Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Different Channel Coding Options for MIMO-OFDM n

Published byСулејман Кораћ Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Different Channel Coding Options for MIMO-OFDM n"— Presentation transcript:

1 Different Channel Coding Options for MIMO-OFDM 802.11n
2/24/2019 doc.: IEEE /0014r1 January 2004 Different Channel Coding Options for MIMO-OFDM n Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Semiconductors, Irvine, CA Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Realtek

2 Overview Simulation environment/assumptions Different channel codes
January 2004 Overview Simulation environment/assumptions Different channel codes Comparison: Required SNR, selected cases Observations and recommendations Appendix: Rate/RX sensitivity tables for different channel coding options Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

3 Simulation Environment
2/24/2019 doc.: IEEE /0014r1 January 2004 Simulation Environment 802.11a PHY simulation environment, plus Higher order QAM constellations Higher/lower channel code rates TX/RX diversity/MIMO OFDM Alamouti with MRC ZF detection and soft post processing Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Realtek

4 Likely 802.11n Transmitter Shown with 2 TX antennas channel encoder
January 2004 Likely n Transmitter channel encoder Shown with 2 TX antennas Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

5 Likely 802.11n Receiver Shown with 2 RX antennas channel decoder
January 2004 Likely n Receiver channel decoder Shown with 2 RX antennas Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

6 Simulation Assumptions
2/24/2019 doc.: IEEE /0014r1 January 2004 Simulation Assumptions Perfect channel knowledge/synchronization Idealized multipath MIMO channel More optimistic than [3] Sub-channels independent; exponential decay, Trms = 60ns Quasi static (channel stays constant during one packet) Packet length: 1000 bits and bits 10dB noise figure (conservative [4]) 5dB implementation margin (conservative [4]) Not yet incorporated in results: Channel estimation Packet detection, synchronization foff estimation Clipping DAC/finite precision ADC Front-end filtering Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Realtek

7 Different Channel Codes
January 2004 Different Channel Codes Convolutional code memory 6 (abbreviation CC6) Convolutional code memory 8 (CC8) Parallel concatenated code [9], UMTS turbo code memory 3 (PCC3), random bit interleaver (over packet), 8 iterations Serially concatenated code [10], inner memory 1, outer memory 2 code (SCC2), random bit interleaver (over packet), 15 iterations LDPCC, regular [11] (LDREG), random edge interleaver (over packet), 40 iterations (note: 1-Rate = dv/dc) Rate 1/2: variable node degree dv=3, check node degree dc=6; rate 3/4: dv=3, dc=12; rate 7/8: dv=3, dc=24 LDPCC, irregular [12] (LDIRR), random edge interleaver (over packet), 40 iterations dv,1=3 (89.74% of variable nodes), dv,2=4 (2.78%), dv,3=16 (7.48%); rate 1/2: dc=8; rate 3/4: dc=16; rate 7/8: dc=32 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

8 Table C1, 802.11a, 1x1, different codes, AWGN, length 1000 bits
January 2004 Table C1, a, 1x1, different codes, AWGN, length 1000 bits Required SNR at 10% PER Difference between various channel coding options is about 1-2dB Best: Turbo code of memory 3, PCC3 Worst: Convolutional code of memory 6, CC6 Memory 8 convolutional code CC8 gains about 0.5dB Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

9 Table C1, 802.11a, 1x1, AWGN, length 10000 bits
January 2004 Table C1, a, 1x1, AWGN, length bits Longer block length: CC6, CC8 have worse PER by about 1dB: Code does not become stronger, but packet error prob. increases Longer block length: good for iterative decoding (stronger code) Differences between codes more pronounced for longer block length LDREG and LDIRR virtually identical for maxlog-decoding Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

10 Table C2, 802.11a, 1x1, fading, length 10000 bits
January 2004 Table C2, a, 1x1, fading, length bits Trms=60ns Maxlog-decoding used for PCC3, SCC2 and LDREG In fading, CC8 gains about 1dB over CC6 PCC3 still best; gain of about 2-3.5dB over CC6 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

