Scholarship of Teaching & SCL/LCE (part II). Instructional Vs Learner Centered (1) Knowledge is transmitted from lecturer to students VS Students construct.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

Stephanie Burba, Noyce Graduate Tyler Ghee, Noyce Scholar Shelby Overstreet, Noyce Scholar Kathryn Crawford, Noyce Graduate Hope Marchionda, PhD Using.
Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Paradigms From Figure 1-2 in Huba and Freed, Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting.
Chapter 8 and 9: Teacher- Centered and Learner-Centered Instruction EDG 4410 Ergle.
Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Paradigms From Figure 1-2 in Huba and Freed, Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Guidelines and Methods for Assessing Student Learning Karen Bauer, Institutional Research & Planning, Undergraduate Studies; Gabriele Bauer, CTE.
COGNITIVE VIEWS OF LEARNING Information processing is a cognitive theory that examines the way knowledge enters and is stored in and retrieved from memory.
Teaching by Fostering Learning Strategies EDU 221.
University of Delaware Comparison of Paradigms Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education George Watson
The Role of General Education in Developing Leadership for a Sustainable Future March 23, 2007 George Watson Sr. Associate Dean, College of Arts & Sciences.
Problem-Based Learning by floating facilitation Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education George Watson Courtesy of Deborah Allen and Hal White.
Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Paradigms George Watson Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education
University of Delaware Comparison of Learning Paradigms: Learner-Centered vs. Instructor-Centered Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education George.
Copyright 2001 by Allyn and Bacon Social Cognitive and Constructivist Views of Learning: Chapter 9.
Problem-Based Learning by floating facilitation Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education George Watson Courtesy of Deborah Allen and Hal White.
University of Delaware Workshops on Problem-Based Learning International Islamic University Malaysia Comparison of Paradigms Institute.
Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Paradigms
University of Delaware Plenary Presentation at September Institute Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning University of Cincinnati September.
7/3/2015 Musgrove – Broward College Learning Theories & Technology Integration.
Meaningful Learning in an Information Age
University of Delaware Experience It Yourself: An Introduction to Problem-Based Learning Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education George Watson.
Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Paradigms From Figure 1-2 in Huba and Freed, Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting.
Learning Theory EDUC 275 Winthrop University Lisa Harris, Marshall Jones, Suzanne Sprouse.
UNIT 9. CLIL THINKING SKILLS
INTERDISCIPLINARY SUMMER SCHOOL Concept Map Kojuri J M.D. Cardiologist.Interventionist Associate professor of SUMS.
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
Problem Based Learning (PBL) David W. Dillard Arcadia Valley CTC.
Study Skills Study Skills Active Learner vs Passive Learner.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Higher-Level Cognitive Processes
Instructional software. Models for integrating technology in teaching Direct instructional approach Indirect instructional approach.
Knowledge is communicated from teacher to student. Student passively receives information. Emphasis is on acquisition of knowledge outside the context.
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, a Subsidiary of The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. 1 CHAPTER 8 The Cognitive Information- Processing.
A. Erzberger, April, 2003 Inquiry & Scientific Research.
Problem-Based Learning. Process of PBL Students confront a problem. In groups, students organize prior knowledge and attempt to identify the nature of.
PRESENTED BY KILA O’NEILL TECHNOLOGY AND THE STUDENT-CENTERED CLASSROOM.
STUDENT-CENTERED TEACHING & LEARNING METHODS Richard Lynch Graduate School of Education Assumption University.
Transfer and Problems Solving Denise Nichols and Brant Kenny.
EDN:204– Learning Process 30th August, 2010 B.Ed II(S) Sci Topics: Cognitive views of Learning.
Cognitive Theories of Learning Dr. K. A. Korb University of Jos.
Theories of Learning: Cognitive Theories Dr. K. A. Korb University of Jos 15 May 2009.
Strategies for Teaching Students with Learning and Behavior Problems, 8e Vaughn and Bos ISBN: © 2012, 2009, 2006 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
University of Delaware Asia-Pacific Conference on Education National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technogical University Singapore, June 4,
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
Problem-Solving Approach of Allied Health Learning Community.
Chapter Two The Technical Core Teaching & Learning.
How to Apply it in the Classroom Elicit ideas Elaboration & Reconstruc- tion Frequent problem based activities Variety of info. & resources Collaboration.
Jeanne Ormrod Eighth Edition © 2014, 2011, 2008, 2006, 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Educational Psychology Developing Learners.
Scholarship of Teaching & SCL/LCE (part III). Teaching the Content TOPIK PEMBICARAAN Teaching for Understanding Teaching for Transfer.
Connecting the Characteristics Margaret Heritage UCLA/ CRESST Attributes of Other Characteristics of Effective Instruction and Assessment for Learning.
The Information Processing Approach Chapter 8 By Eva Tantri Mahastri
The Transformation of Undergraduate Education through Faculty Development and Course Design – Part 1 George Watson (with acknowledgement to.
Learner Strategies Gagne and Driscoll Chp. 7. Self-learners/Independent Thinkers: A priority goal  Seek self-generated strategies l that activate internal.
Structuring Learning. Agenda Structuring learning. Structuring lab sessions. Engagement. Critical Thinking. Ideas for structuring learning. Activity.
National Science Education Standards. Outline what students need to know, understand, and be able to do to be scientifically literate at different grade.
CognitiveViews of Learning Chapter 7. Overview n n The Cognitive Perspective n n Information Processing n n Metacognition n n Becoming Knowledgeable.
University of Delaware How to get started with PBL: moving to a new paradigm Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education George Watson
University Counseling Center Study Skills Seminar Memorial Hall, First Floor.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Cognitive explanations of learning Esther Fitzpatrick.
21st Centruy Approaches to Teaching Physics
Using Cognitive Science To Inform Instructional Design
Exam 2 Review Chapters 9-13.
The whole is greater than the sum of the parts. –Aristotle
Comparison of Learning Paradigms: Learner-Centered vs
Problem-Based Learning by floating facilitation
CONSTRUCTIVISM Submitted To: Ma’am Misbah Yasmeen BPGCW (Air University)
Presentation transcript:

Scholarship of Teaching & SCL/LCE (part II)

Instructional Vs Learner Centered (1) Knowledge is transmitted from lecturer to students VS Students construct knowledge through gathering & synthesizing information & integrating it with the general skills of inquiry, communication, critical thinking, problem solving etc. Huba & Freed, Learner Centered Assessment on College Campuses, Allyn & Bacon, 2000

Instructional Vs Learner Centered (2) Students passively receive information VS Students are actively involved Huba & Freed, Learner Centered Assessment on College Campuses, Allyn & Bacon, 2000

Instructional Vs Learner Centered (3) Emphasis on acquisition of knowledge outside the context in which it will be used VS Emphasis is on using & communicating knowledge effectively to address enduring & emerging issues & problems in real life contexts Huba & Freed, Learner Centered Assessment on College Campuses, Allyn & Bacon, 2000

Instructional Vs Learner Centered (4) Lecturer’s role is to be primary information giver & primary evaluator VS Lecturer’s role is to coach & facilitate Huba & Freed, Learner Centered Assessment on College Campuses, Allyn & Bacon, 2000

Instructional Vs Learner Centered (5) Teaching & assessing are separate VS Teaching & assessing are intertwined Huba & Freed, Learner Centered Assessment on College Campuses, Allyn & Bacon, 2000

Instructional Vs Learner Centered (6) Assessment is used to monitor learning VS Assessment is used to promote & diagnose learning Huba & Freed, Learner Centered Assessment on College Campuses, Allyn & Bacon, 2000

Instructional Vs Learner Centered (7) Emphasis is on wright answers VS Emphasis is on generating better questions & learning from errors Huba & Freed, Learner Centered Assessment on College Campuses, Allyn & Bacon, 2000

Instructional Vs Learner Centered (8) Desired learning is assessed indirectly through the use of objectively scored tests VS Desired learning is assessed directly through papers, projects, performances,portfolios, etc Huba & Freed, Learner Centered Assessment on College Campuses, Allyn & Bacon, 2000

