Brownfields Redevelopment in Ontario, Canada: Two Case Studies Steven Rose Malroz Engineering Inc. NATO/CCMS Pilot Study Meeting Athens, June 4-7, 2006.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

BITHLO COMMUNITY WATER Utilities Department Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 8, 2013.

Advertisements

DEQ Waste and Remediation Division Programs Michael McCurdy Ground Water and Remediation Section Manager Boise Regional Office.

Department of Environmental Protection “…conserving, protecting and improving the natural resources and environment of the state…” Graham J. Stevens and.

What Can Be Done?. THE US CONFERENCE OF MAYORS SURVEY FINDS….. …of the 153 cities that already have redeveloped brownfield sites… that redevelopment brought.

Introduction to Brownfields New Partners for Community Revitalization, Inc. June 29, 2009.

Vermilion County Brownfield Assessment Grant. Overview Brownfield Basics USEPA Brownfield Assessment Grant Vermilion County Assessment Grant Site Selection.

SB 5296 passed in 2013 authorizing new tools: Defined Brownfields Changed Remedial Action Grant (RAG) program; made Integrated Planning Grant (IPG)

Center City Development Office Brownfields Program.

Pine Hills ROCC (Redeveloping Orange County Communities) Brownfield Designation Environmental Protection Division District 2 and 6 April 23, 2013.

Land Recycling Program Pennsylvania DEP

Redevelopment of Former Industrial Lands in the Australian Capital Territory Toby Hobbs Coffey Geosciences, Australia NATO/CCMS Pilot Study June

Indianapolis Brownfields Forum April 14, 2005.

1 LAND USE CONTROLS THE ISSUES AND CHALLENGES Presented by MGP Partners LLC December 7, 2000.

Connecticut Brownfield Redevelopment Authority – Connecticut Development Authority Cynthia Petruzello Vice President Connecticut Brownfield Redevelopment.

Massachusetts Community & Banking Council Economic Development Committee June 10, 2010.

NATO/CCMS Pilot Study Meeting on Prevention and Remediation in Selected Industrial Sectors: Mega-Sites, Ottawa, Canada 12-16, June 2005 The State of Remediation.

The Role of the Licensed Site Remediation Professional (LSRP) Paul Sakson, LSRP Paul D. Sakson Associates, Inc.

1 Risk Assessment Develop Objectives And Goals Develop and Screen Cleanup Alternatives Select Final Cleanup Alternative Communicate Decisions to the Public.

Connecticut Department of Public Works -- Rebecca Cutler – Environmental Analyst.

Resolve: to establish a response team to facilitate the redevelopment of unoccupied mills LD 1675.

Office of Smart Growth p. 1 WIND ENERGY SYMPOSIUM THE COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY Thursday, July 23, 2009 B rownfields R edevelopment I nteragency T eam.

Bridging the Finance Gap Terri Smith Environmental Liability Management, Inc.

State Financing Programs for Brownfield Redevelopment.

BITHLO COMMUNITY WATER Utilities Department Orange County Board of County Commissioners December 18, 2012.

* Old gas stations * Old dry cleaners * Oil/chemical spills from past commercial/ industrial operations * Industrial wastes left on property * Old.

Tax Increment Thomas Chapman Raymond James John Repsholdt Ehlers Steven Langert Consolidated High School District 230.

Brandon Real Estate Board - June 19/20031 Your Logo Here ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS Phase I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS Phase I.

From Brownfields to Greenfields  Why we care  Process and goals  Funding options  Creative partnerships  Brownfield strategy  Future projects.

GFOA PS3260 Contaminated Sites Workshop Thursday, November 14, 2013 Whitehorse, YT.

Overview of Land Use Compatibility between Sensitive Land Uses and Nuisance Sources Peter Piersol A&WMA/OPPI Land Use Compatibility.

Office of Smart Growth p. 1 WIND ENERGY SYMPOSIUM RUTGERS UNIVERSITY Friday, September 25, 2009 B rownfields R edevelopment I nteragency T eam.

NATO-CCMS Pilot Study Tour de Table - Greece Recent Developments on Contaminated Land in Greece Anthimos Xenidis Laboratory of Metallurgy National Technical.

Social Benefits Improve public health of work force and community. Create more walkable, accessible, and livable neighborhoods by incorporating Smart Growth.

Tim Sullivan, Deputy Commissioner Revitalizing Connecticut’s Brownfields.

Spectron Superfund Site Proposed Plan Contaminated Shallow Soils U.S. EPA Region III June 26, 2003 Philadelphia, PA Robert J. Sanchez US EPA - Remedial.

