Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Linking Fatigue Measures on a Common Reporting Metric

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Linking Fatigue Measures on a Common Reporting Metric"— Presentation transcript:

1 Linking Fatigue Measures on a Common Reporting Metric
Jin-Shei Lai, PhD, David Cella, PhD, Betina Yanez, PhD, Arthur Stone, PhD  Journal of Pain and Symptom Management  Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages (October 2014) DOI: /j.jpainsymman Copyright © 2014 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Terms and Conditions

2 Fig. 1 Comparisons of T-scores from fixed-parameter and Stocking-Lord linking methods. All but one subject in the SF-36 Vitality Scale and one in Neuro-QOL showed discrepancies between these two methods were within 1 T-score range (.1 SD). a) Linking between PROMIS FIB and Vitality. b) Linking between PROMIS FIB and NeuroQOL Fatigue. SF-36=Short Form 36; Neuro-QOL=Quality of Life in Neurological Disorder; PROMIS=Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System; FIB=Fatigue Item Bank. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management  , DOI: ( /j.jpainsymman ) Copyright © 2014 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Terms and Conditions


Download ppt "Linking Fatigue Measures on a Common Reporting Metric"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google