11 Table C3, 802.11a, 2x3, AMRC, length 10000 bits
January 2004 Table C3, a, 2x3, AMRC, length bits AMRC, Alamouti space/time block code [8] with max. ratio combining at receiver CC8 gains about 0.5dB over CC6 PCC3 still best; gain of about 2-3dB over CC6 SCC2 worse than PCC3; omitted in the following Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

12 Table C4, High-rate, 2x3, SMX, length 10000 bits
January 2004 Table C4, High-rate, 2x3, SMX, length bits SMX, spatial multiplexing [6,7] Rate 7/8 PCC3 obtained by random puncturing of parity bits CC8 gains about 0.5-1dB over CC6 PCC3/LDPCC gain of about 2-3dB over CC6 for rate 3/4 PCC3/LDPCC gain of about 4dB over CC6 for rate 7/8 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

13 2/24/2019 doc.: IEEE /0014r1 January 2004 Observations About 1-4dB gain possible with improved coding (LDPCC/PCC) for large block lengths CC8 gains about 0.5-1dB over CC6; simple to implement LDPCC similar performance as PCC3 Concatenated codes with iterative decoding (PCC3, LDPCC) yield best performance, but implementation complexity high Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Realtek

14 From “11-03-0845-01-000n-receiver-sensitivity-tables-mimo-ofdm.ppt”
2/24/2019 doc.: IEEE /0014r1 January 2004 Recommendation Bandwidth 20MHz 40MHz From “ n-receiver-sensitivity-tables-mimo-ofdm.ppt” SMX 2x3 3x4 Modulation 128QAM or higher 64QAM Code rate 7/8 3/4 Data rate >147Mbit/s 162Mbit/s 216Mbit/s Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Realtek

15 From “11-03-0845-01-000n-receiver-sensitivity-tables-mimo-ofdm.ppt”
2/24/2019 doc.: IEEE /0014r1 January 2004 Recommendation Bandwidth 20MHz 40MHz From “ n-receiver-sensitivity-tables-mimo-ofdm.ppt” SMX 2x3 3x4 Modulation 128QAM or higher 64QAM Code rate 7/8 3/4 Data rate >147Mbit/s 162Mbit/s 216Mbit/s From “ n-diff-channel-codes-mimo-ofdm.ppt” (this doc.) Coding scheme CC6 New coding scheme PCC3 or LDPCC or CC8 (mandatory) CC8 (mandatory) PCC3 or LDPCC (optional) Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Realtek

16 Recommendation Bandwidth 20MHz 40MHz SMX 2x3 3x4 Modulation
2/24/2019 doc.: IEEE /0014r1 January 2004 Recommendation Bandwidth 20MHz 40MHz From “ n-receiver-sensitivity-tables-mimo-ofdm.ppt” SMX 2x3 3x4 Modulation 128QAM or higher 64QAM Code rate 7/8 3/4 Data rate >147Mbit/s 162Mbit/s 216Mbit/s From “ n-diff-channel-codes-mimo-ofdm.ppt” (this doc.) Coding scheme CC6 New coding scheme PCC3 or LDPCC or CC8 (mandatory) CC8 (mandatory) PCC3 or LDPCC (optional) From “ n-on-off-feedback-mimo-ofdm.ppt” Feedback Subchannel on/off-feedback or other forms (optional) Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Realtek

