Extended Foster Care Beyond Age 18 Using Innovative and Effective Approaches Kate Hanley, Consultant.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title IV-E Guardianship Assistance Program (GAP) Liliana Hernandez, Childrens Bureau Child Welfare Program Specialist September 2010.
Advertisements

Illinois Guardianship Assistance Waiver and GAP Implementation September 15, 2010.
Quality Parenting for Children in Foster Care Act Nancy C. Detert Common Sense and Compassion Independent Living Act July 31, 2013.
Critical Issues for Successful Implementation.  Samanthya Amann, Iowa  Nicole Byers, Delaware  Kate Hanley, Consultant with the NRCYD.
Community Based Care in Florida and the IV-E Waiver.
Subsidized Guardianship Permanency Initiative. SG Introduction Focuses on improving permanency outcomes for children in out-of-home care through a comprehensive.
Top Ten Things You Need to Know About Extended Foster Care Training for Post-Secondary Education Professionals.
Aging out of Foster Care Transitions to Adulthood.
Yes No Is the student 18 years old or older? ? Surrogate Parent Decision-Making Flowchart.
Extended Foster Care (EFC) (AB 12, Chapter 559, Statutes of 2010)
Planning With Youth in Transition Tips, Tools and Techniques.
Child Welfare Services Family centered services to achieve well- being through ensuring self-sufficiency, support, safety, and permanence. Dual tracks-
Foster Youth and the Transition to Adulthood: Findings from the Midwest Study Mark Courtney, Principal Investigator Amy Dworsky, Project Director.
IMPROVING OUTCOMES FOR TRANSITIONAL AGED YOUTH: A FACILITATORS GUIDE FOR SOCIAL WORKERS, FOSTER PARENTS, AND SUPPORTIVE ADULTS Katherine Robinson California.
February 10, 2011 San Diego.  Federal law enacted in 2008  Intent to improve well-being and permanency outcomes for court dependent children  Two California.
Youth Transitioning from Foster Care Training for District Court Judges North Carolina Institute of Government March 31, 2006 Chris Sinha Joan McAllister.
1 THE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES REVIEW (CFSR) PRACTICE PRINCIPLES: Critical Principles for Assessing and Enhancing the Service Array The Service Array.
Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide coordinated community-based services and supports to families of youth with complex emotional, behavioral.
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
Program oversight – Role and Implications of the Courts New England November2012.
An introduction to for Caregivers. The Alliance for Child Welfare Excellence is Washington’s first comprehensive statewide training partnership dedicated.
Top Ten Things You Need to Know About Extended Foster Care
Top 10 Things to Know About Extended Foster Care – for Foster Youth Services Version 1.0 December 2012.
SUPERVISED INDEPENDENT LIVING PLACMENTS. Placement and case management as it relates to adults in OHC Case management activities must ensure: ⁻life skill.
VISITATION 1. Competencies  SW Ability to complete visitation plans that underscore the importance of arranging and maintaining immediate, frequent,
Educational Champion Training MODULE 12: Mentoring Non-Minor Dependents and/or their Educational Champions © National Center for Youth Law, April 2013.
Foster Care Re-Entry: Creating a Supportive & Meaningful Transition to Adulthood Betsy Fordyce Director of Advocacy Initiatives, Rocky Mountain Children’s.
Outpatient Services Programs Workgroup: Service Provision under Laura’s Law June 11, 2014.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH ADULT SYSTEMS OF CARE – JAIL MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES ACT Full Service Partnership.
Systems Change to Achieve Permanency Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Arlington, Texas April 15, 2009.
AB490 + San Francisco County’s Interagency Agreement.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
National Youth in Transition Database (NYTD) Services and Outcomes Reporting And Independent Living Transition to Discharge (ILTD) Enhancement Christine.
PROBATION PROVISIONS IN CALIFORNIA’S FOSTERING CONNECTIONS TO SUCCESS ACT JENNIFER RODRIGUEZ MARIA F. RAMIU WEBINAR YOUTH LAW CENTER AUGUST 30, 2011.
1 Fostering Connections After 18: Benefits Essentials Version 2.0 August 2012.
2012 Child Welfare Legislative Update Ann Ahlstrom
AB 12: California Fostering Connections to Success Act Policy Overview and Implications for THP-Plus Presentation to THP-Plus Institute July 28, 2009.
Questions & Answers about Extending Foster Care to Age 21 THP-Plus Institute November 8, 2010 Oakland, CA.
1 Fostering Connections After 18: Benefits Essentials Version 1.0, April 17, 2012.
1 Fostering Connections After 18: Benefits Essentials Version 2.1 December 2012.
Parent-Child Visitation: Could Practice Make a Difference? Washington State CASA Conference October 2015Washington State CASA Conference October 2015.
PL THE PREVENTING SEX TRAFFICKING AND STRENGTHENING FAMILIES ACT WASHINGTON STATE'S RESPONSE TO THE PREVENTING SEX TRAFFICKING AND STRENGTHENING.
Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth: Outcomes at Age 19 Chapin Hall Center for Children University of Chicago.
1 Introduction to After 18 California Fostering Connections to Success What does After 18 mean to YOU? Version 2.0, November 28, 2012.
Intersection of Fostering Connections and McKinney-Vento What is the connection? How do we connect? Susie Greenfelder, Education Planner MI Department.
Understanding Applicable Laws in Child Protection and Child Welfare Cases: Presentation at TCAP Tribal Courts Conference – Minneapolis August 20, 2015.
Kamala H. Shugar Assistant Attorney in Charge Oregon Department of Justice Child Advocacy Section.
11/28/12 1 CALIFORNIA FOSTERING CONNECTIONS TO SUCCESS ACT Version 2.0 Assembly Bill 12.
Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System Challenges and Opportunities.
GROWING LEADERS Opportunity. Engagement. Achievement. Emma Ramirez Guardian Scholars Program Supporting Foster Youth Students Attain Their.
Closing the Gap for Skipped- Generation Households.
The Children’s Aid Society of Brant Preliminary Findings Crown Ward Review 2011 February 28-March 10, 2011.
Foster Care After 18 AB12 signed into law September 30, 2010 Designed to align with the Federal Fostering Connections to Success Act Extends foster care.
The Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) and the Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) Program WIOA Regional Forums October 2016.
Maryland Healthy Transition Initiative
Amy Harding – Volunteer Coordinator & Case Supervisor
Presented by Hill Country CASA
Presented by Hill Country CASA
The Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) and the Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) Program WIOA Regional Forums October 2016.
The Current State of Foster Care in Virginia
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
2018 National IV-E Roundtable for Child Welfare Training & Education
Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act: New Opportunities for Federal Funding for Child Welfare Key Questions and Considerations.
Fostering Connections To Success Act And What It Means For Texas Partners In CPS Reform Meeting, Jan. 14, 2009 Liz Kromrei, Department of Family and Protective.
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
? Surrogate Parent Decision-Making Flowchart
Extended court jurisdiction
Foster Care to 21 Carl E. Ayers, MSW
Florida’s New Guardianship Assistance Program
Transitioning to Independence
Presentation transcript:

