Innovations in Measuring POE Performance and Service Levels Development and Application of a Level-of-Service (LOS) Methodology TBWG | Montreal 2013Slide.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview What is the National ITS Architecture? User Services
Advertisements

Achieve Benefit from IT Projects. Aim This presentation is prepared to support and give a general overview of the ‘How to Achieve Benefits from IT Projects’
What is the Enerjetic Business? The business offers consulting and reporting tools to report on energy and related data for business purposes. Common uses.
1 Department of State Program Evaluation Policy Overview Spring 2013.
State of Indiana Business One Stop (BOS) Program Roadmap Updated June 6, 2013 RFI ATTACHMENT D.
Document number Finding Financial Solutions & Models for Microgrids Maryland Clean Energy Summit Panel Wednesday, October 16, 2013.
Clean Water Act Integrated Planning Framework Sewer Smart Summit October 23, 2012.
Policy Overview Hugh Conroy Whatcom Council of Governments (MPO) Bellingham, WA TBWG Data Workshop Detroit Metro, Michigan Crowne Plaza Hotel,
Transportation Border Working Group Montreal October 22 and 23, 2013 CBSA Project Update.
Pembina - Emerson Port of Entry Study David Lettner: Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation.
Operations / ITS Provisions in SAFETEA-LU What’s in There and What’s Not Jeff Lindley Operations / ITS Discipline Meeting August 16, 2005.
The SMARTFREIGHT project Hans Westerheim SINTEF ICT.
Chapter 15 Application of Computer Simulation and Modeling.
Transportation Data Palooza Washington, DC May 9, 2013 Steve Mortensen Federal Transit Administration Data for Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Analysis,
Session C2: Promising Research Roundtable An Integrated Work-Zone Computer System For Capacity Estimation, Cost/Benefit Analysis, and Design Of Control.
With Development of National e-Agriculture Strategy In collaboration with.
Business Driven Enterprise Architecture Assessment Methodology Josh Arceneaux August 16, 2011.
IT Planning.
Seminar on selected evaluation methodology issues 评估方法论研讨会 Independent Office of Evaluation of IFAD Beijing, 16 July 2014 国际农业发展基金独立评估办公室 2014 年 7 月 16.
Quantifying the Effect of Intelligent Transport Systems on CO 2 Emissions from Road Transportation Zissis Samaras Laboratory of Applied Thermodynamics.
Measuring the effectiveness of government IT systems Current ANAO initiatives to enhance IT Audit integration and support in delivering Audit outcomes.
Beyond the Border Action Plan Border Infrastructure Investment Plan (BIIP)
Cristobal Irazoqui Smart Cities & Sustainability
Enterprise Architecture
Traffic Incident Management – a Strategic Focus Inspector Peter Baird National Adviser: Policy and Legislation: Road Policing.
Patrick DeCorla-Souza, P3 Program Manager, FHWA
15 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Tuesday, May 19 th, 2015 – Atlantic City, NJ Integrating Travel Demand Models & SHRP2 C11 Tools:
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to NCHRP Project Panel presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with PB Consult Inc. Texas Transportation.
Intersection & Interchange Geometrics (IIG) Innovative Design Considerations for All Users Module 8 Intersection- Interchange Evaluation Process.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION BORDER WAIT TIME WORKING GROUP.
AT Benefit Cost Analysis Model Highway Design, Project Management and Training Section Technical Standards Branch Presented by Bill Kenny, Director: Design,
FHWA Reorganization Update Program Performance Management Standing Committee on Performance Management Meeting Detroit, MI October 14, 2011 Peter Stephanos.
Bi-national Collaboration in Delivering Port-of-Entry Highway Infrastructure Improvements Case Study: Pembina-Emerson Port-of-Entry and Innovations in.
TSM&O FLORIDA’S STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Elizabeth Birriel, PEElizabeth Birriel, PE Florida Department of TransportationFlorida Department of TransportationTranspo2012.
Project Monitoring and Evaluation in the GMS 7-18 May 2012, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen Project Monitoring and Evaluation for Road Construction in Lao.
Setting Goals and Getting Started with Scenarios Emily McKenzie.
1 IntelliDrive SM Research, Development and Emerging Technologies National ITS Perspective Panel Joseph I. Peters, Ph.D. Federal Highway Administration.
Project Proposal: Survey and Assessment of Current Deployment of Applications for Surface Transportation Utilizing GNSS in the APEC Region Maureen Walker.
Statewide Strategies for Coordinating Regional Transportation and Land Use Planning Katie Benouar, Senior Transportation Planner Office of Regional and.
5 th Bi-Annual Border to Border Conference Performance Measures at Commercial Ports of Entry Juan Carlos Villa.
Managing Travel for Planned Special Events: What, Why, & Benefits Walt Dunn, P.E. Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. Talking Operations Seminar January.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
Productivity Micro-economic Analysis Division 1 Productivity Micro-economic Analysis Division Statistics Canada January 2008.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop presented by Krista Jeannotte Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March.
 Welcome, introductions  Conceptualizing the evaluation problem  stakeholder interests  Divergent and convergent processes  Developing evaluation.
Economic Significance of the Border: A Perspective at the Regional and National Levels for both Passenger and Freight Movements Bruno Penet HDR | Decision.
Project Portfolio Management Business Priorities Presentation.
Workgroup: Delivering and Accounting for Development Results
Competitive and Efficient Freight Transportation
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Canada/U.S. Transportation Border Working Group presented by Stephen Fitzroy & Brian Alstadt, Economic.
Wireless Sensor Network Solutions Regional Mobility Solutions Sensys Networks and the Sensys Networks logo are trademarks of Sensys Networks, Inc. Other.
SHRP2 Reliability Implementation | February 2013 When Research Meets the Road Reliability Focus Area February 7, 2013.
Analysis of Demand Response Modeling in GridView Andy Satchwell and Sarah Smith Modeling Work Group December 21, 2015 The work described in this presentation.
Integrated Corridor Management Initiative ITS JPO Lead: Mike Freitas Technical Lead: John Harding, Office of Transportation Management.
Technology Subcommittee November Topical Outline Technology Subcommittee Technology Subcommittee RoleRole Work PlanWork Plan ActivitiesActivities.
Border Technology Update BORDER INFORMATION FLOW ARCHITECTURE WORKING GROUP Presented to Transportation Border Working Group (TBWG) 29 April 03 Washington,
1 Surface CDM Sub-team Concept of Operations Briefing Marshall Mowery (FAA CDM Lead) Dan Allen, FedEx Express (Industry CDM Lead) Carl Calcasola, ATM PBI.
ANASOFT VIATUS. Challenges Supply chain optimization is necessary for achieving competitive price of final products Synchronization and utilization of.
R EHABILITATION OF R AILWAY T RANSPORT IN C ENTRAL AND E ASTERN E UROPE I NTRODUCTION
Transportation Border Working Group - Vancouver October 21 and 22, 2014 CBSA Infrastructure Project Update.
WIS DOT MCLARY MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT.
Road Investment Decision Framework
Sample Fit-Gap Kick-off
5 Comtec: Entry Point to Reusing Services
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
© 2016, 2017 Change Healthcare Solutions, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
مديريت كارورزي پزشكي اجتماعي.
FHWA TSMO / SHRP2 Research
Beyond the Border Action Plan
ProZorro : Innovations in Digital Ex-Ante Monitoring Tools for Public Procurement in Ukraine Eliza Niewiadomska
Presentation transcript:

Innovations in Measuring POE Performance and Service Levels Development and Application of a Level-of-Service (LOS) Methodology TBWG | Montreal 2013Slide 1: LOS Methodology Presenter: David E. Lettner, BA, MPA, MCIP Senior Transportation Planning Consultant Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation 2013 TBWG Canadian Plenary | Montreal Wednesday October 23, 2013

TBWG Presentation Overview  Why is a POE performance measurement tool needed?  How was this new POE tool developed?  What is the new POE performance measurement tool?  How does the new tool work?  What are the applications for using the new tool?  Who benefits from using the new tool?  How should the new tool be used Slide 2: LOS Methodology TBWG | Montreal 2013

WHY a new POE Performance Measurement Tool? Problem statement: There is currently no standardized POE performance measurement tool that can:  Evaluate impacts of pre to post POE improvements  Provide standardized port to port comparisons  Provide standardized border to border comparisons Slide 3: LOS Methodology TBWG | Montreal 2013

WHY a new POE Performance Measurement Tool? Problem Statement: How can service level policy, service levels and port performance be conveyed in a consistent, meaningful, understandable and accurate manner for all POE’s?  Time?  Queue length?  Real time or longitudinal data?  Is there consistency of measurement?  Is there consistency of understanding? TBWG | Montreal 2013 Slide 4: LOS Methodology

