Chapter 9A Process Capability and Statistical Quality Control

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 1997 Prentice-Hall, Inc. S3 - 1 Principles of Operations Management Quality Via Statistical Process Control Chapter S3.
Advertisements

Operations Management Statistical Process Control Supplement 6
Quality Assurance (Quality Control)
Chapter 9A. Process Capability & Statistical Quality Control
1 © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2006 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Technical Note 9 Process Capability and Statistical Quality Control.
Operations Management Supplement 6 – Statistical Process Control © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer/Render Principles.
Statistical Process Control Operations Management Dr. Ron Lembke.
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.S6 – 1 Operations Management Chapter 8 - Statistical Process Control PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer/Render Principles.
Chapter 18 Introduction to Quality
13–1. 13–2 Chapter Thirteen Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Managing Quality Chapter 5.
Statistical Process Control Operations Management Dr. Ron Tibben-Lembke.
Statistical Process Control
Statistical Process Control Managing for Quality Dr. Ron Lembke.
S6 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S6 Statistical Process Control PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and Render.
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.S6 – 1 Operations Management Supplement 6 – Statistical Process Control PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer/Render Principles.
J0444 OPERATION MANAGEMENT SPC Pert 11 Universitas Bina Nusantara.
1 © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Technical Note 7 Process Capability and Statistical Quality Control.
CHAPTER 8TN Process Capability and Statistical Quality Control
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 10 Quality Control.
Irwin/McGraw-Hill 1 TN7: Basic Forms of Statistical Sampling for Quality Control Acceptance Sampling: Sampling to accept or reject the immediate lot of.
Control Charts for Variables
MIM 558 Comparative Operations Management Dr. Alan Raedels, C.P.M.
Statistical Process Control Operations Management Dr. Ron Tibben-Lembke.
Using Control Charts to Keep an Eye on Variability Operations Management Dr. Ron Lembke.
X AND R CHART EXAMPLE IN-CLASS EXERCISE The following collection of data represents samples of the amount of force applied in a gluing process: Determine.
QUALITY CONTROL AND SPC
X-bar and R Control Charts
Statistical Process Control
Statistical Quality Control/Statistical Process Control
Statistical Applications in Quality and Productivity Management Sections 1 – 8. Skip 5.
Process Capability and SPC
To accompany Quantitative Analysis for Management, 8e by Render/Stair/Hanna 17-1 © 2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ Chapter 17.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Quality Management CHAPTER 6.
1 © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2006 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Technical Note 8 Process Capability and Statistical Quality Control.
THE MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF QUALITY, 5e, © 2002 South-Western/Thomson Learning TM 1 Chapter 12 Statistical Process Control.
Statistical Process Control Chapters A B C D E F G H.
Process Capability and SPC
Statistical Process Control
Process Capability and Statistical Process Control.
Statistical Process Control (SPC) Chapter 6. MGMT 326 Foundations of Operations Introduction Strategy Quality Assurance Capacity, Facilities, & Work Design.
Control Charts for Attributes
Chapter 13 Statistical Quality Control Method
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.S6 – 1 Operations Management Supplement 6 – Statistical Process Control © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. PowerPoint presentation to.
Statistical Process Control (SPC)
Operations Management
Statistical Quality Control/Statistical Process Control
Statistical Quality Control
Operations Fall 2015 Bruce Duggan Providence University College.
Production and Operations Management: Manufacturing and Services PowerPoint Presentation for Chapter 7 Supplement Statistical Quality Control © The McGraw-Hill.
1 Slides used in class may be different from slides in student pack Technical Note 8 Process Capability and Statistical Quality Control  Process Variation.
1 © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Technical Note 7 Process Capability and Statistical Quality Control.
MGS8020 Measure.ppt/Mar 26, 2015/Page 1 Georgia State University - Confidential MGS 8020 Business Intelligence Measure Mar 26, 2015.
Inspection- “back-end quality control” BUT, Start by designing quality into the front end of the process- the design QFD (Quality Function Deployment)
Quality Control  Statistical Process Control (SPC)
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Process Capability and Statistical Quality Control.
© 1998 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 1/e Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel Statistical Applications.
Quality Control Chapter 6. Transformation Process Inputs Facilities Equipment Materials Energy Outputs Goods & Services Variation in inputs create variation.
1 © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved Technical Note 8 Process Capability and Statistical Quality Control.
Assignable variation Deviations with a specific cause or source. Click here for Hint assignable variation or SPC or LTPD?
Acceptable quality level (AQL) Proportion of defects a consumer considers acceptable. Click here for Hint AQL or producer’s risk or assignable variation?
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.S6 – 1 Operations Management Supplement 6 – Statistical Process Control © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. PowerPoint presentation to.
acceptable quality level (AQL) Proportion of defects
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel 3rd Edition
10 Quality Control.
Process Capability.
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 9A Process Capability and Statistical Quality Control Process Variation Process Capability Process Control Procedures Variable data Attribute data Acceptance Sampling Operating Characteristic Curve

Basic Causes of Variation Assignable causes are factors that can be clearly identified and possibly managed. Common causes are inherent to the production process. In order to reduce variation due to common causes, the process must be changed. Key: Determining which is which!

