1 RACE TO THE TOP: Because Our Children Can’t Wait.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School Improvement Grants Webinar – Tier I and II Schools April 21, 2010.
Advertisements

April 15, Through the SIG program, the United States Education Department (USED) requires state educational agencies (SEAs) to use three tiers to.
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION APRIL 27, 2010 VANDERBILT MARRIOTT NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT APPLICATION ROLLOUT 1.
Race to the Top Discussion Points to determine LUSD’s interest in participating in the State program January 7, 2010.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
2011 Bridge to Excellence Master Plan Annual Update Review Division of Student, Family, and School Support Office of Finance Division of Academic Reform.
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
Computing Leadership Summit STEM Education Steve Robinson U.S. Department of Education White House Domestic Policy Council February 22, 2010.
Shelda Hale, Title III, ELL and Immigrant Education Kentucky Department of Education.
MSBO 2009 CONFERENCESEPTEMBER SECRETARY OF EDUCATION DISCRETIONARY FUNDS Sally Vaughn Deputy Superintendent, Ph.D. Michigan Department of Education.
Nebraska Department of Education Focus on Effective Instruction and Student Learning Revised Standards and NeSA Nebraska’s P-16 Effort Federal Agenda Fiscal.
Support for the Change, Challenge, and Commitment All Maryland Students College and Career Ready.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
Introduction to Enhancing Education Through Technology Charles LovettJohn Bailey February 2002.
Common Core State Standards and Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Common Core State Standards and Partnership for.
1 Race to the Top: Louisiana’s Blueprint for Education Reform … More Than an Application 1 …BECAUSE OUR CHILDREN CAN’T WAIT.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
Massie Ritsch U.S. Department of Education ESEA REAUTHORIZATION.
Subtitle 1003(g) School Improvement Grants April 2, 2012.
Eighth Street Elementary School September 25 th, 2014 Mr. John McCollum Title I Annual Parent Meeting.
M AXIMIZING F LEXIBILITY IN THE A DMINISTRATION OF F EDERAL G RANTS July 17, 2013.
Leveraging Race to the Top to Maximize the Use of Data To Ensure College & Career Readiness Aimee R. Guidera Achieve ADP September 10, 2009.
School Improvement Grants March, Overview American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Goals and purpose of SIG grants Definition of “persistently lowest-
Mississippi Department of Education Office of School Recovery November 18, :30-4:30 Committee of Practitioners Meeting School Improvement Grant 1003(g)
Eric W. Waldo U.S. Department of Education Deputy Chief of Staff July 2012 U.S. Department of Education Policy Overview.
Race to the Top (RTTT) Overview of Grant Competition Goals and Requirements 1.
Georgia Association of School Personnel Administrators May 30,
What is Title I ?  It is federal funding that is attached to NCLB/ESEA legislation  It is intended to help students who are falling behind.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
Mississippi Department of Education Office of Innovative Support February 17, 2010 Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting.
Agenda (5:00-6:30 PM): Introduction to Staff Title I Presentation PTA Information Classroom visits (two 30 minute rotations)
U.S. Department of Education Reform Agenda Overview April 2010.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
Considerations for Technical Assistance School Improvement Grant 1.
Title I 2010 Spring Admin. Meeting Spring Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education April 13-14, 2010 Presented by: Maria E.
MARYLAND’S REFORM PLAN RACE TO THE TOP.  Maryland’s initiatives are about reform, not simply the money.  Reform efforts will continue with or without.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
ESEA Flexibility: Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 1 of 8.
SAM REDDING ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE CENTER ON INNOVATIONS IN LEARNING CENTER ON SCHOOL TURNAROUND BUILDING STATE CAPACITY AND PRODUCTIVITY CENTER.
University Park Creative Arts School Title I Annual Parent Meeting Title I 101 September 12, :00 pm.
Melissa Cropper Teacher and President Georgetown Federation of Teachers Deborah S. Delisle Superintendent of Public Instruction Ohio Department of Education.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
2 Louisiana Believes Objective: The Department is providing districts increased support in preparation for the school year. As districts plan for.
Title I, IDEA Part B and IDEA Part C September 2, 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Use of Funds Guidance 1.
Application for Funding for Phase II of the Education Fund under the State Fiscal Stabilization Fund Program CFDA Number:
AB Miller High School Community Meeting April 13, 2010.
1 46th Annual PAFPC Conference May 5, 2015 MARIA GARCIA Schoolwide Program Manager DIVISION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Title I Schoolwide Programs.
February 2016 Overview of the Every Student Succeeds Act.
Center on School Turnaround at WestEd. 2 3 Race to the Top School Improvement Grants Alignment of Existing Federal Resources ESEA Flexibility Lowest-
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.
Minnesota’s Promise World-Class Schools, World-Class State.
Program Information for Applicants School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
How can ARRA Funds Be Wisely Applied? How Researchers Can Help Lou Cicchinelli, Ph.D. Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning Fourth Annual IES.
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
TTIPS Model Overview.
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting
WVDE Office of Federal Programs
Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT
RACE TO THE TOP: An Overview
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
Title I Annual Meeting Pinewood Elementary, August 30, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