Instructional Vs Learner Centered (9) Focus is on single discipline VS Approach is compatible with interdisciplinary investigation Huba & Freed, Learner Centered Assessment on College Campuses, Allyn & Bacon, 2000

Instructional Vs Learner Centered (10) Culture is competitive & individualistic VS Culture is cooperative, collaborative & supportive Huba & Freed, Learner Centered Assessment on College Campuses, Allyn & Bacon, 2000

Instructional Vs Learner Centered (11) Only students are viewed as learners VS Lecturer & students learn together Huba & Freed, Learner Centered Assessment on College Campuses, Allyn & Bacon, 2000

DO YOU HAVE THESE PROBLEMS? Students forgot what you taught after the final examination Students can not apply their knowledge in a new situation (near transfer) Students can not solve problems (far transfer) P. Blumberg: Developing Learner Centered Teaching, p.3, Jossey Bass, 2008

Students are not Tough ??? Zebra vs Lion

Teaching the Content TOPIK PEMBICARAAN Teaching for Understanding Teaching for Transfer

TEACHING THE CONTENT TO OVERCOME RETENTION PROBLEMS

Cognitive Theory Sensory Memory Working Memory Long Term Memory (permanent) Attention Encoding Retrieval Decay in 20 sec. Decay in 1-4 sec. Rehearsal Context

Menimbulkan Student’s Attention Identify key features → clear definition → lists critical features of the concept M.D. Svinicki, Learning & Motivation in the Postsecondary Classroom, p.15, Jossey Bass, 2004

Identify Key Features to be Learned 1. Carefully analyze any concept to be learned, identify key features → give clear definition. 2. Situations learners are going to use this new information → what will be present → what to pay attention & what to ignore M.D. Svinicki, Learning & Motivation in the Postsecondary Classroom, p.15, Jossey Bass, 2004

1.3THE STRESS AT A CRACK TIP (cont’) 1. Tegangan dekat ujung retak mendekati tak berhingga → terjadi singularitas. 2. Distribusi tegangan sangat curam disekitar ujung retak 3.Intensitas medan tegangan disekitar ujung retak digambarkan oleh suku  a

Focus Student Attention by Highlighting Key Features 1. Verbal cues (verbally) 2. Use of outlines 3. Underlining text 4. Using bold font 5. Contrasting colored text 6. Progressive disclosure 7. Bright vs dim M.D. Svinicki, Learning & Motivation in the Postsecondary Classroom, Jossey Bass, 2004

Focus Student Attention by Highlighting Key Features 1. Verbal cues (verbally) 2. Use of outlines 3. Underlining text 4. Using bold font 5. Contrasting colored text 6. Progressive disclosure 7. Bright vs dim M.D. Svinicki, Learning & Motivation in the Postsecondary Classroom, Jossey Bass, 2004

Focus Student Attention by Highlighting Key Features 1. Verbal cues (verbally) 2. Use of outlines 3. Underlining text 4. Using bold font 5. Contrasting colored text 6. Progressive disclosure 7. Bright vs dim M.D. Svinicki, Learning & Motivation in the Postsecondary Classroom, Jossey Bass, 2004

Focus Student Attention by Highlighting Key Features 1. Verbal cues (verbally) 2. Use of outlines 3. Underlining text 4. Using bold font 5. Contrasting colored text 6. Progressive disclosure 7. Bright vs dim M.D. Svinicki, Learning & Motivation in the Postsecondary Classroom, Jossey Bass, 2004

Focus Student Attention by Highlighting Key Features 1. Verbal cues (verbally) 2. Use of outlines 3. Underlining text 4. Using bold font 5. Contrasting colored text 6. Progressive disclosure 7. Bright vs dim M.D. Svinicki, Learning & Motivation in the Postsecondary Classroom, Jossey Bass, 2004

Focus Student Attention by Highlighting Key Features 1. Verbal cues (verbally) 2. Use of outlines 3. Underlining text 4. Using bold font 5. Contrasting colored text 6. Progressive disclosure 7. Bright vs dim M.D. Svinicki, Learning & Motivation in the Postsecondary Classroom, Jossey Bass, 2004

