New York State Education Department October 8, 2014 “The Omni Circular: What You Need to Know to Administer a 21 st Century Education Program” Presented.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
Advertisements

Grants Administrative Changes under the New EDGAR
PLENARY SESSION Financial Management and Accountability Accountability and Grants Management: Connecting the Dots U.S. Department of Labor, ETA, Region.
Raúl Soto Ph.D., Associate Director CTE 1 CTE Funding & OMNI Circular.
OMB Circulars and Beyond Nancy Duncan, Award Analysis Supervisor Sponsored Projects Administration.
THE SUPER CIRCULAR – “OMNI CIRCULAR” THE ONE-STOP SHOP FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE OMB Revised Administrative, Cost, Audit Rules Governing All Federal Grants.
New Uniform Guidance Combines the requirements of OMB Circulars A-21, A-87, A-110, A-122, A-89, A-102, A-133, and A-50 into a streamlined format. *NOTE:
The Super Circular – “Omni Circular”
TIFFANY R. WINTERS, ESQ. BRETTE KAPLAN WURZBURG, ESQ. BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC OCTOBER Grant Allowability Changes Under the OMB.
Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards University Senate Meeting Martha Taylor.
Presented by Edward A. Hofma, CPA, CGMA Principal in the CPA firm of Averett Warmus Durkee, PA 1417 East Concord Street Orlando, Florida (407) 849.
Key Aspects of the New Omni Circular
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Implementing the Uniform Guidance U.S. Department of Education.
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
Subrecipient Monitoring Under the New Uniform Guidance Steven A. Spillan, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2015.
New Responsibilities of Pass Through Entities Under the Uniform Grant Guidance Jennifer S. Mauskapf, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC.
Purchasing Changes 2 CFR OSU Grants & Contracts Financial Administration.
Enhanced Assessment Grant1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Enhanced Assessment Grants (Updated June 2012)
1 Susan Weigert, Project Officer GSEGs Overview of GSEG Management.
MICHAEL BRUSTEIN, ESQ. BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC 1 Navigating the New EDGAR.
Audio is available via internet. Please be sure your… speakers are attached and turned on and your volume is up.
Drafting Compliant (and Some Newly Required) Policies and Procedures Tiffany Winters, Esq. Brustein & Mansevit, PLLC
Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal.
Presented by Michael Brustein, Esq. Bonnie L. Graham, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2013.
Uniform Grant Guidance Laura Hirst Office of the Auditor General.
The Uniform Grants Guidance - Compliance Starts Now Are You Ready? Virginia Department of Education Roanoke, VA July 2015 Leigh Manasevit Brustein & Manasevit,
Effective Management and Compliance 1 ANA GRANTEE MEETING  FEBRUARY 5, 2015.
2015 VOCA National Training Conference Grant Financial Management.
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
Omni Circular Key Area #7: New Responsibilities of the Pass- Through Agency By Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring.
UT-Arlington Accounting CPE Day August 13, 2014 SEFA Preparation and Subrecipient Monitoring.
The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards The OMB SuperCircular Information for FTA Grantees.
Page 1 Discretionary Grants Administration David J. Downey Office of the Deputy Secretary Risk Management Service.
Presented by: Dan Parker/FHWA. Streamlines the language from eight OMB circulars to one consolidated set of guidance. The following have been combined.
FHWA Implementation 2CFR 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards September 2015.
Risk and Subaward Management under the Uniform Guidance U.S. Department of Education.
PRESENTED BY MICHAEL BRUSTEIN, ESQ. NEVADA AEFLA DIRECTORS A DISCUSSION OF FEDERAL ISSUES NOVEMBER 28, 2012 HYATT PLACE.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
The Impact of OMB Circulars (Super or Otherwise) on Federal Programs Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum.
GRANTS MANAGEMENT TEST FOR STATE AND LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES Tiffany R. Winters, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
Audit and Audit Resolution Presented by Wendy Spivey ADECA Audit Manager.
Preston Alderman MSDE, Director of Audit.  As recipients of federal and state funds we are charged with ensuring that the funds are adequately accounted.
What Laws Apply to Federal Grants: A Historical Perspective Leigh M. Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.
Obligations, Tydings and Complying with Cash Management Requirements Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit,
What Laws Apply to Federal Grants: A Historical Perspective Leigh M. Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring.
DEVELOPING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum.
Office of Sponsored Programs- OMB Uniform Guidance October 21, 2015.
Tiffany R. Winters, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit November Federal Grants Administration Changes Under the New EDGAR.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
How To Ensure Your Agency Has A Strong Subrecipient Monitoring System Jennifer S. Mauskapf, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Accounting for Grant Funds, including Documentation for Expenditures.
A risk assessment is the process of identifying potential hazards an organization may face and analyzing methods of response if exposure occurs.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Other Key Uniform Administrative Grant Requirements.
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
UNIFORM GUIDANCE: RESULTS AND BEST PRACTICES
Subaward - 2 CFR A formal legal agreement between your institution and another legal entity An award provided by a pass-through entity (PTE) to.
The Administration of Subrecipient Agreements
Other Key Uniform Administrative Grant Requirements
The Importance of Subrecipient Monitoring
Avoiding Financial Management Pitfalls: The Mississippi Story
EDGAR OVERVIEW Michael L. Brustein, Esq.
Policies & Procedures A How-To Guide Bonnie Graham, Esq.
To Accountability…and Beyond
Drafting Compliant (and Some Newly Required) Policies and Procedures
Managing Federal grants
EDGAR 201 Steven A. Spillan, Esq.
A Tutorial on Grants Management Rules Under EDGAR
Presentation transcript:

New York State Education Department October 8, 2014 “The Omni Circular: What You Need to Know to Administer a 21 st Century Education Program” Presented by Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

1. FOCUS ON OUTCOMES 2. PERFORMANCE METRICS 3. RISK ASSESSMENTS 4. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT POLICIES 5. EQUIPMENT USE 6. MICRO PURCHASES 7. CORRECTIVE ACTION 8. FAMILY FRIENDLY POLICIES 9. FALSE CLAIMS CERTIFICATIONS 10. AUDIT THRESHOLDS 2 The Major Themes Impacting Federal Grants Management

Key Dates: Dec 26, 2013Federal Register 26/pdf/ pdf 26/pdf/ pdf June 26, 2014ED Draft EDGAR Changes August 29, 2014COFAR Releases FAQ Dec 26, 2014Final EDGAR Published 3

Date of Applicability of Revised Rules OMB stated on 12/20/13All Drawdowns, after December 26, 2014 ? ? ? 4

What is covered? A-102 – Administrative Rules State / Local – Part 80 – EDGAR A-110 – Administrative Rules Postsecondary – Part 74 – EDGAR A-87 – Cost Rules – State / Local A-21 – Cost Rules – Rules – Postsecondary A-122 – Cost Rules – Nonprofit A-133 – Audit Rules (>$750,000) 5

Who is covered? All “nonfederal entities” expending federal awards 6

Reasons for the Change? 1. Simplicity 2. Consistency 3. Obama Executive Order on Regulatory Review  Increase Efficiency  Strengthen Oversight 7

2 CFR PART Structure of Omni-Circular (p )

(p ) 9 Subpart A – Definitions Subpart B – General Provisions Subpart C – Pre Award Requirements Subpart D – Post Award Requirements Subpart E – Cost Principles Subpart F – Audit Requirements

Key Definitions 10 Cognizant Agency for Audit (78611) Cognizant Agency for Indirect (78611) Computing Devices (78612) Cooperative Audit Resolution (78612) Cost Objective (78612)

11 Internal Control Over Compliance (78615) Major Program (78615) Micro Purchase (78615) Modified Total Direct Cost (78615) Non-Federal Entity (78615)

12 Conflict of Interest  (78621)

13 Mandatory Disclosures  (78621)

Financial Management Controls The Key Component to Federal Grants

Quick Overview of New Financial Management Requirements: 1. Performance Metrics 2. Risk Management 3. Augmented Pass-Through Responsibilities 4. Emphasis on Immediate Corrective Action 5. Cooperative Audit Resolution 15

WHY?? All oversight will examine financial management controls: 1) OIG Audit 2) Single Audit 3) Federal Program Monitoring 4) “Pass Through” Monitoring 16

New Risk Assessment Will be Based on Financial Management Controls 17

The more attention paid to financial management controls, fewer headaches down the road!!! 18

