Central Emergency Response Fund CERF: Guidelines and Tools JANUARY 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CAP SECTION OCHA-GENEVA
Advertisements

Tips and Resources IASC Cluster/Sector Leadership Training
Guidance Note on Joint Programming
Planning and Preparation Inter-agency Child Protection Working Group & Save the Children Picture: Lindsay Stark Training material developed by: Hani Mansourian.
ESTHER KUISCH-LAROCHE CHIEF, FINANCIAL TRACKING SERVICE
Session 4 Responding to an Emergency. Objectives At the end of this session, you will: Be familiar with the RC/HC Handbook and the Emergency Checklist.
Nutrition Cluster - South Sudan Nutrition Cluster Performance Monitoring Review Workshop Findings 4 th April 2014 ARON HOTEL.
KA2 – Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of good practices Capacity Building in the field of Higher Education (CBHE) Application and selection.
R2HC Third Call for Proposals Launch
Country Support Programme (CSP) GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop 1 to 3 November 2011 Cape Town, South Africa.
M3 – S4 FUNCTION 3 – ‘ PLANNING AND STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT ’: Resource Mobilisation.
PART IX: EMERGENCY EXPOSURE SITUATIONS Module IX.1: Generic requirements for emergency exposure situations Lesson IX.1-2: General Requirements Lecture.
1 Roles of UNEP, GEF & CBD in the Environment 2 nd Training Workshop for BCH Regional Advisors May 2006 Bangkok, Thailand.
1Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) CAP (Consolidated Appeal Process) Section The Consolidated Appeal Process Rome, 9-10 May 2012.
The MCH Proposal Development and Critique. The MCH Proposal: Development and Critique Introduction Donor vs foundation funding Funding resources Funding.
Canadian International Development Agency Agence canadienne de développement international CIDA and Crisis Prevention and Recovery.
This work is part of EQUITY ACTION which has received funding from the European Union, in the framework of the Health Programme.
CED Application Reviewer Training Module 6: Budget and Budget Justification June 2012.
FTS: Financial Tracking Service OPS: Online Project System.
Session 271 Comparative Emergency Management Session 27 Slide Deck.
Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Eastern and Southern Africa Sandton, South Africa, 3-4 November 2010 Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points.
CP Sub-Cluster Coordinator Training CP Sub-Cluster Coordinator Training 2010 The Role of the Coordinator in Situational Assessments.
Coordination and Net Working on DRR Rapid Emergency Assessment and Coordination Team (REACT) Bishkek November, 2009.
OPS CAP ONLINE PROJECT DATABASE. ONLINE PROJECT SYSTEM (OPS) The OPS allows CAP partners to edit, manage, submit and revise their projects online, as.
NEW INITIATIVES. TWINNING PROGRAM  To exchange of best practices via member-to- member technical engagement  Competitive small grants program funded.
INEE Regional Tools Launch Washington, DC July 1, 2010.
Assessments. Assessment in the Project Cycle DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING EVALUATION ASSESSMENT.
UN-REDD – QUICK OVERVIEW. The UN-REDD Programme. What it is? Since part of you may not have heard about the UN-REDD Programme, I have thought it could.
Social Innovation Fund Creating an Application in eGrants Technical Assistance Call 1 – 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, March 19, ;
The Early Recovery and Reconstruction Cluster in Pakistan - From saving lives to restoring livelihoods - Angelika Planitz UNDP BCPR Shelter Meeting May.
CP Sub-Cluster Coordinator Training CP Sub-Cluster Coordinator Training 2010 Resource Mobilisation.
Overcoming HIV/AIDS Epidemic in Ukraine National programme supported by GFATM Presentation by Alvaro Bermejo and Andriy Klepikov at the Stakeholders Meeting.
FTS Financial Tracking Service.
Humanitarian Financing ACF Training – March 2010 Session I: Humanitarian Financing (Appeals processes, pooled funding mechanisms, role of clusters, CERF.
CERF TRAINING TRAINING INTRODUCTION TO THE CENTRAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE FUND WORKSHOP 1 SESSION.
Financial reporting Linda Wormö, MA Per Dahlström, MA 1st October,2015 Kuopio, Finland.
Global Health Cluster Orientation Package An Introduction to the Orientation Package.
ACTIONS AT NATIONAL LEVEL Proposal on criteria to choose ERFP activities/projects on national (sub-regional) level Elżbieta Martyniuk on behalf of the.
Applications for Non-recurrent subsidy to carry out Major Repairs / Slope Repairs Briefing Session for Schools under the Direct Subsidy Scheme
Action Plan Skills Building: Introduction January 2013.
Country Support Programme GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop March 22 – 24, 2011 Kyiv, Ukraine.
FTS FINANCIAL TRACKING SERVICE. WHAT IS THE FTS?  On-line database of humanitarian funding  Real time/snapshot  Needs/contributions.
Dr Wilma Doedens Humanitarian Response Unit UNFPA-Geneva 10 October 2005 IASC Guidelines for Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Settings.
Freedom of Information- E-publication schemes, Internal Procedures & Disability Guidelines Brief to Information Managers 19 November 2008.
12/12/2005 IASC IASC Principals Slide 1 IASC in 2005 Work Plan 2006 Ms. Yvette Stevens Chairperson, IASC Working Group and Assistant Emergency Relief Coordinator.
Flash Appeals NATF/ACAPS Training Revinge When is a Flash appeal issued? Part of the Consolidated Appeals Process, the FA is considered as the humanitarian.
Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action Basic Introduction and Overview.
HRSA DIVISION OF GRANTS MANAGEMENT OPERATIONS GRANTS MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES TO HRSA REVIEWERS.
4/18/2007 Surge Capacity Section 1 Humanitarian Situation in Madagascar – Aftermath of Cyclones Indlala and Jaya Mr. Dusan Zupka OCHA Geneva.
ADMINISTRATION. Goals of this session Understanding of the administrative process for the funding of a CERF project Understanding of.
GENERIC GUIDELINES FOR DONATIONS Global Logistics Cluster Meeting Paris (March 2010)
Support National Social Protection Strategy (NSPS) CARD/SPCU 1.
Coordination Performance Survey Validation workshop May 2016.
TRAINING 4 THE CERF LIFE-SAVING CRITERIA SESSION WORKSHOP.
5 CERF BUDGET AND ADMINISTRATION REQUIREMENTS TRAINING SESSION
TRAINING 6 WORKING WITH PARTNERS SESSION WORKSHOP.
Country Support Programme (CSP)
INVESTING IN SYRIAN HUMANITARIAN ACTION (ISHA)
INVESTING IN SYRIAN HUMANITARIAN ACTION (ISHA)
Country Support Programme GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop
Proposal Preparation & Review Process
The Gender Analysis Process in Food For Peace Development Programs
8 September CERF briefing – RCOs 1.0 WEBINAR OPENING
CCPM (Cluster coordination performance monitoring) results
GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop Country Support Programme (CSP)
United Nations Voluntary Fund on Disability (UNVFD)
Task Force on Target Setting and Reporting TFTSR
24 January 2018 Juba, Republic of South Sudan
GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop
GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Central Emergency Response Fund CERF: Guidelines and Tools JANUARY 2007