Extended Foster Care Beyond Age 18 Using Innovative and Effective Approaches Kate Hanley, Consultant

Changing the Landscape Fostering Connections 2008 changed the landscape of foster care. Foster care could now be provided to young adults up to the age of 21 with title IV-E funding. Had to wait until October 1, 2010 to implement and provisions were sketchy. Worth the wait – Children’s Bureau had come through with flexible, open expectations - allowing states to try innovative and creative policy and programming.

Recognizing Reality Expectation is that foster care will be short term and temporary. Promises not kept especially for those entering care after age 10. Young adults exiting care at 18 have an average of 3+ years in foster care. Goal setting for youth in foster care does not reflect the actual outcomes.

Emancipation Goals and Outcomes from Foster Care 2003 to 2011 YearCase GoalTotal # in F. C. % Emancipation Exits # Emancipation Exits %520,0008%22, %517,0008%23, %513,0009%24, %510,0009%26, %491,00010%29, %463,00010%29, %423,77311%29, %408,42511%27, %400,54011%26,286 Children’s Bureau Adoption and Foster Care Statistics research/afcars

VT NH MA NJ DE DC CT RI STATES IMPLEMENTING EXTENSION OF FOSTER CARE (7/13) Implemented PendingLeg. Passed Imp. No Fed. Funding

States Implementing Title IV-E Funded Extension Approved (18) Pending (2) AlabamaMinnesota Massachusetts ArkansasNebraska Pennsylvania CaliforniaNew York D.C.N. Dakota IllinoisOregon IndianaTennessee MaineTexas MarylandWashington MichiganW. Virginia

Implementation Who, What, How Program instructions encourage creativity, innovation and “developmentally appropriate” policy and programs. Some states have simply continued the same policies without taking into consideration that participants will be legal adults. What are the critical elements for success?

