Validity of Quantitative Research Conclusions. Internal Validity External Validity Issues of Cause and Effect Issues of Generalizability Validity of Quantitative.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Agenda Group Hypotheses Validity of Inferences from Research Inferences and Errors Types of Validity Threats to Validity.
Advertisements

Defining Characteristics
Experimental Research Designs
CHAPTER 8, experiments.
Questions  Is Exam 2 going to be cumulative or will it just cover the second part of the information?  Are cause-and-effect relationships the same as.
Research Design and Validity Threats
Educational Action Research Todd Twyman Summer 2011 Week 1.
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS Criteria for Experiments
Chapter 9 Group-Level Research Designs. CHARACTERISTICS OF “IDEAL” EXPERIMENTS Controlling the Time Order of Variables Manipulating the Independent Variable.
MSc Applied Psychology PYM403 Research Methods Validity and Reliability in Research.
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS What Is Required for a True Experiment? What Are the Independent and Dependent Variables? What Is a Confounding Variable? What Are.
Statistics Micro Mini Threats to Your Experiment!
Chapter 7 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 8 Experimental Research.
Group-Level Research Designs
Sampling and Experimental Control Goals of clinical research is to make generalizations beyond the individual studied to others with similar conditions.
Educational Research by John W. Creswell. Copyright © 2002 by Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Slide 1 Chapter 11 Experimental and Quasi-experimental.
Validity Lecture Overview Overview of the concept Different types of validity Threats to validity and strategies for handling them Examples of validity.
Chapter 9 Experimental Research Gay, Mills, and Airasian
Experimental Research
L1 Chapter 11 Experimental and Quasi- experimental Designs Dr. Bill Bauer.
Experimental Research Take some action and observe its effects Take some action and observe its effects Extension of natural science to social science.
Experimental Design The Gold Standard?.
Group Discussion Explain the difference between assignment bias and selection bias. Which one is a threat to internal validity and which is a threat to.
Copyright © 2008 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. John W. Creswell Educational Research: Planning,
Evaluating Research Articles From Start to Finish By Ellen R. Girden (Sage Publications, Inc. Thousand Oaks, CA) 2001 Chapter One PAF 502 Terrie Ekin.
Day 6: Non-Experimental & Experimental Design
V ALIDITY IN Q UALITATIVE R ESEARCH. V ALIDITY How accurate are the conclusions you make based on your data analysis? A matter of degree Non-reification.
Research Methodology For IB Psychology Students. Empirical Investigation The collecting of objective information firsthand, by making careful measurements.
Chapter 11 Experimental Designs
Power Point Slides by Ronald J. Shope in collaboration with John W. Creswell Chapter 11 Experimental Designs.
Design Experimental Control. Experimental control allows causal inference (IV caused observed change in DV) Experiment has internal validity when it fulfills.
CHAPTER 8, experiments.
Research Strategies Chapter 6. Research steps Literature Review identify a new idea for research, form a hypothesis and a prediction, Methodology define.
The Scientific Method in Psychology.  Descriptive Studies: naturalistic observations; case studies. Individuals observed in their environment.  Correlational.
Copyright © 2008 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 11 Enhancing Rigor in Quantitative Research.
Chapter 14 Cooper and Schindler
Chapter Four Experimental & Quasi-experimental Designs.
1 Experimental Design. 2  Single Factor - One treatment with several levels.  Multiple Factors - More than one treatment with several levels each. 
Experimental Designs. Experiments are conducted to identify how independent variables influence some change in a dependent variable.
Experimental Design Chapter 1 Research Strategies and the Control of Nuisance Variables.
Research methods and statistics.  Internal validity is concerned about the causal-effect relationship in a study ◦ Can observed changes be attributed.
Research Methods ContentArea Researchable Questions ResearchDesign MeasurementMethods Sampling DataCollection StatisticalAnalysisReportWriting ?
Introduction section of article
Chapter 6 Research Validity. Research Validity: Truthfulness of inferences made from a research study.
Chapter 10 Experimental Research Gay, Mills, and Airasian 10th Edition
Experimental Research Methods in Language Learning Chapter 5 Validity in Experimental Research.
Experimental & Quasi-Experimental Designs Dr. Guerette.
Research Design. Time of Data Collection Longitudinal Longitudinal –Panel study –Trend study –Cohort study Cross-sectional Cross-sectional.
 The basic components of experiments are: 1) taking action 2) observing the consequence of that action  Experimental model is most closely linked to.
Chapter Eight: Quantitative Methods
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS. Categories Lab experiments –Experiments done in artificial or contrived environment Field experiments –Experiments done in natural.
Introduction to Validity True Experiment – searching for causality What effect does the I.V. have on the D.V. Correlation Design – searching for an association.
11-1 Chapter 11 Experiments and Test Markets Learning Objectives Understand... uses for experimentation advantages and disadvantages of the experimental.
Journalism 614: Experimental Methods Experimental Research  Take some action and observe its effects –Extension of natural science to social science.
CHAPTER 8 EXPERIMENTS.
Experiments.  Labs (update and questions)  STATA Introduction  Intro to Experiments and Experimental Design 2.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Business Research Methods, 10eCopyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 10 Experiments.
Research Design Quantitative. Quantitative Research Design Quantitative Research is the cornerstone of evidence-based practice It provides the knowledge.
Criminal Justice and Criminology Research Methods, Second Edition Kraska / Neuman © 2012 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
Can you hear me now? Keeping threats to validity from muffling assessment messages Maureen Donohue-Smith, Ph.D., RN Elmira College.
Educational Research Experimental Research Chapter 9 (8 th Edition) Chapter 13 (7 th Edition) Gay and Airasian.
Experimental Research
Experiments Why would a double-blind experiment be used?
Part Three SOURCES AND COLLECTION OF DATA
Chapter Eight: Quantitative Methods
Quantitative Research
Experiments: Part 2.
Group Experimental Design
Chapter 11 EDPR 7521 Dr. Kakali Bhattacharya
Types of Designs: R: Random Assignment of subjects to groups
Presentation transcript:

Validity of Quantitative Research Conclusions

Internal Validity External Validity Issues of Cause and Effect Issues of Generalizability Validity of Quantitative Research Conclusions

Issues of Cause and Effect Issues of Generalizability Validity of Quantitative Research Conclusions Internal Validity External Validity

Issues of Cause and Effect Issues of Generalizability Validity of Quantitative Research Conclusions Statistical Conclusion Validity Internal Validity Construct Validity External Validity

Statistical Conclusion Validity Is there a relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions

Statistical Conclusion Validity Is there a relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions Low Statistical Power Violated Assumptions of Statistics Fishing (Multiple Comparisons) Low Reliability of Measures Treatment Differs Across Occasions Random Confounds in the Setting Random Differences in Subjects

Internal Validity Is there a cause and effect relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions

Internal Validity Is there a cause and effect relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions History Maturation Testing Instrumentation Statistical Regression (to the Mean) Selection (and Interaction with Selection) Mortality Unknown Direction of Causation Diffusion of Treatment Compensatory Equalization of Treatment Compensatory Rivalry by Subjects Resentful Demoralization of Subjects

Construct Validity of Cause and Effect Assumption Is the cause and effect relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions

Construct Validity of Cause and Effect Assumption Is the cause and effect relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions Poor Representation of Constructs Single Operation Bias Single Method Bias Hypothesis Guessing by Subjects Evaluation Manipulation Experimenter Expectations Confounding Constructs and Measurement Level Multiple Treatment Confound Measurement and Treatment Interaction Restricted Generalization Across Possible Dependent Variables

External Validity Is the relationship between A and B generalizable? ThreatSolutions

External Validity Is the relationship between A and B generalizable? ThreatSolutions Sample does not represent the population of interest. The setting of a study does not represent all settings of interest. The time during which a study takes place does not represent all future times. (History and Treatment Interaction)

Research Design Choices Use large sample size. Choose powerful statistics tests. Meet assumptions of statistics. Choose robust statistics tests. Use a conservative post-hoc comparison correction procedure. Use internally reliable tests. Use group means, not individual scores. Correct for attenuation (low reliability). Precisely define & standardize treatment. Choose settings free of confounds. Use more than one dependent variable. Select subjects randomly from a well- defined population. Vary settings and analyze across settings. Replicate the same experiment at different times. Conduct a literature review to see if prior evidence is consistent with hypotheses. Measure potential confounds. Use a within-subjects (repeated Measures design. Randomly assign to treatment group. Share study rationale with subjects. Treat all subjects justly. Hide true hypotheses from subjects. Define constructs precisely. Use measures with high validity. Measure dependent variable with multiple measures. Manipulate independent variable in many ways. Use double-blind study design. Use continuous level of measurement. Give a single treatment to subjects. Measure effect of pretests on dependent variable.

