Data Normalization Milestones. Data Normalization  Goals –To conduct the science for realizing semantic interoperability and integration of diverse data.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr. Leo Obrst MITRE Information Semantics Information Discovery & Understanding Command & Control Center February 6, 2014February 6, 2014February 6, 2014.
Advertisements

Building FHIR Servers on Existing Applications
VXQFQ2 Monday June 3, 2013Trillium Bridge Negotiations Meeting1.
CTS2 Terminology Services
Looking ahead: caGrid community requirements in the context of caGrid 2.0 Lawrence Brem 7 February 2011.
©2013 MFMER | slide-1 Building A Knowledge Base of Severe Adverse Drug Events Based On AERS Reporting Data Using Semantic Web Technologies Guoqian Jiang,
CIMI Modelling Taskforce Progress Report
Guoqian Jiang, MD, PhD Mayo Clinic
Information and Business Work
Overview of Biomedical Informatics Rakesh Nagarajan.
CIMI/IHTSDO DCM tooling ecosystem thoughts
FEBRUARY 4, 2015 STANLEY M. HUFF, MD CHIEF MEDICAL INFORMATICS OFFICER INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE Modeling and Terminology.
A Model Driven Approach for Cross Paradigm Interoperability using OMG’s MDMI Standard Cross Paradigm Working Group.
3/18/19990© 1999, Health Level Seven, Inc. Introduction: Vocabulary domains Marital Status –single (never married) –married –divorced –separated “Vocabulary”
Harmonization of SHARPn Clinical Element Models with CDISC SHARE Clinical Study Data Standards Guoqian Jiang, MD, PhD Mayo Clinic On behalf of CDISC CEMs.
SHARPn Data Normalization November 18, Data-driven Healthcare Big Data Knowledge Research Practice Analytics Domain Pragmatics Experts.
Initial Prototype for Clinical Data Normalization and High Throughput Phenotyping SHARPn F2F June 30,2011.
TECHNICAL. The iMDHT technical team Shared Technical Objective: Toolkit that lowers the bar and accelerates development of innovative applications Shared.
Document Standards Faced and Lessons Learned Calvin Beebe, Tom Oniki, Hongfang Liu, Kyle Marchant.
December 15, 2011 Use of Semantic Adapter in caCIS Architecture.
HL7 HL7  Health Level Seven (HL7) is a non-profit organization involved in the development of international healthcare.
A Case Study of ICD-11 Anatomy Value Set Extraction from SNOMED CT Guoqian Jiang, PhD ©2011 MFMER | slide-1 Division of Biomedical Statistics & Informatics,
Mobile Topic Maps for e-Learning John McDonald & Darina Dicheva Intelligent Information Systems Group Computer Science Department Winston-Salem State University,
Referral request - data classification Patient information – Patient demographics, covered by MU2 and CCDA requirements – Patient identifier (Med Rec Number)
HL7 Centralized Terminology Services (CTS) Harold Solbrig Mayo Clinic May 25, 2000.
Using the Open Metadata Registry (openMDR) to create Data Sharing Interfaces October 14 th, 2010 David Ervin & Rakesh Dhaval, Center for IT Innovations.
Development Process and Testing Tools for Content Standards OASIS Symposium: The Meaning of Interoperability May 9, 2006 Simon Frechette, NIST.
1/26/2004TCSS545A Isabelle Bichindaritz1 Database Management Systems Design Methodology.
HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup Report Jamie Ferguson, Chair Kaiser Permanente John Halamka, Co-chair Harvard Medical School 20 August,
LexBIG Release Overview Aug 21, LexBIG Context Project Goals for Sept –Incremental point release of LexBIG infrastructure to support EVS activities.
1 Schema Registries Steven Hughes, Lou Reich, Dan Crichton NASA 21 October 2015.
Value Set Resolution: Build generalizable data normalization pipeline using LexEVS infrastructure resources Explore UIMA framework for implementing semantic.
CTAKES The clinical Text Analysis and Knowledge Extraction System.
