Instructional Improvement System (IIS) (a.k.a. Learning Management System – LMS) Needs Analysis Discussion, Planning Meeting, and Focus Group Session This.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
21 st Century Learning Title I Technology Integration Specialists.
PORTFOLIO.
Program Improvement Unit Collaborating to increase student achievement and fundamentally improve the interaction between the teacher and the students to.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
Providence School Board September 10, 2012 Introductory Briefing Providence Public School District Comprehensive Information Technology Blueprint Center.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
IT Strategic Planning Project – Hamilton Campus FY2005.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
Stephanie Warmoth MEDT 6466 Fall Compton Elementary Mission The mission of Compton Elementary School is to provide students with a diverse education.
APPR How to be a HIGHLY EFFECTIVE World Language Teacher How to be a HIGHLY EFFECTIVE World Language Teacher.
Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Education.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Intel ® Teach Essentials ICT in the Classroom Conference St John's College, Johannesburg 5-7 July 2011 Workshop by Claire Dean Senior Trainer SchoolNet.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
A Project Sponsored by the McCormick Foundation LINC Consortium Meeting August 9, 2011.
Outline of Presentation 1.Mission, Vision and Values for Task Force 2.Definition of Engagement 3.Explanation of Research-Informed Framework 4.Characteristics.
Digital High School Program. Lincoln HS Vision Statement It is our vision to produce –problem solving, critical thinkers who are –responsible citizens.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
Microsoft Corporation Teaching with Technology. Ice Breaker.
College and Career Ready Standards (a.k.a. Common Core Standards) and Educator Effectiveness Systems Kutztown University College of Education Faculty Retreat.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Hazlet Township Public Schools
PANAMA-BUENA VISTA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
Teacher Effectiveness Pilot II Presented by PDE. Project Development - Goal  To develop a teacher effectiveness model that will reform the way we evaluate.
By Nanette Chapa.  To realize the benefits of technology, schools must develop a plan for integrating technology into the curriculum. An effective technology.
Katie A. Learning Collaborative For Audio, please call: Participant code: Please mute your phone Building Child Welfare and Mental.
ANNOUNCEMENT The NC Department of Public Instruction is pleased to announce that Summer Institutes 2014 will take place in all eight regions across the.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Curriculum and Instruction Curriculum Cross-walks available via ODE website Regional professional development opportunities Reminder: Begin the work NOW!
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
To Test or Not to Test?...that is the question! By: Sandy Church and Linda Lerch.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Dallas Independent School District Technology Plan Ronald R. Pugh ET8011 May 15, 2011.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Office of Performance Review (OPR) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Stephen Dorage.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Federal Support for World-Class Schools Gwinnett County Public Schools 4/18/13.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Project 3 Supporting Technology. Project Proposal.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.
Implementation of Competency Education in K12 Systems Insights from Local Leaders November 8, 2015 iNACOL Symposium Pre-Conference Workshop.
STATE TECHNOLOGY PLAN DRAFT GOAL DEVELOPMENT. The five goals of the 2010 Plan are: 1. Teaching for Learning: Michigan students will have meaningful technology-enabled.
The Statewide System of Support & Regional Roundtables.
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 2: Balanced Assessment.
_Macros Learning in the 21st Century Learning in the 21 st Century – Students as Self-Directed and Self-Assessing Learners PowerPoint Slides at.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
What do you think should be the goal of technology in education?
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
Breaking Ranks II: Leading and Supporting High School Reform Rosa Aronson Director, Office of Advocacy Archived Information.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Home Base Partnership Team
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Collaborative Leadership
Presentation transcript:

Instructional Improvement System (IIS) (a.k.a. Learning Management System – LMS) Needs Analysis Discussion, Planning Meeting, and Focus Group Session This presentation was prepared by an independent consulting firm for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. While the data and analysis contained in this document were used to inform the foundation, it is not a representation of the current grant-making strategy. For more information on the foundation’s strategy, please visit:

Slide 2 Prepared for Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Instructional Improvement System (IIS) Project For nearly two decades, CELT has helped align leadership, learning, and technology in support of improved student learning by working collaboratively with educational organizations to support and transform teaching, learning, and administrative processes.

Slide 3 What is the purpose of today’s meeting? To gather end-user input for developing a conceptual model, functional requirements, and performance specifications for an Instructional Improvement System (IIS) (a.k.a. Learning Management System)…  as defined in the Race to the Top (RTTT) application process and proposal submissions;  based on IIS/LMS activities currently underway in learning organizations at all levels;  and, includes the results of statewide field-based assessment activities and state-level legislation.

Slide 4 Who are the meeting participants? Superintendents of Schools Chief Academic Officers Directors of Research and Assessment Staff Development Coordinators Chief Information Officers Library, Media, Instructional Resource Specialists School Principals  elementary  middle  high school Education Association/Consortium Leaders

Slide 5 Who are the CELT facilitators? Florida Meetings John Phillipo Laurie Keating Harold Ellis Lisa Connelly Ohio Meetings Don Ginder Cyndi Dunlap John Bowles Christine Ginder

Slide 6 What is today’s agenda? 8:30 – 9:00Registration and Continental Breakfast 9:00 – 9: 15Welcome and Introductions 9: 15 – 9:25Project Background and Rationale 9: 25 – 10:00IIS (LMS) Vision/Overview 10:00 – 10:40Breakout Session Part I 10:40 – 10:50Break 10:50 – 11:15Breakout Session Part II 11:15 – 11:45Reporting Back and Discussion 11:45 – 12:00Concluding Comments and Next Steps

Slide 7 Who is CELT? CELT’s Mission To help learning organizations attain their vision, mission, and goals by integrating high- quality programs, services, and technology with the organization's people and processes in a timely, efficient, and cost-effective way.

