Subrecipient Monitoring Webcast Presenters Pat O'Rourke, Irene St. Croix, Bridget Ware Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FEDERAL FUNDING ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY ACT (FFATA)
Advertisements

New FFATA Reporting Requirements: Subawards and Executive Compensation Doretha Dixon, Grants Policy Analyst Department of Health and Human Services Health.
The Governors Grants Office Presents: Smart Issues for Effective Grants Management Governors Grants Office Higher Education Conference May 22, 2012 Martin.
OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
A-133 Compliance & Audit Readiness Presented By: Tracy Jackson and Susan Cook.
OMB Circular A-133 Audits of States, Local Governments and Non-Profit Organizations CReATE May 2013 Cathi Bass, Grants Compliance Manager Sponsored Research.
Rules Governing Sponsored Projects (aka OMB Circulars) Presented by Beverly Blakeney, Diane Cummings and Julie Macy.
OMB Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Part 200.  The final guidance was issued on December 26, 2013 and supersedes and streamlines requirements from OMB Circulars.
Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Training Overview OMB.
FHWA Implementation of the Transparency Act October 5,
4/28/20151 Presented by: Anne Taylor, NECTAC David Steele, OSEP OSEP Part C Fiscal Management Verification: What Is It And How Do I Prepare For It?
New Uniform Guidance Combines the requirements of OMB Circulars A-21, A-87, A-110, A-122, A-89, A-102, A-133, and A-50 into a streamlined format. *NOTE:
Subrecipient Monitoring CCIA Spring Conference Sheena Tran, Rancho Santiago CCD Tania Walden, Los Rios CCD Tracy Young, Coast CCD May 2013.
Subawards and Subcontracts Sponsored Projects Training Program October 17 th, 2011 Renee Hunt, Julie Macy & Dawn Pelkey.
Grant Guidance Changes
Presented by Edward A. Hofma, CPA, CGMA Principal in the CPA firm of Averett Warmus Durkee, PA 1417 East Concord Street Orlando, Florida (407) 849.
P rogram and Financial Integrity Preparing for the A-133 September 17, 2013 Presented by Lawrence Horlamus, Auditor Office of Federal Assistance Management.
THE NEW OMB SUPERCIRCULAR: WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO YOU?
Subrecipient Monitoring OFFICE OF RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION 2010.
DII Best Practices Forum: New Developments Peter J. Eyre Crowell & Moring © Crowell & Moring LLP All Rights Reserved. June 23, 2011.
Subawards and Subrecipient Monitoring
Dionysios Karamalikis November 9,  Award Identification—At the time of the award, identifying to the sub-recipient the federal award information.
FEDERAL FUNDING ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY ACT OF 2006 (FFATA)
Implementing the Uniform Guidance U.S. Department of Education.
Prior Approval? Is That A Fact? Attention! Uniformed Guidance Audit Anyone? $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100.
Grants.maryland.gov The Governor’s Grants Office Presents Successful Post Award Grants Management For the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Lifecycle.
Financial Management For Project Administrators. How Feds View Themselves.
FFATA – Town Hall Meeting Kim Linkous, CRA Director of Post Award Office of Sponsored Programs Virginia Tech
1 F EDERAL F UNDING A CCOUNTABILITY AND T RANSPARENCY A CT R EPORTING R EQUIREMENTS U.S. Department of Education Risk Management Service Guidance for Grantees.
Financial Management Stacey Jones, Resolution Specialist OGCM- Division of Policy, Review and Resolution Young Offender Grants New Grantee Orientation.
ARRA Reporting Training LSU Health Sciences Center at New Orleans September 29, 2009.
F EDERAL F UNDING A CCOUNTABILITY AND T RANSPARENCY A CT R EPORTING Utah Governor’s Office of Planning and Budget December 9, 2010.
Subaward and Executive Compensation  Requires prime recipients to report on first- tier subawards of $25K or more.  Requires prime recipients to report.
