Doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/0013r0 Submission January 2004 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 “On/off”-Feedback Schemes for MIMO-OFDM 802.11n.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OFDM Transmission over Gaussian Channel
Advertisements

OFDM Transmission over Wideband Channel
Doc.: IEEE /825r0 Submission November 2003 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 Comparison of 128QAM mappings/labelings for n.
Cyclic Shift Diversity Design for IEEE aj (45GHz)
Doc.: IEEE /1212r0 Submission October Jeng-Hong Chen, Pansop Kim, Winbond ElectronicsSlide 1 Performance of Circulation Transmission (Sub_BC)
MIMO Communication Systems
Doc.: IEEE /1090/r2 Submission September 2013 Submission Zhanji Wu, et. Al. Non-linear pre-coding MIMO scheme for next generation WLAN Date:
The Impact of Channel Estimation Errors on Space-Time Block Codes Presentation for Virginia Tech Symposium on Wireless Personal Communications M. C. Valenti.
a By Yasir Ateeq. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION TASKS OF TRANSMITTER PACKET FORMAT PREAMBLE SCRAMBLER CONVOLUTIONAL ENCODER PUNCTURER INTERLEAVER.
Doc.: IEEE /0064r0 Submission Shogo Fujita, Kyushu Inst. Of Tech. Slide 1 Modulo Precoding for 11ac Date: Authors: January 2011.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0069r0 January 2015 Amichai Sanderovich, QualcommSlide 1 MIMO option for NG60 Date: Authors:
Submission May, 2000 Doc: IEEE / 086 Steven Gray, Nokia Slide Brief Overview of Information Theory and Channel Coding Steven D. Gray 1.
10 th MCM - Novi Sad, March 2006 Joaquim Bastos ( ) 1 The information in this document is provided as is and no guarantee or warranty.
Multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) communication systems
Receiver Performance for Downlink OFDM with Training Koushik Sil ECE 463: Adaptive Filter Project Presentation.
Muhammad Imadur Rahman1, Klaus Witrisal2,
Doc.: IEEE /1536r1 Zhanji Wu, et. Al. November 2011 Submission Joint Coding and Modulation Diversity for ah Date: Authors: Slide1.
Doc.: IEEE /0489r1 Submission May 2010 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 PHY Performance Evaluation with 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1399r0 Submission November 2014 Multi-Carrier Training Field for OFDM Transmission in aj (45GHz) Authors/contributors: Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0330r2 SubmissionSameer Vermani, QualcommSlide 1 PHY Abstraction Date: Authors: March 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /0493r1 Submission May 2010 Changsoon Choi, IHP microelectronicsSlide 1 Beamforming training for IEEE ad Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /180r0 Submission March 2002 Monisha Ghosh, et al., Philips Slide 1 On The Use Of Multiple Antennae For Monisha Ghosh, Xuemei.
Doc.: IEEE /0372r0 Submission March 2004 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 Rate Feedback Schemes for MIMO-OFDM n (a sequel.
Ali Al-Saihati ID# Ghassan Linjawi
Doc.: IEEE /0075r0 Submission January 2004 H. Sampath, PhD, Marvell SemiconductorSlide 1 Pros and Cons of Circular Delay Diversity Scheme for.
Space-Time and Space-Frequency Coded Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing Transmitter Diversity Techniques King F. Lee.
Doc.: IEEE /0039r0 Submission January 2007 SooYoung Chang, Huawei TechnologiesSlide 1 IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors: Soft.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1088r0 September 2015 Daewon Lee, NewracomSlide 1 LTF Design for Uplink MU-MIMO Date: Authors:
Transmit Power Adaptation for Multiuser OFDM Systems Jiho Jang, Student Member, IEEE, and Kwang Bok Lee, Member, IEEE IEEE JOURNAL ON SELECTED AREAS IN.
Doc.: IEEE /314r0 Submission March 2004 Taehyun Jeon, ETRISlide 1 Adaptive Modulation for MIMO-OFDM Systems Taehyun Jeon, Heejung Yu, and Sok-kyu.
Doc.: IEEE /0909r0 Submission July 2012 Jong S. Baek, AlereonSlide 1 Analysis, simulation and resultant data from a 6-9GHz OFDM MAC/PHY Date:
Doc.: IEEE /232r0 Submission March 2002 Todor Cooklev, AwareSlide 1 Extended Data Rate a Marcos Tzannes Todor Cooklev Dongjun Lee Colin.
Doc.: IEEE /0016r0 Submission January 2004 Yang-Seok Choi et al., ViVATOSlide 1 Layered Processing for MIMO OFDM Yang-Seok Choi,
Doc.: IEEE /0112r0 Zhanji Wu, et. Al. January 2013 Submission Joint Coding and Modulation Diversity for the Next Generation WLAN Date:
Media-based Modulation
3: Diversity Fundamentals of Wireless Communication, Tse&Viswanath 1 3. Diversity.
Presented by: Ahmad Salim. 2  The acronym WiMAX stands for “Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access”. It is based on IEEE standard for.
Doc.: IEEE /298r0 Submission March 2004 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 Generalized Puncturing to Eliminate Pad Bits in MIMO-OFDM.
Doc.: IEEE /159r0 Submission March 2002 S. Hori, Y Inoue, T. Sakata, M. Morikura / NTT. Slide 1 System capacity and cell radius comparison with.
Doc.: IEEE 11-04/0304r0 Submission March 2004 John S. Sadowsky, Intel PER Prediction for n MAC Simulation John S. Sadowsky (
Doc.: IEEE /0535r0 Submission May 2008 Thomas Kenney, Minyoung Park, Eldad Perahia, Intel Corp. Slide 1 PHY and MAC Throughput Analysis with 80.
Doc.: IEEE /553r0 Submission May 2004 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 MIMO Mode Table for n Ravi Mahadevappa,
Performance Analysis of Open Loop SU-MIMO Receivers for IEEE ay
Doc.: IEEE /0174r1 Submission February 2004 John Ketchum, et al, QualcommSlide 1 PHY Abstraction for System Simulation John Ketchum, Bjorn Bjerke,
Doc.: IEEE /0632r1 Submission May 2016 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Performance Analysis of Robust Transmission Modes for MIMO in 11ay Date:
EE359 – Lecture 16 Outline ISI Countermeasures Multicarrier Modulation
Space Time Codes.
Space-Time and Space-Frequency Coded Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing Transmitter Diversity Techniques King F. Lee.
Further Rotation Modulation Application
Length 1344 LDPC codes for 11ay
September 2004 doc.: IEEE n September 2004
John Ketchum, Bjorn A. Bjerke, and Irina Medvedev Qualcomm, Inc.
MIMO-OFDM with antenna selection
HDR a solution using MIMO-OFDM
ETRI Proposal to IEEE TGn
DCM QPSK For Channel Aggregation In 11ay
DCM QPSK For Channel Aggregation in 11ay
Different Channel Coding Options for MIMO-OFDM n
Whitening-Rotation Based MIMO Channel Estimation
May 2016 doc.: IEEE /XXXXr0 May 2016
PHY Abstraction based on PER Prediction
Optimal Combining of STBC and Spatial Multiplexing for MIMO-OFDM
Joint Coding and Modulation Diversity for ac
Rotation Modulation Application to ac system
STBC in Single Carrier(SC) for IEEE aj (45GHz)
Joint Coding and Modulation Diversity for ah
PER Prediction for n MAC Simulation
Turbo-equalization for n/ac
PHY Performance Evaluation with 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models
Performance Analysis of Outer RS Coding Scheme
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission January 2004 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 “On/off”-Feedback Schemes for MIMO-OFDM n Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Semiconductors, Irvine, CA

doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission January 2004 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 2 Overview Brief description of the method Computing ZF SNR of spatial subchannels Simulator settings Rate vs SNR(10% PER) for various configurations –1x1 with fixed number of subcarriers switched off –1x1, 1x2, 2x3, 3x4 variable number of subchannels switched off

doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission January 2004 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 3 Brief description SISO case: Compute “effective SNR” (include channel coefficient) for each subcarrier Switch off subcarriers with effective SNR below a certain threshold Normalize transmit power so that average time-domain SNR is fixed MIMO case: Subcarriers are further divided into N T spatial subchannels, effective SNR is computed based on ZF detection (N T transmit antennas assumed) Subchannels are switched off when effective SNR falls below threshold Transmit power renormalized to fix time-domain SNR

doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission January 2004 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 4 Subchannel ZF-SNR on a subcarrier Received signal: y = H s + n With stransmitted N T x1 constellation vector of QAM symbols s i, i=1..N T, with entries having average power P s HN R xN T matrix of channel coefficients, assumed iid complex Gaussian nN R x1 vector of additive noise, with entries having variance  2 Zero forcing detection: W = (H * H) -1 H * N T xN R matrix, “pseudo inverse”; H * denotes the complex conjugate transpose (Hermitian) of H; s est = W yN T x1 vector estimate of transmitted constellation vector Spatial subchannel SNRs, SNR j, j=1..N T computed as SNR j = P s /([(H * H) -1 ] jj  2 ) where [(H * H) -1 ] jj denotes the jth diagonal element of (H * H) -1

doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission January 2004 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 5 Simulator settings Coded MIMO-OFDM system Convolutional outer encoder with memory 6 Pseudo-random interleaver of length equal to one OFDM symbol Modulation QPSK, 16QAM, 64QAM MIMO configurations 1x1, 1x2, 2x3, 3x4 Feedback scenarios: ZF SNR for each subchannel (M for MxN case) is computed 1x1: subcarrier on/off based on ZF SNR –constant number of subcarriers switched off (6, 12, 24) –threshold to switch off subcarriers -6dB, -4dB, -2dB from average SNR 1x2, 2x3, 3x4: subchannel on/off –threshold to switch off subchannels -6dB, 0dB from average SNR

doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission January 2004 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 6 1x1, 16QAM, Rate vs SNR(10% PER) no feedback case 16QAM rate 1/4 to rate 7/8, corresponding to data rates of 12Mbps to 42Mbps 25 1x1s1 SMX 16QAM Required SNR (10% PER) in dB Rate in Mbps no feedback 16 QAM 1x1 Exponential Decay Channel 60 ns Trms Random interleaving 1000 bit packets 2000 packets avg. Code Rates 1/4, 1/3, 1/2, 2/3, 3/4, 7/8

doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission January 2004 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 7 1x1, 16QAM, worst 6 subcarriers off Data Rate reduces by a fraction 6/48 Required SNR is lower As a result, curve shifts left and down Gain ~0.8dB in low rate region 1x1s1 SMX 16QAM Required SNR (10% PER) in dB Rate in Mbps no feedback worst 6 carriers off 16 QAM 1x1 Exponential Decay Channel 60 ns Trms Random interleaving 1000 bit packets 2000 packets avg. Code Rates 1/4, 1/3, 1/2, 2/3, 3/4, 7/8 25

doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission January 2004 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 8 1x1, 16QAM, worst n subcarriers off Curves shift lower and more left as more subcarriers are switched off. Gain upto ~1.3 dB 1x1s1 SMX 16QAM Required SNR (10% PER) in dB Rate in Mbps no feedback worst 6 carriers off 12 off 24 off 16 QAM 1x1 Exponential Decay Channel 60 ns Trms Random interleaving 1000 bit packets 2000 packets avg. Code Rates 1/4, 1/3, 1/2, 2/3, 3/4, 7/8 25

doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission January 2004 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 9 1x1, 16QAM, variable number of subcarriers switched off SNR of each subchannel compared with a threshold relative to average SNR, those below threshold are switched off. Gains are higher compared to the case where constant number of subcarriers are switched off. 2.5 dB gain almost uniformly for all rates 1x1s1 SMX 16QAM Required SNR (10% PER) in dB Rate in Mbps no feedback worst 6 carriers off 12 off 24 off SNR threshold -6 dB 16 QAM 1x1 Exponential Decay Channel 60 ns Trms Random interleaving 1000 bit packets 2000 packets avg. Code Rates 1/4, 1/3, 1/2, 2/3, 3/4, 7/8 25

doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission January 2004 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 10 1x1, 16QAM, variable number of subcarriers switched off Higher thresholds lead to lower average data rates. An “optimum threshold” for which the gain is maximized may exist. 1x1s1 SMX 16QAM Code Rates 1/4, 1/3, 1/2, 2/3, 3/4, 7/8 25

doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission January 2004 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 11 1x1, QPSK Gains are marginally higher for QPSK, but behavior is similar to 16QAM case 1x1 QPSK: Upto 3 dB gain for threshold -6 dB x1s1 SMX-QPSK Required SNR (10% PER) in dB Rate in Mbps QPSK 1x1 Exponential Decay Channel 60 ns Trms Random interleaving no feedback worst 6 carriers off 12 off 24 off threshold -6 dB -4 dB -2 dB Code rates 1/4, 1/3, 1/2, 2/3, 3/4, 7/8

doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission January 2004 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 12 1x1, 64QAM 1x1, 64QAM: Upto 2.5 dB gain for threshold -6 dB x1s1 SMX-64QAM Required SNR (10% PER) in dB Rate in Mbps 64 QAM 1x1 Exponential Decay Channel 60 ns Trms Random interleaving 1000 bit packets 2000 packets avg. SNR threshold -6 dB -4 dB -2 dB 24 off Code rates 1/4, 1/3, 1/2, 2/3, 3/4, 7/8 12 off worst 6 carriers off no feedback

doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission January 2004 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 13 1x1, Summary QPSK rate 1/4 to 64QAM rate 7/8, corresponding to data rates of 6Mbit/s to 63Mbit/s Average data rates with feedback from approx. 5 to 50 Mbps. Gain of 1.5 to 3 dB Required SNR (10% PER) in dB Rate in Mbps 64QAM no feedback 16QAM no feedback QPSK no feedback 64QAM SNR threshold -6 dB 16QAM -6 dB QPSK -6 dB 1x1 Exponential Decay Channel 60 ns Trms 1000 bit packets 2000 packets avg. Code Rates Used : 1/4, 1/3, 1/2, 2/3, 3/4, 7/8

doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission January 2004 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 14 1x2, variable (adaptive) number of subchannels switched off For the same threshold, gain reduces as more Rx antennas are used, the average data rate is also higher. ~0.8 dB gain for 1x2 case with threshold -6 dB Required SNR (10% PER) in dB Rate in Mbps QPSK no feedback 16QAM -6 dB 64QAM SNR threshold -6 dB 16QAM no feedback 64QAM no feedback QPSK -6 dB 1000 bit packets 2000 packets avg. 1x2 Exponential Decay Channel 60 ns Trms Code Rates Used : 1/4, 1/3, 1/2, 2/3, 3/4, 7/8

doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission January 2004 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 15 1x2, variable (adaptive) number of subchannels switched off Upto 2.3 dB gain as threshold is increased to 0 dB Required SNR (10% PER) in dB Rate in Mbps QPSK no feedback 16QAM -6 dB 64QAM SNR threshold -6 dB 16QAM no feedback 64QAM no feedback QPSK -6 dB 1000 bit packets 2000 packets avg. 1x2 Exponential Decay Channel 60 ns Trms Code Rates Used : 1/4, 1/3, 1/2, 2/3, 3/4, 7/8 64QAM 0 dB 16QAM 0 dB QPSK 0 dB

doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission January 2004 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 16 2x3, variable (adaptive) number of subchannels switched off Upto 2.5 dB gain possible with appropriate threshold

doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission January 2004 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 17 3x4, variable (adaptive) number of subchannels switched off Up to 2.5 dB gain possible with appropriate threshold Required SNR (10% PER) in dB Rate in Mbps 3x4 Exponential Decay Channel 60 ns Trms Random Interleaving 1000 bit packets 2000 packets avg. 64 QAM SNR threshold -6 dB 64 QAM 0 dB 64 QAM no feedback 16 QAM no feedback 16 QAM -6 dB 16 QAM 0 dB QPSK -6 dB QPSK 0 dB QPSK no feedback Code Rates used : 1/4, 1/3, 1/2, 2/3, 3/4, 7/8

doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission January 2004 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 18 Observations Switching on/off subchannels is a simple way of using channel information at the transmitter Gains up to 3dB in 1x1 case, upto 2.5 dB in 2x3, 3x4 case Gain reduces when number of Rx antennas is increased as diversity increases Performance is better with variable number of subchannels switched off compared to fixed number switched off

doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission January 2004 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 19 Some References [1]M. Tzannes, T. Cooklev, D. Lee, C. Lanzl, “Extended Data Rate a”, /232r0 [2]G. Kleindl, “Signaling for Adaptive Modulation”, /283r0 [3] Leke, A. and Cioffi, J.M., "Transmit optimization for time-invariant wireless channel utilizing a discrete multitone approach," Proc. of IEEE ICC’97, V.2, pp. 954 – 958. [4]Bangerter et.al., “High-Throughput Wireless LAN Air Interface,” Intel Tech. Journal, Vol. 7, Issue 3, Aug 2003.