Step 3: Critically Appraising the Evidence: Statistics for Diagnosis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Step 3: Critically Appraising the Evidence: Basic Statistics.
Advertisements

Power and sample size.
Likelihood ratios Why these are the most thrilling statistics in Emergency Medicine.
Step 5: Communication and Evaluation. Table of Contents Communication Communicate with Your Patients Video 1 Communicate with Health Professionals Evaluation.
TESTING A TEST Ian McDowell Department of Epidemiology & Community Medicine November, 2004.
GP 4001 Lecture Series Dealing with undifferentiated problems in primary care II.
1 Case-Control Study Design Two groups are selected, one of people with the disease (cases), and the other of people with the same general characteristics.
Step 3: Critically Appraising the Evidence: Statistics for Harm and Etiology.
EBM for Novice Maria Kwok, MD, MPH Assistant Clinical Professor Section of Pediatric Emergency Medicine Morgan Stanley Children’s Hospital of New York.
Evidence-Based Diagnosis in Physical Therapy Julie M. Fritz, PhD, PT, ATC Department of Physical Therapy University of Pittsburgh.
CRITICAL APPRAISAL Dr. Cristina Ana Stoian Resident Journal Club
Interpreting Basic Statistics
Epidemiology in Medicine Sandra Rodriguez Internal Medicine TTUHSC.
Data Management & Basic Analysis Interpretation of Diagnostic test.
Interpreting Diagnostic Tests
Diagnosis Concepts and Glossary. Cross-sectional study The observation of a defined population at a single point in time or time interval. Exposure and.
BASIC STATISTICS: AN OXYMORON? (With a little EPI thrown in…) URVASHI VAID MD, MS AUG 2012.
Multiple Choice Questions for discussion
Diagnosis Articles Much Thanks to: Rob Hayward & Tanya Voth, CCHE.
DEB BYNUM, MD AUGUST 2010 Evidence Based Medicine: Review of the basics.
Statistics for Health Care Biostatistics. Phases of a Full Clinical Trial Phase I – the trial takes place after the development of a therapy and is designed.
Principles and Predictive Value of Screening. Objectives Discuss principles of screening Describe elements of screening tests Calculate sensitivity, specificity.
Risk Concepts and Glossary. Cross-sectional study The observation of a defined population at a single point in time or time interval. Exposure and outcome.
Vanderbilt Sports Medicine How to practice and teach EBM Chapter 3 May 3, 2006.
Dichotomous Tests Thomas B. Newman, MD, MPH September 27, 2012 Thanks to Josh Galanter and Michael Shlipak 1.
Evidence Based Medicine Workshop Diagnosis March 18, 2010.
Evidence Based Practice in Psychology – Lecture 3 May 31, 2007.
EBCP. Random vs Systemic error Random error: errors in measurement that lead to measured values being inconsistent when repeated measures are taken. Ie:
EVIDENCE ABOUT DIAGNOSTIC TESTS Min H. Huang, PT, PhD, NCS.
Advanced Physical therapy Procedures Ahmed alhowimel.
Diagnosis: EBM Approach Michael Brown MD Grand Rapids MERC/ Michigan State University.
Evaluating Diagnostic Tests Payam Kabiri, MD. PhD. Clinical Epidemiologist Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Appraising A Diagnostic Test
Likelihood 2005/5/22. Likelihood  probability I am likelihood I am probability.
Evidence-Based Medicine Diagnosis Component 2 / Unit 5 1 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0 /Fall 2010.
Stats Facts Mark Halloran. Diagnostic Stats Disease present Disease absent TOTALS Test positive aba+b Test negative cdc+d TOTALSa+cb+da+b+c+d.
1. Statistics Objectives: 1.Try to differentiate between the P value and alpha value 2.When to perform a test 3.Limitations of different tests and how.
TESTING A TEST Ian McDowell Department of Epidemiology & Community Medicine January 2008.
Prediction statistics Prediction generally True and false, positives and negatives Quality of a prediction Usefulness of a prediction Prediction goes Bayesian.
HSS4303B – Intro to Epidemiology Feb 8, Agreement.
Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value
Organization of statistical research. The role of Biostatisticians Biostatisticians play essential roles in designing studies, analyzing data and.
Evidence base of clinical diagnosis 邓贝贝 张棣 王迎. Category of diagnostic test laboratory examination medical history and information from physical examination.
Evidence based medicine Diagnostic tests Ross Lawrenson.
1 Medical Epidemiology Interpreting Medical Tests and Other Evidence.
/ 101 Saudi Diploma in Family Medicine Center of Post Graduate Studies in Family Medicine EBM Diagnostic Tests Dr. Zekeriya Aktürk
EVALUATING u After retrieving the literature, you have to evaluate or critically appraise the evidence for its validity and applicability to your patient.
BIOSTATISTICS Lecture 2. The role of Biostatisticians Biostatisticians play essential roles in designing studies, analyzing data and creating methods.
Diagnosis Examination(MMSE) in detecting dementia among elderly patients living in the community. Excel.
PTP 560 Research Methods Week 12 Thomas Ruediger, PT.
Diagnostic Likelihood Ratio Presented by Juan Wang.
Diagnosis:Testing the Test Verma Walker Kathy Davies.
Biostatistics Board Review Parul Chaudhri, DO Family Medicine Faculty Development Fellow, UPMC St Margaret March 5, 2016.
© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC. Chapter 12 Clinical Epidemiology.
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Receiver- Operator Characteristic Curves 10/10/2013.
Sensitivity:DISEASE Specificity:PRESENTABSENT TEST RESULTS POSITIVEAbA+b NEGATIVECdC+d a+cb+da+b+c+d Lets recall the 2x2 contingency table Probability.
Role of Tests and Measures in Clinical Practice Paul Mintken PT, DPT, OCS, FAAOMPT Associate Editor, Tests & Measures, PTNow Associate Professor Physical.
Critical Appraisal Course for Emergency Medicine Trainees Module 5 Evaluation of a Diagnostic Test.
GP ST2 Group, 28/9/11 Tom Gamble
Diagnostic studies Adrian Boyle.
HelpDesk Answers Synthesizing the Evidence
Evidence-Based Medicine
Principles of Epidemiology E
Diagnosis II Dr. Brent E. Faught, Ph.D. Assistant Professor
Refining Probability Test Informations Vahid Ashoorion MD. ,MSc,
کارگاه تکميلی کشوری تربيت مربی آموزش طب مبتنی بر شواهد
Figure 1. Table for calculating the accuracy of a diagnostic test.
PICO model for developing EBM questions
Evidence Based Diagnosis
Basic statistics.
Presentation transcript:

Step 3: Critically Appraising the Evidence: Statistics for Diagnosis

Table of Contents Clinical Statistics Calculator (Excel) Statistics for: –Diagnosis Sensitivity (Sn) Specificity (Sp) Likelihood Ratios (LR) Pre-test Probabilities/Prevalence Post-Test Probabilities/Predictive Values

Making It Easier If available, find the best evidence in secondary sources where analysis has already occurred. If not pre-assessed, use critical appraisal worksheets to help you through the process.

Importance of Critically Appraising the Evidence Understanding the Limitations of the Author’s Analyses and Interpretations of the Data Assessing Internal Validity Assessing External Validity Identifying Potential Confounding Variables –Simpson’s ParadoxSimpson’s Paradox

Critical Appraisal Basics View movie as: –QuickTime (.mov)QuickTime (.mov) –Flash (.swf)Flash (.swf) Double-click on video for full-screen mode.

Generalized 2x2 Clinical Table Target Outcome +- Intervention/ Comparison +a (True Positives) b (False Positives) -c (False Negatives) d (True Negatives)

Sensitivity and Specificity View movie as: –QuickTime (.mov)QuickTime (.mov) –Flash (.swf)Flash (.swf) Double-click on video for full-screen mode.

Diagnostic Table Target DisorderTotal PresentAbsent Diagnostic Test Result +aba + b -cdc + d Totala + cb + da + b + c + d Sensitivity a/(a+c) Specificity d/(b+d)

Sensitivity Answers the question: When the target disorder was present, what fraction of the time did the diagnostic test produce positive results? –Excludes all trials where the diagnostic test produced negative results

Calculating Sensitivity How many times was the target disorder actually present?: a+c How many of these times did the diagnostic test produce positive results?: a –Note: We do not count the number of times the diagnostic test produced positive results when the target disorder was absent (b). We are only interested in the cases where target disorder was present. So what fraction of the total number of times the target disorder was present did the diagnostic test produced positive results?: a / (a + c)

Try it Yourself: Calculating Sensitivity 1 Step 1: How many times was the target disorder actually present? a ca + b a + c

Calculating Sensitivity Bingo! The target disorder was present a+c times.