The State of Ohio is an Equal Opportunity Employer and Provider of ADA Services energizing…sustaining…transforming.

Summer Institute 2009 Brownfields and Urban Redevelopment A former brownfield site in Lawrence, Massachusetts is rehabilitated into a community recreation.

THE GEORGIA BROWNFIELD PROGRAM MAY 22, BROWNFIELD: FEDERAL DEFINITION Real property, the expansion, development or reuse of which may be complicated.

Italy: the new legislation on the remediation of contaminated sites F. Quercia, APAT Tour de Table NATO CCMS Pilot Study Meeting 5-7th June 2006, Athens,

Brownfields Redevelopment Incentives Northeast States Renewable Energy Conference June 25, 2008 Catherine Finneran, MassDEP.

Brownfields: Real Property, the expansion or redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of contamination.

Georgia Department of Community Affairs.  States have programs to:  Recruit (usually state funded)  Market (federal and state mix)  Develop Products.

Atlantic Gulf Colonial Brownfield: ROCC (Redeveloping Orange County Communities) Brownfield Designation Environmental Protection Division District 5 March.

Department of Economic and Community Development -Peter Simmons and Brian Dillon -Office of Responsible Development -Office of Brownfield Remediation and.

BROWNFIELDS: “Financial and Technical Support for Redevelopment” HAYWOOD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS COALITION Presented to: TOWN OF WAYNESVILLE.

Gene: ROCC Brownfield Designation District 4 Gene: ROCC Brownfield Designation District 4 Environmental Protection Division December 1, 2015.

Brownfield First Policy Past campaigning by EIC. National Vision The regeneration of brownfield land should be a key aim of Government policy to establish.

Decatur Parks and Greenspace George Dusenbury Chair, Downtown Decatur Neighbors

Case Study – A Brownfield Cleanup in the City of Amsterdam, NY Joseph S. Campisi Geomatrix Consultants, Inc.

Public Financing Strategies to Leverage Private Investment in Brownfields Hennepin County Brownfield Program USEPA Brownfields 2015 Chicago, Illinois September.

1 FORMER COS COB POWER PLANT From Characterization to Redevelopment Brownfields2006 November 14, 2006.

Marian Anderson Place Site Update City Commission Special Workshop December 14, 2015.

Brownfields 101 Federal and State Role in Brownfields Redevelopment Carol Tucker, Section Chief Brownfields Program US EPA New England.

Brownfields Redevelopment Financing for Small Cities, Rural Communities And Tribes October 27-29, 2003 Sharon Kophs Washington State Department of Community,

1 Canadian Brownfields An Emerging Market Presentation By: Mitchell Fasken President MATRIX PROPERTIES LTD. Tammy Lomas-Jylha General Manager,

Starter Homes Rotherham Town Centre Sites Tom Bell Strategic Housing and Investment Manager 5 th April 2016.

Community-Based Development of Brownfields: Opportunities and Challenges Kris Wernstedt Associate Professor, Urban Affairs & Planning Virginia.

What are Brownfields? and…. Do I have One???? Sabine E. Martin, Ph.D., P.G. Center for Hazardous Substance Research Kansas State University April 2010.

Is The Marcellus Fairway Also A Pathway To Brownfield Redevelopment? Hull & Associates, Inc. National Brownfields Conference Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Somerville, MA From mattress factory to assisted living Rochester, NY From car dealer/repair shop to residential Old Town, ME From warehouse to waterfront.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RESOURCES, HELPING WISCONSIN SUCCEED 7 Rivers Alliance Rural Workforce Housing Summit June 1, 2016.

Downtown Stockton Housing Strategy Stockton City Council/ Stockton Redevelopment Agency Draft Report August 28, 2007.

Tax Tactics for Brownfields TAX INCREMENT FINANCING Brownfields 2004 September 21, 2004 presented by: Lisa Lyon URS Corporation Chicago, IL.

Works of Art: Redeveloping Properties for Cultural Reuse Harvester Artspace Lofts Council Bluffs, Iowa Tina Hochwender – City of Council Bluffs.

Renewable Energy at Contaminated Sites in in New York City Daniel C. Walsh Ph.D. NYC Mayor’s Office April 4, 2011.

Apalachee Regional Planning Council BROWNFIELDS 101 9/28/2017.

Redevelopment Authority of the County of Washington O

Introduction of Pilot Study

Excess Soil Management in Ontario

Forum on the strategies for the management and development of contaminated sites in Taiwan Shian-chee Wu October 25, 2007.

