 Site Assessment and Mitigation Program Department of Environmental Health – County of San Diego.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Midland Community Meeting Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Steven Chester, Director Jim Sygo, Deputy Director.
Advertisements

BoRit Superfund Site Timeline
GASB 49 –Accounting & Financial Reporting for Pollution Remediation Obligations An Overview.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Authorizes EPA to identify hazardous wastes and regulate their generation, transportation, treatment, storage and.
PA One Cleanup and Land Use Controls The “Business of Brownfields” Conference April 17, 2008 Terri Smith Environmental Liability Management, Inc.
Voluntary Action Program – A Primer Amy Yersavich State and Federal Resources to Redevelop Blighted Properties Lake County November 12, 2010.
Voluntary Action Program – A Primer Martin Smith, Ohio EPA State and Federal Resources to Redevelop Blighted Properties Workshop.
California EPA Dept. of Toxic Substances Control Brownfields & Environmental Restoration Program Sam V. Martinez, Jr.
Craig L. Carlisle Senior Engineering Geologist San Diego Water Board Update.
1 Indiana Department of Environmental Management Budget Presentation FY
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Connecticut Remediation Programs Elsie Patton Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection.
1 Workshop for the Proposed Gregory Canyon Landfill California Department of Resources Recycling & Recovery (CalRecycle) June 27, 2011 Fallbrook Public.
Who’s Monitoring Land Use Controls on Brownfield Sites? Terri Smith Environmental Liability Management, Inc.
1 LAND USE CONTROLS THE ISSUES AND CHALLENGES Presented by MGP Partners LLC December 7, 2000.
Environmental Issues for Rural Communities STATE FUNDING AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT Sandy Karinen Cal/EPA Department of Toxic Substances Control Site Mitigation.
Measuring Environmental Performance: Beyond the Beans – San Diego County’s EPIC Pilot Project 16 th ANNUAL CIHC CONFERENCE December 4, 2006 presented by:
COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE OFFICE Giving small businesses a helping hand to overcome hurdles in Environment Regulations Genevieve Salmonson Compliance Assistance.
Solano County Department of Environmental Management Environmental Health Services Division Hazardous Materials.
The Polanco Redevelopment Act By: Richard G. Opper (619)
Emergency Response: Preparing for Disasters & Emergency Incidents June 2, 2015 Guest Secured Password: rangers!
Phase I Environmental Assessment By: Robert M. Senga, Section Chief Tiered Permitting Corrective Action Branch DTSC, Cypress Office (714)
Voluntary Cleanup and Redevelopment Act
Tier II: Module 1C CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program.
DTSC VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE California Industrial Hygiene Council 16 th Annual Conference Dan Gallagher Department of Toxic Substances Control California.
New LEA Orientation 101 8th LEA/CIWMB Conference 2005 Anaheim, CA Presenters: Robyn Browne - Lake County LEA Bill Prinz - City of San Diego LEA.
Solid Waste Laws. Federal Legislation RCRA (1976)- The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) CERCLA (1980) –The Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Contaminated Land Management Framework in Malaysia
Overview of Regulatory Changes, Policy and Implementation Colleen Brisnehan Colorado Department of Public Health And Environment Hazardous Materials and.
Overview of the Land Recycling Program (Voluntary Cleanup Program)
A PROGRAM THAT OFFERS CUSTOMIZED ASSISTANCE TO PROPERTY OWNERS & INTERESTED PARTIES WITH THEIR ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Voluntary Assistance Program (VAP)
Determining and Citing Violations - A Basis for Enforcement Mickey Pierce DTSC February 7, 2006.
Underground Storage Tank Compliance Act of 2005 Bill Torrey UST/LUST Regional Program Manager US EPA – New England EBCNE April 19, 2006.
Air & Waste Management Assoc. August 6, 2008 Region 4 RCRA Division Ken Lapierre, Deputy Director.
1 The Use of Institutional Controls Under the RCRA Corrective Action Program.
Web Resources Michael Gage New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection County Environmental and Waste Enforcement Special Investigations and Oversight.
Environmental Regulations. Learning Objectives TLW understand the history of environmental regulations TLW be able to describe key content of environmental.
Developing and Implementing Solid Waste Codes ITEP - TSWEAP Wyndham San Diego Bayside, San Diego, CA February 24-26, 2015 Gussie A. Lord Jill Grant & Associates,
Tier I: Module 5 CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program Element 4: Verification & Certification.
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Food Program & UST Program at Santa Clara County DEH By: Michelle Santos University of San Francisco December 5, 2013.
Tier 1 Module 4 CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Element 3: Public Participation.
MassDEP Underground Storage Tank Program Program Requirements for Owners and Operators Winter 2015 Workshops 1.
COMPLIANCE MONITORING and INSPECTIONS Or, how to run an effective program through an adequate field presence.
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
Congratulations! It’s a Burn Dump. What Do You Do Now? LEA/CIWMB PARTNERSHIP CONFERENCE Anaheim, California May , 2005 California Environmental.
Corrective Action Program: Working with Your Local Agency to Solve Local Problems James Clay County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Site.
December 2015 Detailed Presentation STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARDS CALIFORNIA Water Boards.
Environmental Factors In this module, we will discuss: Environmental legislation Environmental hazards Due diligence Conducting an environmental.
Environmental Regulation.  Complex set of laws  Constantly changing  Cover: Release, treatment, storage and disposal of Hazardous materials Into air,
1 Indiana Department of Environmental Management Budget Presentation FY
How does the VAP handle COCs that have left the VAP Property? Certified Professional Coffee February 24, 2016 Sydney Poole DERR-VAP.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Pete Doorn Special Remediation Branch Superfund Section Division of Waste Management
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 and 1989 (RCRA) Alex Chenault Period 4.
Division of Waste Management Dexter R. Matthews, Director Mission: to prevent harmful releases of waste to the environment and clean up existing contamination.
Sustain Noblesville Committee September 19, 2011 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
RCRA 2020 Vision… A View from a Facility Owner Lloyd E. Dunlap Atlantic Richfield Company, BP.
Beth Blalock, Asst. Chief Land Protection Branch GEORGIA EPD LAND PROTECTION BRANCH UPDATE MARCH 2016.
Department of Toxic Substances Control “IT’S ELEMENTARY!” School Brownfields and Institutional Controls Hamid Saebfar Acting Assistant Deputy Director.
Licensed Environmental Professionals (“LEPs”) in Connecticut CT DEP overview Gina McCarthy, Commissioner.
Leon Wirschem, REHS/HMS County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Division
EPA Options for the Federal Regulation of Coal Combustion Waste Lisa Evans Earthjustice October 22, 2010.
RESTORING CONTAMINATED SITES TO PRODUCTIVE USE
Timothy Veatch, Section Chief
CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Site Specific Work: Introduction
Solano County Department of Environmental Management Environmental Health Services Division Hazardous Materials.
Temporary Rulemaking for 15A NCAC 02L Section .0400
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Purpose To address the hazards to human health and the environment presented.
Branch Organization Chuck Mueller, Branch Chief
Cupa violation Review BAESG Meeting May 20, 2019 Matthew Burge
2018/2019 Activities. 2018/2019 Activities Revised Regulations - HSRA Reflect changes in scientific understanding since 1994 Provide Consistency in.
Presentation transcript:

 Site Assessment and Mitigation Program Department of Environmental Health – County of San Diego

 Senate Bill (SB) 445, signed September 8, 2014, extended UST Program authorization for 10 years  The funding basis of 2 cents per gallon was renewed for remediation of UST releases  10-year program for removing remaining single- walled USTs initiated

 Funding Source # Cases  LOPUST Cleanup Fund 293  VAPPrivate Party 175  CAPPrivate Party 1  Site DesignationPrivate Party 6

Corrective Action Program: Working with Your Local Agency to Solve Local Problems Neil Searing County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Site Assessment & Mitigation Program

Corrective Action Designation O On February 28, 2014, the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) delegated authority to DEH, as the local Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA), to oversee Corrective Action at permitted facilities in the County of San Diego. O Application submission and acceptance was a multi- year process.

What is Corrective Action? O Corrective Action is the term used in federal (RCRA) and state (HSC Ch. 6.5) law for the cleanup of hazardous waste or constituents at a facility engaged in the management of hazardous waste. O Corrective Action is all the activities taken to investigate, characterize, evaluate, remove, or remediate a release of a hazardous waste or constituents to a level of human health and environmental protection compatible with the use of the property.

Corrective Action cont. Corrective Action does not apply to: 1. The cleanup of waste residue during closure of a hazardous waste management unit 2. Small spills and releases that are cleaned up as part of routine housekeeping 3. Emergency response actions

Corrective Action Delegation to CUPA O A two Tier delegation approach was adopted based on CUPA qualifications and the complexity of the site requiring corrective action. O A qualified CUPA and DTSC are the only agencies authorized to implement the corrective action requirements of the Unified Program (HSC ).

CA Delegation cont. Tier 1 delegation authority allows a UPA to: O Oversee Preliminary Endangerment Assessments O Issue orders requiring corrective action at less complex sites O Oversee corrective action at less complex sites

Less Complex Site O Contaminants of Concern limited to those for which cleanup screening numbers have been developed (CHHSLs) O Cleanup will consist of removing less than 60 cubic yards of contaminated material O Cleanup will achieve 10-6 risk screening levels for all contaminants

CA Delegation cont. Tier 2 delegation authority allows a UPA to: O Implement and enforce all Tier 1 activities O Enforce corrective action at all facilities within the jurisdiction of the CUPA O Oversee corrective action at complex sites

When is Corrective Action Required? Corrective Action Required Phase II Environmental Assessment Inspections PBR/CA Closure Suspected Release No Further Investigation Required Further Investigation Required Clean Closure

Title 22 CCR Section Requires a corrective action process that fulfills the following: O Meaningful public involvement O Site screening using Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA) manual O Adequate site characterization of release and risk assessment that evaluates risk O Cleanup that is protective of human health and environment (10-6 risk level)

Title 22 CCR Section cont. O Adequate oversight to ensure corrective action is completed appropriately O Enforcement to ensure corrective action is performed O Financial assurance for long term implementation of corrective action remedies O Requirement for land use covenants for residual contamination left in place that is not suitable for unrestricted land use

Sources for Corrective Action Cases O Referrals from Hazardous Materials Division, including routine inspections and PBR/CA closures O Recalcitrant Voluntary Assistance Program cases that are or were CUPA permitted facilities O Analytical data submitted in compliance with Monitoring Well Program permits at sites that are were CUPA permitted facilities

Thank You