Education Department Technical Assistance Web Conference Series: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Discretionary Grant Administration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
Step 3 – Carrying Out Grant Activities EPA GRANTS 101 Making the Project a Success This is YOUR project! EPA staff is available to give advice and guidance,
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
PLENARY SESSION Financial Management and Accountability Accountability and Grants Management: Connecting the Dots U.S. Department of Labor, ETA, Region.
Rules Governing Sponsored Projects (aka OMB Circulars) Presented by Beverly Blakeney, Diane Cummings and Julie Macy.
Page 1 Discretionary Grant Administration. Page 2  Overview of ED financial policies  Managing budget  Avoiding audit problems  Identifying key resources.
4/28/20151 Presented by: Anne Taylor, NECTAC David Steele, OSEP OSEP Part C Fiscal Management Verification: What Is It And How Do I Prepare For It?
Presented at the National Association of HBCU Title III Administration, Inc Technical Assistance Workshop June 24, 2014 Presenter: Perry L. Herrington.
Grant Management Webinar Presenters – Karla Freeman – Beth Romero – Chris Epoca.
Implementing the Uniform Guidance U.S. Department of Education.
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
Financial and Grants Management Institute - March 18-20, Federal Grants Management for Fiscal Staff.
Staff Timesheets 2014 Project Director Training & Annual Meeting1.
Trini Torres-Carrion. AGENDA Overview of ED 524B Resources Q&A.
Financial Management For Project Administrators. How Feds View Themselves.
Enhanced Assessment Grant1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Enhanced Assessment Grants (Updated June 2012)
1 Susan Weigert, Project Officer GSEGs Overview of GSEG Management.
Audio is available via internet. Please be sure your… speakers are attached and turned on and your volume is up.
Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
Monitor and Closeout Awards Lamar Revis NMFS Team Leader Paulette S. Moss OAR, NWS, NESDIS Team Leader.
1 INTERNAL CONTROLS Matthew Pakos School Improvement Grant Programs May 23, 2011.
2013 INBRE Project Subaward Management Barbara Bunge MSU Subaward Manager (406)
Effective Management and Compliance 1 ANA GRANTEE MEETING  FEBRUARY 5, 2015.
MANAGING SPONSORED PROJECTS FINANCIAL COMPLIANCE May 1, 2008 Office of Grants &Contracts Accounting.
11 HEP/CAMP NEW DIRECTOR’S TRAINING December 4, 2012 DEVELOPING A PROGRAM BUDGET By: Susy Sarmiento, Amas Aduviri & Nate Weiss.
2015 VOCA National Training Conference Grant Financial Management.
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
Presented by Raaj Kurapati and Charlene Hart. Introduction  The Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 was enacted to streamline and improve the effectiveness.
Audit-Readiness Riverside Community College District Grants Office.
The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards The OMB SuperCircular Information for FTA Grantees.
Grant Financial Management U.S. Department of Commerce Officer of the Inspector General 1.
DCB New Grantee Workshop: Post-Award Administration of Grants Brett Hodgkins Team Leader National Cancer Institute Office of Grants Administration.
Page 1 Discretionary Grants Administration David J. Downey Office of the Deputy Secretary Risk Management Service.
11 HEP/CAMP NEW DIRECTOR’S TRAINING SEPTEMBER 23, 2010 DEVELOPING A PROGRAM BUDGET BY: Dr. Maria T. Escobedo.
Mission of the Office of Migrant Education To provide excellent leadership, technical assistance, and financial support to improve the educational opportunities.
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY IN TITLE III AND OTHER SPONSORED PROGRAMS AND GRANTS ADMINISTRATION Presented by Sharon S. Crews, M.Ac., CPA Vice President for Administrative.
Employment and Training Administration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ETA Grant Management and Monitoring – Discretionary Grantees Pacific Northwest Workforce Development.
Time with Office of Sponsored Programs April 4, 2011 Topic: Cost Share.
Risk and Subaward Management under the Uniform Guidance U.S. Department of Education.
Presented at the National Association of HBCU Title III Administration, Inc Technical Assistance Workshop June 24, 2015 Presenters: Perry L. Herrington,
1 Expanded Authorities & Financial Monitoring. 2 Greater flexibility for managing ED Discretionary Grants The “Expanded Authorities” Amendments Amendments.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
DCB New Grantee Workshop: Post-Award Administration of Grants Brett Hodgkins Team Leader National Cancer Institute Office of Grants Administration.
2008 California AmeriCorps Conference1 Federal and Grants Management for Program and Fiscal Staff.
Charter School 2015 Annual Finance Seminar Grant Management Office of Grants Fiscal September 11, 2015.
Award Transfers Office of Research Services ORS Brown Bag November 20, 2006.
June 3, 2007NTIA PSIC Public Meeting1 How to Avoid Audit Problems: Matching Share and Cost Principles National Telecommunications and Information Administration.
CANAR Consortia of Administrators for Native American Rehabilitation FISCAL MANAGEMENT FOR PROJECT SUCCESS CANAR 2012.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
Preston Alderman MSDE, Director of Audit.  As recipients of federal and state funds we are charged with ensuring that the funds are adequately accounted.
DCB New Grantee Workshop: Post-Award Administration of Grants Brett Hodgkins Team Leader National Cancer Institute Office of Grants Administration.
Daily Management of Awards Jennifer Crockett Jennifer Crockett, Director, Sponsored Projects Finance, Columbia University Tamara Hill Tamara Hill, Manager,
Post-Award basics MATTHEW MOORE ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, POST-AWARD OPERATIONS.
1 FIRST UIC ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE Striving for Excellence March 8 th & 9 th, 2007 Workshop Session: 3 D Best Practices for Sponsored.
OnTrack Financial and Grant Compliance. Welcome The OnTrack Policies and Procedures is a draft and a living document. It may be changed based on UWGC.
OSEP Project Directors’ Conference Managing Your Grants 101 Terry Jackson – OSEP Shedeh Hajghassemali – OSEP July 22, 2008.
PY 2005 Grant Officer Overview U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Office of Grant and Contracts Management.
Sponsored Research Accounting1 Cost Transfers Policy and Procedure.
1 On-Line Financial Management Workshops Cost Classification, Administrative Costs & Program Income June 2009.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Other Key Uniform Administrative Grant Requirements.
Juanita Syljuberget Alabama Cooperative Extension System May 23, 2012.
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
2015 Leadership Conference “All In: Achieving Results Together”
Grants Management 101 Part A
Post-Award Grant Administration
Uniform Guidance and Grants Accounting
Post-Award Grant Administration
Presentation transcript:

Education Department Technical Assistance Web Conference Series: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Discretionary Grant Administration

Audio is available via the internet. Please be sure your— computer is un-muted, your speakers are on & your volume is turned up Sound Check

Discretionary Grant Administration Otis Wilson Office of the Secretary Risk Management Service

Legislation Regulations EDGAR Cost Principles (OMB Circulars) Grant Award Notification (GAN) Your approved Application Tools of the Trade

2 CFR Part 215 – Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Other Agreements with IHE’s, Hospitals and Other Non-Profit Organizations (see OMB Circular A-110) OMB Circular A-102 – Grants and Cooperative Agreements with State and Local Gov’ts EDGAR Parts 74 & 80

OMB Circular A-21 - Educational Institutions (2 CFR Part 220) OMB Circular A-87 - State, Local and Indian Tribal Governments (2 CFR 225) OMB Circular A Non-Profit Organizations (2 CFR 230) Cost Principles

Accountability

 Ties federal funding to results  Greater accountability  Project objectives and activities must reflect GPRA indicators Government Performance and Results Act of 1993

 Clear, concise, and detailed  Consistent with institutional policy  Meets federal requirements  Aligned with GPRA  Revised within scope of project  Achieve project goals Monetary Road Map

Roles & Responsibilities

Lines of authority  As stated in approved package  Key personnel changes need ED approval  Staff made aware of project’s… purpose, duration, objectives Administration / Management EDGAR §§74.25 & 80.30

¯Project’s success and financial accountability ¯Submit annual & final performance reports Grantee Responsibilities - Valid & reliable data - Report on GPRA standards & indicators EDGAR §§74.51 & 80.40

On site:  Funded application & grant awards  Previous audits / site visit reports  Annual performance reports  Project revision(s) documentation  Current budget & personnel list Grantee Responsibilities

Budget Management

must do the following… Provide for accurate, current, and complete disclosure of results regarding the use of project funds Document both the federal and non-federal funds used to carry out the project and track partners Financial Management Systems EDGAR §§74.21 & 80.20

Maintain effective internal controls Answer the following budgetary questions: Financial Management Systems State systems must allow for the proper tracking of expenditures for itself, sub-recipients, contractors to ensure proper use of funds

Allowable – permitted or not specifically prohibited Allocable – necessary for project’s success Reasonable – costs incurred by a “prudent” person Budget Items

Budget Categories Contractual Other Indirect Costs Training Stipends Personnel Fringe Travel Equipment Supplies Internal Controls — Procedures for expending funds for:

Maintained for grant’s staff Reflects total activity Signed by staff & supervisor Prepared monthly (w/i pay period) Cost sharing/matching salaries/wages supported Personnel: Internal Controls Time & Attendance Certification See OMB Circular A-21 or A-122

o Justify purpose o Identify travelers o Destination / travel dates o Number & cost of trips Travel

 Approval required?  Who approves?  Advances provided?  How are costs reconciled? Travel – Internal Control

 Definitions consistent with institution’s policy  Provide per unit cost  Maintain control  Lease or buy? Equipment & Supplies EDGAR §§74.34 & 80.32

Who…  Initiates?  Approves?  Receives?  Authorizes payment? Equipment & Supplies – Internal Control

Written procurement procedures Cost and price analysis Procurement records Contracts administration Contracts EDGAR §§74.40 & 80.36

Audits

 Non-Federal audit if expending $500,000 or more annually in Federal awards  Mail to Federal Audit Clearinghouse  Review Attachment C Audit Requirements OMB Circular A-133 EDGAR §§74.26 & 80.26

