Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 5. ” All are lunatics, but he who can analyze his delusion is called a philosopher.” Ambrose Bierce “ Those who lack the courage.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Necessary & Sufficient Conditions Law, Science, Life & Logic.
Advertisements

Rules of Inferences Section 1.5. Definitions Argument: is a sequence of propositions (premises) that end with a proposition called conclusion. Valid Argument:
1 Valid and Invalid arguments. 2 Definition of Argument Sequence of statements: Statement 1; Statement 2; Therefore, Statement 3. Statements 1 and 2 are.
Reason & Argument Lecture 3. Lecture Synopsis 1. Recap: validity, soundness & counter- examples, induction. 2. Arguing for a should conclusion. 3. Complications.
Euler’s circles Some A are not B. All B are C. Some A are not C. Algorithm = a method of solution guaranteed to give the right answer.
Use a truth table to determine the validity or invalidity of this argument. First, translate into standard form “Martin is not buying a new car, since.
2 Basic Types of Reasoning Deductive Deductive Inductive Inductive.
Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, even further more, expanded, Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.
Chapter 1 The Logic of Compound Statements. Section 1.3 Valid & Invalid Arguments.
The Conditional Syllogism otherwise knows as: The Hypothetical Syllogism “If I had a millions dollars, then I’d buy you a house” The Barenaked Ladies.
2 Basic Types of Reasoning Deductive Deductive Inductive Inductive.
Intro to Logic: the tools of the trade You need to be able to: Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people’s claims). Organize arguments.
CS128 – Discrete Mathematics for Computer Science
Uses for Truth Tables Determine the truth conditions for any compound statementDetermine the truth conditions for any compound statement Determine whether.
Logic 3 Tautological Implications and Tautological Equivalences
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions and Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
Deductive reasoning.
Reasoning
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1.
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual
Validity: Long and short truth tables Sign In! Week 10! Homework Due Review: MP,MT,CA Validity: Long truth tables Short truth table method Evaluations!
1.5 Rules of Inference.
3.6 Analyzing Arguments with Truth Tables
Valid and Invalid Arguments
Deductive versus Inductive Reasoning Consider the following two passages: Argument #1 Mr. Jones is a member of the Academy of Scholarly Fellows and only.
Reasoning Top-down biases symbolic distance effects semantic congruity effects Formal logic syllogisms conditional reasoning.
Deductive Arguments.
Unit 1D Analyzing Arguments. TWO TYPES OF ARGUMENTS Inductive Deductive Arguments come in two basic types:
Deductive Reasoning Chapter 2 Lesson 4.
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
Chapter 3: MAKING SENSE OF ARGUMENTS
1 DISJUNCTIVE AND HYPOTHETICAL SYLLOGISMS DISJUNCTIVE PROPOSITIONS: E.G EITHER WHALES ARE MAMMALS OR THEY ARE VERY LARGE FISH. DISJUNCTS: WHALES ARE MAMMALS.(P)
READING #4 “DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS” By Robert FitzGibbons from Making educational decisions: an introduction to Philosophy of Education (New York & London:
Chapter 3: Introduction to Logic. Logic Main goal: use logic to analyze arguments (claims) to see if they are valid or invalid. This is useful for math.
Philosophy: Logic and Logical arguments
Philosophical Method  Logic: A Calculus For Good Reason  Clarification, Not Obfuscation  Distinctions and Disambiguation  Examples and Counterexamples.
The construction of a formal argument
6.6 Argument Forms and Fallacies
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Thinking Critically 1C Discussion Paragraph 1 web 88. State Politics 89. US Presidents 90. Web Venn Diagrams.
DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to recognize, analyze, and evaluate deductive arguments.
Syllogisms and Three Types of Hypothetical Syllogisms
Propositions and Arguments. What is a proposition? A proposition is a predicative sentence that only contains a subject and a predicate S is P.
Chapter 7 Evaluating Deductive Arguments II: Truth Functional Logic Invitation to Critical Thinking First Canadian Edition.
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
Arguments Arguments: premises provide grounds for the truth of the conclusion Two different ways a conclusion may be supported by premises. Deductive Arguments.
Symbolic Logic ⊃ ≡ · v ~ ∴. What is a logical argument? Logic is the science of reasoning, proof, thinking, or inference. Logic allows us to analyze a.
Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 7 Lecture Notes Chapter 7.
Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 12. Our Learning  Fallacy Reminder  Summary following Homework NAB  Class NAB.
Logic: The Language of Philosophy. What is Logic? Logic is the study of argumentation o In Philosophy, there are no right or wrong opinions, but there.
Deductive Reasoning. Inductive: premise offers support and evidenceInductive: premise offers support and evidence Deductive: premises offers proof that.
L = # of lines n = # of different simple propositions L = 2 n EXAMPLE: consider the statement, (A ⋅ B) ⊃ C A, B, C are three simple statements 2 3 L =
PHIL102 SUM2014, M-F12:00-1:00, SAV 264 Instructor: Benjamin Hole
Deductive Reasoning Valid Arguments
Chapter 3 Basic Logical Concepts (Please read book.)
Deductive Arguments.
Demonstrating the validity of an argument using syllogisms.
Chapter 3: Reality Assumptions
Introduction to Logic PHIL 240 Sections
Hurley … Chapter 6.5 Indirect Truth Tables
Logical Forms.
Thinking Critically Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
Concise Guide to Critical Thinking
6.4 Truth Tables for Arguments
8C Truth Tables, 8D, 8E Implications 8F Valid Arguments
Intermediate Level Conditionals.
Arguments in Sentential Logic
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Identifying & Ordering
Presentation transcript:

Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 5

” All are lunatics, but he who can analyze his delusion is called a philosopher.” Ambrose Bierce “ Those who lack the courage will always find a philosophy to justify it.” Albert Camus

Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 5

Our Learning Mini Test Finish Off Posters Deductive Arguments Forms – Modus Ponens and Modus Tollens

Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 5 1.Define the word Philosophy. (3 marks) 2.Define the philosophical understanding of ‘argument’ (2 marks) 3.What two types of statement go into making up an argument? (2 marks) 4.What two types of wording do not contribute to an argument? (2 marks) 5.Who came up with the form of the syllogism? (1 mark) 6.Give two reasons why premises might be hidden? (2 marks) 1.Define the word Philosophy. (3 marks) 2.Define the philosophical understanding of ‘argument’ (2 marks) 3.What two types of statement go into making up an argument? (2 marks) 4.What two types of wording do not contribute to an argument? (2 marks) 5.Who came up with the form of the syllogism? (1 mark) 6.Give two reasons why premises might be hidden? (2 marks)

Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 5 Finish Off Posters

Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 5 To the Notes – Page 12

Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 5 A deductive argument is one where it is thought that the premises provide a guarantee of the truth of the conclusion. The premises provide support for the conclusion which is so strong that if the premises are true, it is impossible for the conclusion to be false.

Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 5 Birds Scotland Aberdeen is in Scotland John is in Aberdeen Therefore John is in Scotland Aberdeen All chickens are birds John is a chicken Therefore John is a bird Chickens John John

Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 5 To the Notes Page 13 / 14 A valid argument is when which ‘works’ - where the conclusion logically follows from the premises. If it doesn’t, it is called invalid. (GLOSSARY) Page A conditional proposition (premise) is one using the form ‘if p then q’ (GLOSSARY) To the Notes Page 13 / 14 A valid argument is when which ‘works’ - where the conclusion logically follows from the premises. If it doesn’t, it is called invalid. (GLOSSARY) Page A conditional proposition (premise) is one using the form ‘if p then q’ (GLOSSARY)

Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 5 DEDUCTIVE FORMS - MODUS PONENS AntecedentConsequent CP1If X then Y P2 X (affirming) CTherefore Y Affirming the Antecedent - Modus Ponens DEDUCTIVE FORMS - MODUS PONENS AntecedentConsequent CP1If X then Y P2 X (affirming) CTherefore Y Affirming the Antecedent - Modus Ponens

Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 5 Critical Thinking Quick Helps – Affirming & Denying Critical Thinking Quick Helps – Affirming & Denying If it is too hot, then I will sweat It is too hot Therefore, I will sweat The Second Line is agreeing with the first part of the first line This is AFFIRMING the ANTECEDENT (thing that comes first) AFFIRMING the ANTECEDENT = MODUS PONENS

Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 5 Critical Thinking Quick Helps – Affirming & Denying Critical Thinking Quick Helps – Affirming & Denying If there is a fire, then there must be smoke There is no smoke Therefore, there is no fire The Second Line is denying the second part of the first line This is DENYING the CONSEQUENT (the thing that comes after) DENYING THE CONSEQUENT = MODUS TOLLENS

Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 5 Our Learning Mini Test Finish Off Posters Deductive Arguments Forms – Modus Ponens and Modus Tollens