Broadest Population Possible Maximum age 21 – o Only Indiana has a lower age of 20 Inclusion of Juvenile Justice – o 15 states indicate yes, if dual wards or in foster care at age 18. Reentry to Care – all states except: o Oregon - under development o N. Y. – Limited to two times o Washington State – until age 19

What does it take? Agencies must make a concerted effort to develop policies and programs that allow: – Young adults to maintain eligibility. – Address challenges faced by different types of young adults. – Reentry is open to all and process is customer friendly.

Eligibility Conditions Must meet one of the following: School – High School, GED, College –. Full or Part time Vocational Programs, Trade School Programs to Address Barriers to Employment Employed 80 hours a month Unable to perform any of the above 17 States allow all of the above for eligibility

Three States Eligibility Tennessee, Washington and W. Virginia have more traditional eligibility conditions. Young adults must be involved in an educational program which includes vocational or trade school. All three have the option to expand eligibility in the future built into legislation.

Policy on Removing Barriers California – “based on a youth-centered assessment of skills and needs. Such activities may include, but not be limited to, unpaid employment, volunteer activities, unpaid intern or apprenticeships. Additionally, participation in programs for drug or alcohol addiction treatment will meet these participation criteria. These activities could be self- directed, completed in conjunction with the youth’s caregiver or CM (case manager), or part of an organized program.”

Broad Interpretation of Federal Guidelines California policy includes planning meetings with the case manager as an activity to address barriers to employment. “A NMD (nonminor dependent) shall be deemed participating in a program or activity designed to promote or remove barriers to employment as long as the youth is participating in regular meetings with his/her CM to develop and implement his or her TILP (Transitional Independent Living Plan).” (All County Letter 11-61)

Keeping Eligibility Open States can keep the foster care case open through state or local funding until the young adult can meet eligibility requirements. Michigan policy allows for a grace period of 30 days during which “it remains the caseworker’s responsibility to actively assist the youth in reestablishing the employment, edu­cation, or incapacitating medical condition requirements, and to include documentation of these efforts in the service plan.”

Critical to Recognize Status as “Adults ” Case management involves a paradigm shift in the way young adults are engaged during casework and supervision. Their adult status must be acknowledged and respected. Can leave foster care at any time, case manager must engage in a way that supports their developmental needs and provides a safety net for trial and error experiences, so they can learn from mistakes made. These young adults can be provided with the experience of living independently while still in a supportive environment. (California Policy)

Change of Status - Adults  California’s 2013 Court Rule 5.900(c) - “A nonminor dependent retains all his or her legal decision-making authority as an adult.”  Texas Policy - “Caseworkers and providers must respect the status of young adults and the need for a supportive environment that allows them to practice, improve and enhance their life skills so that they can experience positive outcomes as they leave care.”

Young Adult Status Texas – “While casework requirements (such as monthly caseworker contacts) are the same for the Extended Foster Care population as they are for those in foster care under age 18, how these are accomplished should allow for more flexibility and responsiveness to requests from the young adult.”

Young Adult Status Texas – “Young adults in Extended Foster Care should have greater responsibility for activities; they need to be empowered to manage their activities.” o initiating caseworker contacts; o identifying settings and topics for caseworker monthly contacts; o participating in independent living activities; and o participating in age appropriate activities.”

Will Young Adults Choose to Stay? Voluntary Agreement - spelling out what the expectations are and the benefits of being in the program. 9 states all young adults, 4 states at reentry, 2 working on. Direct payments - take responsibility for daily living challenges. 12 states allow. IL placements - all either have, or are working on developing.

Voluntary Agreement California policy states – “The NMDs must sign the mutual agreement to acknowledge that they are voluntarily agreeing to remain in foster care in supervised placements as court dependents. The purpose of the mutual agreement is to ensure that the NMD’s status as a legal adult is recognized and to provide clear expectations to both the NMD and case manager as to what the responsibilities are for each party. The mutual agreement further specifies what services and assistance the NMDs receive from the agency.”

