Roundtable Discussion Topics Tools/Technologies for Rapid SE - Room 107 –Tools and technologies that enable rapid development of mission/business capabilities - from concept to fielding and sustainment –Facilitators: Kristen Baldwin, Rob Cloutier Workforce Development - Room 106 –Addressing the critical shortage of SE talent and skills through training, mentoring, certification, career development, acceleration of experience … –Facilitators: Don Gelosh, David Olwell Architecture/Security - Room 105 –Architectural approaches, processes and tools that anticipate change by building in adaptability/flexibility to possible future states, and that incorporate system engineering ‘ilities’ early in the life-cycle –Facilitators: Drew Hamilton, Jennifer Bayuk Agile SE/Governance - Room 208 –Frameworks for structuring system development efforts that enable rapid, adaptable, incremental delivery of value, guided by an overarching governance and enterprise architecture –Facilitators: Judith Dahmann, Ali Mostashari

ASRR Roundtable Workforce Team Discussion Summary 10 Minutes

Team Members Barnes, Jeremy AU Eisinger, Marian NSA Ellis, Darin WSU Ferreiro, Larrie DAU Gelosh, Don OSD Jablokow, Kathryn PSU O’Brien, Sue UAH Olwell, Dave NPS Facilitators: Gelosh, Don; Olwell, Dave

SYSCOM SYSTEMS ENGINEERING CHIEF/LEAD TRAINING, QUALIFICATION & CERTIFICATION PROGRAM GRADUATE SE COURSES EDUCATION MASTERS SE DESIRED DOD SPRDE PSE LEVEL I/II/III *CERTIFIED* SYSCOM CHIEF /LEAD SYSTEMS ENGINEER DEMONSTRATED ABILITY TO IMPLEMENT & EXECUTE SYSCOM SE PROGRAMS & PLANNING TECHNICAL EXPERIENCE 8-10 YEARS Navy SE & TECHNICAL AUTHORITY Course NAVAL SE Guide ECPs FOR ENGINEERS COURSE LEADERSHIP 10-15HRS COMMUNICATION SKILLS SEP DEVELOPMENT NSERC TOOLS SYSCOM UNIQUE NAVY SE TRAINING PERFORMANCE ENTRY LEVEL TWH CERTIFIES :

DoN Engineering of Systems ( Hierarchy of Systems Engineering) System Enterprise Translates Operational Concepts  Mission Capabilities Force Focus Capability Focus Functional Focus Mission SoS SoS Platform / Net Centric Translates Mission Capabilities  System Requirements Translates System Requirements  Component Functions Strike Ballistic Missile Defense Anti-Air Warfare Electrical Warfare Anti-Submarine Warfare Mine Warfare Component End Item Focus Translates Component Functions  End Items

Problem Definition Define the problem being addressed by the research topic The inadequate supply of qualified, current, and aligned systems engineers across industry, academia, and government, now and in the foreseeable future, is inadequate to meet demand.

Purpose/Objectives of a Research Effort Define what you would plan to accomplish as a result of the research e.g. analyze, prototype, create a framework, create a roadmap –Define the requirements for the SE workforce –Understand the reasons for the status quo –Create a roadmap for system engineering workforce development within an agreed framework to meet the requirements

Benefits of a Research Effort Higher probability of meeting workforce requirements –Clearer path for careers and organization More versatile, efficient (systems) engineering workforce Less risk of program failure due to under- qualified, not up-to-date, or mis-aligned personnel

Approach of a Research Effort Apply SE to SE workforce development –Define the requirements by manpower models and stakeholder input –Catalog and model the status quo for current and projected needs and supply of systems engineers –Identify benchmarks from existing SE development programs across government, industry, academia and national borders Salient features Successes Inhibitors –Analyze and synthesize –Develop pilot SE development program

Potential Sponsors List potential sponsors and specific focus areas they may have, if any –OSD DDRE – defense workforce –Services –NSF –DHS, NASA, other government –DAU – defense workforce –INCOSE – SE profession –Intelligence Community

Potential Collaborators List potential collaborators and specific areas of expertise they would bring to the research effort –SERC –NDIA –INCOSE –BKCASE partners