Recycled Asphalt Program & Environmental Stewardship Program (Post Consumer Content) Robert C. Rea Nebraska Department of Roads WASHTO – Omaha, Nebraska.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2014 Washington Asphalt Conference “Specification Update & Initiatives” Joe DeVol Assistant State Materials Engineer State Materials Laboratory.
Advertisements

CUPGA 2008 Western Canada Perspective on State – of - the Canadian Technology Challenges and Solutions John Berti, P. Eng.
Background: Hot mix asphalt (HMA) is a mixture of aggregate and asphalt binder. The asphalt is a petroleum based substance and, since the oil embargo of.
BASICS OF A GOOD ROAD ASPHALT AND AGGREGATES
Extending the Life of Asphalt Mixes David Lee, P.E. - ARAC Chair, Salem District Materials Kevin McGhee, P.E. – ARAC Secretary, VCTIR.
2014 AAPA Conference March 11-12, 2014 Curtis Vincent, P.E. Construction Engineer Lyndi Davis Blackburn, P.E. Assistant Materials and Tests Engineer Specification.
Steve Jackson, PE Technical Manager NB West Contracting As seen on shinglerecycling.org 6 th Asphalt Shingle Recycling Forum Denver, CO With Solutions.
Maximizing the Service Life of Dense Graded Asphalt Mixes David Lee, P.E. - ARAC Chair Salem District Materials.
Test Result Relationships
Evaluation of Cracking Resistance of Superpave Mixtures Using Texas Overlay Test Syeda Rubaiyat Aziz Mustaque Hossain Greg Schieber Department of Civil.
Bituminous Street Recertification Initiatives. Initiative Items n Stone Matrix Asphalt (SMA) n Longitudinal Joint Spec and other methods for longitudinal.
WMA TWG December NCAT WMA Research 2007 Andrea Kvasnak.
TRB AFK10 Committee on General Issues in Asphalt Technology Update on NCAT Test Track and Other Research Results April 24-26, 2006.
Warm Mix Asphalt Yellowstone National Park Brad Neitzke Western Federal Lands Highway Division.
Warm Mix for a Cold Climate Colorado DOT’s 2007 WMA Project.
ACEC WI Department of Transportation Liaison Committee Quarterly Meeting February 3, 2015.
1 Overview CQC Asphalt Specifications.  Payment based on Contractor’s Quality Control tests.  FDOT runs verification tests at a lesser frequency. 
1 Green Roadway Design from a Pavements Perspective Rene’ Renteria, P.E. ODOT Pavement Design Engineer April 13, 2010.
Recycling and Reclamation of Airfield Pavements 35 th Airports Conference FAA Eastern Region, Hershey, PA April 4, 2012 Campbell & Paris Engineers, 35.
1 Emissions and Energy in the Asphalt Paving Industry Chris Robinette January 18, 2010 National Asphalt Pavement Association.
RAP and RAS At DelDOT Karl Zipf, Chief Chemist DelDOT 2014.
2013 Year In Review APAI Winter Conference January 9, 2014 Matt Beeson, P.E. Asphalt Engineer.
Reclaimed Asphalt Pavements “RAP” Pete Coffman. RAP ◊Uses ◊Mix Methods ◊Cost Savings ◊Concerns ◊Case Studies ◊Uses ◊Mix Methods ◊Cost Savings ◊Concerns.
Characterization of Alaskan Hot-Mix Asphalt containing RAP
Warm Mix for a Cold Climate Update on Colorado DOT’s 2007 WMA Project on I Rocky Mountain Asphalt Conference and Equipment Show.
Saving Your Asphalt! 36 th Annual Rocky Mountain Asphalt Conference & Equipment Show February 18-20, 2009.
Florida Department of Transportation 1 Overview of CQC Asphalt Specifications.
Recycling shingles since 1996 Presentation at the March 16, 2005 CONEXPO-CON/AGG By Dusty Ordorff Bituminous Roadways, Inc.
Developing a Mixture-Based Specification for Flexible Base.
AAPA 2010 Study Tour – Recycled Asphalt Pavement Recycled Asphalt Pavement Trevor Distin | Cassandra Simpson.
Research Findings from the NCAT Test Track APAI Winter Conference Indianapolis, December 14, 2010.
1 Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in Arizona - Application and Verification October 3, 2008 Arizona Association of County Engineers.
Session #3 Asphalt 103- Materials: Basics of RAP, Usage and Specifications.
Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Volumetric Properties
Kersten Stelmach, Maggie Bailey, Hailey Frankland.
Mix Designs with RAS Dr. Richard Willis National Center for Asphalt Technology at Auburn University Asphalt Shingle Recycling Forum November 8 th, 2013.
Warm Mix Asphalt & Recycled Asphalt Pavements
2003 Warranty Presentations Caltrans WARRANTED HMA PAVEMENTS PAVEMENTS.
Paving the way for over 60 years Presentation at the January 10, 2007 NCAUPG Technical Conference By Dusty Ordorff Bituminous Roadways, Inc.
3 - 1 Holding The Contractor to 105% of the Target Spread Rate!
Asphalt Concrete Mix Design
National Performance of High Recycled Mixtures. 2 Outline Trends in RAP and RAS usage and practices Motivations for higher recycled contents Barriers.
Using Reflective Crack Interlayer-
Volumetric Properties of High RAP Mixtures Based on Calculated Bulk Specific Gravities of RAP and Constituent Aggregates Nassim Sabahfer Mustaque Hossain,
Green Concrete 1 1.
AMERICA RIDES ON US HMA ECONOMICS 101 Minimizing Project Costs without Sacrificing Quality Purdue Road School March 09, 2011 M. Dudley Bonte PE Regional.
Extending the Life of Asphalt Mixes David Lee, P.E. - ARAC Chair, Salem District Materials Kevin McGhee, P.E. – ARAC Secretary, VCTIR.
Use of RAP in Asphalt Mixtures. 2 Outline Why Recycle? Economics of HMA Recycling Current Practices for Using RAP Sources and Processing of RAP Sampling.
Quantity Calculations Module 3. Quantity Calculations  Specifications  Post Bid Quantity Calculations  Production Quantity Calculations –Checking Yield.
Alabama Asphalt Pavement Association
Seminar On Green Concrete Submitted To: Submitted By:
Critical Factors Affecting Asphalt Concrete Durability
Thin Hot Mix Asphalt Overlays PennDOT Research Findings
Evaluation of Cracking Resistance and Durability of 100% Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Mixtures Hesham Ali, PhD, PE. Mojtaba M. Afzali.
Research Implementation WHRP Flexible Group
Materials & Research Winter Workshop
Presenters: Sumon Roy1 and Badrul Ahsan1
Update on the current APT Project in Texas
UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI MASTERS OF SCIENCE IN CIVIL ENGINEERING
Recycled Asphalt Pavement
Panel discussion Date.
2018 Pavement Workshop May 23-24, 2018
Performance Assessment of 100% Recycled Hot Mix Asphalt
Best Practices on the Use of RAS
Dr. Randy West, P.E. Director / Research Professor
Effect of Recovered Binder From Recycled Shingles
High Value Research Sweet 16 – RAC Region 3
Superpave5 Superpave Design at Five Percent Air Voids
Warm Mix Asphalt & Recycled Asphalt Pavements
Warm Mix Asphalt & Recycled Asphalt Pavements
Presentation transcript:

Recycled Asphalt Program & Environmental Stewardship Program (Post Consumer Content) Robert C. Rea Nebraska Department of Roads WASHTO – Omaha, Nebraska April 2014

Average RAP Contents (Overall) 6.9% 27.3% 28.6% 34.4% 37.3% 39.2%

RAP Savings ($ millions) 3.6M 23.3M 19.8M 41.7M 35.3M 43.6M

How did we get to 39.2% average RAP ? Design and Specifications to optimize RAP Design and Specifications to optimize RAP RAP Incentive for binder savings

1. Binder Cost Subsidiary to Mix (36 States) Not Needed -- Incentive is already there to use less contractor purchased ‘new’ binder SPECIFICATIONS 2. Binder Paid Separately as Bid Item (14 States) Needed -- No incentive for the Contractor to underrun an established item, so we must place incentive on the net binder savings SPECIFICATIONS and INCENTIVE

15% of Binder Savings For Contractor 35% of Binder Savings For Contractor 50% of Binder Savings For Contractor DOT Millings from ‘ON’ project DOT Millings from ‘OFF’ project Contractor ‘Owned’ Millings 90% of our projects are this 8% of our projects are this 2% of our projects are this 85/15 Incentive Split 65/35 Incentive Split 50/50 Incentive Split

Example 40,000 Ton Project ( 5 M ESAL Design – Typical SPR mix ) MILLINGS FROM ON PROJECT 85/15 Incentive Split Mill 2” – Fill 3” Mill 2” – Fill 3” Hot Mix = $ 30 per ton Hot Mix = $ 30 per ton Binder PG = $650 per liquid ton Binder PG = $650 per liquid ton Design is for 5.4% Binder Content Design is for 5.4% Binder Content