Choices Being Made Minnesota implemented on October 1, 2010 Approximately 590 young adults turn 18 each year and could be eligible to opt into the extension. From 10/1/10 to 9/30/12 - 1,900 youth have either remained or returned to foster. 454 lived in a supervised independent living setting. Social service agencies received $1,761,727 in federal Title IV-E reimbursement since the inception of the program – a 117% increase in Title IV-E reimbursement for providing foster care to young adults

Maintenance Payments 12 states have implemented maintenance payments directly to young adults and several more are working on making this an option for certain situations. Minnesota policy - “For youth age 18 or older living independently in a supervised setting, there may be no direct caregiver... In these situations, an agency may pay all or part of the foster care maintenance payment directly to the youth. This flexibility to pay all or part of the maintenance payment allows an agency to help youth adjust to independent living and learn to budget and pay bills.”

Support for Parents When a young adult has a child a payment will be made to assist in caring for the child. Only the young adult, not the child, will be in foster care. Michigan policy states “A youth parent in an independent living placement will be paid directly for each of his/her minor children living with him/her.

Independent Living with Supervision T exas “ (SIL) placement setting allows young adults 18 and older to be placed in a non-traditional, less restrictive environment while still in paid foster care. Young adults placed in SIL settings have minimal supervision and case management… allows young adults to practice necessary independent living skills and achieve self-sufficiency in a supportive environment before leaving foster care.”

Permanency The Federal Program Instruction clarifies that permanency continues to be a priority for young adults in extended care. “…title IV-E agency should continue to work with youth who are in supervised independent living settings to form permanent connections with caring adults. This could take the form of determining whether guardianship, adoption or living with other caring adults remains appropriate options for an older youth, and if so, helping the youth to work towards those outcomes.” *(cite and offer link)

Permanent Connections Indiana policy – “efforts should be made to enhance and develop existing relationships with adults whom youth trust, or with whom trust could be strengthened. Building the capacity of existing relationships to offer more empathetic and insightful emotional support could provide important resources for the youth as he or she leaves out-of-home placement and continues to deal with the emotions and questions raised by his or her experiences prior to, and during, placement.”

C. B. Flexible Policy The Children’s Bureau (C. B.) continues to demonstrate their commitment to allowing states to make decisions about what is appropriate for the young adults. Child Welfare Policy release of Q & A in May 2013 allows broad range of eligibility and supervised independent living arrangements.

Foster Care Prior to Age 18? Title IV-E agencies may determine eligibility based on a young adult being in foster care prior to age 18 and/or in care on their 18 birthday. However, there is no federal requirement that the young adult must be in foster care prior to turning age 18 to be eligible for title IV-E foster care after age 18. A title IV-E agency could use this process to allow for young adults 18 and over, who were under juvenile justice jurisdiction, to enter the extended foster care program.

Marriage or Military A title IV-E agency may determine that a young adult who is otherwise eligible for the extension may be married or enlisted in the military, including the reserves or ROTC. For a young adult over the age of 18 entering a voluntary agreement for the extension of foster care, the AFDC eligibility is determined based on the young adult’s income without consideration of the parents/legal guardians or others in the assistance unit in the home from which the youth was removed as a younger child and without regard to the youth’s spouse.

Independent Living Setting Home of Parent or Guardian Discretion to determine that residing in the home of a parent or legal guardian is an allowable IL setting Parent or guardian would not be considered a foster care provider and the agency would not be returning the young adult to live under the care of the parent or legal guardian. The young adult would be choosing this residence as a supervised independent living setting and the agency would determine it is an appropriate setting.

ILS – Adult Treatment Center An adult treatment center would be an allowable independent living setting only if the young adult, age 18 and older, is a voluntary resident and the title IV-E agency maintains supervision. Allows for inpatient treatment for substance abuse or mental health issues if the young adult chooses to enter.

New World for Case Managers, Courts, Foster Parents & Stakeholders Must be conscious that this is new territory where the boundaries have moved and the maps no longer work. Training and support for all stakeholders is critical for true change to take hold. Young adults must be the voice that carries the message – we must build this new world based on their knowledge of what will work.

More than policy “States should pay careful attention to the ways that serving young adults, instead of minors, calls not only for changes in policies, but also for changes in the cultures of the institutions involved in providing services, and ultimately in the hearts and minds of the individuals working in those institutions.” (Providing Foster Care for Young Adults: Early implementation of California’s Fostering Connections Act )