1 2004 OMB Exhibit 53 Changes Briefing Presented by the Office of the Chief Information Officer June 5, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning, Budgeting, Acquisition & Management of Capital Assets Capital programming is an integrated process within an agency for planning, budgeting,
Advertisements

Effectively Integrating Information Technology (IT) Security into the Acquisition Process Section 4: Effective Integration.
SYSTEM OF EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT CONTROL RESULTS-BASED BUDGETING THE CHILEAN EXPERIENCE Heidi Berner H Head of Management Control Division Budget Office,
4/28/20151 Presented by: Anne Taylor, NECTAC David Steele, OSEP OSEP Part C Fiscal Management Verification: What Is It And How Do I Prepare For It?
Subrecipient Monitoring CCIA Spring Conference Sheena Tran, Rancho Santiago CCD Tania Walden, Los Rios CCD Tracy Young, Coast CCD May 2013.
TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
NLRB: Information Security & FISMA Daniel Wood, Chief IT Security February 19, 2004.
Cybersecurity Summit 2004 Andrea Norris Deputy Chief Information Officer/ Director of Division of Information Systems.
Introduction & Background Laurene Christensen National Center on Educational Outcomes National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO)
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
Trini Torres-Carrion. AGENDA Overview of ED 524B Resources Q&A.
Complying With The Federal Information Security Act (FISMA)
The Acquisition Community’s Role in Capital Planning and Investment Control Patricia E. Corrigan DOI Office of Acquisition and Property Management U.S.
I/3 Budget FY 2008 Department Request Training Nickie Whitaker Department of Management August 14, 2006.
Information Security Compliance System Owner Training Richard Gadsden Information Security Office Office of the CIO – Information Services Sharon Knowles.
Proposed EA Assessment Framework 2.0 Chief Architect’s Forum (CAF) Dick Burk Chief Architect and Director of Federal Enterprise Architecture Program, OMB.
ADLA Budget Application For Parishes
Office of Acquisition and Property Management Completing an Effective Project Data Sheet (PDS)
Requisition Process Procurement Services Laurie Krauel Updated
EEC Internal Control Plan (ICP) FY2013. Direction from Secretary Malone Acting EEC Commissioner Thomas Weber shall initiate a top-to-bottom review of.
Enterprise Service Desk (ESD) Enterprise Service Desk Approvers and SDR Overview.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
FY 2011 Part A Program Updates May 17, 2011 The HIV/AIDS Bureau Division of Service Systems.
Welcome to the Regional SPR&I trainings Be sure to sign in Be sure to sign in You should have one school age OR EI/ECSE packet of handouts You.
Important acronyms AO = authorizing official ISO = information system owner CA = certification agent.
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
Monitoring Schedule David Chappell, or
December 14, 2011/Office of the NIH CIO Operational Analysis – What Does It Mean To The Project Manager? NIH Project Management Community of Excellence.
The Auditors are Coming (Part I) Prepare for Federal Program Fiscal Monitoring Visits July 26, 2006.
ECPIC Quick Guide: eCPIC-ITDB Interactions Purpose: The eCPIC-ITDB Interactions Quick Guide has been developed to provide a high-level, informational overview.
1 This Presentation is printed on recycled materials.
Review of the Operational Policies and Guidelines: key issues from a civil society perspective Sven Harmeling, Germanwatch Held.
Disaster Recover Planning & Federal Information Systems Management Act Requirements December 2007 Central Maryland ISACA Chapter.
0 Un ited States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program Enterprise Architecture Working Group.
1 © Material United States Department of the Interior Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) April 2008 Larry Ruffin & Joe Seger.
Presenter’s Name June 17, Directions for this Template  Use the Slide Master to make universal changes to the presentation, including inserting.
Region Three Pilot “Virtual” Consolidation. Consolidation Legislation and Guidance Title I Schoolwide Fiscal Guidance issued February, 2008 [Section E]
Office of Management and Budget NDIA Program Management Systems Committee May 3, 2005 EVMS Compliance Requirements David Muzio.
Department of Defense Knowledge Fair Tim Young Office of Management and Budget September 27, 2007.
Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) By K. Brenner OCIO Internship Summer 2013.
1 Commonwealth Project Management Division Bob Haugh Project Management Division November 15, 2010 Revision of.
SFY 2016 OLGA TRAINING. REGISTERING FOR AN ACCOUNT All OLGA users need to have an account on the Turnstile by going to the department website, or right.
Requirements for Public Computer Centers (PCCs) in the Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP) under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.
OMB’s Management Watch List (MWL) & High Risk Projects List How to More Effectively Track, Analyze and Evaluate Your Agency IT Investments October 9, 2007.
EGovOS Panel Discussion CIO Council Architecture & Infrastructure Committee Subcommittee Co-Chairs March 15, 2004.
Tulane Effort Reporting-Systems, Policies, Procedures ERS (Effort Reporting System) From paper to web based, remove from PAF Move from planned/confirmation.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education State Performance Plan and Annual Performance.
Preparing and Submitting PS&E Packages What does ODOT need? Local Agency Project Delivery Conference May 2 & 3, 2006.
Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) Architecture Plus Meeting December 4, 2007 Kshemendra Paul (Acting) Chief Architect.
IT PR Tool Update Session 11/04/2009. IT PR Tool Update Session – 11/04/2009 Roadmap – Welcome – Background – Overview of updates IT PR Tool dropdowns.
Select Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
The NIST Special Publications for Security Management By: Waylon Coulter.
OMB Status 03/31/05 Monday, June 6, 2005 OMB Progress 03/31/05 Vicki Novak Tom Luedtke Gwen SykesPat DunningtonGwen Sykes Best in Government! Steps to.
0 eCPIC User Training: v6.5 Webinars August 2014 These training materials are owned by the Federal Government. They can be used or modified only by FESCOM.
Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency 3rd Health Programme The Electronic Submission System (JA 2015) Georgios MARGETIDIS.
Important acronyms AO = authorizing official ISO = information system owner CA = certification agent.
NIST SP800 53R4 WMISACA Conferance April 2016 By Dean E Brown CISSP, ISSMP, CSSLP, MCSD Owner – ITSecurityAxioms.com 262 Barrington Cir Lansing, MI
COIT Planning & Budgeting
ISO Smart and Sustainable Cities developments
Introduction to the Federal Defense Acquisition Regulation
Implementation Plan for the Higher Education Sector
Webinar: ESSA Improvement Planning Requirements
Tulane Effort Reporting-Systems, Policies, Procedures
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
ISO Smart and Sustainable Cities developments
United Nations Voluntary Fund on Disability (UNVFD)
15 March 2017 Briefing to Portfolio Committee of the Higher Education and Training on review of the draft APPs.
TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Overview of The Bidder Response Form and Changes to the IT RFP Template March 8, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