Types of Control Charts Attribute (Go or no-go information) Defectives refers to the acceptability of product across a range of characteristics. p-chart application Variable (Continuous) Usually measured by the mean and the standard deviation. X-bar and R chart applications

Types of Statistical Quality Control Process Process Acceptance Acceptance Control Control Sampling Sampling Variables Variables Attributes Attributes Variables Variables Attributes Attributes Charts Charts Charts Charts

Excellent review in exhibit TN8.5. Statistical Process Control (SPC) Charts UCL LCL Samples over time 1 2 3 4 5 6 Normal Behavior Look for trends! UCL LCL Samples over time 1 2 3 4 5 6 Possible problem, investigate Excellent review in exhibit TN8.5. UCL LCL Samples over time 1 2 3 4 5 6 Possible problem, investigate

Control Limits We establish the Upper Control Limits (UCL) and the Lower Control Limits (LCL) with plus or minus 3 standard deviations. Based on this we can expect 99.7% of our sample observations to fall within these limits. x LCL UCL 99.7%

Example of Constructing a p-Chart: Required Data Sample Sample size Number of defectives

Statistical Process Control Formulas: Attribute Measurements (p-Chart) Given: Compute control limits:

Example of Constructing a p-chart: Step 1 1. Calculate the sample proportions, p (these are what can be plotted on the p-chart) for each sample.

Example of Constructing a p-chart: Steps 2&3 2. Calculate the average of the sample proportions. 3. Calculate the standard deviation of the sample proportion

Example of Constructing a p-chart: Step 4 4. Calculate the control limits. UCL = 0.0930 LCL = -0.0197 (0)

Example of Constructing a p-Chart: Step 5 5. Plot the individual sample proportions, the average of the proportions, and the control limits

R Chart Type of variables control chart Shows sample ranges over time Interval or ratio scaled numerical data Shows sample ranges over time Difference between smallest & largest values in inspection sample Monitors variability in process Example: Weigh samples of coffee & compute ranges of samples; Plot

R Chart Control Limits From Table (function of sample size) Sample Range in sample i # Samples

R Chart Example You’re manager of a 500-room hotel. You want to analyze the time it takes to deliver luggage to the room. For 7 days, you collect data on 5 deliveries per day. Is the process in control?

R Chart Hotel Data Sample Day Delivery Time Mean Range 1 7.30 4.20 6.10 3.45 5.55 5.32 7.30 + 4.20 + 6.10 + 3.45 + 5.55 5 Sample Mean =

R Chart Hotel Data Sample Day Delivery Time Mean Range 1 7.30 4.20 6.10 3.45 5.55 5.32 3.85 Largest Smallest 7.30 - 3.45 Sample Range =

R Chart Hotel Data Sample Day Delivery Time Mean Range 1 7.30 4.20 6.10 3.45 5.55 5.32 3.85 2 4.60 8.70 7.60 4.43 7.62 6.59 4.27 3 5.98 2.92 6.20 4.20 5.10 4.88 3.28 4 7.20 5.10 5.19 6.80 4.21 5.70 2.99 5 4.00 4.50 5.50 1.89 4.46 4.07 3.61 6 10.10 8.10 6.50 5.06 6.94 7.34 5.04 7 6.77 5.08 5.90 6.90 9.30 6.79 4.22

R Chart Control Limits Solution From Table (n = 5)

R Chart Control Chart Solution UCL R-bar

X Chart Type of variables control chart Shows sample means over time Interval or ratio scaled numerical data Shows sample means over time Monitors process average Example: Weigh samples of coffee & compute means of samples; Plot

X Chart Control Limits From Table Mean of sample i Range of sample i # Samples

X Chart Example You’re manager of a 500-room hotel. You want to analyze the time it takes to deliver luggage to the room. For 7 days, you collect data on 5 deliveries per day. Is the process in control?

X Chart Hotel Data Sample Day Delivery Time Mean Range 1 7.30 4.20 6.10 3.45 5.55 5.32 3.85 2 4.60 8.70 7.60 4.43 7.62 6.59 4.27 3 5.98 2.92 6.20 4.20 5.10 4.88 3.28 4 7.20 5.10 5.19 6.80 4.21 5.70 2.99 5 4.00 4.50 5.50 1.89 4.46 4.07 3.61 6 10.10 8.10 6.50 5.06 6.94 7.34 5.04 7 6.77 5.08 5.90 6.90 9.30 6.79 4.22

X Chart Control Limits Solution* From Table (n = 5)

X Chart Control Chart Solution* UCL X-bar LCL

X AND R CHART EXAMPLE IN-CLASS EXERCISE The following collection of data represents samples of the amount of force applied in a gluing process: Determine if the process is in control by calculating the appropriate upper and lower control limits of the X-bar and R charts.

X AND R CHART EXAMPLE IN-CLASS EXERCISE

Example of x-bar and R charts: Step 1 Example of x-bar and R charts: Step 1. Calculate sample means, sample ranges, mean of means, and mean of ranges.