Presentation transcript:

Brownfields Redevelopment in Ontario, Canada: Two Case Studies Steven Rose Malroz Engineering Inc. NATO/CCMS Pilot Study Meeting Athens, June 4-7, 2006

2 Brownfields Redevelopment in Ontario Evolution of Ontario Regulations Evolution of Ontario Regulations 1989 Decommissioning Guidelines (limited) 1989 Decommissioning Guidelines (limited) 1996 Contaminated Sites Guidelines 1996 Contaminated Sites Guidelines 2004 Brownfields Regulation 2004 Brownfields Regulation Two Case Studies Two Case Studies Risk Assessment in Shallow Soils Risk Assessment in Shallow Soils Completing a Record of Site Condition Completing a Record of Site Condition Brownfields Development Initiatives Brownfields Development Initiatives City of Kingston REAP Program City of Kingston REAP Program S. Rose, Malroz Engineering Inc., NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, 2006

3 Development of Ontario Regulations 1996 Guidelines 1996 Guidelines multiple land use criteria multiple land use criteria expanded list of parameters expanded list of parameters guidance on sampling protocols guidance on sampling protocols Site Specific Risk Assessments Site Specific Risk Assessments S. Rose, Malroz Engineering Inc., NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, 2006

4 Development of Ontario Regulations 2004 Regulations 2004 Regulations numerically similar to 1996 guidelines numerically similar to 1996 guidelines harmonization with Federal criteria harmonization with Federal criteria definition of “Qualified Person” definition of “Qualified Person” guidelines become standards guidelines become standards public site condition record public site condition record S. Rose, Malroz Engineering Inc., NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, 2006

5 Images from: Google Earth Case Studies

6 Case Study 1: Former Canning Plant Town of Deseronto, Town of Deseronto, pop. ~ 2,000 vacant food processing facility vacant food processing facility located on downtown waterfront located on downtown waterfront thin soil veneer over bedrock thin soil veneer over bedrock clean-up clean-up S. Rose, Malroz Engineering Inc., NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, 2006 Source: maps.google.com

7 Case Study 1: Former Canning Plant 4 hectares, 2 parcels 4 hectares, 2 parcels potentially sensitive site potentially sensitive site waterfront waterfront limited soil depth limited soil depth Contaminants of Concern Contaminants of Concern 7 metals 7 metals 6 PAHs 6 PAHs clean-up to 1996 guidelines clean-up to 1996 guidelines S. Rose, Malroz Engineering Inc., NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, 2006 Main St. Mill St. Water St.

8 Case Study 1: Former Canning Plant Goal Goal repurpose property for commercial/residential use repurpose property for commercial/residential use Challenges Challenges sensitive site (surface water & shallow soil) sensitive site (surface water & shallow soil) 1996 guidelines allowed 2 clean-up strategies: 1996 guidelines allowed 2 clean-up strategies: background background Site Specific Risk Assessment (SSRA) Site Specific Risk Assessment (SSRA) Solution Solution modified SSRA approach modified SSRA approach measure on-site soil and groundwater contamination measure on-site soil and groundwater contamination evaluate leachable contaminant levels in soil evaluate leachable contaminant levels in soil develop site specific criteria for protection of aquatic receptor species. develop site specific criteria for protection of aquatic receptor species. S. Rose, Malroz Engineering Inc., NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, 2006

9 Case Study 1: Former Canning Plant S. Rose, Malroz Engineering Inc., NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, 2006 May, 2006

10 Case Study 1: Former Canning Plant S. Rose, Malroz Engineering Inc., NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, 2006 May, 2006

11 Case Study 2: Carwash Redevelopment City of Kingston City of Kingston pop. ~120,000 mixed industrial/residential neighbourhood mixed industrial/residential neighbourhood 0.7 hectare site 0.7 hectare site site clean-up site clean-up S. Rose, Malroz Engineering Inc., NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, 2006 Source: maps.google.com

12 Case Study 2: Carwash Redevelopment S. Rose, Malroz Engineering Inc., NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, 2006

13 Case Study 2: mixed land uses on neighbouring properties mixed land uses on neighbouring properties uncertain soil conditions uncertain soil conditions adjacent to former scrap steel & battery recycling facility adjacent to former scrap steel & battery recycling facility Photo: courtesy of City of Kingston

14 Case Study 2: waste ash materials encountered waste ash materials encountered elevated metals concentrations elevated metals concentrations concerns about PCBs concerns about PCBs remediation accomplished by off-site soil removal remediation accomplished by off-site soil removal S. Rose, Malroz Engineering Inc., NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, 2006 Photo: Courtesy of MOE

15 Case Study 2: Record of Site Condition S. Rose, Malroz Engineering Inc., NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, 2006