Focus Student Attention by Highlighting Key Features 1. Verbal cues (verbally) 2. Use of outlines 3. Underlining text 4. Using bold font 5. Contrasting colored text 6. Progressive disclosure 7. Bright vs dim M.D. Svinicki, Learning & Motivation in the Postsecondary Classroom, Jossey Bass, 2004

Do not Overload student’s short term memory Short term memory can only hold 7 (+ & - 2) pieces of informations at one time. Limit each lecture to 5 main ideas Flashing words & cute sounds divide learners attention When overloaded students will become verbatim M.D. Svinicki, Learning & Motivation in the Postsecondary Classroom, p.17, Jossey Bass, 2004

Cognitive Theory Sensory Memory Working Memory Long Term Memory (permanent) Attention Encoding Retrieval Decay in 20 sec. Decay in 1-4 sec. Rehearsal Context

Support Students Encoding Content 1. Organization 2. Elaboration 3. Imagery 4. Prior knowledge 5. Deep processing 6. Meaningfulness 7. Structural understanding M.D. Svinicki, Learning & Motivation in the Postsecondary Classroom, Jossey Bass, 2004

Support Students Encoding Content 1. Organization 2. Elaboration 3. Imagery 4. Prior knowledge 5. Deep processing 6. Meaningfulness 7. Structural understanding M.D. Svinicki, Learning & Motivation in the Postsecondary Classroom, Jossey Bass, 2004

1.3THE STRESS AT A CRACK TIP (cont’) 1. Tegangan dekat ujung retak mendekati tak berhingga  terjadi singularitas. 2. Distribusi tegangan sangat curam disekitar ujung retak 3.Intensitas medan tegangan disekitar ujung retak digambarkan oleh suku  a

Support Students Encoding Content 1. Organization 2. Elaboration 3. Imagery 4. Prior knowledge 5. Deep processing 6. Meaningfulness 7. Structural understanding M.D. Svinicki, Learning & Motivation in the Postsecondary Classroom, Jossey Bass, 2004

Exfoliation Corrosion INTRODUCTION TO DAMTOL

Exfoliation (cont’) Failure Modes in A/C Structures (cont’) Exfoliation attack follows elongated grain path planes created by forming processes e.g. rolling, extruding or forging The picture has to represent WHAT IS TO BE REMEMBERED

Support Students Encoding Content 1. Organization 2. Elaboration 3. Imagery 4. Prior knowledge 5. Deep processing 6. Meaningfulness 7. Structural understanding M.D. Svinicki, Learning & Motivation in the Postsecondary Classroom, Jossey Bass, 2004

THE IMPORTANCE OF PRIOR KNOWLEDGE

Fish is Fish

Support Students Encoding Content 1. Organization 2. Elaboration 3. Imagery 4. Prior knowledge 5. Deep processing 6. Meaningfulness 7. Structural understanding M.D. Svinicki, Learning & Motivation in the Postsecondary Classroom, Jossey Bass, 2004

Deep processing of content involves making connections between what learners are trying to encode & whatever they already know about the topic → use examples the learners can connect with Meaningfulness: something that has a lot of connections to a learner’s prior knowledge or with other things also being learned → use more concrete examples M.D. Svinicki, Learning & Motivation in the Postsecondary Classroom, p.27 & p.29, Jossey Bass, 2004

Support Students Encoding Content 1. Organization 2. Elaboration 3. Imagery 4. Prior knowledge 5. Deep processing 6. Meaningfulness 7. Structural understanding M.D. Svinicki, Learning & Motivation in the Postsecondary Classroom, Jossey Bass, 2004

Encoding by Structural Understanding: encoding based on the organization of the material, how various parts fit together as a whole → e.g. creating outline, concept map M.D. Svinicki, Learning & Motivation in the Postsecondary Classroom, p.31, Jossey Bass, 2004

Give Students Opportunity to Actively Work with the Matetrial → Fluency & Transfer Multiple opportunity to use information they learned → automaticity → less cognitive processing capacity → can be used for more complex cognitive task Varied practice situations → learners pick out similar things across situations M.D. Svinicki, Learning & Motivation in the Postsecondary Classroom, p ,Jossey Bass, 2004

Teach Them Integrity Do Not Cheat