Chapter Five Interrogation & Identification Procedures All Images © Microsoft Corporation Written by Karmel Tanner May 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 16 Arrest, Interrogation, and Identification.
Advertisements

Chapter 6 Interrogations and Confessions Grounds for excluding confession – not admissible if it is product of police violation of any of following requirements.
The Interrogation Process and the Law
CJ305: Legal Foundations of Criminal Evidence Welcome to Unit 6! Instructor: K. Austin Zimmer, J.D. Make sure you adjust your speakers and audio settings.
Chapter Eleven – Confessions and Admissions: Miranda v. Arizona Rolando V. del Carmen.
ADMISSIONS & CONFESSIONS FOR STREET OFFICERS Portland – October 24, 2013 Bangor – October 30,
AJ 104 Chapter 14 Self-Incrimination.
The Government must respect ALL legal rights of all people. It must treat people fairly.
Fifth and Sixth Amendment
Vivek Barbhaiya and John Coriasco
Miranda Rights 5th Amendment
Miranda v. Arizona.
Chapter Eleven – Confessions and Admissions: Miranda v. Arizona
Miranda v. Arizona 1966 Read Miranda v. Arizona Parties Facts Issue.
Criminal Procedure for the Criminal Justice Professional 11 th Edition John N. Ferdico Henry F. Fradella Christopher Totten Prepared by Tony Wolusky Interrogations,
Criminal Evidence 6th Edition
Plain View Doctrine 1.Item is positioned easily in an officer’s sight. 2.Officer is legally in a position to notice. 3.The discovery of the item is inadvertent.
1 Interviews & Interrogations What skills and techniques do Investigators use to get information from a person?
Right Against Self-Incrimination ACG 6935/4939. Based in the 5th Amendment Can only be applied if defendant’s statement is testimonial. (not blood samples,
Police and the Rule of Law Chapter 7 In Your Textbook John Massey Criminal Justice.
Criminal Procedure for the Criminal Justice Professional 11th Edition
Interrogation Process and Law
“ Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Criminal Evidence Chapter Seven: Confessions and the 5 th Amendment This multimedia product and its contents are protected.
The 4th & 5th Amendments Search & Seizure Search & Seizure Rights Against Self Incrimination Rights Against Self Incrimination.
1 Chapter 12 Obtaining Statements and Confessions for use as Evidence Obtaining Statements and Confessions for use as Evidence.
Miranda v. Arizona. Facts of the Case Police arrest Ernesto Miranda after the victim identifies him in lineup Police interrogate Miranda for two hours.
Rights When Arrested Objective 2.01 Recognize types of courts. Business Law.
Arrests and Miranda. 2 Copyright and Terms of Service Copyright © Texas Education Agency, These materials are copyrighted © and trademarked ™ as.
PROCEDURES IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM, 8 th ed. Roberson, Wallace, and Stuckey PRENTICE HALL ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ
MIRANDA AND TESTIMONIAL EVIDENCE
Chapter 1 The Pursuit of Justice Unit #1 Notes Packet.
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Unit 2 - Week 2 Ann Marie Lampariello-Perez professor.
Rights of the Accused Search & Seizure Search & Seizure Right Against Self Incrimination Right Against Self Incrimination Right to Counsel Right to Counsel.