 Missing time and effort reports  Poor record-keeping  Failure to obtain prior approval  Incorrect indirect cost rates  Unallowable costs  Lack of internal controls Common Audit Exceptions

Grant Monitoring

Rate of drawdown must be commensurate with approved scope of work and milestones  Draw down only enough cash to meet grant’s immediate need  Minimize time between drawdown and payout of funds ED’s Drawdown Policy

Monitoring Using G5 G5 Tracks spending patterns for each grant Identify: performance issues financial issues Work in collaboration to resolve

1st Quarter More than 50% 2nd Quarter More than 80% 3rd Quarter 100% G5 Monitoring Report: Excessive Drawdowns Must return excess cash & interest to govt.

 Verifies financial data on annual performance report  Discrepancies clarified before award  Within 90 days, flags grants – 70% or more G5 Monitoring Report: Large Available Balance

Serious implications Special terms/conditions added Unsuccessful implementing project More technical assistance Notified by correspondence High-risk EDGAR §§74.14 & 80.12

 Documented unsatisfactory performance  Financially unstable  Non-standard management  Non-conformance to terms/conditions  Otherwise not responsible High-risk Designation Necessary to ensure compliance with grant requirements

 Temporarily stop funds  Increased reporting  Require prior approval – “Att. Z”  Withhold continuation grant  Suspension/Termination Special Conditions

Grantee Flexibility

Goals:  Increase flexibility  Increase accountability  Reduce paperwork burden  Develop relationships Grantee Flexibility Promote successful project outcomes

  Pre-award costs   Carryover   Budget transfers   Time extensions Grantee Flexibility EDGAR §§74.25(e)(f) & (75.261, , )

Incurred up to 90 days before budget period begins Pre-award Costs No prior approval New & NCC awards

Reasonable expectation of receiving a grant Incurred at own risk Funds not available until the budget period begins Not for cost over-runs Pre-award Costs Overview

Incurred MORE than 90 days before budget period begins… Pre-award Costs Requires prior approval

Unexpended funds “forwarded” without prior approval For any allowable cost within the approved scope Complete unfinished activities New activities within scope – Program Staff Carryover

Program Office may require written statement:  How will unexpended funds be used?  When: At time of funding decision  New funds can be reduced Carryover Large Available Balance? Written statement required!

No prior approval for most See exceptions in EDGAR… Training funds Transfer or contracting work OMB Cost Principles – other exceptions Budget Transfer

Changes in project scope or objectives Changes in key personnel IHE & non-profit project directors > absent for more than 3 months > 25% reduction in time Need for additional Federal funds Prior Approval

Final year…  One-time extension for up to one year without prior approval  Grantees should carefully consider time extension needs Time Extension

 No later than 10 days before project ends  State reasons for extension  Include revised expiration date Time Extension Written notice to Program Officer

Time Extension Restrictions Not just for using unexpended funds No additional Federal funds No change to scope or objectives

 Large amounts of unobligated funds at end of budget period  Excessive or infrequent drawdown of funds  Project goals not met ED Concerns

 Annual substantial progress met  GPRA indicators met  Recordkeeping & fiscal accountability What ED Looks for…

At Your Fingertips Program Legislation EDGAR 2CFR Application package GPRA

Grantee’s major responsibilities Monitoring activities to evaluate grantee’s performance ~ when performance conferences will take place ~ performance reports and when to submit them Site visits – compliance and technical assistance Fiscal management and recordkeeping Four administrative actions permitted via “expanded authority” Who ~ new project directors and business officers ~ refresher for experienced staff What ~ training materials - resources/pubs – ED grant office home page links When ~ Where ~ wherever you have computer access Why ~ responsible/effective project management- avoid costly mistakes On-line Grantee Training

 Check grant terms, conditions and grant award attachments for possible exceptions  In rare circumstances, some or all may be denied  When in doubt, call your Program Officer Important Reminders

References and Resources Main web page - Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) OMB Circulars General uses of funds guidance by program at: ED Recovery Act > Programs Grantmaking at ED Grants.gov - FIND. APPLY. SUCCEED Grant Awards Database List of Parties Excluded From Federal Procurement & Non-procurement Programs OMB Circulars Online Grantee Training

Questions?

Focus on successful project outcomes! Conclusion Flexibility Communication Resolving Issues Spirit of collaboration…

My card… USA-LEARN Otis Wilson U.S. Department of Education Office of the Secretary Phone:

That’s my time… I appreciate yours! Please complete an evaluation… And, good luck with your discretionary grant! 4e9-663b-40a4-aea7-8f8113b486b2

Cost Sharing/Matching

Cost Sharing/ Matching Fully documented & accounted Any “cost-sharing” promised by grantee Statutorily-specified % (formula)

Costs NOT covered by the Federal Government Cost Sharing / Matching Value of 3 rd party in-kind Interchangeable terms

Cash In-kind (personnel, equipment, space, etc.) Program income Matching Examples Poor recordkeeping and unallowable costs