Example of x-bar and R charts: Step 2 Example of x-bar and R charts: Step 2. Determine Control Limit Formulas and Necessary Tabled Values

Example of x-bar and R charts: Steps 3&4 Example of x-bar and R charts: Steps 3&4. Calculate x-bar Chart and Plot Values

Example of x-bar and R charts: Steps 5&6: Calculate R-chart and Plot Values

SOLUTION: Example of x-bar and R charts: 1. Is the process in Control? 2. If not, what could be the cause for the process being out of control?

Process Capability Process limits - actual capabilities of process based on historical data Tolerance limits - what process design calls for - desired performance of process

Process Capability How do the limits relate to one another? You want: tolerance range > process range 1. Make bigger 2. Make smaller Two methods of accomplishing this: Implies having greater control over process Þ Good! Bad idea

Process Capability Measurement Cp index = Tolerance range / Process range What value(s) would you like for Cp? Þ Larger Cp indicates a more reliable and predictable process (less variability) The Cp index is based on the assumption that the process mean is centered at the midpoint of the tolerance range

LTL UTL

While the Cp index provides useful information on process variability, it does not give information on the process average relative to the tolerance limits. Note: LTL UTL

Cpk Index = process mean (Unknown but can be estimated Refers to the LTL Refers to the UTL = process mean (Unknown but can be estimated with the grand mean) s = standard deviation (Unknown but can be estimated with the average range) Together, these process capability Indices show how well parts being produced conform to design specifications.

Since Cp and Cpk are different we can conclude that the process is not centered, however the Cp index tells us that the process variability is very low LTL UTL

An example of the use of process capability indices The design specifications for a machined slot is 0.5± .003 inches. Samples have been taken and the process mean is estimated to be .501. The process standard deviation is estimated to be .001. What can you say about the capability of this process to produce this dimension?

Process capability Machined slot (inches) 0.497 inches 0.503 inches LTL 0.503 inches UTL  = 0.001 inches Process mean 0.501 inches

Sampling Distributions (The Central Limit Theorem) Regardless of the underlying distribution, if the sample is large enough (>30), the distribution of sample means will be normally distributed around the population mean with a standard deviation of :

Computing Process Capability Indexes Using Control Chart Data Recall the following info from our in class exercise: Since A2 is calculated on the assumption of three sigma limits:

From the Central Limit Theorem: So, Therefore,

Suppose the Design Specs for the Gluing Process were 10. 7  Suppose the Design Specs for the Gluing Process were 10.7  .2, Calculate the Cp and Cpk Indexes: Answer:

Note, multiplying each component of the Cpk calculation by 3 yields a Z value. You can use this to predict the % of items outside the tolerance limits: From Appendix E we would expect: .008 + .036 = .044 or 4.4% non-conforming product from this process .792 * 3 = 2.38 .597 * 3 = 1.79 .008 or .8% of the curve .036 or 3.6% of the curve

Capability Index – In Class Exercise You are a manufacturer of equipment. A drive shaft is purchased from a supplier close by. The blueprint for the shaft specs indicate a tolerance of 5.5 inches ± .003 inches. Your supplier is reporting a mean of 5.501 inches. And a standard deviation of .0015 inches. What is the Cpk index for the supplier’s process?

Your engineering department is sent to the supplier’s site to help improve the capability on the shaft machining process. The result is that the process is now centered and the CP index is now .75. On a percentage basis, what is the improvement on the percentage of shafts which will be unusable (outside the tolerance limits)?

To answer this question we must determine the percentage of defective shafts before and after the intervention from our engineering department

Before: From Table From Table .004 .089 Total % outside (3x.88) =2.67s 3x.444 = 1.33s Total % outside Tolerance = .089 + .004 = .093 or 9.3% -4

After Since the process is centered then Cpk = Cp; Cp = UTL-LTL / 6s, so the tolerance limits are .75 x 6s = 4.5s apart each 2.25s from the mean From Table .012 2.25s 2.25s So % outside of Tolerance = .012(2) = .024 Or 2.4% -4

So the percentage decrease in defective parts is 1 – (2.4/9.3) = 74%

Basic Forms of Statistical Sampling for Quality Control Sampling to accept or reject the immediate lot of product at hand (Acceptance Sampling). Sampling to determine if the process is within acceptable limits (Statistical Process Control)

Acceptance Sampling Purposes Advantages Determine quality level Ensure quality is within predetermined level Advantages Economy Less handling damage Fewer inspectors Upgrading of the inspection job Applicability to destructive testing Entire lot rejection (motivation for improvement)

Acceptance Sampling Disadvantages Risks of accepting “bad” lots and rejecting “good” lots Added planning and documentation Sample provides less information than 100-percent inspection No information is obtained on the process. Just sorting “good” parts from “bad” parts

Risk Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) a (Producer’s risk) Max. acceptable percentage of defectives defined by producer. a (Producer’s risk) The probability of rejecting a good lot. Lot Tolerance Percent Defective (LTPD) Percentage of defectives that defines consumer’s rejection point.  (Consumer’s risk) The probability of accepting a bad lot.