40 CFR 1500-1508 REGULATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURAL PROVISIONS OF NEPA Legislative vs. Discretionary Timelines - Agency Requirements for Implementing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SAFETEA-LU Efficient Environmental Review Process (Section 6002) Kelly Dunlap.
Advertisements

Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
Improvements to Project Development and Program Management of New Starts Projects FY 2008 Proposed Effective April 30, 2006.
36 CFR 218.  Moves projects documented in an Environmental Assessment (EA)/Decision Notice (DN) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/Record of Decision.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
EDDIE TERRILL AIR QUALITY DIVISION DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AUGUST 21, 2014 EPA’s 111(d) Clean Power Plan Rule: A DEQ Perspective.
Institutional Controls Pamela Elkow and Richard Fil.
Environmental Review: NEPA, TEPA and Tribes. NEPA – good and bad for Tribes Tribes can use as tool to slow, examine, participate in process and urge changes.
1 The National Environmental Policy Act in the Oil & Gas Industry.
LNG USA 2005 IQPC Houston, Texas November 9, 2005 Bruce F. Kiely Baker Botts L.L.P. Washington, D.C.
Bureau of Land Management Regulations Washington State Association of Counties Cooperating Agency & Coordination Training November 22, 2013 – Vancouver,
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
MSRA Environmental Review Requirement. Section 107 Requirements Revise and Update Procedures Consult with CEQ and Councils, involve public Sole environmental.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Utah Field Office.
Variations and Timelines in the Federal Appeals Process Robert Mathes, Bjork Lindley Little PC.
Opportunities for RAC Participation. Three Part discussion General presentation; Example of oil and gas decision making; and Panel Discussion of RAC involvement.
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Deciding How To Apply NEPA Environmental Assessments Findings of No Significant Impact Environmental Impact Statements.
Negotiating the NEPA Maze: It Really Is Rocket Science Start.
Draft RMP/EIS. Objectives Write a draft land use plan and EIS. Issue a draft land use plan and EIS for public review.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
Our mission ead and execute environmental programs and provide expertise that enables Army training, operations, acquisition and sustainable military communities.
Legal Framework for BLM Planning. Objective Describe the major laws and regulations that guide and influence planning at BLM.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
The National Environmental Policy Act
1 Cooperating Agency and Coordination Training Washington State Association of Counties Friday, November 22, 2013 Victoria Barr, Oregon/Washington State.
Implementing the Second Pillar of the Aarhus Convention: Problems Identified in the National Implementation Reports Magda Tóth Nagy, Senior Expert Geneva,
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
I Larry Heil, FHWA October 15, 2003 Environmental Streamlining.
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
Cooperating Agencies & Coordination Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) and BLM Regulations Federal Coordination with Local Government Hosted.
What is the purpose of the Class I Redesignation Guidance? Provides guidance for tribes who are considering redesignating their areas as Class I areas.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
NPS Energy Summit January 21-23, 2002 EPA Presentation Cindy Cody Director, NEPA Program EPA Region 8 (303)
MS4 Remand Rule Intergovernmental Associations Briefing September 15, 2015.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
LIFE AFTER LANDFILL – THE TRANSITION FROM LANDFILLS TO RESOURCE RECOVERY AND TRANSFER STATION 27 September 2007 "Planning – Guidance on Planning Issues.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The Pre-Filing Process IRWA/AI January 13-14, 2009 IRWA/AI.
State of implementation of the decision III/6f regarding Ukraine (MOP 2, June, , 2008, Riga, Latvia)
Tier I: Module 5 CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program Element 4: Verification & Certification.
Designations for 24-Hour PM2.5 NAAQS: Overview and Guidance Amy Vasu PM2.5 Workshop June 20-21, 2007.
ADS 204 – Environmental Procedures. EA Training Course Tellus Institute 2 USAID ADS 204  Authority  Objective è Environmental sustainability.
The National Environmental Policy Act and Oil and Gas Development in Region 8 WESTAR Oil and Gas Conference October 22, 2008.
April 2006 Middle Fork Project Relicensing Process April 25, 2006
Cooperating Agency Status Presented by Horst Greczmiel Associate Director, NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental Quality Washington, DC September 14,
CHAPTER 4 ALTERNATIVES. --- “The driving impetus for conducting environmental impact studies is to comparatively present the effects of proposed alternatives.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Monitoring and Evaluation. Objective Identify appropriate monitoring techniques. Identify approaches to evaluating plan implementation and effectiveness.
United States Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management Winnemucca District Draft Resource Management Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Statement.
Clean Air Act Section 111 WESTAR Meeting Presented by Lisa Conner U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation November 6, 2013.
Rulemaking by APHIS. What is a rule and when must APHIS conduct rulemaking? Under U.S. law, a rule is any requirement of general applicability and future.
Preparation Plan. Objectives Describe the role and importance of a preparation plan. Describe the key contents of a preparation plan. Identify and discuss.
1 1 CEQA Scoping Naomi Feger Planning TMDL Section Leader Region 2.
By: Alyssa Kaiser and Celia Rozanski. Before the Act Prior to 1969, the USA had no clear environmental policy Prior to 1969, the USA had no clear environmental.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
Welcome to the Public Comment Hearing on the Proposed Regulatory Update to the California Environmental Quality Act AB 52, Gatto (2014) Heather Baugh Assistant.
“The people’s forests” Public Participation in National Forest Planning Susan Jane Brown, Staff Attorney Western Environmental Law Center The National.
Submittal And Review Of New And Revised Water Quality Standards
Water Quality Standards Submittal & Review Process
Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement and
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Environmental Planning in the Army Corps of Engineers
National Environmental Policy Act 2018: Making NEPA Great Again!
Stakeholder Engagement: Webinar Part I: The Regulatory Development Process for the Government of Canada Part II: Making Technical Regulations Under.
Federal EIS Air Quality Analysis
Presentation transcript:

40 CFR REGULATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURAL PROVISIONS OF NEPA Legislative vs. Discretionary Timelines - Agency Requirements for Implementing Project Level EAs and EISs June 11, 2008

Buys & Associates, Inc. Our discussion focuses on key tasks that have the most salient impact on the timing of O&G project EAs and EISs.

Buys & Associates, Inc. Decision to Prepare an EA or EIS? (Sections and ) Task-Level Time Frames

Buys & Associates, Inc. An EIS is prepared when: 1)The action normally requires an EIS; or 2)When the agency knows there will be significant impacts. For other situations, an EA is usually prepared. EISs are more involved than EAs, and have more task-specific, non-discretionary, and lengthy timeframes.

Buys & Associates, Inc. Key Tasks for EISs: Proposed Action Internal Scoping Draft Notice of Intent (NOI) Review Public Scoping Preparation of Preliminary Draft EIS (PDEIS) Internal review of PDEIS Notice of Availability (NOA) & Draft EIS (DEIS) Internal Review DEIS Public Comment Period Responses to Comments (RTCs) & Preparation of Preliminary Final EIS (PFEIS) NOA, Final (FEIS) and Draft ROD Review FEIS Availability ROD Appeal Period

Buys & Associates, Inc. Proposed Action Prior to public scoping the operator must have a Proposed Action to present to the public. This task, although technically outside the formal EIS process, can take a substantial amount of time. Timing is operator-specific: How long will it take you to prepare a complete Proposed Action? Do you know what the agency wants/needs to see in the Proposed Action? Do you have a feel for the key issues of the project area; things that you may need to consider within the operational aspects of your Proposed Action? Is the agency expecting you – are they planning for an EIS? All of the above boil down to pre-planning; start your pre- planning 6 to 18 months before you want the formal EIS process to begin.

Buys & Associates, Inc. Internal Scoping Once your Proposed Action is received by the agency, there is usually some level of internal scoping that is conducted in conjunction with the lead agency prior to the formal public scoping period. During this general timeframe, the lead agency prepares the Notice of Intent (NOI). Internal scoping can take 2 – 6 months before agency is ready to officially scope the project to the public. Timing depends on the completeness of your Proposed Action, sensitivity of the project area, scope of the project, and budget and staffing availability.

Buys & Associates, Inc. Draft NOI Review Prior to publication in the Federal Register, the draft NOI is reviewed by (as appropriate) upper agency management (e.g., USFS Solicitor Office, BIA Regional Office, or BLM State and Washington Offices): –Although CEQ provides no guidance on time frames for NOI review, plan for at least days Acceleration of this time frame often requires pressure by the lead agency and operator Recent Wyoming and Utah NOIs: Sat in the Washington Office of the BLM for over 6 months before being approved for publication

Buys & Associates, Inc. Formal Public Scoping ( and ) CLOCK STARTS when the EPA publishes the NOI (1501.7) in their Federal Register: – Although CEQ provides no guidance on required time frames, public scoping takes no less than 45 days –Lead agency has discretion to extend the scoping period

Buys & Associates, Inc. Preparation of PDEIS Realistic estimate = 9 months to 2 years depending on: 1) The scope of the Proposed Action, 2) Degree to which the action is controversial, 3) Scope of the EIS (e.g., # of alternatives, depth of analysis), and 4) Degree to which relevant baseline information is available (i.e., is field work needed first ?),

Buys & Associates, Inc. Preparation of PDEIS Other factors affecting how long it takes to prepare the PDEIS: Involvement by Cooperating Agencies and Consulting Parties – it’s valuable, but consensus/compromise is difficult and time consuming Changes to the Proposed Action or alternatives – changes have ripple effects

Buys & Associates, Inc. PDEIS Internal Review i.e., Review of the PDEIS by the lead agency, Cooperating Agencies, and operator –timing is at the lead agency’s discretion, plan for at least 30 days. –At a minimum, the lead agency will review the PDEIS. –Limiting internal review periods becomes more difficult with each agency office, Cooperating Agency or Consulting Party in the mix (more schedules to accommodate)