17 Some References January 2004
[1] J. M. Keenan, A. J. Motley, “Radio coverage in buildings”, British Telecom Technology Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, Jan. 1990, pp [2] J. Medbo, J.-E. Berg, “Simple and accurate path loss modeling at 5GHz in indoor environments with corridors”, Proc. VTC 2000, pp [3] J. P. Kermoal, L. Schumacher, K. I. Pedersen, P. E. Mogensen, F. Frederiksen, “A stochastic MIMO radio channel model with experimental validation”, IEEE Journ. Sel. Areas. Commun., vol. 20, no. 6, pp , Aug. 2002 [4] IEEE Std a-1999, Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications, High-speed Physical Layer in the 5 GHz Band [5] J. H. Winters, J. Salz, R. D. Gitlin, “The impact of antenna diversity on the capacity of wireless communication systems”, IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 42, no. 2/3/4, pp , Feb./Mar./Apr. 1994 [6] G. J. Foschini, “Layered space-time architecture for wireless communication in a fading environment when using multi-element antennas”,Bell Labs. Tech. J., vol. 1, no. 2, pp , 1996 [7] H. Sampath, S. Talwar, J. Tellado, V. Erceg, A. Paulraj, “A fourth-generation MIMO-OFDM broadband wireless system: Design, performance, and field trial results”, IEEE Commun. Mag., pp , Sept. 2002 [8] S. M. Alamouti, “A simple transmit diversity technique for wireless communications”, IEEE J. on Select. Areas in Commun., vol. 16, pp , Oct. 1998 [9] C. Berrou, A. Glavieux, P. Thitimajshima, “Near Shannon limit error-correcting coding and decoding: Turbo-codes”, in Proc. ICC, May 1993, pp [10] S. Benedetto, D. Divsalar, G. Montorsi, F. Pollara, “Serial concatenation of interleaved codes: Performance analysis, design and iterative decoding”, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 44, no. 3, pp , May 1998 [11] R. G. Gallager, “Low-density parity-check codes”, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 8, pp , Jan. 1962 [12] T. J. Richardson, A. Shokrollahi, R. L. Urbanke, “Design of capacity-approaching low-density parity-check codes”, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 47, no. 2, pp , Feb. 2001 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

18 Appendix Receiver sensitivity tables C1-C4
January 2004 Appendix Receiver sensitivity tables C1-C4 Abbreviations, diversity/MIMO modes: SEL: selection diversity at RX AMRC: Alamouti Space/Time [8] with MRC at RX SMX: spatial multiplexing (i.e. MIMO mode, [6,7]) Abbreviations, MIMO detection algorithms ZF: Zero Forcing with APP post processing Abbreviations, channel coding options CC6, CC8: convolutional codes of memory 6, 8 PCC3: parallel concatenated code (memory 3) SCC2: serially concatenated code (inner memory 1, outer memory 2) LDREG, LDIRR: regular, irregular low-density parity-check code (LDPCC) Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

19 Rate Table (C1) 802.11a, 1x1, Different Codes, AWGN
January 2004 Rate Table (C1) a, 1x1, Different Codes, AWGN Data rate (Mbps) Constellation Code rate, code MIMO mode Bandwidth (MHz) simulation result: Required Es/N0 (time: Es/N0fr-0.9dB) [dB] (10% PER, 1000bits), (1%, 1000), (10%, 10000) RX sensitivity [dBm] (10% PER, NF=10dB, margin 5dB) 20MHz: ( )dBm+Es/N0 (10% PER, 1000bits, maxlog) 6 BPSK 1/2, CC6 1x1 20 -1.0 -0.2 -87.0 1/2, CC8 -1.6 -0.8 -0.9 -87.6 1/2, PCC3 max/jac / -2.8 max/jac / -2.5 max/jac / -3.0 -88.5 1/2, SCC2 -1.8 / -2.2 -1.6 / -2.0 -2.0 / -2.6 -87.8 1/2, LDREG -1.8 / -2.3 -2.0 / -2.5 1/2, LDIRR -1.8 / -2.5 -1.6 / -2.2 -2.1 / -2.7 24 16QAM 7.3 8.1 8.4 -78.7 6.7 7.6 7.4 -79.3 5.7 / 5.5 6.2 / 5.8 5.7 / 5.3 -80.3 7.0 / 6.4 7.3 / 6.6 6.8 / 6.0 -79.0 6.7 / 6.1 6.5 / 5.8 6.7 / 5.9 7.0 / 6.2 6.4 / 5.6 54 64QAM 3/4, CC6 16.0 17.2 -70.0 3/4, CC8 15.4 16.4 16.3 -70.6 3/4, PCC3 14.9 / 14.7 15.5 / 15.4 14.7 / 14.5 -71.1 3/4, SCC2 15.4 / 14.9 15.9 / 15.7 15.0 / 14.6 3/4, LDREG 15.4 / 15.1 15.8 / 15.5 15.0 / 14.7 3/4, LDIRR 15.3 / 14.9 15.7 / 15.5 14.9 / 14.4 -70.7 AWGN channel Abbreviations: max = maxlog decoding; jac = jacobian logarihm decoding Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