Crosswork Between 34 CFR (b) and CFR (b) 34 CFR (b) 1. Financial Reporting 2. Accounting Records 3. Internal Control 4. Budget Control 5. Allowable Cost 6. Source Documentation 7. Cash Management 2 CFR (b) 1. Identification of Awards 2. Financial Reporting 3. Accounting Records (Source Docs) 4. Internal Control 5. Budget Control 6. Written Cash Management Procedures 7. Written Allowability Procedures 19

1) Identification of Awards (New) All federal “awards” received and expended The name of the federal “program” Identification # of award  CFDA Title and Number  Federal Award I.D. #  Fiscal Year of Award  Federal Agency  Pass-Through (If S/A) 20

2) Financial Reporting New shift to OMB approved performance metrics 21

2) Financial Reporting (cont.) Accurate, current, complete disclosure of financial results of each award (Old) in accord with the financial reporting requirements of the grant (New) in accord with and – Federal awarding agency can only collect OMB approved data elements, no less than annually, no more than quarterly – Non federal entity must submit performance reports at intervals required by federal agency or pass through. Annual performance reports due 90 days after reporting period; Quarterly performance reports due 30 days after reporting period 22

2) Financial Reporting (cont.) Performance Metrics: 1. Compare actual accomplishments to objectives. (quantify to extent possible) 2. Reasons goals were not met if appropriate 3. Additional pertinent information (e.g. analysis and explanation of cost overruns, high unit costs) 23

2) Financial Reporting (cont.) 4. Significant developments a. Problems, delays. Adverse conditions that would impair ability to meet objective of the award b. Favorable developments. Finishing sooner or at less cost 24

2) Financial Reporting (Cont.) OMB Allows ED to waive “performance metrics” not required. How will ED reconcile performance metrics with accountability / performance indicators of ESEA, IDEA, CTE, AEFLA 25

3) Accounting Records (Source Documentation) Combines (b)(2) and (b)(6) Source Documentation on: 1. Federal Awards 2. Authorizations 3. Obligations 4. Unobligated balances 5. Assets 6. Expenditures 7. Income 8. Interest (New) Eliminatedliabilities 26

4) Internal Control Essentially same as (b) (3) Effective control over and accountability for: 1. All funds 2. Property 3. Other assets Must adequately safeguard all assets Use assets solely for authorized purpose 27

4) Internal Control (cont.) Cross reference (New) Internal controls “should” be in compliance with Comptroller General’s “Standard for Internal Control Integrated Framework” and “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission 28

4) Internal Control (cont.) Comply with federal statutes, regs, terms of the award Evaluate and monitor compliance Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are identified Safeguard protected personally identifiable information 29

5) Budget Control Same as (b)(4) Comparison of expenditures with budget amounts for each award 30

6) Written Cash Management Procedures (New) Written Procedures to implement the requirements of

6) Written Cash Management Procedures (cont.) For states, payments are governed by Treasury – State CMIA agreements 31 CFR Part 205 No Change 32

6) Written Cash Management Procedures (cont.) For all other non federal entities, payments must minimize time elapsing between draw from G-5 and disbursement (not obligation) 33

6) Written Cash Management Procedures (cont.) Written procedures must describe whether non- federal entity uses: 1) Advance Payments (preferred) Limited to minimum amounts needed to meet immediate cash needs 2) Reimbursement Pass through must make payment within 30 calendar days after receipt of the billing 3) Working Capital Advance The pass through determines that the nonfederal entity lacks sufficient working capital. Allows advance payment to cover estimated disbursement needs for initial period 34

6) Written Cash Management Procedures (cont.) Non federal entity must use existing resources before requesting an advance: program income, refunds, rebates, interest earned 35

6) Written Cash Management Procedures (cont.) 36 For all other non federal entities, payments must minimize time elapsing between draw from G-5 and disbursement (not obligation).