OMB Exhibit 53 Changes Briefing Presented by the Office of the Chief Information Officer June 5, 2002

2 AGENDA Background Changes to Exhibit 53 Updating I-TIPS DOE Resources Next Steps

3 BACKGROUND Reporting requirements changing for 2004 –OMB distributed draft A-11, Section 53 in late May Section 53 describes IT portfolio data reporting requirements and focuses on how such investments should be linked to President’s Management Agenda (PMA), E-government Changes to Exhibit 53 requirements impact Exhibit 300 reporting requirements Changes also affect use of I-TIPS

4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM LAST YEAR Elimination of “significant” project category “Major” and “small/other” target percentages Definition of “major” IT systems expanded to include all investments that support PMA/E-Gov Inclusion of additional criteria for identifying IT Security costs; identification of security and financial percentages for “small/other” investments Requirement to identify “major” investment Funding Source(s) Other minor changes

5 CHANGES IN EXHIBIT 53 REQUIREMENTS Project Category Designations – “Significant” project category is eliminated. Projects must be identified as “major” or grouped into a “small/other” total. This may affect how many Exhibit 300s you submit. For each “small/other” investment, Financial and IT Security Percentages are required. Performance Goals for IT Investment Portfolio Percentages (Section 53.7) – “Major” projects should account for 60+ percent of DOE IT investment portfolio (entire Exhibit 53). In each mission area, “the greater percent of your IT expenditures should be … within the major category,” i.e., each mission area should report 50+% as “major”.