2015 VOCA National Training Conference Grant Financial Management.
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
Presented by Raaj Kurapati and Charlene Hart. Introduction  The Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 was enacted to streamline and improve the effectiveness.
The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards The OMB SuperCircular Information for FTA Grantees.
BTOP OVERSIGHT WASHINGTON D.C. MAY 2012 U.S. DOC Inspector General Recovery Act Oversight Task Force 1.
Page 1 Discretionary Grants Administration David J. Downey Office of the Deputy Secretary Risk Management Service.
Presented by: Dan Parker/FHWA. Streamlines the language from eight OMB circulars to one consolidated set of guidance. The following have been combined.
FHWA Implementation 2CFR 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards September 2015.
USDOL REGION 3 FISCAL FORUM Introduction to Grants ManagementApril 26 – 29, 2005.
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY IN TITLE III AND OTHER SPONSORED PROGRAMS AND GRANTS ADMINISTRATION Presented by Sharon S. Crews, M.Ac., CPA Vice President for Administrative.
The University Corporation Cost Sharing Sponsored Programs The University Corporation Research, Investments and Commercial Services California State University,
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
New NSF Awardee Checklist Requirements: WHY? November 19, 2014 joyce y. JOHNSON POST-AWARDS COORDINATOR OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS.
Subaward and Executive Compensation  Requires prime recipients to report on first- tier subawards of $25K or more.  Requires prime recipients to report.
Webinar for FY 2011 i3 Grantees February 9, 2012 Fiscal Oversight of i3 Grants Erin McHughJames Evans, CPA, CGFM, CGMA Office of Innovation and Improvement.
Audit and Audit Resolution Presented by Wendy Spivey ADECA Audit Manager.
Preston Alderman MSDE, Director of Audit.  As recipients of federal and state funds we are charged with ensuring that the funds are adequately accounted.
Arkansas Association of Federal Coordinators September 23, 2011.
SUBAWARDS & SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING UNIFORM GUIDANCE AT K-STATE 2 CFR Part 200 – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP P RESENTED B Y : M ARCY F RIEDLE C OLLABORATIONS : S UBRECIPIENT V. C ONTRACTOR.
Indirect Cost Rates 101 CNCS Uniform Guidance § Indirect Costs.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
Uniform Administrative Requirements 2014 YouthBuild Webinar Series.
Sponsored Project Administration Fall 2012 CERTIFICATION PROGRAM Sponsored Project Lifecycle Introduction Overview Creating a Project Budget Compliance.
A risk assessment is the process of identifying potential hazards an organization may face and analyzing methods of response if exposure occurs.
Prior Approval? Is That A Fact? Attention! Uniformed Guidance Audit Anyone? $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100.
What’s your friend up to? Subrecipient Monitoring Issues Tom Egan, MIT OSP Jeannette Gordon, Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight OPERA, OER, NIH.
Maryland State Department of Education Brief Update on Select Fiscal Matters Related to Grant Issuance and Management Title I Spring Meeting 2016 Kim Stewart,
Juanita Syljuberget Alabama Cooperative Extension System May 23, 2012.
SF-425 Exercise Report actual expenditures not disbursements from Federal Government Report from the lowest level in Section 10 Report correct indirect.
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
Subaward - 2 CFR A formal legal agreement between your institution and another legal entity An award provided by a pass-through entity (PTE) to.
OMB Super Circular Big Changes for Nonprofits
The Importance of Subrecipient Monitoring
Subrecipient vs. Contractor Determinations
Presentation transcript:

Subrecipient Monitoring Webcast Presenters Pat O'Rourke, Irene St. Croix, Bridget Ware Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration Program Integrity Team

Agenda Program Integrity Why Monitor Subrecipients Funding Subrecipients Definitions Characteristics of a Subrecipient Sub-Award Agreement Federal Regulations Pre-Award Monitoring Post-Award Monitoring Wrap Up

Program Integrity This session is part of HRSA’s Program Integrity series Program Integrity aims to help: o ensure programmatic compliance, efficiency, and accountability o identify vulnerabilities that can adversely affect the integrity of the program o detect and prevent fraud, waste, and abuse

Why Monitor Subrecipients? For program integrity assurance To meet Federal regulations reporting requirements It’s the law!

Funding Subrecipients Funding vehicle can either be a grant or contract Prime Recipient Subrecipient

Definitions Prime Recipient – Entity who receives a direct award from the agency to carry out a Federal program Subrecipient - Non-Federal entity that expends Federal awards on behalf of the prime recipient to carry out a Federal program

Definitions Subaward - A legal instrument to provide support for the performance of any portion of the substantive project or program for which the recipient received the funds and then awards to an eligible subrecipient.

Who Is Not a Subrecipient? A vendor is not a subrecipient A dealer, distributor, merchant, or other seller providing goods or services that is required for the conduct of the sponsored program

Characteristics of a Subrecipient Has responsibility for making programmatic decision Has responsibility for adherence to applicable programs compliance requirements Has its performance measured against program objectives Uses funds to carry out a program as compared to providing goods or services for a program

Sub-Award Agreement Inform subrecipients of: –Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number –Award information –Notice of Award (NoA) terms and conditions –Reporting requirements –Circular A-133 requirement if expending $500K or more in Federal awards

Sub-Award Agreement At a minimum, the sub-award agreement must include the following: –Programmatic roles and responsibilities of individuals at the subrecipient’s organization –Procedures for directing and monitoring the programmatic effort –Procedures to be followed in providing funding to the subrecipient –Applicable policy that meets HRSA’s requirement

Federal Regulations Cost Principles: –2 CFR part 220 –2 CFR part 225 –2 CFR part 230 Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) OMB Circular A-133

Federal Cost Principles Sub-award to State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments, 2 CFR part 225 shall apply Sub-award to a college or university, 2 CFR part 220 (Circular A–21) shall apply Sub-award to a commercial organization, FAR Subpart 31.2 the cost principles applicable to commercial organizations shall apply Sub-award to some other non-profit organization, 2 CFR part 230, Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations (Circular A–122), shall apply Sub-award to a hospital, 45 CFR 74 (Appendix E) Principles for Determining Cost Applicable to Research and Development under Grants and Contracts with Hospitals, shall apply

The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) The Act was signed on September 26, 2006 Requires information on Federal awards (Federal financial assistance and expenditures) to be made available to the public via a single, searchable website, which is

FFATA Sub-Award Reporting System (FSRS) Reporting tool Federal prime awardees use to meet FFATA reporting requirements –i.e., prime contractors and prime grants recipients FSRS captures and reports sub-award and executive compensation data regarding first-tier sub-awards

FFATA Requirements

FFATA Requirements when Funds Reduce If an initial award equals or exceeds $25,000 …but is subsequently de-obligated and falls below $25,000 The award continues to be subject to the reporting requirements of the Transparency Act

Reporting Timeline for Prime Recipients The prime recipient is required to file a FFATA sub-award report by the end of the month following the month in which the prime recipient awards any sub-grant or subcontract greater than or equal to $25,000

Executive Compensation An executive is an officer, managing partner, or any other employees in management positions Total compensation includes cash and noncash dollar value earned by the executive during the subrecipient’s preceding fiscal year (17 CFR (c)(2))

Executive Compensation 80% or more of prior year annual gross revenues are from Federal awards; and $25 million or more in annual gross revenues are from Federal awards; and the public does not have access to compensation information filed under SEC and IRS requirements 80% $25M No access periodic reports Names and total compensation of the five most highly compensated officers are required

Costs Associated with Sub-Awards Audit costs and related services –The costs of audits required by Circular A-133 –Other audit costs included in a cost allocation plan or indirect cost proposal Settlement expenses –Accounting, legal, clerical, and similar costs reasonably necessary for: The termination and settlement of sub-awards

Pre-Award Monitoring Verify the subrecipients have not been debarred or suspended from receiving Federal funds at M// M// Determine whether the applicant is a subrecipient or a vendor

Pre-Award Monitoring Request agreement documents to be returned at a reasonable deadline Verify subrecipient written agreement has been completed with all required information Review the budget to ensure the correct rates are being used

Post-Award Monitoring Review all documentation Ensure the correct indirect cost rate and fringe benefit rate have been used Ensure the budget is reasonable and only allowable costs have been included

Post-Award Monitoring Review ongoing programmatic effort and expenditures Log communications with the subrecipient Maintain a Risk Assessment Log - include entities with A-133 findings or have been written off for non- payment

Wrap Up Program Integrity is key to meet program objectives Federal regulations require subrecipient monitoring The Prime recipient must report sub-award data in the FFATA Sub-Award Reporting System (FSRS)

Resources Public Law FFATA Legislation Public Law FFATA Legislation Federal Acquisition Regulation OMB Guidance on Subaward and Executive Compensation ReportingOMB Guidance on Subaward and Executive Compensation Reporting

You may contact the Program Integrity Team if you have questions your questions to Questions specific to grant policy should be sent to Contact Information