1 RACE TO THE TOP: Because Our Children Can’t Wait

Louisiana’s children have made tremendous progress… Louisiana is the only state where the achievement gap has narrowed significantly in both 4 th grade reading and 8th grade math. This year marked the largest performance gain in the past decade. Thirty-five high-poverty schools placed among the highest performing schools in the state.

However, there are still students being left behind academically. Nearly one of out of every three public school students is performing below grade level. In more than 400 schools throughout our state, nearly 50% of the children are below grade level. High school graduation rates are still too low, and Louisiana has highest dropout rate in the country.

Louisiana has a vision and ambitious goals for whole-system reform. A Vision for Building a World-Class Education System Where: All children achieve at academically acceptable levels; There are no achievement gaps between race and class; All students complete high school college and career ready.

11/5/ DRAFT5 Goals of World-Class Education – Louisiana Children Will… Enter kindergarten ready to learn Be literate by 3rd grade Arrive in 4th grade on time Perform on grade level in English Language Arts (ELA) in the 8th grade Perform on grade level in Mathematics in 8th grade Graduate on time Be prepared for and enroll in post-secondary education Achieve these goals regardless of race or socio-economic statu Louisiana’s Children Will… Enter kindergarten ready to learn Be literate by 3rd grade Arrive in 4th grade on time Perform on grade level in English Language Arts (ELA) in the 8th grade Perform on grade level in Mathematics in 8th grade Graduate on time Be prepared for and enroll in post-secondary education Achieve these goals regardless of race or socio- economic status Goals of World-Class Education

Whole-system reform has begun in LA R2T accelerates the natural historical trajectory of reform in Louisiana Planting Seed Reforms Exceptional standards of accountability RSD – turnaround infrastructure and laboratory for developing best- practices LEAs implemented innovative reforms in response to accountability (e.g., TAP, HPHP schools) Building a Broad Foundation R2T tailors and scales up best-practices of Louisiana’s LEAs R2T provides resources to implement comprehensive reforms with evidence of success R2T builds critical capacity at all levels R2T develops methods for sharing best-practices R2T serves as catalyst for LDOE to truly support LEAs Reaching World-Class LDOE becomes a delivery oriented, school support institution State completes whole-system reform by advancing the 8 outcome goals of a world-class system LDOE ensures all districts have the capacity to improve all schools

7 R2T Requires Whole-System Reform Standards and Assessments Transition state to enhanced, common national academic content standards and high-quality assessments that effectively measure student performance against those standards. Data Systems to Support Instruction Develop systems based on student achievement and other data that support educators in providing improved instruction. Great Teachers and Leaders Improve teacher and principal effectiveness based on performance as measured by growth in student achievement, ensure equitable distribution of high-quality teachers and leaders and provide effective support to all educators. Turning Around the Lowest Achieving Schools Give districts additional resources to implement one of four intervention strategies in the High-Performance Schools Initiative.