1 Geospatial and Business Intelligence Jean-Sébastien Turcotte Executive VP San Francisco - April 2007 Streamlining web mapping applications.
Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 5b Health Data Interchange Standards.
EuroRec Annual Conference 2006 EHR systems and certification Archetypes: the missing link? Dr Dipak Kalra Centre for Health Informatics and Multiprofessional.
© Geodise Project, University of Southampton, Knowledge Management in Geodise Geodise Knowledge Management Team Barry Tao, Colin Puleston, Liming.
Query Health Concept-to-Codes (C2C) SWG Meeting #11 February 28,
A Semantic-Web Representation of Clinical Element Models
# 1 Clinical Element Models (CEMs) SHARP F2F Meeting Mayo Clinic June 21, 2010 Stanley M Huff, MD.
Common Terminology Services 2 CTS 2 Submission Team Status Update HL7 Vocabulary Working Group May 17, 2011.
Promoting excellence in social security Building on sector wide commonalities to enhance the benefits of Information.
User Profiling using Semantic Web Group members: Ashwin Somaiah Asha Stephen Charlie Sudharshan Reddy.
Issues in Ontology-based Information integration By Zhan Cui, Dean Jones and Paul O’Brien.
Dictionary based interchanges for iSURF -An Interoperability Service Utility for Collaborative Supply Chain Planning across Multiple Domains David Webber.
Enabling Medical Experts to navigate clinical text for cohort identification (meTAKES) Stephen Wu, Mayo Clinic SHARPn Summit 2012 June 12, 2012.
Open Source & Interoperability Profit Proprietary Closed Free Collaborative Open.
HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup Report on Gaps and Next Steps Jamie Ferguson Kaiser Permanente John Halamka Harvard Medical School.
1 Open Ontology Repository initiative - Planning Meeting - Thu Co-conveners: PeterYim, LeoObrst & MikeDean ref.:
Part I: Introduction to SHARPn Normalization Hongfang Liu, PhD, Mayo Clinic Tom Oniki, PhD, Intermountain Healthcare.
Clinical research data interoperbility Shared names meeting, Boston, Bosse Andersson (AstraZeneca R&D Lund) Kerstin Forsberg (AstraZeneca R&D.
Manufacturing Systems Integration Division Development Process and Testing Tools for Content Standards Simon Frechette National Institute of Standards.
A Portrait of the Semantic Web in Action Jeff Heflin and James Hendler IEEE Intelligent Systems December 6, 2010 Hyewon Lim.
Architectural Considerations for Semantic Support Group Name: WG5 Source: Martin Bauer (NEC), Joerg Swetina (NEC) Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
© 2005 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION 2 11 Jan 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I Terminology Service Bureau Vision Processes  Procedures.
Semantic Data Extraction for B2B Integration Syntactic-to-Semantic Middleware Bruno Silva 1, Jorge Cardoso 2 1 2
Open Health Natural Language Processing Consortium
SNOMED CT Vendor Introduction 27 th October :30 (CET) Implementation Special Interest Group Tom Seabury IHTSDO.
What problems are we trying to solve? Hannes Tschofenig.
Tung Tran, Ph.D. What is the EMR? Computerized legal medical record created by healthcare organizations Enables storage and retrieval of patient information.
ITI Infrastructure - Wednesday November 7th, IHE IT infrastructure “Terminology Sharing” Christel Daniel (AP-HP, INSERM, Paris), Ana Esterlich (GIP-DMP),
3M Health Information Systems 1© 3M All Rights Reserved. 3M Health Information Systems Data Standardization Interoperability.
HSPC Terminology and Information Model Initiative Susan Matney, PhD, RNC-OB, FAAN (Initiative Lead) Stan Huff, MD, FACMI, FHL7 11/6/2016.
REDCap External Modules
Pharmacogenomics Data Standardization using Clinical Element Models
Kathy Giannangelo, Map Lead
Terminology Service Bureau Vision
Data Normalization Architecture
Metadata Construction in Collaborative Research Networks
Electronic Health Record Access Control 7
Presentation transcript:

Data Normalization Milestones

Data Normalization  Goals –To conduct the science for realizing semantic interoperability and integration of diverse data sources –To develop tools and resources enabling the generation of normalized EMR data for secondary uses

Data Normalization  Information Models Target Value Sets Raw EMR Data Tooling Normalized EMR Data Normalization Targets Normalization Process

SHARPn Data Normalization Team  PIs: Dr. Chris Chute; Dr Stan Huff  Program Management Team –Manager: Lacey Hart; Assistant: Erin Martin  Members Hongfang Liu (Lead) Calvin Beebe (co-Lead) Tom Oniki (co-Lead; Modeling Lead) Harold Solbrig (CTS2 Lead) Vinod Kaggal (Implementation Lead) Kyle Marchant (CEM DB Lead ) Joey Coyle (Modeling) Teresa Conway (Modeling) Nathan David (Modeling) Edinardo Potich (Modeling) Cyndalynn Tilley (Modeling) Les Westberg (CEM DB) Kevin Peterson (CTS2) Siddhartha Jonnalagadda (Pipeline) Dingcheng Li (Pipeline)

Modeling -Accomplishments  CORE and Secondary Use Models/terminology patient, meds, labs, administrative dx and procedure, disease/disorder  Definition of value sets in terms of standards where possible

Modeling - Accomplishments  Request site (in pilot)  CEM Browser

Modeling - Future work  Request site full launch  Browser launch  Browser enhancements (terminology integration, knowledge repository integration)  Better documentation  Model enhancements  Tooling – explore collaborations

Value Sets- Accomplishments  SHARP Value Sets published as CTS2 Resolved Value Sets –ICD-9 –RxNorm –LOINC –ECIS –SNOMED-CT

Value Sets- Accomplishments  CTS2 Services Created For –SNOMED-CT Simple Refsets and Dynamic Value Set Definition –ECIS Value Sets and Maps  CTS2 Participation in CIMI effort

Value Sets - Future work  CTS2 Service for RxNorm and UMLS access –Allow creation of new value sets –Links to concept descriptions and relationships  Integrate BioPortal Value Set Services –Bridge Bioinformatics Ontology / Clinical Terminology

Value Sets – Future Work  Complete ECIS Server –Will aid in CEM to ADL migration  CTS2 Services available to CIMI project  Integration –Create Pipeline specific services coupled directly to CTS2 –Tighter coupling of Concept Domains and Value Sets –Ajax Widgets for viewing, integrating and Authoring

Pipeline - Accomplishments  Architecture revision to make pipeline highly configurable –Enable seamlessly pipeline integration of components from different data sources (e.g., NLP)  Generic pipeline components –XML Initializer

Pipeline - Accomplishments  Highly configurable syntactic and semantic mappings –Allow four kinds of syntactic mapping – constant, 1:1, 1:n, and inference  Two options to process data –XML tree-based (achieve semantic mapping through UIMA annotations) –Template based (achieve translation directly in CEM annotations)

Pipeline – Future work  Integrate NLP normalization pipeline into data normalization  GUIs to simplify the configurations of the pipeline –syntactic mapping –Semantic mapping  Integrate the two options provided to process data into a single project

CEM to DB - Accomplishments Completed the following CEM to DB Mirth Channel Development –Patient CEM Channel (Add and Update) –NotedDrug CEM Channel (Add) –AdministrativeDiagnosis CEM Channel (Add) –Lab (Quantitative, Narrative, Ordinal, and Titer) CEM Channel (Add)

CEM DB - Accomplishments Completed CEM DB Design and Development –Patient CEM Tables  Demographics including Names, Addresses, Telecom, and Language  Patient Cross Reference and External IDs –Clinical CEM Tables  Index Data  Source Data  Patient Data

HL7 to XDR Channel - Accomplishments Completed the following HL7 to XDR channels for data exchange –HL7 AdminDX to XDR Channel (Sender) –HL7 Lab to XDR Channel (Sender) –HL7 Noted Drug to XDR Channel (Sender) –HL7 Message Separator (Sender) –HL7 Receive Message Separator (Receiver) –ReceiveXDR and Extract HL7 (Receiver)

Next Steps for Channels and CEM DB  Next Steps –Complete the Update feature for Clinical CEM Channels –Enhance the Error Handling and resending of error Message for channels –Additional Relational field data storage for Clinical CEM Messages –Support CEM changes and new data types

In summary  Continue effort in tooling for –Modeling (through CEMBrowser and Request Site) –Value sets (through CTS2) –Pipeline set up (GUIs for configuration and tools for generating semantics mapping) –CEM XML -> CEM DB, CEM RDF, etc