Goal Participants familiarize themselves with the key CERF guidelines and background documents, learn where to find them on the CERF website ( and gain an understanding of how to avoid common mistakes that can delay preparation or processing of a CERF requesthttp://cerf.un.org

Lessons Learned 2006: Guidance and Training are key to improving quality and appropriateness of CERF proposals from the field Thus, improved training and guidance are key parts of the overall strategy to improve the timeliness and appropriateness of CERF allocations

CERF Application Toolkit on the CERF Website Guidelines: CERF Grant Component Project and Budget Template, incl. PSC Calculation Guidance Flash Appeals Cheat Sheet: CAP/Flash Appeals and CERF Secretary-General’s Report and Bulletins: On Improvement of the Central Emergency Response Fund On Establishment and Operation of the CERF Power Point Presentations: Introduction to the CERF How to Apply: Rapid Response How to Apply: Under funded (third allocation) All documents found at through the link on the homepagehttp://cerf.un.org

Guidelines: CERF Grant Component

FAQ: HC/RC’s justification for CERF RR proposals Generally field-driven request from the HC/RC HC/RC prioritizes life-saving needs following consultations with IASC CT Agencies prepare proposals according to agreed priorities HC/RC sends package of proposals to the ERC along with a justification including: 1.cause of the situation 2.number of people affected 3.description of humanitarian indicators 4.displacement figures (new displacements) 5.implications if needs are not met 6.review of fund-raising efforts to date Source: Guidelines CERF Grant Component para 18 and SG’s Bulletin para 4.5