Buys & Associates, Inc. NOA and DEIS Internal Review i.e., Review by USFS Solicitor Office, BIA Regional Office, or BLM State and Washington Offices –Although CEQ provides no formal guidance on time frames for NOA review, plan for at least days Timeframe can usually be expedited if the Solicitor/Regional/State/Washington Office(s) is involved early in the process –Last minute involvement can result in significant delays (e.g., 2 recent NOAs and DEISs sat in the Washington Office of the BLM for over 6 months, were remanded and had to be revised/re- printed) –For recent EIS where Washington BLM had been involved since scoping, the NOA and DEIS review took about 2 months

Buys & Associates, Inc. NOA and DEIS Internal Review And sometimes, even with early involvement, review by agency upper management can result in major schedule slip. Acceleration of this time frame often requires pressure by the lead agency, operator, and sometimes legal counsel

Buys & Associates, Inc. DEIS Public Review After preparing a DEIS, the agency shall (1503.1): Obtain comments of any Federal agency with jurisdiction by law or special expertise with respect to any environmental impact involved or which is authorized to develop and enforce environmental standards (e.g., EPA under Clean Air Act). Request the comments of appropriate State and local agencies…, Indian Tribes…, and any [other] agency which has requested that it receive [DEISs]. Request comments from the public.

Buys & Associates, Inc. DEIS Public Review CLOCK STARTS when EPA publishes NOA in their Federal Register CEQ guidelines ( (d)) require no less than 45 days for DEIS public review but agencies have discretion to add additional time – plan for at least 60 days plus requests for additional time Minimum 90-day review period if the EIS decision is going amend a land use plan

Buys & Associates, Inc. Responses to Comments & Preparation of PFEIS Realistic range = 3 months to 1 year depending on the volume of comments and whether comments: 1)modify the alternatives, 2)lead to consideration of additional alternatives, 3)modify the impact analysis.

Buys & Associates, Inc. PFEIS Internal Review i.e., review/edits by lead agency, upper agency management, Cooperating Agencies, and operator: –Although CEQ provides no formal guidance on time frames for NOA review, plan for at least 30 days Reviewers will be looking at how the EIS was revised based on public comments – RTCs generally receive careful scrutiny

Buys & Associates, Inc. NOA, FEIS and Draft ROD Review i.e., Review by USFS Solicitor Office, BIA Regional Office, or BLM State and Washington Offices: –Although CEQ provides no guidance on time frames for NOA, FEIS, and Draft ROD review - plan for at least days. Again, acceleration of this discretionary time frame often requires pressure by the lead agency, operator, and legal counsel

Buys & Associates, Inc. FEIS Availability CLOCK STARTS when the EPA publishes the NOA (1506.6) in their Federal Register: –CEQ guidelines require no less than 30 days –Substantive comments on FEISs do not have to be incorporated into a revised FEIS, but are generally responded to by the agency within the ROD

Buys & Associates, Inc. ROD Appeal Period No less than 30 days for ROD appeal + additional time if there’s a land use plan amendment (40 CFR 1610), which for BLM projects are becoming commonplace given the number of outdated RMPs: –60-day Governor’s consistency review with State and local plans (is sometimes concurrently with FEIS review), –30-day protest period afforded to the public (can run concurrently with 30-day ROD appeal period), –discretionary protest resolution period (up to 90 days can be taken to resolve protests on land use plan decisions)

Buys & Associates, Inc. Save appeals and/or litigation, the EIS process is now complete, but what about timing on EAs?

Buys & Associates, Inc. TYPICAL Task Level Timing for EAs is Agency-specific & Project-specific: TasksTime Frames Pre-planning & Internal scoping2 – 4 months Public Scoping days Prep. of Internal Draft EA2 – 4 months Internal Draft EA Review(s) USUALLY months per review Draft EA Public Review days RTCs and EA Revisions2 weeks - 2 months Agency Final ReviewUSUALLY 2 weeks - 2 months Final EA Public ReviewUsually 0 days Decision Record/Notice 30-day average Appeal Period

Buys & Associates, Inc. Start – Finish? Project Level Time Frames (Section )

Buys & Associates, Inc. CEQ says:Large, complex energy project EISs - 12 months start to finish. More realistic - 3 to 5 years CEQ says: EAs – 3 months start to finish. More realistic - 6 months to about 2 years While CEQ has made suggestions on time limits for EAs and EISs, in reality, timeframes are agency-specific, operator-specific, and (especially these days) project scope, project area, and issue-specific.

Buys & Associates, Inc. Keys to keeping the NEPA process running: Operator needs to establish early dialogue with the lead Agency – get on the agency’s schedule; Operator needs to prepare a thorough Proposed Action - avoid 11 th hour changes when feasible; Early/Ongoing involvement by upper agency management, Cooperating Agencies, other stakeholders - avoid 11 th hour revisions; Know the sticking points of the project and project area and try to preempt holdups; Understand that small details can yield big delays. So, COMMUNICATE - Make sure everyone understands roles, responsibilities, and timelines throughout the process