8 Program Requirements of Participating LEAs Ensure all schools implement more rigorous standards and implement instructional strategies designed to assist students in meeting those standards. Use local instructional data systems (i.e., benchmarking and formative assessments) to increase the use of real-time student achievement data to drive instructional practices. Recruit and continuously support highly effective teachers and school leaders, distribute them in areas of high-need, and promote, retain and remove them based on a Comprehensive Performance Management System that is driven by student academic growth data. Intervene in schools that are persistently low-achieving (voluntary). LEA actions to implement these reforms specified in the Louisiana Education Reform Plan.

9 Financial and Regulatory: A share (Based on the Title I Formula) of the 50% of R2T money that is to Be Allocated Directly to LEAs Access to an unprecedented level of state support (see Louisiana’s Education Reform Plan for more information) Eligible for school improvement funding (up to $1.5 million per struggling school) for schools voluntarily placed in the High- Performance Schools Initiative Special consideration under accountability and streamlined reporting Benefits to Participating Districts

10 R2T Money Distribution: Amount each District, Charter or LEA receives through R2T depends on 3 unknowns: 1.What is the size of the grant award the state will receive? 2.How many districts will participate? 3.Of the districts that participate, what is the relative share of poverty in each district compared to other participating districts? Model Assumptions: roughly 50% of the state’s students (both in population and FRL) will be covered by R2T The following numbers are ESTIMATES BASED ON MODELING; FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Benefits to Participating Districts

11 Benefits of Participating Districts LEA Size R2T Total Award to Districts School Improvement Total Award to Eligible Schools** Students$100,000,000$160,000,000$1.5M per school X-Large40,000$10,000,000$18,000,000$1.5M per school Large20,000$4,000,000$7,000,000$1.5M per school Medium10,000$3,000,000$5,000,000$1.5M per school Small5,000*$2,000,000*$3,000,000$1.5M per school X-Small1,000*$1,000,000*$2,000,000$1.5M per school Charter450$225,000$300,000$1.5M per school * Signifies additional funds have been provided from the state’s share. ** Participating LEA’s must volunteer to receive a priority for funding at this level, provided the school is in corrective action and provided the approach to improving that school is a USDOE authorized approach. LDOE will work with districts to identify eligible schools.

12 How to Qualify as a Participating LEA Comply With the Following USDOE Regulations: Implement a set of broad educational improvements that support whole system reform (see LA Education Reform Plan) Obtain endorsements of the Participating LEA Partnership Agreement Accept conditions for accountability and comply with federal and state reporting requirements 90 Days after receipt of R2T funds, devise a final scope of work with specific goals, activities, timelines, budgets, key personnel, annual targets for key performance measures and a plan for how use other federal, state and local funds to support R2T reforms

13 High Performance Schools Initiative Participating LEAs can voluntarily place schools with an SPS below 75 in the state’s High-Performance Initiative. Participating LEAs will receive School Improvement Grant (SIG) funds to support one of the following interventions as outlined in the SIG & R2T regulations. Turnaround: Put in place new leadership and a majority of new staff, new school-level autonomy/governance, and improved instructional programs. Provide school with sufficient operational flexibilities (ability to select staff, control budget & expand learning time). Restart: Convert a school to a charter or EMO. School Closure: Close the school and place its students in a high-performing school within the district. Transformation: Hire new principal and implement a suite of best practices, including comprehensive instructional management reform. The suite of best practices is detailed in the Louisiana Education Reform Menu. Schools may also be eligible if they made one of these changes within the last two years.

14 Timeline for Districts December 8-14 Regional meetings and presentations – open to the public and individual discussions with Superintendents December 14 Comments on Blueprint, Plan, and Agreement due December 16 LDOE will release revised plans after consideration of feedback December 18 Districts indicate an intent to become a Participating LEA January 11 Participating LEA Partnership Agreements must be signed by all relevant parties by 12 Midnight on this date to be a partner in the state’s application January 14 Louisiana submits its R2T application

15 Whether successful in R2T or not, Louisiana will continue to pursue these goals. We want to develop the capacity and infrastructure to support world-class education in every school. We are committed to developing district-level capacity to turn around struggling schools before they reach Academically Unacceptable Status. Conclusion

16 Please visit for more information and access to all public documents. Please send questions or comments to For More Information