How was this new POE Tool Developed ?  Highway Capacity Manual (HCM)  Level-of-Service Concept (LOS)  Uninterrupted Flows / Interrupted Flows  Other applications of the LOS concept  Transport Canada: ATB subsystem analysis TBWG | Montreal 2013 Slide 5: LOS Methodology

How was this new POE Tool Developed ? MIT TBWG | Montreal 2013Slide 6: LOS Methodology

What is the new Tool ? (A: An LOS approach) LOS Criteria A-F Service Level Categories Service Policy Settings TBWG | Montreal 2013Slide 7: LOS Methodology The LOS Framework for POE’s

How does the LOS Tool Work? (A: Algorithms) LOS Algorithm Model (based on hourly traffic distributions) Total vehicles (arrivals + queue) TBWG | Montreal 2013 Slide 8: LOS Methodology

How it Works | Setting LOS Policy TBWG | Montreal 2013Slide 9: LOS Methodology Algorithms convert hourly arrival data into LOS categories LOS Framework: Policy Settings LOS Output: Trade-Off Analysis

How it Works | Trade-Off Analysis TBWG | Montreal 2013Slide 10: LOS Methodology

How it Works | Pre to Post Improvement Analysis LOS Decay (Pre and Post Investment) pre-investment trigger point LOS “D” LOS gain post-investment LOS would continue to decay without POE improvements TBWG | Montreal 2013Slide 11: LOS Methodology

How it Works | Next Step in Concept Refinement Modify algorithms to provide benefit-cost data  Pre-post LOS improvement scenarios  Aggregation of delay, fuel and emissions LOS Decay (Pre and Post Investment) Benefits Costs TBWG | Montreal 2013 Slide 12: LOS Methodology

What are some LOS applications? (micro) The LOS output provides:  A snapshot for any or all 8,760 hours in a year  Longitudinal analysis over a 20+ year planning horizon  Capability to set service level standards and assess LOS policy  Capability to evaluate PIL infrastructure or staffing levels  Capability to evaluate various processing time scenarios  Output generated by direction of travel  Output generated by vehicle type TBWG | Montreal 2013Slide 13: LOS Methodology

WHAT are some LOS applications? (macro) A standardized POE performance measurement tool that can:  Evaluate impacts of pre to post POE improvements  Provide standardized port to port comparisons  Provide standardized border to border comparisons Slide 14: LOS Methodology TBWG | Montreal 2013

Who benefits from using the LOS methodology ?  Transportation and border services agencies  Trade-off analysis to determine optimal port improvements  Federal, State and Provincial funding agencies  Standardized analysis for evaluating funding applications  Inland Ports | Logistics Interests  Supports business case analysis to assess fluidity at POE’s  All Stakeholders  Meaningful data on future port performance TBWG | Montreal 2013 Slide 15: LOS Methodology

WHERE can the LOS Methodology be Applied? TBWG | Montreal 2013Slide 16: LOS Methodology Top 20 POE’s: Canada-USA-Mexico

WHEN should the LOS Methodology be used?  Major POE planning studies / funding applications  Trade-off analysis for POE improvement scenarios  Evaluating the costs-benefits of POE improvements  Longitudinal analysis & monitoring POE performance  Responding to stakeholders on POE performance TBWG | Montreal 2013 Slide 17: LOS Methodology

Summary: Advantages of an LOS Approach at POE’s  A standardized approach for system-wide POE planning  A concept that is user-friendly & easy to understand  Predictive capabilities (20+ years)  Ability to express positive measures of POE performance  Ability to conduct multi-variant trade-off analysis  An efficient & cost effective tool for scenario testing  Multiple beneficiaries and applications Slide 18: LOS Methodology TBWG | Montreal 2013

A Final Word on the LOS Methodology for POE’s  Challenge: POE project delivery requires 6-10 years to complete a number of sequential planning and implementation steps  Conceptual Planning, Functional Design, Final Design  Tendering and Construction  Challenge: The bi-national POE context can involve input from up to 8 agencies to deliver an integrated infrastructure solution  Opportunity: The LOS methodology provides a common approach for all transportation and border services agencies to test, select and monitor POE performance improvement solutions that can include infrastructure improvements, technology deployment or staffing scenarios Slide 19: LOS Methodology TBWG | Montreal 2013

Presenter Contact Information David E. Lettner, BA, MPA, MCIP Senior Transportation Planning Consultant Transportation Systems Planning Branch Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation CONTACT T: E: TBWG | Montreal 2013 Slide 20: LOS Methodology