data. 8

Financial Targets: All-Payer Test The all-payer per capita growth rate is expected to be calculated using: –Regulated, inpatient and outpatient hospital charges, from Maryland hospitals for Maryland residents receiving services. Summarized from the new monthly hospital charge submissions for Maryland and non-Maryland residents –Population growth from the Maryland Department of Planning. Interim population growth estimated from State projections 9

Financial Targets: All-Payer Test Illustrative example: 10

Financial Targets: All-Payer Test Compliance calculation – Example 1: 11

Financial Targets: All-Payer Test Compliance calculation – Example 2: 12

Financial Targets: All-Payer Test Points to consider –Timeliness and accuracy of monthly data reported MD Resident vs. Non-MD Resident charges –Population estimates versus actual experience –Variable changes in rates (assessments, UCC, etc.) –Use of charges versus payments (Not a significant risk unless the differential changes) Monitoring compared to other data sources (CRISP, etc.) 13

Financial Targets: Medicare Test From the October 11, 2013 Application: –“In addition to limiting…cost growth for all payers…Maryland will limit its Medicare per beneficiary total hospital cost (payment) growth…to produce $330m in Medicare savings over five years.” –“CMS will calculate Medicare savings by establishing a baseline that is the actual Medicare per beneficiary total hospital expenditures (payments) for Maryland Medicare fee- for-service beneficiaries in 2013 trended forward by the national average growth rate in Medicare per beneficiary hospital expenditures (payments) to each year of the model and comparing Maryland’s annual Medicare per beneficiary hospital expenditures…” 14

Financial Targets: Medicare Test Baseline = CY2013 Medicare hospital payments for Maryland Medicare beneficiaries –Medicare hospital payments = Inpatient and outpatient hospital payments Medicare claim type 60 (Inpatient) and claim type 40 (Outpatient), TOB = 11X Includes: short term general hospitals, multiple hospital component in a medical complex, Alcohol/drug hospitals Excludes reference lab (unregulated) Excludes 72x bill type (ESRD clinics) Refer to CMS application, page 53 for guidance –Maryland Medicare beneficiaries = All Maryland residents who are (Medicare) fee-for-service beneficiaries enrolled in Part A and/or Part B –Includes all geographic service locations: in-state and out-of-state 15

Financial Targets: Medicare Test 16

Financial Targets: Medicare Test A CY2013 baseline will also be established for the national average The savings test will compare the actual growth rate of the Maryland hospital payment per beneficiary versus the applied national (actual) growth rate to the baseline Maryland hospital payment per beneficiary. The growth rate differential applied to the Maryland beneficiary total will compute the annual savings The October 11, 2013 application reflects savings targets (p. 16) that assume no savings in year 1 and approximately 0.5% below the national trend in years 2-5. The assumptions and charts on the next several pages reflect illustrative, example calculations. The figures are NOT EXACT and are examples only. 17

Financial Targets: Medicare Test Assumptions: –Maryland Medicare beneficiaries remain fixed for all periods at 845,000 Table 2.8 at Reports/MedicareMedicaidStatSupp/2013.htmlhttp://cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and- Reports/MedicareMedicaidStatSupp/2013.html –Example Maryland per beneficiary base = $6,545 Source: 10/11/13 CMS application –Fixes national payment per beneficiary growth at 1.0% per year (general assumption for illustrative purposes) Scenarios: –“A” Targeted growth rates to achieve CMS application annual targets –“B” Straight line savings beginning in CY2015 to achieve $330m savings target –“C” Straight line savings beginning in CY2014 to achieve $330m savings target –“D” Straight line savings beginning in CY2014 with a fixed 0.5% savings per year 18

Scenario “A” Targeted growth rates to achieve CMS application annual targets 19

Scenario “B” Straight line savings beginning in CY2015 to achieve $330m savings target 20

Scenario “C” Straight line savings beginning in CY2014 to achieve $330m savings target 21

Scenario “D” Straight line savings beginning in CY2014 with a fixed 0.5% savings per year 22

Financial Targets: Medicare Test Points to consider: –Uncertainty of national growth rate –Impact of the ACA (coverage expansion, etc.) –Localized clinical epidemic –Inclusion of unregulated services in the hospital measure –MD vs. national percentage of Medicare Part B to Medicare Part A beneficiaries –Relationship of All Payer ceiling to Medicare savings 23

Quality Targets: Readmissions Maryland maintains its waiver from the CMS Hospital Readmission Reduction Program. To do so, Maryland will reduce 30-day Medicare readmission rate to the national average in five years –Most recent Medicare readmission rates: Maryland = 20.5% vs. national = 18.5% Based on the most recent data, a 0.5 percentage point reduction in the rate each year of the agreement is required Appendix B of the application (p. 55) outlines the readmission calculation –Monthly readmissions rate = Readmissions during the 30 day period / index admissions that occurred during the month –Readmission occurs if first day of a stay occurred within 30 days of the last service date of an index admission 24

Quality Targets: MHAC/PPC Maryland maintains its waiver from the CMS Hospital Acquired Conditions Program. Maryland will achieve an annual, aggregate reduction of 6.89% in 65 Potentially Preventable Complications (PPCs) –PPCs, not MHACs –30% reduction over 5 years 25

Proposed Terms During the five year period, there are specific events that will lead to further review by CMS and potentially early termination. (Application p. 17) They are: –Failure to achieve (Medicare) savings for two consecutive years –Failure to meet the cumulative (Medicare) savings target by $100m or more at any point during the life of the model –Annual growth in Maryland Medicare per beneficiary total cost that is more than 1% point greater than the national average –Determination of significant quality of care deterioration Should any of these occur, CMS will provide notice to Maryland. –Maryland has 90 days to respond, with CMS having 90 days to accept the response or request a corrective action plan, due in 30 days. –If the corrective action plan is not implemented successfully within 1 year of notification, CMS may terminate the agreement. –See flowchart in Application, page

Questions and Answers 27

Thank You Brett McCone Managing Director, KPMG LLP