6 CHANGES IN EXHIBIT 53 REQUIREMENTS (cont. )  Expanded Definition of “major” Investments (Section 53.3) – “Major IT system or project means a system that requires special management attention because of its importance to an agency mission... Large infrastructure investments (e.g., major purchases of personal computers or local area network improvements) should be evaluated against [“major” IT system or project] criteria… Additionally, if the project or initiative directly supports the President's Management Agenda Items, then the project meets the criteria of "high executive visibility". Projects that are E-Government in nature or use e-business technologies must be identified as major projects regardless of the costs.”

7 CHANGES IN EXHIBIT 53 REQUIREMENTS (cont. ) risk assessment security planning/policy certification & accreditation specific management, operational, and technical security controls authentication or cryptographic apps. education, awareness, training system reviews/evaluations oversight/compliance inspections development and maintenance of agency OMB reports contingency planning/testing physical & environmental controls for hw/sw auditing/monitoring compusec investigations & forensics contractor reviews, inspections, audits & other evaluations IT Security Costs Percent Identification (Section 53.7) – Percentage must be reported for ALL investments. Explicit criteria to consider now must include costs of “products, procedures, and personnel primarily dedicated to or used for provision of IT security for the specific IT investment”, such as:

8 CHANGES IN EXHIBIT 53 REQUIREMENTS (cont. ) Funding Source Identification (Section 53.7) – Funding sources must be identified for all “major” investments. On-Going Project (Section 53.3) – New definition: A project that has been through a complete budget cycle with OMB and represents budget decisions consistent with the President's Budget for the prior year (BY-1).

9 CHANGES IN EXHIBIT 53 REQUIREMENTS (cont. ) Linking “major” Investments to the President’s Management Agenda (Section 53.2) – For help preparing Exhibit 300s, additional guidance has been provided in linking “major” investments to the President’s Management Agenda, guiding principles, e-Government strategies, and portfolio outcomes. For each such “major” investment an Exhibit 300 report must be prepared and should address elements discussed in section 53.2.

10 HOW I-TIPS IS AFFECTED Update I-TIPS to ensure that all on-going and new investments designated “major” or “small/other” –Use the OMB Project Type field at bottom of General Descriptive Information screen –For on-going investments, “moves” require footnoting –For new investments, final two digits: 00 Populate IT Security and IT Financial % fields for “small/others” in Life Cycle Cost Info. Folder –IT Security: > 0; IT Financial >= 0 For “majors,” use I-TIPS Funding Source Name drop down list in Life Cycle Budget and Financing Info. Folder to identify codes –To add codes, notify Help Desk,

11 Edit Investment

12 Indicate OMB 300 Project Type

13 Indicate IT Security/Financial %

14 Indicate Funding Source

15 HOW I-TIPS IS AFFECTED (Cont.) Footnoting All FY ‘03 baseline investment “Moves,” “Combinations” and “Deletions” must be footnoted, including projects formerly designated as “significant” that must be moved to “major” or “small/other” –Please follow existing instructions for Moves, Combinations & Deletions found within Attachment #5 of DOE I-TIPS User Guide for IT OMB Exhibit 53 Reports

16 USEFUL REFERENCE MATERIALS The following are available at and/or in the I-TIPS Global Resource Library –Revised OCIO “Instructions for OMB Exhibit 53 Submissions” –May 2002 Draft of OMB Circular A-11, Section 53 –OCIO List of Exhibit 53 Changes –DOE “I-TIPS User Guide for IT OMB Exhibit 53 Reports,” including an updated Attachment #5 on Footnoting

17 POINTS OF CONTACT For Exhibit 53 OMB Numbers: –Doug Todak, For Exhibit 53 data questions: –Joe Martin, –Helen McBride, For I-TIPS system questions –Help Desk, –David Glassman, –Jim King,

18 NEXT STEPS Update and finalize Exhibit 53 data and portfolios in I-TIPS by 6/24 Notify Jim King in OCIO at x once I-TIPS update is complete Questions?