1 RTWG Tariff update to the BOD, MOPC, SPC, and RSC January 4, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
10/22/20101 Westar Formula Rate and your bill. 10/22/20102 What we will be going over Transferring the results from the Westar Formula Rate to the SPP.
Advertisements

FPLs Request for Recovery of the Costs Associated with the Seabrook Transmission Substations Pool Transmission Facilities NEPOOL Participants Committee.
The Midwest ISO from a Transmission Owner Perspective.
Introduction to Concurrency Management. What is Concurrency? Chapter , F.S. requires Comprehensive Plans to adopt a concurrency management system,
Cleco Transmission Planning Summit Attachment K November 15, 2007 Terry Whitmore.
03/11/2013 MARKETS COMMITTEE Aleks Mitreski MARKET DEVELOPMENT (413) Overview of Market Rule revisions.
DG Interconnection Working Group Fees and Cost Support for DG Interconnections August 6, 2012.
Notification To Construct Business Practice (NTC BP) Overview Terri Gallup, PCWG Chair Paul Suskie, SPP.
Public Service Company of New Mexico
WELCOME Western Area Power Administration1. Where did the journey begin? Western Area Power Administration2.
CLECO TRANSMISSION RATE CASE. AGENDA Welcome and Introduction Purpose of Meeting Transmission System Update Formula Rate Overview Formula Rate Protocols.
October 30, 2014 Terry Wolf, Manager of Transmission Services.
SPP.org 11. SPP Delivery Point Addition (DPA) Process Effective May 1, 2010.
An Overview of Arizona’s Renewable Transmission Planning Process Southwest Renewable Energy Transmission Conference Amanda Ormond – Ormond Group LLC Brian.
Highway-Byway Cost Allocation: What it Offers MISO January 2010 Presented to the Organization of MISO States CARP and the Midwest ISO RECB Task Force Meeting.
What’s New in Southern Companies’ OATT Southern Company Transmission 2008 Customer Forum.
NERC LTRA Update / CDR Capacity Counting Issues
1 American Electric Power Company Transmission Formula Rate AEP Appalachian Transmission Co., Inc. AEP Indiana Michigan Transmission Co., Inc. AEP Kentucky.
RenewElec October 21, 2010 Robert Nordhaus, David Yaffe Van Ness Feldman 1050 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW Washington, DC (202) FERC’s.
SPP.org 1. 2 Aggregate Transmission Service Study (ATSS)
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 1 Network Operating Committee (NOC) June 12 th, 2014.
Highlights of Commission Activities Little Rock ASHRAE Monthly Meeting October 12, 2011 Presented By: John P. Bethel.
Need for Transmission Investment 2010 Mid-American Regulatory Conference AEP.
Economic Incentive Plan and Impact Fee Update Board of County Commissioners Work Session February 7, 2012.
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services Thursday, May 13th, :00 to 3:00 p.m. EDT.
Large Generator Interconnection Procedures Reform Stakeholder Meeting February 19, 2009.
OSC Meeting April 27, Transmission Cost Allocation Overview.
SPS policy – Information Presentation Presentation to ROS June 16, 2004.
Discussion of Market Participant Choice for Transmission Connections Stakeholder Session October 14, 2011.
August 21, 2015 Terry Wolf, Manager of Transmission Services.
1 Westar Energy’s 2013 Annual Transmission Revenue Requirement Meeting October 30, 2012.
Flowgate Allocation Option Parallel Flow Visualization Business Practices Subcommittee Meeting June , 2010.
1 Interconnection Update Jay Zimmerman Manager, Transmission Policy Entergy Transmission Planning Summit New Orleans, LA July 8, 2004.
Large Generator Interconnection Procedures Reform 2 nd Stakeholder Meeting May 5, 2009.
Entergy AFC Stakeholder Meeting February 16, 2005 Houston, TX.
Cost Allocation Proposals associated with MISO Transmission Expansion WIEG Board Meeting May 6, 2010 WIEG Board Meeting May 6, 2010 Presented by: Kavita.
ARIN Change Utilization Requirements from last-allocation to total-aggregate.
Standards Review Subcommittee Update August 17, 2010.
Tariff Change Recommendations to the Commercial Practices Committee From the Regional Tariff Working Group April 9, 2001.
Midwest ISO Discussion February 5, 2009 Greg Levesque Manager – Regional Relations & Policy.
G&T Update – Western Farmers Electric Cooperative OAEC MR/PR Fall Meeting (2015)
2013 Wind Conference. Transmission Service Study Process Steve Purdy.
Credit Updates Vanessa Spells Credit Work Group ERCOT Public February 18, 2015.
1 Northern States Power Companies (NSP-MN & NSP-WI) Transmission Customer Meeting October 27, 2015 Rate Discussion: Attachment O, GG & MM.
Cost Allocation for 2009 STEP, Appendix B: Comparison of Highway/Byway/Local v. Currently Effective Cost Allocation Methods 1/21/2010.
1 WSPP EC SLIDES FOR AGENDA ITEMS 3 AND 4 WSPP SERVICE SCHEDULE C WSPP Service Schedule C includes a provision allowing interruption “to meet Seller’s.
SPP.org Transmission Expansion and Cost Allocations for FERC SPP-Entergy CBA 1.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board February 16, 2005.
August 22, 2014 Terry Wolf, Manager of Transmission Services.
SPP.org 1. ICT Working Groups Current Activities Jody Holland Dowell Hudson Antoine Lucas Tim Phillips.
1 Rate Impact Task Force’s Updated Results for it’s Report to the SPP Regional State Committee January 24, 2011.
Tariff Changes Proposed by Integrated System (IS) 2/20/2014 Carl A. Monroe EXEC VP & COO.
Market Working Group Update Presentation to CAWG March 29, 2011 Jim Sanderson, KCC.
Generator Interconnection Studies & Agreements Charles Hendrix.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board July 18, TAC Summary 4 PRRs for approval (3 unanimous) 4 PRRs for approval (3 unanimous) 5 Nodal PRRs for approval.
Kansas City Power & Light and KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations – Suggestions for Chapter 22 Revisions Missouri Public Service Commission Meeting Aug 31,
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY © 2013 New York Independent System Operator, Inc. All Rights Reserved. EIPC Roll-Up Powerflow Model Zach Smith Director,
EE590 Transmission Planning Projects and Cost Allocation Ming NI Economic Studies, Midwest ISO.
Orange County Government Adoption Public Hearing May 10, 2016 Board of County Commissioners School Impact Fee Update.
Open Access Transmission Tariff Amendment No. 9 Greg Broeking, Chief Financial Officer March 7, 2012.
2016 Annual Attachment O Stakeholder Meeting Ameren Missouri
Clarification of the Resident Load Definition
New England States Committee on Electricity (NESCOE)
Status Update for Reliability/Market Power Mitigation Assessment
T.O. Highway/Byway Recommendations
BPM Change Management Meeting
Westar Formula Rate and your bill
2014 Annual Attachment O Stakeholder Meeting Ameren Missouri
Rochester Public Utilities Presentation on Forward-Looking Transmission Revenue Requirements Update for Calendar 2019 October 17, 2018.
Mountain West Transmission Group Panel Discussion
Presentation transcript:

1 RTWG Tariff update to the BOD, MOPC, SPC, and RSC January 4, 2005

2 RTWG Tariff Update  Where are we in the process  What is the expected timeline for completion  Review of the proposed tariff changes

3 Overview  RTWG is making changes to the tariff to implement the RSC approved Participant Funding plan  Clarifications or fundamental questions regarding the plan are referred back to the RSC/CAWG  RTWG is NOT discussing the merits of the plan

4 A Review of the RSC Plan  100% of the costs of approved Base Plan upgrades are recovered through the tariff  The Plan defines the rules for how an upgrade is included in the Base Plan  RTO approved reliability upgrade  Upgrades required by a Network Customers to receive power from a new DNR if upgrades meet certain criteria

5 RSC Plan (cont)  Conditions for Base Plan Treatment of upgrades for new DNRs  Minimal cost (<$100,000)  DNR must be a 5yr or longer firm entitlement  Customer can not exceed a 125% reserve margin  Upgrade costs capped at $180,000/MW  The Plan does allow for SPP to waive some or all of the above conditions

6 RSC Plan (cont)  Waiver requirements  Customer must request the waiver and give supporting documentation  SPP staff will review the waiver request  SPP staff will then present the waiver request and its recommendation to the MOPC  MOPC will pass the waiver, the SPP staff recommendation and its recommendation to the BOD  SPP BOD will decide on the waiver request  The customer has the right to present their position at all levels

