Ashley Brawner Neelam Datta Xing Huang Jesse Jones

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
February 17, Aerodynamics 2 PDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason Tang.
Advertisements

Michael DeRosa Master of Engineering Final Project Exploration of Airfoil Sections to Determine the Optimal Airfoil for Remote Controlled Pylon Racing.
SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 Design.
AAE 451 Aircraft Design Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review #2 Team Members Oneeb Bhutta, Matthew Basiletti, Ryan Beech, Mike Van Meter.
October 28, 2011 Christopher Schumacher (Team Lead) Brian Douglas Christopher Erickson Brad Lester Nathan Love Patrick Mischke Traci Moe Vince Zander.
DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.
The Black Pearl Design Team: Ryan Cobb Jacob Conger Christopher Cottingham Travis Douville Josh Johnson Adam Loverro Tony Maloney.
Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) SAE AERO Chase Beatty.
1 Structures QDR1 Ashley Brawner Neelam Datta Xing Huang Jesse Jones Team 2: Balsa to the Wall Matt Negilski Mike Palumbo Chris Selby Tara Trafton.
Project Presentation Boiler Xpress December 5, 2000 Team Members Oneeb Bhutta Matthew Basiletti Ryan Beech Micheal Van Meter AAE 451 Aircraft Design.
AAE 451 Aircraft Design Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review #1
Patrick Dempsey Bridget Fitzpatrick Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok PROJECT PLAN REVIEW September 26, 2000.
AME 441: Conceptual Design Presentation
D & C PDR #1 AAE451 – Team 3 November 4, 2003
Dane BatemaBenoit Blier Drew Capps Patricia Roman Kyle Ryan Audrey Serra John TapeeCarlos Vergara Critical Design Review Team 1.
Team 5 Dynamics & Control PDR 2 Presented By: Trent Lobdell Eamonn Needler Charles Reyzer.
Aerodynamics PDR #1. Objective To examine airfoil choices To examine wing shape choices Structural and Manufacturing Concerns.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1.
DR2 Stability and Control Preliminary Design Review and Performance PDR October 24, 2000 Presented By: Christopher Peters …and that’s cool Team DR2 Chris.
Christopher Cottingham
Vehicle Sizing PDR Presented by: Mark Blanton Chris Curtis Loren Garrison September 21, 2000 Chris Peters Jeff Rodrian DR2.
March 3, Structures and Weights 2 PDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1 Vehicle Sizing PDR AAE 451 Fall 2006.
1 Critical Design Review Ashley Brawner Neelam Datta Xing Huang Jesse Jones Team 2: Balsa to the Wall and the TFM-2 Matt Negilski Mike Palumbo Chris Selby.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1.
Team 5 Aerodynamics QDR Presented By: Christian Naylor Charles Reyzer.
Dane BatemaBenoit Blier Drew Capps Patricia Roman Kyle Ryan Audrey Serra John TapeeCarlos Vergara Team 1: Structures 1 PDR Team “Canard” October 12th,
Rear spar for control surface hinges Styrene foam wing core Balsa spars carry bending load 0.25 in x 0.25 in T.E. Reinforcement Materials Employed: Balsa:
1 Propulsion PDR Ashley Brawner Matt Negilski Neelam Datta Mike Palumbo Xing Huang Chris Selby Jesse Jones Tara Trafton AAE451: Balsa to the Wall Team.
March 1, Aerodynamics 3 QDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason Tang Joe.
Aerodynamics QDR AAE451 – Team 3 October 9, 2003 Brian Chesko Brian Hronchek Ted Light Doug Mousseau Brent Robbins Emil Tchilian.
Team 5 Aerodynamics PDR Presented By: Christian Naylor Eamonn Needler Charles Reyzer.
Team 5 Structures PDR Presented By: Ross May James Roesch Charles Stangle.
Michael DeRosa Master of Engineering Final Project
SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 Design.
Team 5 Critical Design Review Trent Lobdell Ross May Maria Mullins Christian Naylor Eamonn Needler Charles Reyzer James Roesch Charles Stangle Nick White.
Recent and Future Research for Bird-like Flapping MAVs of NPU Prof. B.F.Song Aeronautics School of Northwestern Polytechnical University.
Team “Canard” September 19th, 2006
Basic aerodynamics relationships
The Lumberjacks Team /16/12 Brian Martinez.
2D Airfoil Aerodynamics
1 Lecture 4: Aerodynamics Eric Loth For AE 440 A/C Lecture Sept 2009.
Ashley Brawner Neelam Datta Xing Huang Jesse Jones
AAE 451 Aircraft Design First Flight Boiler Xpress November 21, 2000
Ashley Brawner Matt Negilski Neal Datta Mike Palumbo Jesse Jones Chris Selby Xing Huang Tara Trafton Team Concept Selection.
Bridget Fitzpatrick Patrick Dempsey Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok Aerodynamics Preliminary Design Review #2 October 23, 2000.
AAE 451 AERODYNAMICS PDR 2 TEAM 4 Jared Hutter, Andrew Faust, Matt Bagg, Tony Bradford, Arun Padmanabhan, Gerald Lo, Kelvin Seah November 18, 2003.
DR2 Aerodynamic PDR Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review October 3, 2000 German National Holiday Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis Chris.
Patrick Dempsey Bridget Fitzpatrick Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok Aerodynamics Preliminary Design Review #1 October 3, 2000.
1 Project Plan Review Ashley Brawner Neelam Datta Xing Huang Jesse Jones AAE451: Team 2 Matt Negilski Mike Palumbo Chris Selby Tara Trafton.
LSA FAA definition Max gross takeoff weight = 1320 lbs Max stall speed = 45 knots Maximum speed in level flight = 120 knots.
AAE 451 AERODYNAMICS QDR 2 TEAM 4 Jared Hutter, Andrew Faust, Matt Bagg, Tony Bradford, Arun Padmanabhan, Gerald Lo, Kelvin Seah November 6, 2003.
STRUCTURES & WEIGHTS PDR 1
VEHICLE SIZING PDR AAE 451 TEAM 4
DYNAMICS & CONTROL PDR 1 TEAM 4
Aerodynamics PDR AAE451 – Team 3 October 21, 2003
Dynamics & Controls PDR 1
Aerodynamics QDR 1 AAE 451: Team 2 Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin
Aether Aerospace AAE 451 September 27, 2006
Team “Canard” September 19th, 2006
DYNAMICS & CONTROL QDR 1 TEAM 4
Prototype Fabrication, Economic, & Test Plan QDR
UAV Wing Design For Efficiency At Low Reynolds Numbers
Propulsion QDR 2 AAE451: Balsa to the Wall Team 2
Team 5 Aerodynamics PDR #2
Aerodynamics PDR # 2 AAE451 – Team 3 November 18, 2003
Team 5 Aerodynamics QDR #1
Aether Aerospace AAE 451 September 19, 2006
STRUCTURES & WEIGHTS QDR 1
Vehicle Sizing PDR AAE451: Balsa to the Wall
Presentation transcript:

Ashley Brawner Neelam Datta Xing Huang Jesse Jones Aerodynamics PDR 2 Team 2: Balsa to the Wall Ashley Brawner Neelam Datta Xing Huang Jesse Jones Matt Negilski Mike Palumbo Chris Selby Tara Trafton

Overview Design Point Airfoil Selection Component Drag Buildup Drag Polar AR trade study (CL)max Approximation (Cl)max method (CL)max Raymer method Flap analysis

The Design Point 5.5 [lbs] Weight 0° Dihedral Angle 110 [ft/sec] Speed Planform area based on approximated (CL)max and weight estimate Dihedral angle of 0° taken from Roskam Design speed decreased from 150 ft/sec Designed to high speed mission Weight 5.5 [lbs] Dihedral Angle 0° Speed 110 [ft/sec] Horizontal Tail Span 1.5 [ft]

Airfoil Selection: Main Wing Wing Section NACA 1408 Gives approximate 2D Cl needed for dash Relatively thin for minimizing drag Thick enough for structural strength

Airfoil Selection: Tail Tail Sections Horizontal Stabilizer Symmetric with low Cd over a wider range of a.o.a. compared to other similar airfoils Symmetric Jones airfoil (≈8% t/c) Vertical Stabilizer NACA 0006

Drag Build-up Method (Raymer) Cfc = Component skin friction coefficient FFc = Component form factor Qc = Component interference effects Swet,c = Component wetted area Sref = Wing planform

Component Coefficient of friction

Drag Build-up Method results Inputs:

Drag Polar

AR Trade study

AR Trade study

(Cl)max Approximation Compare XFOIL with Abbott & Doenhoff wind tunnel data Conclusion αClmax ≈ 0.8αClmax(XFOIL)

Flap analysis Ads Use (CL)max approximation from Raymer Use XFOIL to find (Cl)max with flaps Observation - Flapped (Cl)max follows linear trend Determine maximum achievable (CL)max Find flap configuration that acheives optimal (CL)max

Flap analysis: (continued) Use linear fit lines to find a Δ(Cl)max and then find Δ(CL)max with the following equation from Raymer: ads The ratio blank is based on the intial sizing of the wing area and tail span and is assumed to remain constant

Flap Geometry: flap hinge location (x/c) = 0.8 maximum flap deflection = 35° constant (cf/c) flap (CL)max (w/ flaps) = 1.06 (Cl)max (w/o flaps) = 0.85

Summary Table (CL)max (w/ flaps) 1.06 (CL)max (w/o flaps) 0.84 CD0 0.0253 AR 6 b 5 [ft] croot 16.24 [in] ctip 7.35 [in] troot 1.3 [in] ttip 0.6 [in] Flap location (x/c) 0.8 Maximum flap deflection 35°

Questions?