16 Case Study 2: Former Carwash & Vacant Site S. Rose, Malroz Engineering Inc., NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, 2006

17 Case Study 2: Former Carwash & Vacant Site S. Rose, Malroz Engineering Inc., NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, 2006

18

19 Case Study 2: Carwash Redevelopment S. Rose, Malroz Engineering Inc., NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, 2006 May, 2006 Sept., 2004

20 City of Kingston REAP Program Brownfields Brownfields Redevelopment Program Community Community Improvement Plan Provincial Provincial Incentive Program S. Rose, Malroz Engineering Inc., NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, 2006

21 Kingston REAP Program Designated C.I.P. Designated C.I.P. Total area >201 ha. Total area >201 ha. (497.2 acres) 529 properties 529 properties Old Industrial Area Old Industrial Area Inner Harbour Inner Harbour Commercial Core Commercial Core S. Rose, Malroz Engineering Inc., NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, 2006

22 Kingston REAP Program Incentives: Incentives: Initial Study Grant Initial Study Grant Brownfields Financial Tax Incentive Program (BFTIP) Brownfields Financial Tax Incentive Program (BFTIP) Tax Increment-Based Rehabilitation Grant Program (TIRGP) Tax Increment-Based Rehabilitation Grant Program (TIRGP) Partners: Partners: Province - enabling laws City of Kingston - strategic plan for incentives Development Sector - technical expertise and investment capital S. Rose, Malroz Engineering Inc., NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, 2006

23 Kingston REAP Program Incentives: Incentives: Initial Study Grant Initial Study Grant 50 % grant for costs 50 % grant for costs $10,000 (max.) $10,000 (max.) used for Environmental Assessments used for Environmental Assessments S. Rose, Malroz Engineering Inc., NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, 2006

24 Kingston REAP Program Incentives: Incentives: Initial Study Grant Initial Study Grant Brownfields Financial Tax Incentive Program (BFTIP) Brownfields Financial Tax Incentive Program (BFTIP) applicable during remediation & development applicable during remediation & development exemption from property taxes (municipal & education taxes) exemption from property taxes (municipal & education taxes) Development Charges & Impost Fees - deferred Development Charges & Impost Fees - deferred 3 yr tax holiday (max.) 3 yr tax holiday (max.) S. Rose, Malroz Engineering Inc., NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, 2006

25 Kingston REAP Program Incentives: Incentives: Initial Study Grant Initial Study Grant Brownfields Financial Tax Incentive Program (BFTIP) Brownfields Financial Tax Incentive Program (BFTIP) Tax Increment-Based Rehabilitation Grant Program (TIRGP) Tax Increment-Based Rehabilitation Grant Program (TIRGP) applicable at start of occupancy applicable at start of occupancy 80 % of tax increase -> repays remediation costs 80 % of tax increase -> repays remediation costs 20 % of tax increase -> retained for Municipal Brownfield Fund 20 % of tax increase -> retained for Municipal Brownfield Fund Development Charges & Impost Fees –> can be waived Development Charges & Impost Fees –> can be waived 10 yr period (max.) 10 yr period (max.) S. Rose, Malroz Engineering Inc., NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, 2006

26 Kingston REAP Program S. Rose, Malroz Engineering Inc., NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, 2006 Cost Time pre-development tax level post-development tax level (Environmental Protection Act) Initial Grants CIP (Municipal Act) BFTIPTIRGP Application Phase Rehab./ Develop. Period 3 years10 years Occupancy Period 20 % to Municipal Brownfield Reserve Fund 80 % to Property Owner Planning & Dev’t. Grant Rehabilitation Grant Effective Tax Cost

27 Brownfields Redevelopment in Ontario Summary Key regulatory milestones in 1996 & 2004 Key regulatory milestones in 1996 & 2004 flexibility with remediation methods flexibility with remediation methods Record of Site Condition (2004) Record of Site Condition (2004) public register of environmental conditions public register of environmental conditions City of Kingston experience City of Kingston experience successful partnering with industry and government successful partnering with industry and government S. Rose, Malroz Engineering Inc., NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, 2006

28 Acknowledgements: Acknowledgements: City of Kingston, Brownfields Dept. (J. Davis) City of Kingston, Brownfields Dept. (J. Davis) Home Base Housing Home Base Housing Town of Deseronto Town of Deseronto Information Sources: Information Sources: Ontario Ministry of the Environment Ontario Ministry of the Environment Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs & Housing Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs & Housing Ontario Ministry of Finance Ontario Ministry of Finance City of Kingston City of Kingston Contact: Contact: Steven Rose Steven Rose S. Rose, Malroz Engineering Inc., NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, 2006