Criminal Justice-- Investigations Chapter 12—Due Process Rights of Suspects under 4 th & 5 th Amendments.
1 Bakersfield College Criminal Justice Charles Feer, JD, MPA Miranda.
Miranda v Arizona Rights of the Accused. Citations 384 U.S. 436 (1966) oDocket # 759 oArgued February 28, 1966 o Decider June 13, 1966.
Police and the Constitution: The Rules of Law Enforcement.
CJ227: Criminal Procedure Unit 4 Seminar Trial options and the Defendants Rights Or I am in trouble, I need a good attorney, fast Who will decide my fate?
Authority of the Police Chapter Two All Images © Microsoft Corporation Written by Karmel Tanner May 2010.
CJ © 2011 Cengage Learning Chapter 7 Police and the Constitution: The Rules of Law Enforcement.
Chapter 15 Self Incrimination “If the provisions of the Constitution be not upheld when they pinch as well as when they comfort, they may as well be abandoned.“
SELF-INCRIMINATION “No person…shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself[.]” The 5 th Amendment “I plead the Fifth!”
Arrests and Miranda.  Right to a grand jury  Protection against double jeopardy  Protection against self-incrimination  Right to due process  Custody.
The Investigation.  Right to remain silent  Right to an attorney  No interrogation should take place before they read  Are a result of the US Supreme.
CHAPTER 13 METHODS OF IDENTIFICATION. INFIELD SHOWUPS An In-Field show-up is a one on one viewing of a suspect by a victim/witness in the field, shortly.
 Online Miranda quiz Online Miranda quiz. The constitutional implications of custodial interrogation.
Looking at Miranda Your Right to Remain Silent
Chapter 16 Identification Procedures “Cases of mistaken identification constituted by far the greatest cause of actual or possible wrong convictions” -
1 Bakersfield College Department of Criminal Justice Dr. Charles Feer Lineups, Show-ups and Such.
© 2015 Cengage Learning Chapter 7 CTE S&B:17.04/17.07 Police and the Constitution: The Rules of Law Enforcement Chapter 7 CTE S&B:17.04/17.07 Police and.
Miranda: Its Meaning and Application Chapter 6 Basic Criminal Procedures, 3/E by Edward E. Peoples PRENTICE HALL ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle.
TUTORIAL #3 FIFTH AMENDMENT &CONFESSIONS. RIGHT NOT TO BE WITNESS AGAINST SELF Cannot be compelled to testify Cannot be compelled to testify At trial.
CLASS NO. 19 REVIEW. Miranda Rule Before there is “custodial interrogation,” the defendant must be warned of his Miranda rights: –Right to remain silent.
Know Your Rights Santa Teresa High School Intro to LPSCS.
Entry Into the System Arrests and Miranda.
Miranda v. Arizona.
Criminal Procedure You have the right to:
Arrest power and interrogation techniques
Aim: What are the protections offered by the case of Miranda vs
Amendments in ACTION: The Fifth Amendment
Miranda Warnings.
Rights of the Accused in the 5thAmendment
Entry Into the System Arrests and Miranda.
Chapter Ten – Lineups and Other Means of Pretrial Identification
Ch. 3-2 The Fifth Amendment Right to Remain Silent
Interrogations and Confessions
Amendments in ACTION: The Fifth Amendment
Authority of the Police
Amendments in ACTION: The Fifth Amendment
Ap u.s. government & politics
Presentation transcript:

Chapter Five Interrogation & Identification Procedures All Images © Microsoft Corporation Written by Karmel Tanner May 2010

Self Incrimination: Fifth Amendment Limited to Testimonial Communications that Could Result in Conviction

Does NOT apply to: Body fluids — blood tests, breath tests, urine tests Tissue samples for DNA testing Identification procedures — photographs, line-ups, show-ups Handwriting and voice exemplars Movements — sobriety test, posing as directed, wearing clothing found at crime scene

Can NOT be used: Shield another person Protect against civil liability

Suspect must be informed of the right to remain silent prior to custodial interrogation

Custodial means the person is not free to leave

Warnings are NOT required: Temporary detention Traffic citation issued without taking the violator into custody

Interrogation includes both direct and indirect questioning

Miranda warnings must be given prior to custodial interrogation:

Waiver of Miranda warnings must be knowing, intelligent and voluntary: Knowing — suspect has been advised of the Miranda rights Intelligent — suspect has sufficient intelligence to understand the Miranda warnings Voluntary — no coercion can be used to obtain the waiver

Subsequent Interrogations If prior interrogation session violated Miranda rights: Statements from improperly conducted session are inadmissible

Subsequent Interrogations Statements obtained at later session may be admissible Must have proper Miranda warnings and waiver Fruit of Poison Tree analysis — case by case determination if prior error taints later interrogation sessions

Subsequent Interrogations If prior interrogation session was conducted properly (including valid Miranda waiver) and it ended without suspect invoking Miranda right to remain silent or to have an attorney present:

Subsequent Interrogations May resume interrogation at any time Suspect retains right to invoke Miranda at any time New Miranda warnings required only if suspect may have forgotten his/her rights

Subsequent Interrogations If prior interrogation session ended because suspect invoked Miranda right to remain silent Wait sufficient time to indicate rights will be scrupulously guarded New set of warnings and a waiver are required

Subsequent Interrogations If prior interrogation session ended because the suspect invoked Miranda right to have an attorney present : Must have attorney present at subsequent interrogation If officer initiates the interrogation, waiver valid only if attorney present when waiver is made

Subsequent Interrogations If prior interrogation session ended because the suspect invoked Miranda right to have an attorney present : If suspect requested to talk to the police — waiver of Miranda rights would be required BUT the waiver could be obtained without an attorney present

1 A suspect in a crime is contacted and asked to come into the station to meet with CID. The man confesses to some burglaries. Question A) This is illegal - he should have been Mirandized B) This is illegal - he should have been notified he was a suspect C) This is legal - there was no coercion D) This is legal - there was no custody

Identification Procedures Line-up Several people are shown to eyewitness Show-up One person is shown to eyewitness Photographic line-up Pictures are shown to eyewitness

Identification Procedures Fourth Amendment Rights Need reasonable suspicion in order to detain a suspect in the field to be identified Need probable cause to transport suspect to station (or other location) for identification or questioning

Identification Procedures Fifth Amendment Suspect can NOT claim Fifth Amendment as a reason to refuse to participate in identification procedures Sixth Amendment Suspect has the right to have an attorney present during show-ups and line-ups held after arraignment or indictment on the charges

Identification Procedures Fifth Amendment No right to have an attorney present during photographic line-up at any time

Identification Procedures Due Process: Line-ups and photographic line-ups must not be unduly suggestive Need sufficient selection — 5 to 7 people recommended People displayed need to look similar — should not have any features that make one person stand out

Identification Procedures Due Process: Anything that one person in the line- up is asked to do should be done by every person in the line-up Witnesses must make selection without coaching by police or others

Identification Procedures Show-ups are judged on the credibility of the eye witness.

Identification Procedures Consider: opportunity to observe suspect during crime degree of attention witness paid to suspect at crime scene level of certainty of witness when making identification

2 A photo line up is quickly put together on a serial rapist who is becoming increasingly violent. There is a B&W picture of the rapist and only one other B&W photo of a similar person can be found on short notice so 4 color photos are used: Question A) This is legal due to exigent circumstances B) This is legal because there is one other B&W photo C) This is illegal as it is unduly suggestive D) All of the above are true

Right to Counsel Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel — Basic Rules Government required to provide attorneys for defendants who cannot afford to hire an attorney Applies from arraignment through sentencing and first direct appeal

Right to Counsel Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel — Basic Rules Indigent defendant cannot be sentenced to jail unless he/she was given an attorney Defendant has the right to refuse an attorney at represent self

Right to Counsel Sixth Amendment Issues When Interrogating Suspect Right to counsel attaches at the arraignment or indictment After this point, police may interview suspect only if suspect has attorney present or has waived the right to counsel

Right to Counsel This rule applies to both police and police informants Applies to both in-custody and out-of- custody interrogation Only applies to charges on which suspect has been arraigned or indicted

Right to Counsel Applies to conversations with the defendant in courthouse Applies to interview of defendant by prosecution experts such as psychiatrists and polygraph operators

Chapter Five Interrogation & Identification Procedures