West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Cheat River Watershed TMDLs Draft TMDL Public Meetings August 3,2010 Kingwood, WV August 4, 2010 Blackwater.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2005 Stream Phosphorus TMDLs to be proposed in July 5th NJR The NJDEPs Division of Watershed Management is seeking stakeholder input on proposed phosphorus.
Advertisements

Division of Mining and Reclamation Kenneth Politan (304) , ext
Kansas Spring River Metal TMDLs Thomas Stiles, KDHE Watershed Planning April 14, 2005.
Ann D Hirekatur Project Manager State of Lake Wisconsin Meeting July 13, 2013 Wisconsin River Basin Water Quality Improvement Project.
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
Middle Ohio North Watershed
TMDL Development Mainstem Monongahela River Watershed May 14, 2014.
TMDL Development Rockymarsh Run Watershed May 8, 2013 WV DEP.
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection August 12, 2014 Kanawha City Office Upper Kanawha Tributary Watersheds TMDL Status Update Meeting.
TMDL Development Upper Kanawha River Watershed August 18, 2011 WV DEP WV DEP Dave Montali.
TMDL Development West Fork River Watershed July 27 th, 2010 WV DEP WV DEP James Laine James Laine.
TMDL Development Tygart Valley River Watershed May 9 th & 10 th 2012 WV DEP WV DEP James Laine James Laine.
Prioritization Workgroup Summary. Workgroup Topics Nutrient results What is a watershed? What is a TMDL? Prioritization methods Basin framework and management.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality TMDLs 101 An Explanation of the Federal Clean Water Act’s TMDL Requirements and How they Impact Carter Lake.
Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Tracking Thursday, May 31, 2012 Martin Hurd, Vladislav Royzman, Tetra Tech, Inc. Brian Burch, Megan Thynge,
Bureau of Water Program Overview Local Government Interest.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Imperial River: Water Quality Status and Basin Management Action Plan.
EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Incorporating Climate Change Adaptation in EPA Region 10 Programs: An example based on a newly initiated pilot in the Office of Water and Watershed’s Total.
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection November 6, 2014 Cabela’s Conference Room Wheeling, WV Upper Ohio North Tributary Watersheds Draft.
Lower Kanawha Watershed TMDLs West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Draft TMDL Public Meetings September 28, 2011 Winfield High School.
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) TMDL Assessment ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
Elk Watershed TMDLs West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Draft TMDL Public Meetings September 27, 2011 Elkview Middle School.
Approaches to Addressing Bacteria Impairments Kevin Wagner Texas Water Resources Institute.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality A TMDL Training Program for Local Government Leaders and Other Water Resource.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
West Fork River Watershed TMDLs West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Draft TMDL Public Meetings April 21, 2014.
TMDL Development Monongahela River Watershed June 30th, 2009 WV DEP WV DEP James Laine James Laine.
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
1 Sandra Spence EPA Region 8 TMDL Program EPA Region 8 TMDL Program Integrating Watershed Plans and TMDLs to Help Answer Watershed Planning Questions November.
TMDL Development Upper Guyandotte River Watershed May 4 th & 5 th, 2015.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Redwood River TMDL Critique David De Paz, Alana Bartolai, Lydia Karlheim.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013.
Staci Goodwin Senior TMDL Project Manager Office of Water Quality
Bacteria and Dissolved Oxygen Total Mass Daily Load Development for the Atascosa River Jessica L. Watts.
Region 2000 Local Government Council 828 Main Street, 12th Floor Lynchburg, VA March 4, :30 – 8:30 p.m.
Deep River-Portage Burns Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting March 13, 2013.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
Lake Independence Phosphorus TMDL Critique Stephanie Koerner & Zach Tauer BBE 4535 Fall 2011.
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection August 6, 2014 Moorefield City Hall South Branch Potomac & Shenandoah Hardy Watersheds TMDL Status.
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection October 13 & 14, 2015 Draft TMDLs for Tygart Valley River Watershed.
West Metro Water Alliance A Path to Clean Water – Understanding TMDLs and Watershed Planning September 21, 2011 Diane Spector Wenck Associates, Inc.
Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.
A quantification of groundwater seepage during drought and its importance for water quality modeling in the St. Vrain watershed Hannah Chapin Thomas Gerber.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.
76. The central U.S. law regulating water quality is the Clean Water Act (CWA), adopted in The Act initially focused on point sources, which it.
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection August 31, 2011 Ravenswood High School Middle Ohio South Watershed TMDL Status Update Meeting.
Commonwealth of Virginia TMDL Program Update Citizen for Water Quality Annual Summit September 22, 2001.
Monongahela River Watershed TMDLs West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Draft TMDL Public Meetings August 20, 2013.
Modeling Fecal Bacteria Fate and Transport to Address Pathogen Impairments in the United States Brian Benham Extension Specialist and Associate Professor,
WVDEP TMDL Development Nutrient Management Training December 16, 2009 Dave Montali, WVDEP.
Commonwealth of Virginia Fecal Coliform Bacteria TMDLs Four Mile Run Public Meeting #1 June 14, 2001.
CHRIS ZADAK AND RACHEL OLMANSON, METR0-ST. CROIX WATERSHED UNIT WATERSHED RESTORATION AND PROTECTION STRATEGY.
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS Four Mile Run Bacteria TMDL March 25, 2002
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Water Quality Trading – Utah Perspective
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Presentation transcript:

West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Cheat River Watershed TMDLs Draft TMDL Public Meetings August 3,2010 Kingwood, WV August 4, 2010 Blackwater Falls State Park

Agenda TMDL/ water quality standards recap Overview of this TMDL effort Explanation/demonstration of electronic documents, spreadsheets, tools Questions and Answers

What’s a TMDL? “ Total Maximum Daily Load” TMDL is a pollution budget – the amount of pollutants that can be put into a stream before water quality standards are violated TMDL development is required by the Clean Water Act for all streams impaired by a pollutant

What’s an Impaired Stream? Stream that doesn’t meet water quality standards WV Water Quality Standards are codified in 47CSR2 Standards include “Designated Uses” for WV waters and the criteria to protect those uses Water Quality Criteria can be numeric or narrative

Cheat River Watershed TMDLs Criteria of Concern Total Iron Aquatic Life Protection; Public Water Supply 4-consecutive day average not to exceed 1.5 mg/l more than once in three years (warmwater); 0.5 mg/l (troutwater ) Dissolved Aluminum Aquatic Life Protection One-hour average concentration not to exceed 0.75 mg/l more than once in three years 4-consecutive day average not to exceed 0.75 mg/l (warmwater fisheries) more than once in three years; mg/l (troutwaters) pH All Uses 6.0 – 9.0 Standard Units at all times

Cheat River Watershed TMDLs Criteria of Concern Fecal Coliform Water Contact Recreation; Public Water Supply 200 counts/100ml as a monthly geometric mean no more than 10% of samples in a month exceed 400 counts/100ml Total Manganese 1.0 mg/l or less with a five mile zone upstream of a public water intake

Cheat River Watershed TMDLs Criteria of Concern Biological Impairment Conditions Not Allowable in State Waters (47 CSR 2-3.2i) “.....no significant adverse impact to the chemical, physical, hydrologic or biological components of aquatic ecosystems shall be allowed.” Benthic macroinvertebrate assessment West Virginia Stream Condition Index (WVSCI)

TMDL =  WLA +  LA + MOS  = “sum of” WLA = “wasteload allocations” LA = “load allocations” MOS = “margin of safety” WLAs - pollutant loads for “point sources” Discharge from point Need NPDES permit LAs - pollutant loads for “nonpoint sources” and background Precipitation and runoff No permit required

Cheat Watershed TMDL History EPA developed Blackwater River Dissolved Oxygen TMDL EPA developed metals/pH TMDLs for Cheat River and 50 tributaries – 2001 This effort reevaluates EPA metals/pH TMDLs plus addresses fecal coliform and biological impairements

Cheat Watershed TMDL History This WVDEP project: –Proposed streams advertised for public comment (Spring 2006) –Initial Public Meetings (TMDL 101) - May 2006 –Watershed Monitoring and Source Tracking - July June 2007 –Allocation Philosophy Meeting – April 2010 –Draft TMDL Public Meeting - Today

Impaired Waters 99 named streams – See Table 3-3 starting on page 11 of Main Report

Modeling MDAS (Mining Data Analysis System) Iron, Manganese, Dissolved Aluminum, pH and Fecal Coliform impairments Can handle point and nonpoint sources (representation and allocation) Metals speciation component allows evaluation of dissolved aluminum and pH Recognizes exposure duration and exceedence frequency components of criteria

22 TMDL watersheds Modeling 566 subwatersheds

Baseline Condition Design precipitation period Hourly precipitation data for a six-year period Design period includes wet and dry years Applied to present day land uses Permitted discharges equal to permit limits

Margin of Safety Required component of TMDLs Explicit 5% used in most TMDLs TMDL endpoints for numeric criteria are 95% of value (ex mg/l for 1.5 mg/l Fe criterion)