Total Cost = $2,604,000 Recycle Savings to DOT = $0.00 Recycle Incentive to the Contractor = $0.00 Total final Cost Realized by DOT $2,604,000 Virgin Mix (No RAP) Hot Mix = 1,200,000 Hot Mix = 1,200,000 Virgin Binder = $1,404,000 Virgin Binder = $1,404,000 Binder from RAP = $0 Binder from RAP = $0 Total Cost = $2,604,000 Total Cost = $2,604,000 Pre-incentive 2008 (6.9% RAP) Hot Mix = 1,200,000 Hot Mix = 1,200,000 Virgin Binder = $1,307,124 Virgin Binder = $1,307,124 Binder from RAP = $96,876 Binder from RAP = $96,876 Total Cost = $2,507,124 Current w/Incentive (45% RAP) Hot Mix = 1,200,000 Hot Mix = 1,200,000 Virgin Binder = $772,200 Virgin Binder = $772,200 Binder from RAP = $631,800 Binder from RAP = $631,800 Total Cost = $1,972,200 Total Cost = $2,604,000 Recycle Savings to DOT = $96,876 Recycle Incentive to the Contractor = $0.00 Total final Cost Realized by DOT $2,507,124 Total Cost = $2,604,000 Recycle Savings to DOT = $537,030 Recycle Incentive to the Contractor = $94,770 Total final Cost Realized by DOT $2,066,970

Virgin Mix (No RAP) Total final Cost Realized by DOT $2,604,000 Pre-incentive 2008 (6.9% RAP) Current w/Incentive (45% RAP) Total final Cost Realized by DOT $2,507,124 $2,507,124 Total final Cost Realized by DOT $2,066,970 On one 40,000 ton hot mix project On one 40,000 ton hot mix project

REASONS RAP USE MAY BE LIMITED REASONS RAP USE MAY BE LIMITED 1.Agency limits use of RAP or says ‘I want the new stuff, not the used stuff ’ 2.Stigma of lesser quality, Engineered Design a must 3.Plant Superintendant says ‘The plant won’t run that much’ 4.Design must optimize mill and fill strategies or ‘Road Mining’ 5.Requires binder grade bumps/dumps when higher amounts are used 6.Restrictive in the specification, i.e. dust/asphalt maximum 7.Limits the RAP #200 amounts and therefor rejects the RAP 8.Voids and VMA and other properties restrict the amount of RAP

CAACAA o 83 Allows for RAP Variation, typically 90+ FAAFAA o Allows for RAP Variation, typically 44+ o FAA Sp. Gravity slightly lowers true FAA o Binder Grade and Volumetrics provide added Rutting Resistance o Overshoot FAA – Increased Cracking VoidsVoids o Allow more dust & binder, better field density Min. BinderMin. Binder o Used as Factor for VMA #200#200 o Typically around 4-6%, D/B around

APA Testing of SPR Mixes 8000 Cycles 8000 Cycles 100 PSI Pressure Load 100 PSI Pressure Load 64 degrees C 64 degrees C Max of 12 mm Rutting Max of 12 mm Rutting

APA Testing of SPR Mixes

44.7%

Approach to a 50% RAP Project 1.Pick a 20,000 to 40,000 Ton Project 2.Use a ‘tried and true’ mix that you know works and has been a workhorse for your state 3.Specify the quality and type of virgin aggregate that you want to use, in other words, the ones that you like and are of good quality 4.Use softest base oil you can get either -34 or -28 if you can 5.Specify a minimum Binder Content if you don’t pay ac separately 6.Specify minimum 40 % RAP 7.Have the RAP come from the road…….fresh processed millings 8.Be flexible with the #200 material 9.Lower voids and no VMA spec, effects of burnoff oven – another all day presentation to discuss this  control by voids and binder content 10.Place it in all lifts, especially surface, we want to monitor this material

Robert C. Rea office mobile

Type ‘R’ Asphalt $ 36 $ 24 $ 12 - $ 20 $ 44

RAP Savings Potential $ 12 to $20 per Ton $ 12 to $20 per Ton x ?? Million Tons x ?? Million Tons $ 10 to 40 Million $ 10 to 40 Million Annual Savings realized every year, over and over and over again. Not to mention, Better on the environment, Green Technology, Recycling, Less Raw Materials, Less Hauling, Less Transportation and consumption of fuels ……..

Post Consumer Content

On Project Plan Sets in 2014

Thank You!