How does PROMIS compare to other HRQOL measures? Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA, Los Angeles, CA Symposium 1077: Measurement Tools to Enhance Health- Related.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Social And Behavioral Determinants of Health Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. (UCLA) February 6, 2014 (8:40-9:35 am session) Institute of Medicine Committee on Recommended.
Advertisements

Differential Item Functioning of the English- and Spanish-Administered HINTS Psychological Distress Scale Chih-Hung Chang, Ph.D. Feinberg School of Medicine.
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System.
PROMIS DEVELOPMENT METHODS, ANALYSES AND APPLICATIONS Presented at the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): A Resource for.
PROMIS: The Right Place at the Right Time? David Cella, Ph.D. Department of Medical Social Sciences Northwestern University Chair, PROMIS Steering Committee.
15-minute Introduction to PROMIS Ron D. Hays, Ph.D UCLA Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research Roundtable Meeting on Measuring.
NIH and PROMIS ® ACR-2012 Clinical Highlights November 14, 2012 James Witter MD, PhD FACR CSO PROMIS Medical Officer: Rheumatic Diseases NIH/NIAMS/DSRD.
Why Patient-Reported Outcomes Are Important: Growing Implications and Applications for Rheumatologists Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA Department of Medicine RAND.
Item Response Theory in Patient-Reported Outcomes Research Ron D. Hays, Ph.D., UCLA Society of General Internal Medicine California-Hawaii Regional Meeting.
Cross-Cultural Use of Measurements: Development of the Chinese SF-36 Health Survey Xinhua S. Ren, Ph.D. Boston University School of Public Health, Boston,
Computerized Adaptive Testing in Clinical Substance Abuse Practice: Issues and Strategies Barth Riley Lighthouse Institute, Chestnut Health Systems.
1 Reducing the duration and cost of assessment with the GAIN: Computer Adaptive Testing.
1 Health-Related Quality of Life Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. - UCLA Department of Medicine: Division of General Internal Medicine.
Performance of PROMIS® CATs Versus Short forms in Detecting Change Ron D. Hays October 3, 2011 International Association for Computer.
LOINC for Patient-Reported and Clinician-Administered Psychological Tests Saul Rosenberg, PhD Clinical LOINC Meeting January 28, 2011 Tucson, AZ.
Primer on Evaluating Reliability and Validity of Multi-Item Scales Questionnaire Design and Testing Workshop October 25, 2013, 3:30-5:00pm Wilshire.
Rare Diseases and PROMIS : Opportunities Natcher Conference Center March 1, 2013 James Witter MD, PhD FACR CSO PROMIS Medical Officer: Rheumatic Diseases.
1 Health-Related Quality of Life as an Indicator of Quality of Care Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. HS216—Quality Assessment: Making the Business Case.
Construction and Evaluation of Multi-item Scales Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. RCMAR/EXPORT September 15, 2008, 3-4pm
The emotional distress of children with cancer in China: An Item Response Analysis of C-Ped-PROMIS Anxiety and Depression Short Forms Yanyan Liu 1, Changrong.
Use of Health-Related Quality of Life Measures to Assess Individual Patients July 24, 2014 (1:00 – 2:00 PDT) Kaiser Permanente Methods Webinar Series Ron.
Health-Related Quality of Life as an Indicator of Quality of Care May 4, 2014 (8:30 – 11:30 PDT) HPM216: Quality Assessment/ Making the Business Case for.
SAS PROC IRT July 20, 2015 RCMAR/EXPORT Methods Seminar 3-4pm Acknowledgements: - Karen L. Spritzer - NCI (1U2-CCA )
DEPRESSION INDICATOR Instructions: Read each statement carefully. Use the following scale to indicate how often you have felt that way during the past.
PROMIS ® : Advancing the Science of PRO measurement Common Data Elements NIH CDE Webinar September 8, 2015 Ashley Wilder Smith, PhD, MPH Chief, Outcomes.
Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA Department of Medicine RAND Health Program UCLA Fielding School of Public Health