TMDL Condition Existing pollutant sources reduced such that TMDL endpoints are achieved at each modeled subwatershed Criteria value, duration, exceedence frequency Margin of safety Example – 4-day average concentration of iron in warmwater fishery not greater than mg/l more than once every three years

Baseline/TMDL Example

Boundary Conditions Shavers Fork, Dry Fork, Blackwater River above Beaver Creek Gross allocations – no reductions prescribed Miscellaneous Pennsylvania tributaries in Big Sandy Creek watershed Gross allocations - reductions as necessary to meet TMDL endpoints at the state border

Pennsylvania Allocations

Biological Impairment TMDLs Stressor identification Define potential stressors/pathways Evaluate chemistry, habitat, field notes, bugs Determine stressors Stressor/TMDL Linkage Metals /pH Toxicity Al, Fe, pH Organic Enrichment......FC surrogate Sedimentation Fe Surrogate Linkage Table 4-1, Page 20

Sedimentation Stressor Old Approach –Select unimpaired reference watershed with similar landuse, ecoregion, geomorphological characteristics –Normalized sediment loading in reference watershed is TMDL target for biologically-impaired stream –Present Sediment TMDL Cheat TMDL Approach - Correlate TSS and Iron - Model Iron - Present Iron TMDL - Calculate TSS for Fe - Compare to TSS for reference approach

Iron /TSS Correlation From Pre-TMDL Monitoring, used stations with >5 quantifiable observations of both Fe and TSS, a positive correlation and R 2 >0.5; Fe/TSS correlation = Three “flavors” ranging from to Ex = 2.0 mg/l Fe per 100 mgl TSS Applied to sediment producing land uses and bank erosion sediment loads

Sedimentation Stressor All biologically-impaired streams for which sedimentation is a significant stressor are also impaired for iron Sediment reduction needed to meet iron water quality criteria is larger than that needed under reference watershed approach Iron TMDLs are appropriate surrogate

Ionic Stress Crab Orchard Run Insufficient info on causative pollutants and thresholds (SO4, other ions) Biological TMDL development deferred until December 2011 Work plan developed –DEP monitoring –EPA – model enhancements

Reduced Pollutant Sources Iron Abandoned Mine Lands Upland Sediment sources Residental/Urban Runoff Streambank erosion Active mining permits

Reduced Pollutant Sources Fecal Coliform Failing/nonexistent on- site sewage systems Urban/residential land use stormwater runoff Agricultural land use loading

Manganese Criteria applicable only in five mile stream segments upstream of water supply intakes Impairments only in Heather Run, Lick Run, and Pringle Run watersheds Reductions prescribed only for Abandoned Mine Land sources

pH / Dissolved Aluminum Impairments linked; decreased pH causes increased aluminum in dissolved form Atmospheric deposition - Impact of varies by buffering capacity Iron and aluminum reductions to meet criteria decreases acidity Alkalinity additions captured in baseline

pH / Dissolved Aluminum Allocation Strategy – Pg. 56 Metals/pH spreadsheet, pH LAS tab

Implementation Activities WV/NPDES Permit issuance/reissuance WLAs for mining permits Construction Stormwater General Permits DEP Division of Land Reclamation Office of Abandoned Mine Lands and Reclamation Office of Special Reclamation Public Sewer Projects NPS Regional Coordinator Northern Basin Coordinator, Lou Schmidt

Future Growth OK New point source discharges with limits based on achieving water quality criteria “end-of-pipe” “Remining” without specific allocation New sewage discharges w/ 200/400 fecal coliform effluent limits New mining with TSS effluent limits = 35 mg/l avg. mon., 70 mg/l max. daily applicable at all times New Construction Stormwater in accordance with area allowances

Future Growth – Construction Stormwater 1.5% of area in immediate subwatershed Cumulative area provision See “CSW Future Growth” tab on Metals Allocation spreadsheet

Public Comment Public Comment period ends August 23, 2010 Documents may be reviewed/downloaded from DEP webpage CD available upon request – CD includes GIS Shapefiles and Technical Report Comments should be submitted to Steve Young at Questions - contact Dave Montali, Jim Laine, Ben Lowman, Mike McDaniel (304) (Ext 1063, 1061, 1055, 1101)

TMDL Products Main Report – Overall description of the Cheat River TMDL development process Technical Report with detailed appendices

Allocation spreadsheets: Fecal Coliform, Metals, pH TMDL for each stream, WLAs and LAs by SWS Filterable GIS shapefiles + web- based project coming soon TMDL Products

CD /Spreadsheets/ GIS Demo