Some first observations & lessons learned by Klaus Hüfner, Audit Coordinator of the IREG Ranking Audit and Carla van Cauwenberghe, Dutch Inspectorate of.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation

Advertisements

9 November 2007 Cecilia de la Rosa Head of the Internal Quality Unit How to prepare for an external review Current trends in the European Quality Assurance.

 Follow Up s. What Should Be in the ? Subject: Thanks for your Time (Name of Event) Thank them for their time Mentioning something memorable.

REGIONAL NEWSLETTERS ONE YEAR ON. Evelyn Alves Digital Communications Executive 02 April 2014.

1 GRS and Accreditation March Learning objectives After reviewing this presentation, you will understand  How the Global Rating Scale supports.

Overview of District Self Study. Objectives To understand specific aspects of the District Self Study: A.Purpose and use B.Recommended Practices C.Content:

Chairing a Florida Catholic Conference Accreditation Visitation.

Action Status Update Stephen Ward SIT-30 Agenda Item #2 30 th CEOS SIT Meeting CNES Headquarters, Paris, France 31 st March – 1 st April 2015 Committee.

Edward R. Stollof December 14-15, 2010 Stakeholder Workshop to Solicit Feedback on LED Issues and Potential Solutions with Ice and Snow Build-Up on LED.

Introductory Level Course Rep Training

A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP PGR PERIODIC REVIEW Sara Crowley

1 PROPOSAL FOR PROCEDURES AND SCOPE OF SHA DATA COLLECTION UNDER THE CO-OPERATION BETWEEN OECD, EUROSTAT AND WHO 7 th Meeting of Health Accounts Experts.

Revision of ISSAI 30 INTOSAI Code of Ethics

WHOIS Policy Review Team Interaction with the Community 16 March 2011.

PILOT PROJECT: External audit of quality assurance system on HEIs Agency for Science and Higher Education Zagreb, October 2007.

The LCVP is funded by the Department of Education and Science under the National Development Plan A Teacher’s Experience of WSE LCVP Conference.

CONFERENCE EVALUATION PLANNING Good planning is essential ! (‘’fail to plan is plan to fail’’)

How to Build a Network. Overview: Recruiting and Mobilizing Community Organizations Together, the Steering Committee and the Community Action Team: Identify.

THE OECD APPROACH TO ASSESSING ORGANISATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS Frank van Tongeren Head of Division, Policies in Trade and Agriculture (OECD) ICAE pre-conference.

Overview Continuous Improvement & Focus Monitoring.

Indiana Student Achievement Institute InSAI WELCOME STRATEGY CHAIRS.

OQN Seminar Quality Audit-Learning by Sharing Quality Audit-Learning by Sharing 11 th November 2009 Preparing the Stakeholders for the Audit Visit: The.

Second expert group meeting on Draft fiche on delegated act on the European code of conduct on partnership (ECCP) Cohesion Policy

 Overview  Online Report Process ◦ Report process for Grantees/Look-Alike Site Visits ◦ Report Process for Look-Alike Applicant Site Visits  Report.

Schreiber High School Middle States Accreditation Process.

On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.

Evaluation and the AccessData/Data Services Workshops

Alain Thomas Overview workshop Background to the Principles Definitions The National Principles for Public Engagement What.

UPDATING RIGHT OF WAY MANUALS FLORIDA’S PROCEDURES.

POLICY MAKING IN SWEDEN. A brief overview Policy making in Sweden Political policies are developed in different ways; By the Government By the Opposition.

Internal audit Community of practice. Customer To serve our governments Financial Accomplish donors’ needs and make best value for money of PEMPAL with.

Provenance and Context Content Standard (Emerging) – Status of Activities H. K. Ramapriyan Science Systems and Applications, Inc. & ESDIS Project, Code.

Project financed under Phare EUROPEAN UNION QUALITY EXTERNAL MONITORING IN THE SCHOOL YEAR 2007 – 2008 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Material produced.

Comenius Individual Pupil Mobility. Individual Pupil Mobility Aims of the action-1  Allow secondary school pupils to spend between 3 and 10 months in.

Program Evaluation Workshop Overview of the Site Visit Process Rita Marie Cain Professor of Business Law, Bloch School.

The GEF Monitoring and Evaluation Policy. 2  Result-Based Management (RBM) - setting goals and objectives, monitoring, learning and decision making 

ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES

Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation

Polices, procedures & protocols

Understanding VPNPP Advancement

2017/8 NomCom Review: Status Update

LAS Diagnostic Timetable April May June July August

Contracting Officer Podcast Slides

The GEF Monitoring and Evaluation Policy

Building the Future of Housing with the External Review

The GEF Monitoring and Evaluation Policy

360o Feedback Report Post-Training After-Session Actions

Catoosa County Schools

THANK YOU… Welcome to Microsoft office 365 Customer Support Number Welcome to Microsoft office 365 Customer Support Number For more visit on:

MTE 518 Enthusiastic Studysnaptutorial.com

Welcome to Microsoft Support Number Welcome to Microsoft Support Number For More Visit on:

The experiences of Turkey in the

Institutional Research and Assessment (IR&A) Feedback Survey

Academic Promotion Information session, 22 March 2018.

Time Line for Program Reviews

Department Chair Meeting

Sub-Committee F43.01 on Language Interpreting

How did we do it? Case examples from AIC

Thank You!! For More Information Visit: m/ Call to :

The GEF Monitoring and Evaluation Policy

Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY15)

2018 Staff Survey Results.

The GEF Monitoring and Evaluation Policy

Time Line for Program Reviews

Closing – What Comes Next

Introduction to TDES for Recalled Teachers

Innovative and Responsible Public Procurement

Potential Failure Mode Analysis 4th Edition

"Experience with the peer reviews, successes and things to change for next reviews" Delina Ibrahimaj, Albania.

an open digital question authoring tool

Presentation transcript:

Some first observations & lessons learned by Klaus Hüfner, Audit Coordinator of the IREG Ranking Audit and Carla van Cauwenberghe, Dutch Inspectorate of Education/Auditor of IREG Ranking Audit Warsaw, May

Time table & actions taken by Audit Team January : First contact Coordinator to Audit Team with Self Evaluation Report from ranking organisation concerned; From January till March 14: contacts between Audit Team; Several activities within the Audit Team: – IREG Ranking Audit Manual; – Working method developed and endorsed (ranking form); – First feedback round based on individual and team comments; – Audit Team (online) meetings/deliberations; – Team comments led to clarification questions to the ranking agency; – Clarification questions answered; Draft report by chair with feedback round and comments from members; Audit Report sent to IREG Audit Coordinator: ; Coordinator sends Report to IREG Executitive Commitee; Audit Report reviewed and endorsed by the IREG Executive Committee.

Some Feedback from the Audit Team 1. Need to revise some of the items in the Manual and to have clearer definitions. 2. Need to interview stakeholders and users of the ranking being audited. 3. Preferably, opportunity to visit the ranking team and have a live conversation with them. If a real visit is not possible, a videoconferencing/skype meeting should be envisaged. And last but not least: 4. For all of us it was a great experience, a very interesting and valuable process! Thank you.