Statistical Conclusion Validity Is there a relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions Low Statistical Power Violated Assumptions of Statistics Fishing (Multiple Comparisons) Low Reliability of Measures Treatment Differs Across Occasions Random Confounds in the Setting Random Differences in Subjects

Statistical Conclusion Validity Is there a relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions Low Statistical Power Use large sample size. Choose powerful statistics tests. Violated Assumptions of Statistics Fishing (Multiple Comparisons) Low Reliability of Measures Treatment Differs Across Occasions Random Confounds in the Setting Random Differences in Subjects

Statistical Conclusion Validity Is there a relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions Low Statistical Power Use large sample size. Choose powerful statistics tests. Violated Assumptions of Statistics Meet assumptions of statistics. Choose robust statistics tests. Fishing (Multiple Comparisons) Low Reliability of Measures Treatment Differs Across Occasions Random Confounds in the Setting Random Differences in Subjects

Statistical Conclusion Validity Is there a relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions Low Statistical Power Use large sample size. Choose powerful statistics tests. Violated Assumptions of Statistics Meet assumptions of statistics. Choose robust statistics tests. Fishing (Multiple Comparisons) Use a conservative post-hoc comparison correction procedure. Low Reliability of Measures Treatment Differs Across Occasions Random Confounds in the Setting Random Differences in Subjects

Statistical Conclusion Validity Is there a relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions Low Statistical Power Use large sample size. Choose powerful statistics tests. Violated Assumptions of Statistics Meet assumptions of statistics. Choose robust statistics tests. Fishing (Multiple Comparisons) Use a conservative post-hoc comparison correction procedure. Low Reliability of Measures Use internally reliable tests. Use group means, not individual scores. Correct for attenuation (low reliability). Treatment Differs Across Occasions Random Confounds in the Setting Random Differences in Subjects

Statistical Conclusion Validity Is there a relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions Low Statistical Power Use large sample size. Choose powerful statistics tests. Violated Assumptions of Statistics Meet assumptions of statistics. Choose robust statistics tests. Fishing (Multiple Comparisons) Use a conservative post-hoc comparison correction procedure. Low Reliability of Measures Use internally reliable tests. Use group means, not individual scores. Correct for attenuation (low reliability). Treatment Differs Across Occasions Precisely define & standardize treatment. Random Confounds in the Setting Random Differences in Subjects

Statistical Conclusion Validity Is there a relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions Low Statistical Power Use large sample size. Choose powerful statistics tests. Violated Assumptions of Statistics Meet assumptions of statistics. Choose robust statistics tests. Fishing (Multiple Comparisons) Use a conservative post-hoc comparison correction procedure. Low Reliability of Measures Use internally reliable tests. Use group means, not individual scores. Correct for attenuation (low reliability). Treatment Differs Across Occasions Precisely define & standardize treatment. Random Confounds in the Setting Choose settings free of confounds. Measure potential confounds. Random Differences in Subjects

Statistical Conclusion Validity Is there a relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions Low Statistical Power Use large sample size. Choose powerful statistics tests. Violated Assumptions of Statistics Meet assumptions of statistics. Choose robust statistics tests. Fishing (Multiple Comparisons) Use a conservative post-hoc comparison correction procedure. Low Reliability of Measures Use internally reliable tests. Use group means, not individual scores. Correct for attenuation (low reliability). Treatment Differs Across Occasions Precisely define & standardize treatment. Random Confounds in the Setting Choose settings free of confounds. Measure potential confounds. Random Differences in Subjects Use a within-subjects (repeated measures) design.

Internal Validity Is there a cause and effect relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions History Maturation Testing Instrumentation Statistical Regression (to the Mean) Selection (and Interaction with Selection) Mortality Unknown Direction of Causation Diffusion of Treatment Compensatory Equalization of Treatment Compensatory Rivalry by Subjects Resentful Demoralization of Subjects

Internal Validity Is there a cause and effect relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions History Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Maturation Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Testing Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Instrumentation Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Statistical Regression (to the Mean) Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Selection (and Interaction with Selection) Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Mortality Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Unknown Direction of Causation Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Diffusion of Treatment Compensatory Equalization of Treatment Compensatory Rivalry by Subjects Resentful Demoralization of Subjects

Internal Validity Is there a cause and effect relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions History Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Maturation Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Testing Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Instrumentation Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Statistical Regression (to the Mean) Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Selection (and Interaction with Selection) Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Mortality Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Unknown Direction of Causation Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Diffusion of Treatment Share Study Rationale with Subjects Compensatory Equalization of Treatment Compensatory Rivalry by Subjects Resentful Demoralization of Subjects

Internal Validity Is there a cause and effect relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions History Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Maturation Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Testing Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Instrumentation Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Statistical Regression (to the Mean) Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Selection (and Interaction with Selection) Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Mortality Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Unknown Direction of Causation Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Diffusion of Treatment Share Study Rationale with Subjects Compensatory Equalization of Treatment Treat All Subjects Justly Compensatory Rivalry by Subjects Resentful Demoralization of Subjects