FAQ: What qualifies as a “life-saving” activity? All projects funded through the CERF grant component must be for life-saving/core emergency humanitarian programmes Activities that within a short time span remedy, mitigate or avert direct physical harm or threats to a population or major portion thereof. Also permissible are common humanitarian services that are necessary to enable life- saving activities and the funding of the cluster lead function as long as the cluster lead is also using the CERF funds to implement life-saving activities See: CERF guidelines (para 10), Criteria and Procedures for Under-Funded emergencies (para 4)

CERF Funding Criteria – continued For the purposes of analyzing and identifying eligible crises, the sectors most commonly considered “life-saving” are: food, health, protection, security, shelter/NFI, water and sanitation, multi/sector, and emergency education

CERF Funding Considerations for Discussion Life-Saving Maybe, depending on context Not Life-Saving Medical ServicesDe-miningInfrastructure Reconstruction Therapeutic Feeding Livestock Vaccinations Civil society capacity-building Water/SanitationGeneral Food Distributions Micro-Credit Common Services Surveillance systems Preparedness Plans ProtectionPsycho-socialSME training

Application and Budget Template (CERF website)

Budget Blank template Cost breakdown Amount (USD) [1] A. Staff costs (salaries and other entitlements)- B. Travel- C. Contractual Services- D. Operations [2] (please itemize below; add rows if necessary) - - E. Acquisitions- F. Other- Subtotal project requirements- G. Indirect program support costs (not to exceed 7% of subtotal project costs) [3] PSC amount - Total cost [4] -

Budget - Program Support Costs Please calculate as follows: Project amount$500, Indirect support costs (maximum 7%) $ 35, TOTAL$535, As follows Project amount$ 497, Indirect support costs (maximum 7%) $ 37, TOTAL$535, NOT as:

Budget - Most Common Problems Added incorrectly Inconsistencies between narrative and budget Non-transparent/unclear cost line descriptions Miscalculated Program Support Costs (PSC)

When to use the Application/Budget Template… In all cases agencies must submit a CERF-specific budget using CERF template For Rapid Response Cases: Apply using CERF Application template unless ERC agrees to fund against a Flash Appeal or similar document If funding against an appeal, HC/RC submits summary table with list of projects and requested funding amounts for each See Also: Cheat Sheet: Appeals and the CERF For Under-funded Emergencies: If funding against a CAP/Workplan: HC/RC submits Project Allocation Table, relevant CAP project sheets, and CERF Budget for each project as a package For non-CAP countries: Templates to be provided and will accompany allocation announcements See also: “CERF allocations to under-funded emergencies: Criteria and Procedures”

Cheat Sheet: CAP/Flash Appeals and CERF (CERF Website)

Flash Appeal Table with CERF Allocations

CERF Rapid Response funds and Flash Appeals Situations requiring CERF funds should normally generate a Flash Appeal HC requests CERF funding for the highest-priority Flash Appeal projects simultaneously as the Appeal is prepared Ideal: Flash Appeal released showing CERF allocations in summary financial tables CERF provides the initial injection of funds for the most urgent life- saving projects in the Flash Appeal to cover the time lag between issuance of the Appeal and receipt of funds from donors See also: Flash Appeal Guidelines, Cheat Sheet: CAP/Flash Appeals and CERF

Administrative Overheads UN Secretariat – 3% UN Agency – Maximum of 7% Implementing Partners – No set guidance or limits; decided between Agencies and partners according to regular practice

Improving the CERF Guidance Toolkit Simplify: Make one concise CERF guidance document More examples of good “justification” cover notes from HCs and good proposals Translate documents into French and Spanish Publicize the CERF website and on-line training tools Create links from Agencies’ websites and intranets

Guidance and Training: Plans for 2007 HRSU Regional Workshops (Johannesburg, Bangkok….) Three, two-day “ToT” Workshops in New York (Jan), Geneva (March), Africa (April-May) “listserv” for CERF trainers CERF modules at CAP trainings Improve the CERF application/training toolkit on the website CERF training module at HC training and RC induction course Assist with Agencies’ internal CERF Guidelines

For more information