Development of Physical and Mental Health Summary Scores from PROMIS Global Items Ron D. Hays ( ) UCLA Department of Medicine
Introduction to the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) UCLA Center for East-West Medicine 2428 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite.
Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life
1 11/17/2015 Psychometric Modeling and Calibration Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. September 11, 2006 PROMIS development process session 10:45am-12:30 pm.
Impact of using a next button in a web-based health survey on time to complete and reliability of measurement Ron D. Hays (Rita Bode, Nan Rothrock, William.
Item Response Theory (IRT) Models for Questionnaire Evaluation: Response to Reeve Ron D. Hays October 22, 2009, ~3:45-4:05pm
Multi-item Scale Evaluation Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA Division of General Internal Medicine/Health Services Research
Psychometric Evaluation of Questionnaire Design and Testing Workshop December , 10:00-11:30 am Wilshire Suite 710 DATA.
Measurement of Outcomes Ron D. Hays Accelerating eXcellence In translational Science (AXIS) January 17, 2013 (2:00-3:00 pm) 1720 E. 120 th Street, L.A.,
Considerations in Comparing Groups of People with PROs Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA Department of Medicine May 6, 2008, 3:45-5:00pm ISPOR, Toronto, Canada.
Patient-Reported Physical Functioning Ron D. Hays November 27, 2012 (11:15-11:30) UCLA Department of Medicine MCID for Orthopaedic Devices Silver Springs,
TOMS/NOMS FY12- FY14 Adult Survey Analysis: Does treatment lead to changes over time? 2/16/2016 Prepared by: Abigail Howard, Ph.D.
Impact of using a next button in a web-based health survey on time to complete and reliability of measurement Ron D. Hays (Rita Bode, Nan Rothrock, William.
Overview of Item Response Theory Ron D. Hays November 14, 2012 (8:10-8:30am) Geriatrics Society of America (GSA) Pre-Conference Workshop on Patient- Reported.
Estimating Minimally Important Differences on PROMIS Domain Scores Ron D. Hays UCLA Department of Medicine/Division of General Internal Medicine & Health.
Health-Related Quality of Life in Outcome Studies Ron D. Hays, Ph.D UCLA Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research GCRC Summer Session.
Reducing Burden on Patient- Reported Outcomes Using Multidimensional Computer Adaptive Testing Scott B. MorrisMichael Bass Mirinae LeeRichard E. Neapolitan.
The Impact of Lifestyle Modification on the Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients With Reflux Esophagitis Receiving Treatment With a Proton Pump Inhibitor.
Test-Retest Reliability of the Work Disability Functional Assessment Battery (WD-FAB) Dr. Leighton Chan, MD, MPH Chief, Rehabilitation Medicine Department.
Value Based and Patient Reported Outcomes David N. Assis, MD Assistant Professor of Medicine Yale University.
Introduction to Neuro-QoL
Introduction to ASCQ-MeSM
Psychometric Evaluation of Items Ron D. Hays
QDET2, Miami, FL, Hibiscus A
NIH: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Ron D. Hays Functional Vision and Visual Function November 10, 2016, 8:55-9:15am.
UCLA Department of Medicine
UCLA Department of Medicine
Evaluating Multi-Item Scales
PROMIS-29 V2.0 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scores Ron D. Hays
Linking Fatigue Measures on a Common Reporting Metric
Ron D. Hays GIM-HSR Friday Noon Seminar Series November 4, 2016
Introduction to ASCQ-Me®
Introduction to Neuro-QoL
Cerebral palsy profile (cp-pro)
Linking Fatigue Measures on a Common Reporting Metric
Introduction to Neuro-QoL
Introduction to ASCQ-Me®
A Multi-Dimensional PSER Stopping Rule
Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of Multi-Item Scales
Evaluating Multi-item Scales
Item Response Theory Applications in Health Ron D. Hays, Discussant
International Perthes Study Group
Evaluating the Significance of Individual Change
GIM & HSR Research Seminar: October 5, 2018
Presentation transcript:

How does PROMIS compare to other HRQOL measures? Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA, Los Angeles, CA Symposium 1077: Measurement Tools to Enhance Health- Related Quality of Life Research: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)

Advantages of Short-Forms Developed from Item Banks Select a set of items that are matched to the severity level of the target population. All scales built from the same item bank are linked on a common metric.

no depression mild depression moderate depression severe depression extreme depression    Depressive Symptoms Item Bank Item 1 Item 2 Item 3 Item 4 Item 5 Item 6 Item 7 Item 8 Item 9 Item n   Depression Symptoms Form A Depression Symptoms Form B Depressive Symptoms Form C

Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) CAT selects each question to be administered based on a person’s response to previously administered questions. By iteratively estimating a person’s standing on the domain (e.g., depressive symptoms) and administering the most informative items, the maximum possible level of precision can be obtained with the fewest number of questions.

Example of Short Forms and CAT Compare results from respondents based on two different depressive symptoms short forms, CAT, and full item bank. Do they produce equivalent results? Implications for use of alternate PROMIS short forms in clinical trials.

Respondent (n = 752) Characteristics Responded to the 28 items in the PROMIS depressive symptoms item bank –Mean age = 51 (18-93 range) –52% female –78% white, 10% Hispanic, 10% black –22% high school graduate or less

Ordering of 28 Depressive Symptom items, Least to Most Severe (Short Form A and B items indicated with superscript) #Item# 1I felt sad b 15I felt guilty 2I felt disappointed in myself a 16I felt that I was not as good as other people 3I felt unhappy b 17I felt that nothing was interesting b 4I felt discouraged about the future a 18I felt like a failure a 5I felt pessimistic19I felt that my life was empty b 6I felt emotionally exhausted20I felt that I was not needed 7I had trouble feeing close to people21I felt that I had nothing to look forward to a 8I felt lonely22I felt upset for no reason 9I felt depressed23I felt helpless b 10I found that things in my life were overwhelming a 24I felt that nothing could cheer me up a 11I had trouble making decisions25I felt hopeless b 12I felt ignored by people26I felt worthless a 13I withdrew from other people27I felt that I wanted to give up on everything b 14I felt that I was to blame for things28I felt I had no reason for living a

Form A Items #In the past 7 days…Mean% Never 2I felt disappointed in myself I felt discouraged about the future I found that things in my life were overwhelming I felt like a failure I felt that I had nothing to look forward to I felt that nothing could cheer me up I felt worthless I felt I had no reason for living Response Options: Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, Always

Form B Items #In the past 7 days…Mean% Never 1I felt sad I felt unhappy I felt depressed I felt that nothing was interesting I felt that my life was empty I felt helpless I felt hopeless I felt I wanted to give up on everything Response Options: Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, Always

Mean, Minimum and Maximum Scores Form A (8 items) Form B (8 items) CAT (8 items) Full Bank (28 items) Mean49 Minimum Maximum

Correlations Among Forms Form AForm BCAT Form A Form B CAT Bank

Scale Score Comparisons: Short Forms, CAT (8 items) and Full-Bank (28 Items)

Correlation of Depressive Symptoms Bank with CESD

Fatigue Experience and Impact 95-item bank Legacy Instruments SF-36 Vitality Scale (4 items) FACIT-Fatigue Scale (13 items)

4-item SF36/Vitality 4-item CAT 13-item FACIT-Fatigue 13-item CAT 98-item Bank No Fatigue Severe Fatigue SE=0.32 (r=0.90) SE=0.22 (r=0.95) Comparison of Measurement Precision Full-length Item Bank vs. Legacy vs. CAT vs. Short-form Standard Error

PROMIS Fatigue Short Form Garcia SF et al, J Clin Onc, © 2007 Reprinted with permission of the PROMIS Health Organization and the PROMIS Cooperative Group

7-item Short-form 7-item CAT 98-item Bank No Fatigue Severe Fatigue SE=0.32 (r=0.90) SE=0.22 (r=0.95) Comparison of Measurement Precision Full-length Item Bank vs. Legacy vs. CAT vs. Short-form Standard Error

SE = 3.2 rel = 0.90 SE = 2.2 rel = PROMIS CAT 10 items PROMIS 10 items SF items Physical Functioning SF PROMIS CAT PROMIS static 10

Questions?

Never Rarely Some times Often Always In the past 7 days, I felt unhappy. Item Response Theory (IRT): Category Response Curves very mildsevere Depressive Symptoms very mildsevere Depressive Symptoms Never Rarely Some times Often Always In the past 7 days, I felt I had no reason for living.