Internal Validity Is there a cause and effect relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions History Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Maturation Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Testing Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Instrumentation Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Statistical Regression (to the Mean) Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Selection (and Interaction with Selection) Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Mortality Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Unknown Direction of Causation Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Diffusion of Treatment Share Study Rationale with Subjects Compensatory Equalization of Treatment Treat All Subjects Justly Compensatory Rivalry by Subjects Resentful Demoralization of Subjects Hide True Hypotheses from Subjects

Internal Validity Is there a cause and effect relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions History Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Maturation Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Testing Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Instrumentation Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Statistical Regression (to the Mean) Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Selection (and Interaction with Selection) Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Mortality Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Unknown Direction of Causation Randomly Assign to Treatment Group Diffusion of Treatment Share Study Rationale with Subjects Compensatory Equalization of Treatment Treat All Subjects Justly Compensatory Rivalry by Subjects Resentful Demoralization of Subjects Hide True Hypotheses from Subjects Treat All Subjects Justly

Construct Validity of Cause and Effect Assumption Is the cause and effect relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions Poor Representation of Constructs Single Operation Bias Single Method Bias Hypothesis Guessing by Subjects Evaluation Manipulation Experimenter Expectations Confounding Constructs and Measurement Level Multiple Treatment Confound Measurement and Treatment Interaction Restricted Generalization Across Possible Dependent Variables

Construct Validity of Cause and Effect Assumption Is the cause and effect relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions Poor Representation of ConstructsDefine constructs precisely. Use measures with high validity. Single Operation Bias Single Method Bias Hypothesis Guessing by Subjects Evaluation Manipulation Experimenter Expectations Confounding Constructs and Measurement Level Multiple Treatment Confound Measurement and Treatment Interaction Restricted Generalization Across Possible Dependent Variables

Construct Validity of Cause and Effect Assumption Is the cause and effect relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions Poor Representation of ConstructsDefine constructs precisely. Use measures with high validity. Single Operation BiasMeasure dependent variable with multiple measures. Use measures with high validity. Manipulate independent variable in many ways. Single Method Bias Hypothesis Guessing by Subjects Evaluation Manipulation Experimenter Expectations Confounding Constructs and Measurement Level Multiple Treatment Confound Measurement and Treatment Interaction Restricted Generalization Across Possible Dependent Variables

Construct Validity of Cause and Effect Assumption Is the cause and effect relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions Poor Representation of ConstructsDefine constructs precisely. Use measures with high validity. Single Operation BiasMeasure dependent variable with multiple measures. Use measures with high validity. Manipulate independent variable in many ways. Single Method BiasMeasure dependent variable with multiple methods. Hypothesis Guessing by Subjects Evaluation Manipulation Experimenter Expectations Confounding Constructs and Measurement Level Multiple Treatment Confound Measurement and Treatment Interaction Restricted Generalization Across Possible Dependent Variables

Construct Validity of Cause and Effect Assumption Is the cause and effect relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions Poor Representation of ConstructsDefine constructs precisely. Use measures with high validity. Single Operation BiasMeasure dependent variable with multiple measures. Use measures with high validity. Manipulate independent variable in many ways. Single Method BiasMeasure dependent variable with multiple methods. Hypothesis Guessing by SubjectsHide True Hypotheses from Subjects Use double-blind study design. Evaluation Manipulation Experimenter Expectations Confounding Constructs and Measurement Level Multiple Treatment Confound Measurement and Treatment Interaction Restricted Generalization Across Possible Dependent Variables

Construct Validity of Cause and Effect Assumption Is the cause and effect relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions Poor Representation of ConstructsDefine constructs precisely. Use measures with high validity. Single Operation BiasMeasure dependent variable with multiple measures. Use measures with high validity. Manipulate independent variable in many ways. Single Method BiasMeasure dependent variable with multiple methods. Hypothesis Guessing by SubjectsHide True Hypotheses from Subjects Use double-blind study design. Evaluation ManipulationUse measures with high validity. Experimenter Expectations Confounding Constructs and Measurement Level Multiple Treatment Confound Measurement and Treatment Interaction Restricted Generalization Across Possible Dependent Variables

Construct Validity of Cause and Effect Assumption Is the cause and effect relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions Poor Representation of ConstructsDefine constructs precisely. Use measures with high validity. Single Operation BiasMeasure dependent variable with multiple measures. Use measures with high validity. Manipulate independent variable in many ways. Single Method BiasMeasure dependent variable with multiple methods. Hypothesis Guessing by SubjectsHide True Hypotheses from Subjects Use double-blind study design. Evaluation ManipulationUse measures with high validity. Experimenter ExpectationsUse double-blind study design. Confounding Constructs and Measurement Level Multiple Treatment Confound Measurement and Treatment Interaction Restricted Generalization Across Possible Dependent Variables

