Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
Advertisements

UMC for Consulting & Services. UMC UMC for Consulting & Services UMC Profile UMC Profile UMC Range of Consulting Services UMC Range of Consulting Services.
Managing Risk: A Framework and Reporting Cycle 2014.
Test Automation Success: Choosing the Right People & Process
Introduction to Systems Development and Systems Analysis
CAE Flightscape User’s Conference
1 Industry Workshop, Portland, OR March 23, 2011 NATIONAL HELICOPTER INDUSTRY WORKSHOP Portland, OR 23 March 2011 Fred Brisbois Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation.
ISO 9001 : 2000.
SIKORSKY 30 th International System Safety Conference Awards Luncheon The Business Value of Safety August 9, 2012 Atlanta.
Improving Your Business Results Six Sigma Qualtec Six Sigma Qualtec Six Sigma Qualtec – All Rights Reserved June 26, 2002 BEYOND SIX SIGMA: A HOLISTIC.
New Product and Service Development Children’s Cloth Company.
1 LBNL Enterprise Computing (EC) January 2003 LBNL Enterprise Computing.
Introduction to the State-Level Mitigation 20/20 TM Software for Management of State-Level Hazard Mitigation Planning and Programming A software program.
Strategic Information Initiatives Week 2 Corporate Investment Decisions.
FINANCE 7. Capital Budgeting (1) Professor André Farber Solvay Business School Université Libre de Bruxelles Fall 2006.
IT Governance: Simultaneously Empowers and Controls Source: IT Governance, Chapter 1.
The Analyst as a Project Manager
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Financial performance measures and transfer pricing
What Constitutes a Good Quality Annual Report Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting By Ng Kean Kok.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
HFT 2220 DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS. Development Programs Helps our employees get better every day Helps employees achieve their goals Puts the person in sync.
Chapter 3 – Opportunity Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Introduction ► This slide deck provides a suggested framework for the financial evaluation of an investment project. When evaluating any such project,
© 2010 Plexent – All rights reserved. 1 Change –The addition, modification or removal of approved, supported or baselined CIs Request for Change –Record.
Long-Term Investment Decisions
© 2006 ITT Educational Services Inc. SE350 System Analysis for Software Engineers: Unit 6 Slide 1 Chapter 5 Initiating and Planning Systems Development.
Project Planning and Capital Budgeting
PEIP National workshop in Montenegro: developing environmental infrastructure projects in the water sector Feasibility Study Preparation Venelina Varbova.
CIS 321—IS Analysis & Design Chapter 3: The Analyst as a Project Manager.
EARTO – working group on quality issues – 2 nd session Anneli Karttunen, Quality Manager VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland This presentation.
Lesson 3: Monitoring and Indicator Macerata, 2o th November Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
CERTIFICATION In the Electronics Recycling Industry © 2007 IAER Web Site - -
Duration 1 hour 30 mins Investment Analysis. Topics to be covered Review of last session Investment background Capital budgeting Methods.
Financial Project Metrics in Feasibility Study
Implementing Strategies: Marketing, Finance/Accounting, R&D, and MIS Issues Chapter 6.
1 Safety Leadership: Many Returns TEAM 6: Tom, D J, John, Mary, & Vint.
Chapter 14 Capital Budgeting Cost Accounting Foundations and Evolutions Kinney, Prather, Raiborn.
Guide to Financial Analysis. 2 Contents  Purpose of this Guide  Financial Analysis defined  Defining Costs  Capital Costs  Operating Costs  Benefits.
3 1 Project Success Factors u Project management important for success of system development project u 2000 Standish Group Study l Only 28% of system development.
Continuous Auditing at Unibanco Washington Lopes
Aircraft Maintenance Human Factors 25th and 26th September 2000 The Hatton, London.
Chapter 15 Capital Budgeting Cost Accounting Foundations and Evolutions Kinney and Raiborn Seventh Edition COPYRIGHT © 2009 South-Western, a part of Cengage.
Understanding the EHS Management System Development Process David Downs President EHS Management Partners,Inc.
AGEC 407 Investment Analysis Time value of money –$1 received today is worth more than $1 received in the future Why? –Earning potential –Risk –Inflation.
Feasibility Study.
1 FAAST Review – Mar 17, 2009 International Helicopter Safety Team Briefing Mark Liptak IHST Program Director FAA ASA-100.
Technical Rating Models and Airline Risk Differentiators Dan Boultwood 9 th December 2009.
Software Project Management
Technology Commercialization Technology Commercialization, 2011 Sanjay Dhole, Technology Programs Coordinator Maricopa SBDC.
Company: Cincinnati Insurance Company Position: IT Governance Risk & Compliance Service Manager Location: Fairfield, OH About the Company : The Cincinnati.
HFT 2401 Chapter 1 Introduction to Accounting. Accounting – A Means to an End  Provides answers to questions  How much cash do we have  What was our.
BTS730 – Systems Analysis and Project Management Cost Management.
UNIT No. 3 Capital Budgeting Nature Significance Technique of Capital Budgeting Pay back Method Accounting Rate of Return Net Present Value Profitability.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Manage the IT Portfolio World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
COPYRIGHT © 2009 South-Western/Cengage Learning SURVEY OF ACCOUNTING CHAPTER 1 CARL S. WARREN.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Manage IT Budgets & Cost World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
Other Criteria for Capital Budgeting Text: Chapter 6.
Feasibility Study The First step in any business plan.
Strategic Information Initiatives Week 5 Analysis Framework.
Project Evaluation and Programme Management
2017/18 SIP Request Process September 2016.
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, 4th Edition
THE FEASIBILTY STUDY LECTURE-5.
Business System Development
EC Strategy, Globalization, and SMEs
GCF business model.
Pulling in the same direction
Presentation transcript:

Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation The Value of Safety

Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation AGENDA Background What is ROI? What is ROHSEI? Benefits Business Case EGPWS SMS Summary Questions

Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation THE PARADIGM Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation “Safety people have their hearts in the right place but seldom understand true business objectives” Safety has the high moral ground No one can publicly disagree with what we represent But Safety people are seldom seen as true business partners Our requests are compared with competing business objectives We’re never seen as balancing Safety objectives with business reality We seldom make a credible business case Safety is the high moral ground, but we need to make a ‘business case’ for investing in safety.

WHAT LANGUAGE DO YOU SPEAK? Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation WHAT LANGUAGE DO YOU SPEAK? -OR- Safety managers speak in their own language, normally centered on safety risk management terms But the financial managers speak a different language. To be successful, safety managers must present their proposals for safety investments in financial terms.

METRICS USED BY CFO’s Metric % Time Used Internal Rate of Return 75.6% Net Present Value 74.9% Payback Period 56.7% Discounted Payback Period 29.5% Account Rate of Return 30.3% Profitability Index 11.9% Source: Graham, John R. and Harvey R. Campbell, “The Theory and Practice of Corporate Finance: Evidence from the Field”, Journal of Financial Economics 2001

Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation FINANCIAL METRICS The financial metrics are built around the concept of the: $ Time Value of Money $ That is, a dollar today is worth more than a dollar tomorrow. The worth of a dollar today is different than the worth of a dollar in the future.

INFLATION AND DISCOUNTING Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation October 23-24, 2007 INFLATION AND DISCOUNTING An investment can be viewed in two ways—its future value or its present value. Future Value Inflation Discounting An investment can be viewed in two ways – its future value or its present value. Present Value ROHSEI, Washington, DC 7

Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation U.S. JHSIT PROCESS MODEL Initiate Top Level Safety Intervention Actions (e.g. promoting IHST, SMS, Infrastructure changes) Assign JHSIT Average Feasibility Value Review JHSAT Recommendations & Assign Number JHSAT Overall Effectiveness Value (OE) Prioritize Recommendations (OE x F) Prepare Preliminary Safety Enhancement Plan Group Recommendations By Common Theme Prepare Detailed Safety Implementation Plan IHST Approval The JHSIT process includes evaluating the “value” of the recommended intervention. Execute and Monitor Progress Of Safety Implementation Plan IHST Approval

Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Technical Feasibility: The ability of the project to take advantage of the current state of technology in pursuing further development. 3 - Off-the-shelf technology, no development required 2 - Some development required, not currently in public use 1 - Major technology development effort required Financial Feasibility: Should consider the total cost of the implementation, including the planning process. Financial feasibility also involves the capability of the participating organizations (FAA, Manufacturers, and Airlines and Operators) to provide the appropriate funding needed to implement the project. 3 - Relatively low cost to implement 2 - Relatively medium cost to implement 1 - Relatively high cost to implement Operational Feasibility: Involves the “practicality” of the project within the context of the operating environment, including NAS, ground operations, maintenance, inspection, etc. Considers which organizations within the aviation system are impacted. 3 - Minimal change to entities within the operating environment 2 - Modest change to operating environment 1 - Major change to operating environment Schedule Feasibility: Can the project to contribute to achieving the goal in a selected timeframe? Must consider implementation schedule by project. 3 - Less than 2 years to full implementation 2 - Full implementation in 2-5 years 1 - Longer than 5 years to full implementation Regulatory Feasibility: Should be evaluated against current rules and certification process. Could be a deterrent due to a long approval process. 3 - No policy change 2 - Guidance change only (orders, handbooks, policy) 1 - Rule change The JHSIT process includes evaluating the feasibility of implementing the intervention. One of the 5 feasibility factors evaluated is the “FINANCIAL” feasibility.

Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation MANAGEMENT SYSTEM = SAFETY SYSTEM Financial Management System Safety Management System Finance Plan Safety Plan Targets & Objectives Targets & Objectives Budget Budget Accountabilities Accountabilities Levels of Authority Line Management Authorities Procedures Procedures The management tools used to manage safety are the same as the elements used to manage the business. Checks and Balances Monitoring/Line Checks Audit Plan Accountants Audit Plan Safety Committee Audits Balance Sheets Audits Safety Achievement

ROI – WHAT IS SAFETY’s PAYBACK? Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation ROI – WHAT IS SAFETY’s PAYBACK? Net Present Value Present Value of Project Cost ROI = ROI = Present Value of Project Benefit – Present Value of Project Cost Present Value of Project Cost To be successful, safety managers must be able to show the financial benefits of proposed safety investments! There has to be a financial return on the investment if you want the financial community to support it!

Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation ROHSEI One Way To Change The Paradigm. Return on Health, Safety and Environmental Investment (ROHSEI) ROHSEI is a proven financial software tool used by safety managers to calculate the financial return on safety investments.

Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation GENESIS OF ROHSEI Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation October 23-24, 2007 In 1995 a taskforce of fifteen Fortune 500 companies sponsored the development of a process and supporting tool set to answer important questions such as: What safety investments should we make? How do we know we are doing the “right things” in the “right way” To which projects should we allocate our resources? Which EHS investments create the greatest value to the organization? How do we demonstrate the value of our investment decisions? How do we demonstrate our value and justify our existence? ROHSEI, Washington, DC 13

Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation October 23-24, 2007 BRIDGING FINANCE & SAFETY BUSINESS TALK SAFETY TALK Finance/Operations Safety/Industrial Hygiene Earnings/EPS Accident rates ROI Property loss Payback Insurance premiums PVRR Fines and citations Internal Rate of Return No. of people trained Production rates Exposure Assessments ROHSEI Earnings/employee Near misses Bridges Net Present Value Behavioral Observations the Gap Cost Benefit Audit findings ROHSEI, Washington, DC 14

WHAT ROHESI DOES ROHSEI offers a standardized approach to evaluating health, safety and environmental investments.

WHAT DOES A SAFETY GUY KNOW ABOUT FINANCE? – ROHSEI!

THE CHALLENGING QUESTIONS Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation THE CHALLENGING QUESTIONS What investments should we make? Should we make the investment this year or next? How do we compare an operational investment decision to a health and safety investment decision? To which projects should we allocate our human resources?

ROHSEI NAVIGATION SCREEN Process – Horizontal Tools – Vertical

THE CASE FOR ENHANCED GROUND PROXIMITY WARNING SYSTEM (EGPWS)

DEVELOP AND DOCUMENT The Focus Of Opportunity

DETERMINE ASSUMPTIONS

DOCUMENT BENEFITS AND COSTS

EXPENSE AND CAPITAL COSTS:

ACCIDENT RATES With And Without Equipment

ACCIDENT RATES With And Without Equipment

SOFTWARE DOES THE CALCULATIONS:

PRESENT RESULTS :

THE CASE FOR SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (SMS)

DEVELOP AND DOCUMENT The Focus Of Opportunity - SMS

BRAINSTORM PARAMETERS

DETERMINE ASSUMPTIONS

DOCUMENT BENEFITS AND COSTS:

RELATIVE NUMBER OF INCIDENTS:

FINANCIAL COST OF AN ACCIDENT:

INCIDENT MODULE CALCULATES BENEFIT

ENTER COSTS OF IMPLEMENTATION:

HIT CALCULATIONS BUTTON:

PRESENT RESULTS:

Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation BENEFITS ROHSEI offers a standardized approach to evaluating safety investments

Remember…there is a lot more to safety than economics. Work the business case…but don’t lose focus on what safety is all about. Remember…there is a lot more to safety than economics. 40

ADDITIONAl ROHESI INFORMATION Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation ADDITIONAl ROHESI INFORMATION Dave Eherts 203-386-8666 deherts@sikorsky.com Jo Linhard 202-822-3691 linhard@orc-dc.com