Slide 8

Slide 9 What is the project background? The IIS/LMS Project is funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation CELT serves as the research and development partner along with the state, regional, local education agencies and charter schools The participating states are Florida and Ohio

Slide 10 What are the project phases and timeline? Identify research, best practices, Jul/Aug 2010 and field-based needs assessment Develop IIS/LMS conceptualSep/Oct 2010 model, key components, functional requirements Conduct IIS/LMS Fall InstituteOct/Nov 2010 Draft vignettes on effective use Dec/Jan of an IIS/LMS application

Slide 11 What is the rationale for the project? As educators, we need to:  apply technology to our core mission  reverse the trend of “pulling” data from the classroom without adequate feedback loops and data analysis tools for students, teachers, and parents  recognize that successful IIS/LMS implementation is more of an organizational and industry problem than a technology project

Slide 12 What is the universally accepted core mission of education? Develop the most contemporary standards, curricula, and assessments Coach/facilitate learners through a myriad of developmental instructional activities Identify appropriate instructional strategies and resources with just-in-time staff development Monitor/assess student progress based upon a pre-determined set of learner needs and performance rubrics.

Slide 13 Current and Desired Data Flow Presently, there is a need to create seamless, continuous, and transparent feedback loops at all levels Without feedback loops, data will continue to remain inaccurate and unreliable.

Slide 14 Current and Desired Data Flow Presently, there is a need to create seamless, continuous, and transparent feedback loops at all levels Without feedback loops, data will continue to remain inaccurate and unreliable.

Slide 15 Why hasn’t technology helped transform education? Every major business or industry in the world, with the exception of education, has from the onset applied information technology to its CORE mission Education/Learning (???) Medical/Health (MEDLAR) Airline/Travel (SABRE, Expedia, etc.) Finance/Banks (ATM System)

Slide 16

Slide 17 IIS/LMS Conceptual Model Curriculum/ Instruction (What?) Staff Development (By Whom?) Assessment Strategies (How Well?) Learners (Who?) (With?) Instructional Resources

Slide 18 Why hasn’t technology helped transform education? Every major business or industry in the world, with the exception of education, has from the onset applied information technology to its CORE mission Education/Learning (???) Medical/Health (MEDLAR) Airline/Travel (SABRE, Expedia, etc.) Finance/Banks (ATM System)

Slide 19 Curriculum / Instruction (What?) Common core standards State frameworks Curriculum guides Courses of study Content objectives Process skills Technology competencies Instructional practices

Slide 20 Instructional Resources (With what?) Software Internet, web Manipulatives Multi-media resources Textbooks Lesson plans Field trips Guest speakers

Slide 21 Assessment Strategies (How well?) State – high stakes District - benchmark School - interim Classroom – formative/authentic/performance  Journal  Quiz  Interview  Essay  Project  Test  Portfolio  Other Home/Student – self-assessment and correlation

Slide 22 Staff Development (By whom?) Staff proficiencies  Skills  Knowledge  Behavioral attributes Staff profiles Staff development programs Job portfolios Individual staff development plans Supervision and evaluation strategies

Slide 23 Learners (Who?) Students  Learning profile  Growth pattern  Academic progress Community members  Teachers  Parents  Senior citizens  Business/industry leaders

Slide 24 What is the IIS/LMS integration strategy? Network Communications Infrastructure and Help Desk

Slide 25 Desired Outcomes of an IIS/LMS 1.Accurate and timely information about student achievement in support of decision making at all levels 2.Parents and community members participating more fully in the learning process 3.Students assuming an active role and accepting responsibility for their educational experience 4.Staff empowered to work cooperatively to increase student achievement, enhance productivity, and improve accountability continued…

Slide 26 Desired Outcomes of an LMS (continued) 5.Student achievement linked with staff development programs 6.Standards correlated to instructional practices, assessment strategies, and staff development programs 7.Gaps identified in instructional programs for adequacy of instructional resources, assessment items, and staff proficiencies 8.Ability to determine cost/benefit of instructional programs and learning resources

Slide 27

Slide 28 What are the questions that need to be answered? 1.What are the key components of a comprehensive IIS/LMS? 2.What is the required functionality? 3.Who are the major users of a web-based IIS/LMS and what is the impact upon them? 4.What are the unique needs of the various users? 5.What are the systems (data) integration requirements with LEA (SIS, FMS, DSS) applications and state-level reporting systems? continued…

Slide 29 What are the questions? (continued) 6.What is the impact of an easy-to-use and role- based IIS/LMS on:  curriculum?  assessment?  staff development?  student profile and achievement?  learning resources? 7.What are the barriers to successful implementation of an integrated LMS?  funding?  process improvements?  time?

Slide 30

Slide 31

Slide 32 “You can always trust Americans to do the right thing after they have tried to do everything else.”  Sir Winston Churchill We Must Systemically Change the Way We Manage Change

Slide 33 The Critical Success Factors: Funding Leadership Partnership Planning Technology and Education

Slide 34 Critical Mass* of 21st Century Resources Time Money Staff Technology * Amount of the innovation required to provide a substantial/measurable change in productivity and/or learning.

Slide 35 How can you contact CELT? Center for Educational Leadership and Technology (CELT) 65 West Boston Post Road, Suite 200 Marlborough, Massachusetts Website: Website: Ohio Project Lead: Mr. Don Ginder Office: (508) ex Fax: (508) Florida Project Lead: Dr. John R. Phillipo Office: (508) ex Fax: (508)