Calculating Sensitivity Sorry. That is incorrect. The target disorder was present a+c times

Calculating Sensitivity 2 How many of these times did the diagnostic test produce positive results? –Note: We do not count the number of times the diagnostic test produced positive results when the target disorder was absent (b). We are only interested in the cases where target disorder was present.

Try it Yourself: Calculating Sensitivity 2 Step 2: How many of these times did the diagnostic test produce positive results?: a ca + b a + c

Calculating Sensitivity Bingo! The diagnostic test produced positive results a times.

Calculating Sensitivity Sorry. That is incorrect. The diagnostic test produced positive results a times

Try it Yourself: Calculating Sensitivity 3 Step 3: So what fraction of the total number of times the target disorder was present did the diagnostic test produced positive results?: c/(a + c) c/(b + c) a/(a + b) a/(a + c)

Calculating Sensitivity Bingo! The target disorder was present a out of (a + c) times that the diagnostic test produced positive results. So the correct answer is a/(a + c).

Calculating Sensitivity Sorry. That is incorrect. The target disorder was present a out of (a + c) times that the diagnostic test produced positive results. So the correct answer is a/(a + c).

Specificity Answers the question: When the target disorder was not present, what fraction of the time did the diagnostic test produce negative results? –Excludes all trials where the diagnostic test produced positive results

Calculating Specificity 1 How many times was the target disorder absent?: b+d How many of these times did the diagnostic test produce negative results?: d –Note: We do not count the number of times the diagnostic test produced negative results when the target disorder was present (c). We are only interested in the cases where the target disorder was absent. So what fraction of the total number of times the target disorder was absent did the diagnostic test produced negative results?: b/(b+d)

Helpful Acronyms Specificity – SpPin (spin) –When a test has a high Specificity, a Positive test rules in the diagnosis. Sensitivity – SnNout (snout) –When a test has a high Sensitivity, a Negative test rules out the diagnosis.

Another Way of Looking at It Specificity –1 - α –Probability of not getting a Type I Error/ α Error/False Positive Sensitivity –1 - Β –Probability of not getting a Type II Error/ Β Error/False Negative –Also know as the statistical power of the test

Sensitivity/Specificity Example View movie as: –QuickTime (.mov)QuickTime (.mov) –Flash (.swf)Flash (.swf) Double-click on video for full-screen mode.

Likelihood Ratios Likelihood Ratio for a Positive Result (LR+) –The number of patients testing positive for the target disorder who have the disease for every patient testing positive that does not have it Likelihood Ratio for a Negative Result (LR-) –The number of patients testing negative for the target disorder who have the disease for every patient testing negative that does not have it

Calculating Likelihood Ratios Likelihood Ratio for a Positive Result (LR+) –sensitivity/(1-specificity) Likelihood Ratio for a Negative Result (LR-) –(1-sensitivity)/specificity

Likelihood Ratios Video View movie as: –QuickTime (.mov)QuickTime (.mov) –Flash (.swf)Flash (.swf) Double-click on video for full-screen mode.

How to use Likelihood Ratios View movie as: –QuickTime (.mov)QuickTime (.mov) –Flash (.swf)Flash (.swf) Double-click on video for full-screen mode.

Likelihood Ratio Example View movie as: –QuickTime (.mov)QuickTime (.mov) –Flash (.swf)Flash (.swf) Double-click on video for full-screen mode.

Prevalence and Probability View movie as: –QuickTime (.mov)QuickTime (.mov) –Flash (.swf)Flash (.swf) Double-click on video for full-screen mode.

Prevalence Fraction of the population at risk at a given time who have the target disease

Pre-Test Probability Probability that a patient has the target disease without knowing the results of a diagnostic test

Calculating Prevalence (a+c)/(a+b+c+d) The number of those with the disease divided by the total number of people

Post-Test Probabilities Positive Predictive Value –Probability that a patient with a positive diagnostic test actually has the disease Negative Predictive Value –Probability that a patient with a negative diagnostic test actually does not have the disease

Calculating Predictive Values Positive Predictive Values (+PV) – a/(a+b) Negative Predictive Values (-PV) –c/(c+d)

Predictive Values View movie as: –QuickTime (.mov)QuickTime (.mov) –Flash (.swf)Flash (.swf) Double-click on video for full-screen mode.

Try it on your own. Critical Appraisal Practice Exercises –From CEBM

Links to Other Websites and Hands-On Activities EBM Glossary –From CEBM Critical Appraisal Practice Exercises –From CEBM

Congratulations! You have successfully completed Step 3. The End