20 Rate Table (C2) 802.11a, 1x1, Different Codes
2/24/2019 doc.: IEEE /0014r1 January 2004 Rate Table (C2) a, 1x1, Different Codes Data rate (Mbps) Constellation Code rate, code MIMO mode Bandwidth (MHz) simulation result: Required Es/N0 (time: Es/N0fr-0.9dB) [dB] (10% PER, 1000bits), (1%, 1000), (10%, 10000) RX sensitivity [dBm] (10% PER, NF=10dB, margin 5dB) 20MHz: ( )dBm+Es/N0 (10% PER, 1000bits) 6 BPSK 1/2, CC6 1x1 20 4.5 8.2 6.1 -81.5 1/2, CC8 3.6 7.1 4.4 -82.4 1/2, PCC3 7.3 3.0 1/2, SCC2 3.9 7.4 -82.1 1/2, LDREG 7.8 -81.6 24 16QAM 12.7 16.5 14.0 -73.3 12.2 15.9 12.8 -73.8 11.9 15.7 12.3 -74.1 12.4 15.5 12.5 -73.6 16.3 -73.2 54 64QAM 3/4, CC6 22.8 26.7 24.6 -63.2 3/4, CC8 21.9 26.1 -64.1 3/4, PCC3 22.0 26.0 21.1 -64.0 3/4, SCC2 22.1 27.1 22.4 -63.9 3/4, LDREG 26.6 22.2 Delay profile: Exp. decay Trms=60ns maxlog decoding used for all codes Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Realtek

21 Rate Table (C3) 802.11a, 2x3, AMRC, Diff. Codes
January 2004 Rate Table (C3) a, 2x3, AMRC, Diff. Codes Data rate (Mbps) Constellation Code rate, code MIMO mode Bandwidth (MHz) simulation result: Required Es/N0 (time: Es/N0fr-0.9dB) [dB] (10% PER, 1000bits), (1%, 1000), (10%, 10000) RX sensitivity [dBm] (10% PER, NF=10dB, margin 5dB) 20MHz: ( )dBm+Es/N0 (10% PER, 1000bits) 6 BPSK 1/2 CC6 2x3 AMRC 20 -4.6 -3.0 -3.6 -90.6 1/2 CC8 -5.1 -4.3 -91.1 1/2 PCC3 -5.7 -5.8 -91.7 1/2 SCC2 -3.5 -5.0 1/2 LDREG -4.8 -91.0 24 16QAM 3.7 5.3 5.0 -82.3 3.2 4.7 4.3 -82.8 2.5 3.8 2.7 -83.5 4.0 -82.0 3.5 4.8 3.6 -82.5 54 64QAM 3/4 CC6 12.6 14.3 13.8 -73.4 3/4 CC8 11.8 13.5 13.0 -74.2 3/4 PCC3 11.7 13.2 -74.3 3/4 SCC2 15.0 12.1 -72.8 3/4 LDREG 12.2 13.6 12.0 -73.8 Delay profile: Exp. decay Trms=60ns maxlog decoding used for all codes Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