7 Required Tariff Changes  The RSC Plan calls for major changes in rate design  Will have a two tiered rate:  Current Zonal Charge – For customers that take service under the tariff  Base Plan Charge –applied to all load in SPP for recovery of Base Plan upgrade costs with regional and zonal components  Facilities not eligible for Base Plan treatment directly assigned with revenue credits  A new schedule is required to implement the plan  The remaining changes are primarily in rewriting Attachments H, J, L & S

8 Issues Still Before the RTWG  Outstanding questions posed to the RSC/CAWG  Can a customer recover any directly assigned costs as a credit pursuant to Attachment Z?  How should the Credits for delayed or deferred Base Plan Projects be calculated? (RR or Cost)  Should project costs of < $100,000 be directly assigned to the host zone or split between the Regional and zonal rates?  Finalize remaining tariff language

9 Possible Reasons for Delaying a Filing  Delayed response from RSC/CAWG to outstanding questions  Responses from RSC/CAWG require major changes to proposed language  A problem in the proposed tariff language is discovered at the last minute  RSC/CAWG request changes to the proposed tariff language  Proposed Language is not approved by the MOPC and/or the BOD

10 Time Table  RTWG meets this week to try and finalize the tariff language  Targeted to get language to MOPC and BOD for their review and approval at their respective January meetings  December FERC filing provides for January policy review and February implementation of any directives  SPP committed to file by March 1

11 Questions???

12 Transmission Cost Allocation Proposal – SPP Tariff Modifications January 4, 2005

13 Implementation of Proposal  Need to modify the Tariff to:  Allocate costs for new transmission upgrades  Establish rates for collecting the costs  Recover and distribute the TOs revenue requirement  Document new defined terms

14 Major Tariff Changes for Implementation of Cost Allocation Proposal  Modify Attachment J – Recovery of Costs Associated with New Facilities  Presently includes sunset provision for roll-in  Allocates costs for new upgrades  Add Part V & Schedule 11 – Base Plan Charge  Establishes rates and applicability of the rates to recover TOs revenue requirement for new upgrades  Modify Attachment L – Treatment of Revenues  Distributes revenues collected under Schedule 11 to the TOs

15 Attachment J Cost Allocation Provisions  Base Plan Upgrades  Economic Upgrades  Requested Upgrades  Provides a link to existing Attachment Z, Aggregate Transmission Service Study Procedures  Generation interconnection related Network Upgrades  Provides a link to existing Attachment V, Large Generator Interconnection Procedures

16 Attachment J Other Provisions  Review of the regional allocation factor & zonal allocation methodology at least once every 5 years  Conditions for including future DNRs as Base Plan Upgrades (Safe Harbor)  Waiver process for DNRs that do not meet the Safe Harbor conditions  Intra-zonal allocation review process  Cost allocation provision for Network Upgrades that defer or displace the need for a Base Plan Upgrades

17 New Part V – Recovery of Costs for Base Plan Upgrades  Establishes a “new” charge (Base Plan Charge) to collect the revenue requirement for Base Plan Upgrades & any portion of other Network Upgrades that are eligible for Base Plan Upgrade treatment  Sets out applicability of the charge  Provides a link to new Schedule 11 that sets out the rate/charge

18 Applicability of Base Plan Charge  The intent is to apply this charge to ALL load within the SPP footprint:  Load currently taking network service under the SPP Tariff; and  To all other load that is not currently taking service under the SPP Tariff  Bundled retail load for which Transmission Owners have not requested service under the SPP Tariff  All load being served under Grandfathered Agreements  To Transmission Customers taking P-to-P under the SPP Tariff

19 New Schedule 11 – Base Plan Charge  Charge to Network Customers & TOs for load is assessed on a load ratio share basis  Charge to Transmission Customers taking P-to-P under the SPP Tariff is based on Reserved Capacity  Zonal component & regional component assessed for load & for P- to-P

20 Attachment L – Treatment of Revenues  Currently establishes distribution of revenues to TOs collected by SPP for transmission service and other services  Adds new provision for distribution of revenues to TOs collected by SPP under new Schedule 11  In proportion to their respective ATRRs for new transmission upgrades

21 Other Tariff Changes  Section 1 – Definitions  Attachment H – Annual Transmission Revenue Requirement  Attachment S – Procedure for Calculation of MW-Mile Impacts  Provisions governing revenue distribution in the event of customer non-payment