6) Written Cash Management Procedures (cont.) Payments must not be withheld from nonfederal entities unless finding of noncompliance debt to the U.S. (Treasury Offset Program), or nonfederal entity is withholding payment to a vendor to assure satisfactory completion of work 37

6) Written Cash Management Procedures (cont.) Advances must be maintained in insured accounts Pass through cannot require separate depository accounts Accounts must be interest bearing unless: 1. Aggregate federal awards under $120, Account not expected to earn in excess of $500 per year 3. Bank require minimum balance so high, that such account not feasible 38

6) Written Cash Management Procedures (cont.) Interest earned must be remitted annually to HHS Interest amounts up to $500 may be retained by non federal entity for administrative purposes 39

7) Written Allowability Procedures (New) Written procedures for determining allowability of costs in accord with Subpart E – Cost Principles (see p – 78662) 40

7) Written Allowability Procedures (Cont.) Not a restatement of Subpart E But a GPS through grant development and budget process Training tool for employees 41

42 Payment  (78625)

43 Program Income  (78627)

44 Revision of Budget and Program Plans  (78628)

45 Period of Performance  (78629)  Compare to EDGAR 34 CFR

46 Insurance Coverage  (78629)  Compare to 34 CFR

47 Equipment  (78629)  Significant changes on use and disposition

48 Supplies  (78630)  Covers computers

49 Procurement “Bear Claw”

50 Contract vs. Grant  Note the difference!!

Pass-Through Agency Responsibilities 51

A pass-through entity means a non-federal entity that provides a subaward to a subrecipient to carry out part of a federal program (e.g. ESEA, IDEA, CTE, AEFLA) 52

Under EDGAR / A-102, pass through responsibilities primarily described in 34 CFR – Monitoring of Subgrantees (Note – Part 76* on S/A programs will not change significantly) *And Part 75 53

But OMB / COFAR shifted many new responsibilities to the pass-through, over and above

Omni Circular NPRM (February 1, 2013) proposed reduction of the number of types of compliance requirements in the compliance supplement 55

Many pass-throughs opposed this reduction because of burden on them. OMB punted p

Monitoring Responsibilities of the Pass-Through CFR Non federal entity is responsible for oversight of the operations of the federally supported activities 57

New Risk management Requirements for Pass-Throughs 58

Pass-through must evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of non compliance (federal statute / regulations / terms of award) for purpose of monitoring 59

Risk Factors: 1. Subrecipient’s prior experience with the grant program 2. Results of previous audits 3. New personnel or substantially changed systems 4. Results of federal monitoring 60

Pass-through may impose conditions on subgrant based on risk assessment: 1. Shift to reimbursement 2. Withhold payments until evidence of acceptable performance 3. Require more reporting 4. Require additional monitoring 5. Require additional technical or management assistance 6. Establish additional prior approvals 61

Pass-through must monitor its subrecipients to assure compliance and performance goals are achieved 62

Monitoring must include: 1. Review financial and programmatic reports 2. Ensure corrective action 3. Issue a “management decision” on audit findings if the award is from the pass-through 63

Types of monitoring tools (depending on risk assessment) 1. Providing training and technical assistance 2. On-site reviews 3. Arranging for “agreed upon procedures” (less than $750,000) 64

Pass-through must verify all subrecipients (> $750,000) have single audits 65

Pass-through must adjust its own financial records based on audits, monitoring, on-site reviews 66

Pass-through must consider taking enforcement action based on non compliance: 1. Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction 2. Disallow all or part of the cost 3. Wholly or partly suspend the award 4. Recommend to federal awarding agency suspension / debarment 5. Withhold further federal awards 6. Other remedies that may be legally available 67

The pass-through may terminate the award for “cause”, notice and opportunity for hearing ( and ) 68

Record Retention (78636) 69 Retention Collection and Transmission Access

Non-Compliance (78637) 70 Remedies Termination Notification Appeals Suspension Collection of Amounts Due

71 Subpart E – Cost Principles (78639)

72 Policy Guide (78639)

Basic Considerations (78640) 73 Composition of Costs Allowability Reasonable Costs Allocability Applicable Credits Prior Written Approval

Direct and Indirect Costs (78642) 74 Composition of Costs Direct Costs Indirect Costs

75 False Claims Certifications  (78643)

76 Promotional Costs  (78645)

77 Personnel Compensation  (78646)

78 Conferences  (78650) (see Attachment)

79 Costs of Appeals  (78651)

80 Employee Morale  (78652)

81 Memberships  (78657)

82 Student Activity Costs  (78660)

83 Travel Costs  (78661)

84 Audits  (78662)

Questions? 85

Disclaimer This presentation is intended solely to provide general information and does not constitute legal advice. Attendance at the presentation or later review of these printed materials does not create an attorney-client relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC. You should not take any action based upon any information in this presentation without first consulting legal counsel familiar with your particular circumstances. 86