22 Rate Table (C4) High-rate, 2x3, SMX, Diff. Codes
January 2004 Rate Table (C4) High-rate, 2x3, SMX, Diff. Codes Data rate (Mbps) Constellation Code rate, code MIMO mode Bandwidth (MHz) simulation result: Required Es/N0 (time: Es/N0fr-0.9dB) [dB] (10% PER, 1000bits), (1%, 1000), (10%, 10000) RX sensitivity [dBm] (10% PER, NF=10dB, margin 5dB) 20MHz: ( )dBm+Es/N0 (10% PER, 1000bits) 108 64QAM 3/4 CC6 2x3 SMX 20 19.5 21.9 20.5 -66.5 3/4 CC8 18.7 20.8 19.9 -67.3 3/4 PCC3 18.2 20.0 -67.8 3/4 LDREG 18.5 20.6 18.4 -67.5 126 7/8 CC6 23.3 25.9 25.6 -62.7 7/8 CC8 24.8 23.9 -64.1 7/8 PCC3 21.5 23.8 21.4 -64.5 7/8 LDREG 21.6 144 256QAM 24.2 26.9 25.7 -61.8 23.6 25.8 24.4 -62.4 23.1 25.0 23.4 -62.9 -62.6 168 28.4 31.7 31.1 -57.6 27.3 30.1 29.7 -58.7 26.8 29.1 26.7 -59.2 29.3 ZF MIMO SMX detection Delay profile: Exp. decay Trms=60ns maxlog decoding used for all codes Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

Download ppt "Different Channel Coding Options for MIMO-OFDM n"

Similar presentations

Doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/0071r1 Submission January 2004 Aleksandar Purkovic, Nortel NetworksSlide 1 LDPC vs. Convolutional Codes for 802.11n Applications:

Doc.: IEEE /0071r1 Submission January 2004 Aleksandar Purkovic, Nortel NetworksSlide 1 LDPC vs. Convolutional Codes for n Applications:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0 Submission November 2003 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 Comparison of 128QAM mappings/labelings for 802.11n.

Doc.: IEEE /825r0 Submission November 2003 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 Comparison of 128QAM mappings/labelings for n.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-04-0020-00-000n Submission Jan 2004 M.Faulkner, ATcrcSlide 1 Low Overhead Pilot Structures Igor Tolochko and Mike Faulkner, ATcrc, Victoria.

Doc.: IEEE n Submission Jan 2004 M.Faulkner, ATcrcSlide 1 Low Overhead Pilot Structures Igor Tolochko and Mike Faulkner, ATcrc, Victoria.
Inserting Turbo Code Technology into the DVB Satellite Broadcasting System Matthew Valenti Assistant Professor West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.

Inserting Turbo Code Technology into the DVB Satellite Broadcasting System Matthew Valenti Assistant Professor West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/0013r0 Submission January 2004 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 “On/off”-Feedback Schemes for MIMO-OFDM 802.11n.

Doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission January 2004 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 “On/off”-Feedback Schemes for MIMO-OFDM n.
The Impact of Channel Estimation Errors on Space-Time Block Codes Presentation for Virginia Tech Symposium on Wireless Personal Communications M. C. Valenti.

The Impact of Channel Estimation Errors on Space-Time Block Codes Presentation for Virginia Tech Symposium on Wireless Personal Communications M. C. Valenti.
Space Time Block Codes Poornima Nookala.

Space Time Block Codes Poornima Nookala.
MIMO-OFDM MIMO MIMO High diversity gain (space-time coding) High diversity gain (space-time coding) High multiplexing gain (BLAST) High multiplexing gain.

MIMO-OFDM MIMO MIMO High diversity gain (space-time coding) High diversity gain (space-time coding) High multiplexing gain (BLAST) High multiplexing gain.
Improvements in throughput in 802.11n The design goal of the 802.11n is “HT” for High Throughput. The throughput is high indeed: up to 600 Mbps in raw.

