Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Inspection- “back-end quality control” BUT, Start by designing quality into the front end of the process- the design QFD (Quality Function Deployment)

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Inspection- “back-end quality control” BUT, Start by designing quality into the front end of the process- the design QFD (Quality Function Deployment)"— Presentation transcript:

1 Inspection- “back-end quality control” BUT, Start by designing quality into the front end of the process- the design QFD (Quality Function Deployment) lets customer determine the functions of quality, which are then deployed through design and manufacture. Hoshin Kanri- Japanese methodology for “cascading” front line expertise on how to deploy quality into the design and manufacture.

2 Cost of inspection Total Cost Cost of passing defectives Optimal Inspection Costs

3 Using SPC as part of the inspection process “Is our process in control?” I.e. what are the limits we set, using statistics to determine if we need to take corrective action process distribution vs. sample distribution We use a sampling distribution of means of measurements… because it is normal and has less variability. (we’re taking averages of averages) even though the process distribution may not be normal, stats theory tells us the distribution of samples means probably is Translated: We take numerous samples of numerous observations

4 Sampling distribution Process distribution Mean A sample of means has less variability because the data has been “smoothed” twice

5 Setting control limits We usually use 2 standard deviations from mean (about 95% of distribution captured) or 3 standard deviations from mean (about 99.7% captured) to set control limits Any values that fall outside of these limits are considered “out of control”… and usually are considered non-random, and therefore, actionable variations TYPE I error: sample mean falls outside of control limits when variation is actually random TYPE II: mean inside control limits when actually non-random

6 Type I Error Mean LCLUCL  /2  Probability of Type I error

7 Control Chart 0123456789101112131415 UCL LCL Sample number Mean Out of control Normal variation due to chance Abnormal variation due to assignable sources

8 Calculating Control limits for variables- mean charts Monitor how close the data sticks to the average when we are measuring (not counting) Control Limits= the average of sample means + & - (z *  sample means ) Z is determined by how much of the distribution you want to consider “in control” (Usually 2 or 3)  sample means =std dev. of process samples/ square root of the number of samples

9 Calculating mean chart control limits

10 What happens when we go to z=2?

11 Range charts- a different perspective While mean charts are sensitive to changes in the process mean, range charts give you a feel for process dispersion Because mean charts take averages of means, they don’t tell you when variability is increasing in the process

12 Mean and Range Charts Sampling Distribution (process variability is increasing) x-Chart UCL Does not reveal increase Reveals increase R-chart

13 Control charts for summarizing attributes of process, e.g. defects Used when variables are counted, not measured P-chart monitors proportion of defectives used in binomial distribution situations (e.g. answer is “good” or “bad” p= proportion of defectives UCL = p + z(  p ) LCL = p - z(  p )  p = SQR RT of(p(1-p)/n) where n= sample size of each observation

14 P-chart example. Are we in control?

15 C-charts: use when non- occurrences can’t be counted (i.e. a continuous variable) Example: initial defects per units of new cars Control limits = c + & - z*(SQR RT of c) where c= mean # of defects per unit and std dev = SQR RT of (c)

16 You try one What is mean defects per unit? 116.25 What is Square root of c? 10.78 What’s the limits @ z=2? 116+ 2*10.78=137.56 116-2*10.78=94.44 In control? NO

17 c-chart example. You do z=3.

18 Run tests Sometimes, all data within a control chart may be within limits, but there is a trend or cycle to the data within limits. This trend or cycle may need management action. Example: machine tolerances loosen before weekend down time, within limits. Run tests attempt to characterize these trends or cycles.

19 Process Capability analysis Comparing process variability with designed- for variability. (“Are we producing our Mercedes only to Yugo tolerances?” Expressed in terms of standard deviation typically +&- 3 standard deviations from mean (total of 6  ) “6 sigma quality”

20 Let’s do one Given that machine tolerance is defined as.75mm-1.25mm and you get to choose from 3 machines, which can you choose? Therefore, width=.50 mm (1.25-.75) Machine  (mm) (given)Capability A.05 B.08 C.12

21 Let’s do one Given that machine tolerance is defined as.75mm-1.25mm and you get to choose from 3 machines Machine  (mm) (given)Capability A.05.05*6=.30 B.08.08*6=.48 C.12.12*6=.72 MACHINES A & B function within the.50 specification (1.25-.75).

22 Now compute the capability ratio Given that machine tolerance is defined as.75mm-1.25mm and you get to choose from 3 machines Process capability ratio C p = specification width (“what is our tolerance”)/ process width of machine same as saying upper spec-lower spec/ 6  of machine Machine  (mm) (given)C p A.05.50/.30=1.66 B.08.50/.48=1.04 C.12.50/.72=0.69 MACHINE A is preferable because it has the highest capability ratio. It has the greatest probability of functioning within design specs. Any machine with ratio >= 1.33 is acceptable in generally accepted practiced

23 For next time Chapter 10 PROBLEMS 2,3,6 to hand in For problem 3, pay special attention to range chart factors in the body of the chapter For problem 2, use appropriate Z table from back of book.

24

25 Problem 2 A) mean = 1 ; std. dev = 0.1 n=25 observations z=2.17 (to get 97%) Control limits are mean + and - z*(std dev./ square root of n) (see page 448) UCL = 1+ 2.17*(.01/SQR(25))= 1.004 LCL = 1 – 2.17* (.01/SQR(25))= 0.996 The 5th sample mean of 0.995 is out of control, and should be investigated. See page 881. We’re using this chart because we’re analyzing both “tails” for upper and lower control limits. Because this table only shows area from mean to one tail, you look for the Z value equal to.9700/2.

26 Problem 3 we don’t know the std dev. of process sample First get your mean of X and mean of R. Mean of x= 18.6/6=3.1, Mean of R (range) = 2.7/6=.45 Range chart factors table in body of the chapter gives you factors to plug into a formula if you want to compute range chart UCL and LCL figures to 3S if std deviation of process sample is unknown. Let's do the range chart first. The formulas given are UCL = D4*(mean of R) and LCL = D3*(mean of R) In this problem, you are told that n=20. So, start by pulling all the info off table 10-2 you see: at n=20... A2= 0.18; D3=0.41; and D4= 1.59. Now, you need to figure out your control limits. UCL = D4* mean of R = 1.59*.45=.7155 LCL = D3* mean of R =.41 *.45 =.1845 Now let's do mean chart control limits. From page 470, your mean chart limit formulas using sample range are: UCL = mean of x + A2*R =3.1+ (.18*.45) = 3.181 LCL = mean of x - A2*R = 3.1 - (.18*.45) = 3.019 Now, you can compare x and r values from the data to see if they are within limits.

27 Problem 6 “must be repeated” is code for binomials, and therefore proportion. So, use formulas for p-chart. Given n=200; z =2 In sample 1, p= 1/200=.005 the mean of p= 25/(13*200)=.0096 Control limits =.0096 + & - 2* SQR((mean of p* 1- mean of p)/n)=.0096 + & -.0138 =.0234 and -.0042 (effectively 0)

28 Problem 6 continued Now, as instructed, we’ll throw out sample 10 (it’s value is too large) and re-compute mean of p= 18/(12*200) =.0075 Limits =.0075 + & - =.0197 and = -.005 (0)


Download ppt "Inspection- “back-end quality control” BUT, Start by designing quality into the front end of the process- the design QFD (Quality Function Deployment)"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google