Construct Validity of Cause and Effect Assumption Is the cause and effect relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions Poor Representation of ConstructsDefine constructs precisely. Use measures with high validity. Single Operation BiasMeasure dependent variable with multiple measures. Use measures with high validity. Manipulate independent variable in many ways. Single Method BiasMeasure dependent variable with multiple methods. Hypothesis Guessing by SubjectsHide True Hypotheses from Subjects Use double-blind study design. Evaluation ManipulationUse measures with high validity. Experimenter ExpectationsUse double-blind study design. Confounding Constructs and Measurement Level Use continuous (interval/ratio) level of measurement. Multiple Treatment Confound Measurement and Treatment Interaction Restricted Generalization Across Possible Dependent Variables

Construct Validity of Cause and Effect Assumption Is the cause and effect relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions Poor Representation of ConstructsDefine constructs precisely. Use measures with high validity. Single Operation BiasMeasure dependent variable with multiple measures. Use measures with high validity. Manipulate independent variable in many ways. Single Method BiasMeasure dependent variable with multiple methods. Hypothesis Guessing by SubjectsHide True Hypotheses from Subjects Use double-blind study design. Evaluation ManipulationUse measures with high validity. Experimenter ExpectationsUse double-blind study design. Confounding Constructs and Measurement Level Use continuous (interval/ratio) level of measurement. Multiple Treatment ConfoundGive a single treatment to subjects, not a mix. Measurement and Treatment Interaction Restricted Generalization Across Possible Dependent Variables

Construct Validity of Cause and Effect Assumption Is the cause and effect relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions Poor Representation of ConstructsDefine constructs precisely. Use measures with high validity. Single Operation BiasMeasure dependent variable with multiple measures. Use measures with high validity. Manipulate independent variable in many ways. Single Method BiasMeasure dependent variable with multiple methods. Hypothesis Guessing by SubjectsHide True Hypotheses from Subjects Use double-blind study design. Evaluation ManipulationUse measures with high validity. Experimenter ExpectationsUse double-blind study design. Confounding Constructs and Measurement Level Use continuous (interval/ratio) level of measurement. Multiple Treatment ConfoundGive a single treatment to subjects, not a mix. Measurement and Treatment Interaction Measure effects of pretests on dependent variable. Restricted Generalization Across Possible Dependent Variables

Construct Validity of Cause and Effect Assumption Is the cause and effect relationship between A & B? ThreatSolutions Poor Representation of ConstructsDefine constructs precisely. Use measures with high validity. Single Operation BiasMeasure dependent variable with multiple measures. Use measures with high validity. Manipulate independent variable in many ways. Single Method BiasMeasure dependent variable with multiple methods. Hypothesis Guessing by SubjectsHide True Hypotheses from Subjects Use double-blind study design. Evaluation ManipulationUse measures with high validity. Experimenter ExpectationsUse double-blind study design. Confounding Constructs and Measurement Level Use continuous (interval/ratio) level of measurement. Multiple Treatment ConfoundGive a single treatment to subjects, not a mix. Measurement and Treatment Interaction Measure effects of pretests on dependent variable. Restricted Generalization Across Possible Dependent Variables Use more than one dependent variable.

External Validity Is the relationship between A and B generalizable? ThreatSolutions Sample does not represent the population of interest. The setting of a study does not represent all settings of interest. The time during which a study takes place does not represent all future times. (History and Treatment Interaction)

External Validity Is the relationship between A and B generalizable? ThreatSolutions Sample does not represent the population of interest. Select subjects randomly from a well-defined population. The setting of a study does not represent all settings of interest. The time during which a study takes place does not represent all future times. (History and Treatment Interaction)

External Validity Is the relationship between A and B generalizable? ThreatSolutions Sample does not represent the population of interest. Select subjects randomly from a well-defined population. The setting of a study does not represent all settings of interest. Vary settings and analyze for relationships in each setting. The time during which a study takes place does not represent all future times. (History and Treatment Interaction)

External Validity Is the relationship between A and B generalizable? ThreatSolutions Sample does not represent the population of interest. Select subjects randomly from a well-defined population. The setting of a study does not represent all settings of interest. Vary settings and analyze for relationships in each setting. The time during which a study takes place does not represent all future times. (History and Treatment Interaction) Replicate the same experiment at different times. Conduct a literature review to see if prior evidence is consistent with hypotheses.