Improvements in throughput in n The design goal of the n is “HT” for High Throughput. The throughput is high indeed: up to 600 Mbps in raw.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/180r0 Submission March 2002 Monisha Ghosh, et al., Philips Slide 1 On The Use Of Multiple Antennae For 802.11 Monisha Ghosh, Xuemei.

Doc.: IEEE /180r0 Submission March 2002 Monisha Ghosh, et al., Philips Slide 1 On The Use Of Multiple Antennae For Monisha Ghosh, Xuemei.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/0372r0 Submission March 2004 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 Rate Feedback Schemes for MIMO-OFDM 802.11n (a sequel.

Doc.: IEEE /0372r0 Submission March 2004 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 Rate Feedback Schemes for MIMO-OFDM n (a sequel.
Doc.: 11-04-0012-00-000n-proposal-statistical-channel-error-model.ppt Submission Jan 2004 UCLA - STMicroelectronics, Inc.Slide 1 Proposal for Statistical.

Doc.: n-proposal-statistical-channel-error-model.ppt Submission Jan 2004 UCLA - STMicroelectronics, Inc.Slide 1 Proposal for Statistical.
Iterative Multi-user Detection for STBC DS-CDMA Systems in Rayleigh Fading Channels Derrick B. Mashwama And Emmanuel O. Bejide.

Iterative Multi-user Detection for STBC DS-CDMA Systems in Rayleigh Fading Channels Derrick B. Mashwama And Emmanuel O. Bejide.
Space-Time and Space-Frequency Coded Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing Transmitter Diversity Techniques King F. Lee.

Space-Time and Space-Frequency Coded Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing Transmitter Diversity Techniques King F. Lee.
1 WP2.3 “Radio Interface and Baseband Signal Processing” Content of D15 and Outline of D18 CAPANINA Neuchatel Meeting October 28th, 2005 – Marina Mondin.

1 WP2.3 “Radio Interface and Baseband Signal Processing” Content of D15 and Outline of D18 CAPANINA Neuchatel Meeting October 28th, 2005 – Marina Mondin.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-05/0146r1 Submission March 2005 John Benko, Marie-Helene Hamon, France TelecomSlide 1 Advanced Coding Comparison Marie-Helene Hamon,

Doc.: IEEE /0146r1 Submission March 2005 John Benko, Marie-Helene Hamon, France TelecomSlide 1 Advanced Coding Comparison Marie-Helene Hamon,
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/0909r0 Submission July 2012 Jong S. Baek, AlereonSlide 1 Analysis, simulation and resultant data from a 6-9GHz OFDM MAC/PHY Date:

Doc.: IEEE /0909r0 Submission July 2012 Jong S. Baek, AlereonSlide 1 Analysis, simulation and resultant data from a 6-9GHz OFDM MAC/PHY Date:
Philips Research 11-02-708r0-WNG 1 / 23 IEEE 802.11 session Hawaii November 2002 Alexei Gorokhov, Paul Mattheijssen, Manel Collados, Bertrand Vandewiele,

Philips Research r0-WNG 1 / 23 IEEE session Hawaii November 2002 Alexei Gorokhov, Paul Mattheijssen, Manel Collados, Bertrand Vandewiele,
January 2004 doc.: IEEE 15-04-0064-00-003a Submission Slide 1 Jason Ellis, Staccato Communications Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal.

January 2004 doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 1 Jason Ellis, Staccato Communications Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
V- BLAST : Speed and Ordering Madhup Khatiwada IEEE New Zealand Wireless Workshop 2004 (M.E. Student) 2 nd September, 2004 University of Canterbury Alan.

V- BLAST : Speed and Ordering Madhup Khatiwada IEEE New Zealand Wireless Workshop 2004 (M.E. Student) 2 nd September, 2004 University of Canterbury Alan.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google