Learning Outcomes [Dis]engaging Students in Higher Education OISE – September 24, 2012 Nicola Simmons, Ph.D. Department of Graduate and Undergraduate Studies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leading Learning in the Social Sciences MARGARET LEAMY National Coordinator Social Sciences Te Tapuae o Rehua Consortium
Advertisements

Peer-Assessment. students comment on and judge their colleagues work.
Performance Assessment
Directorate of Human Resources Understanding design for learning Dr. Rhona Sharpe Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
Confirming Student Learning: Using Assessment Techniques in the Classroom Douglas R. Davenport Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Truman State University.
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
The Common Core State Standards: Opportunities and Challenges for the Mathematical Education of Teachers.
QAA-HEA Education for Sustainable Development Guidance Document Consultation 5 November 2013, Birmingham Professor James Longhurst Assistant Vice Chancellor.
Induction: Third Day.  How can we teach to promote learning goals? ◦ Approaches to Teaching  From teacher-focussed to student-centred ◦ Constructive.
Angela Chow Centre for Information Technology in Education The University of Hong Kong IT in Education Symposium, 10th July, 04.
Assessing Learning for Classroom Success Friday, February 16, :00-3:00.
Workshop: Academic development in Higher Education Mieke Clement & Sari Lindblom Ylänne Tempus Project Strategic Management of Staff Development at University.
ORIC – Open Educational Resources for the Inclusive Curriculum 1 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike.
The Priority of Research and Doctoral School Nino Zhvania Head of the Quality Assurance Office.
Writing an Effective Proposal for Innovations in Teaching Grant
MOOCs and the Quality Code Ian G. Giles PFHEA Medical Education
School of Business University of Bridgeport Admissions Presentation Robert Gilmore, Ph.D. Associate Dean School of Business.
Assessing for Deep Understanding A Guide for Learning Sciences Researchers A translation of academic writing Web-Based Learning Designers.
Student (and other) Course Evaluations Response Rates, Relevance and Results Kathleen Norris Plymouth State University, NH.
Planning, Instruction, and Technology
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Solid Catalysts – Synthesis and Characterisation Techniques Emmanuel Iro.
Check-in on Curriculum Progress Next Steps.  Brings all of the pieces together.  Transparency  Creates curriculum conversation  A tool for the journey.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Northampton – Development Opportunities a framework for enabling positive change.
Learning outcomes and introduction to assessment Pg Certificate in Higher Education Professional Practice Jannie Roed and Sue Moron-Garcia 6 th May 2009.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Experiences and requirements in teacher professional development: Understanding teacher change Sylvia Linan-Thompson, Ph.D. The University of Texas at.
Online Course Development and Constructivist Teaching Strategies Susan M. Zvacek, Ph.D
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2: Elements of the Instruction-Learning- Assessment Model.
ON THE NEED TO LEARN IN MONITORING AND EVALUATION Paper for SAMEA 29 March 2007 Prof. Gert J van der Westhuizen University of Johannesburg
Introduction to Working Portfolios Educator Effectiveness System Training.
The Areas of Interaction are…
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Paul Parkison: Teacher Education 1 Articulating and Assessing Learning Outcomes Stating Objectives Developing Rubrics Utilizing Formative Assessment.
The Principles of Learning and Teaching P-12 Training Program
Assuring quality for the teaching of intercultural communication in Europe: perspectives and challenges Sharon Millar and Célio Conceição.
Evidence of Student Learning Fall Faculty Seminar Office of Institutional Research and Assessment August 15, 2012.
Ensuring that Professional Development Leads to Improved Mathematics Teaching & Learning Kristen Malzahn Horizon Research, Inc. TDG Leadership Seminar.
Roles and types of examination ITU, October 8, 2010 Hanne Leth Andersen, RUC.
Review of Class and Syllabus Syllabus Unit Activity and Assessment New AIG Standards.
CT 854: Assessment and Evaluation in Science & Mathematics
Preparing and Evaluating 21 st Century Faculty Aligning Expectations, Competencies and Rewards The NACU Teagle Grant Nancy Hensel, NACU Rick Gillman, Valporaiso.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
1 Rossier School of Education Defining Excellence in Urban Education.
Imaginative Curriculum
Student Name Student Number ePortfolio Demonstrating my achievement of the NSW Institute of Teachers Graduate Teacher Stage of the Professional Teacher.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
Conceptual Framework Presentation, 2006, Slide 1 The Conceptual Framework for Programs that Prepare Professionals Who Work in Schools What - Why - and.
Programme design and student assessment David Baume 1.
What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett.
Results of WP 4: Implementation, experimentation of teacher training actions Open University of Catalonia - From November 4th to December 19th.
Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) As a Curriculum Model
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
COURSE AND SYLLABUS DESIGN
Authentic service-learning experiences, while almost endlessly diverse, have some common characteristics: Positive, meaningful and real to the participants.
LANGUAGE TEACHERS AND THE NEW CURRICULUM IN KAZAKHSTAN Bob Obee Express Publishing Astana 2016.
Equity and Deeper Learning:
What Is This Intentional Learning Thing?
NCATE Unit Standards 1 and 2
My research questions What are academics’ perceptions of the influences on their curriculum decisions? What are the drivers that support and inhibit.
NTNU’s quality system for education
New Goal Clarity Coach Training October 27, 2017
Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers
Questions What really matters in graduate education?
Dr Camille B. Kandiko Howson Academic Head of Student Engagement
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Presentation transcript:

Learning Outcomes [Dis]engaging Students in Higher Education OISE – September 24, 2012 Nicola Simmons, Ph.D. Department of Graduate and Undergraduate Studies in Education, Brock University

Learning Outcomes O Make the instructor’s implicit expectations explicit O Clarify students’ responsibilities O Align course outcomes, tasks, assessments O “Facilitate credit transfers, admission to graduate program, and accreditation of professional programs” (Hubball, Gold, Mighty, & Britnell, 2007, p. 93). O Facilitate conversations at the department level about what is being taught and why 2

Learning Engagement? O “When there is a high level of specification of learning outcomes and a high level of alignment of goals, assessment and criteria, students’ experience is characterized by: O Less coverage of the syllabus O Experience of less and poorer quality feedback O Less experience of ‘appropriate assessment’ O Less experience of ‘clear goals and standards’ O Less deep approach” (Gibbs, 2010) 3

Or Disengagement? O Caine and Caine (1998) suggest that “prespecified ‘correct’ outcomes [that] have been established by an external agent” (p. 5) is one of a set of five conditions that result in cognitive downshifting, in which students disengage from the learning process and curriculum. O Outcomes-based education can run the risk of emphasizing the accumulation of discrete items of content rather than the meta-cognitive and transdisciplinary thinking and problem-solving required of current and future graduates. 4

Some Challenges O Often focus on content and assessment not process of learning O Focus on competencies rather than competence (Sadler, 2007 ); may lead to standardized testing O May be more meaningful to instructor than students O Challenging for most faculty to write (Rust, Price, & O’Donavan, 2003); particularly for the affective domain. O Behavioural engagement is easier to see than cognitive and psychological engagement O An instrumental process, or what Schön (1983) refers to as a techno-rational perspective, rather than a negotiated process that could lead to transformative learning O Little room for discovery; may reduce learning from an aesthetic experience to one that is so constrained as to be anaesthetic (Robinson, 2010) 5

Quality Improvement Efforts “Tend to be compromised to some extent by quality seen as an aspect of accountability or of standard- setting. Increasingly, internal quality management is complemented by external quality-assurance mechanisms, complete with quantifiable indicators, that reflect a considerable loss of public trust in education” (Kehm, 2010, p. 42). Which then leads to more accountability measures… 6

Quality Improvement Efforts “Quality assurance and enhancement are based in quality paradigms that are philosophically opposed. Since accountability is the main driving force behind quality assurance in higher education, the primary goals of quality assurance processes are to monitor and maintain quality. As a result, quality assurance processes tend to inhibit innovation in teaching and learning rather than advance it” (Nicholson, 2011, p. 8). 7

Pedagogical Processes O “Wide assumption that systemic course design is ‘a good thing’; Oxford does not use anything resembling systematic course design …. What is salient is the process, and its rationale, not the goals” (Gibbs, 2010) O Over two thirds of exemplary teachers in one study made changes in their teaching while it was in progress, taking advantage of teachable moments rather than remaining within the confines of their plans for content delivery (McAlpine & colleagues, as cited in Entwistle, Skinner, Entwistle, & Orr, 2000). O This kind of reflection-in-action (Schön, 1983) places an emphasis strongly on the process of learning rather than outcomes. 8

Student Driven Approaches O “Involving students in the design of assessment, choice of assessment task and negotiation of criteria” (Gibbs, 1992, p. 7) can result in higher levels of student engagement. O Outcomes should be written in terms of personal understanding (from Biggs, 1999) rather than target understanding (Entwistle & Smith, cited in Entwistle, 2000). 9

Learning without Outcomes? O “Learners were allowed to identify, seek, and master knowledge that was personally relevant instead of simply having to receive pre-determined curricular information.... As a result new learning was practically applicable” (participant quote, Simmons, 2011). O “I was able to see the value once I moved beyond the frozen fear of uncertainty to ask myself “What did I want to gain from this course? How did I learn when pushed out of my comfort zone?” I had to be transformed into a student who was open to this new concept and new territory for learning …. [where] mistakes … would not be judged but instead used as stepping stones toward learning” (participant quote, Simmons, 2011). 10

Discussion Questions O How can the commodification of education and accompanying specification of discrete chunks to be learned prepare students for the complex (and transdisciplinary) challenges of today’s society? O Whose agenda is privileged by outcomes? O “If learning outcomes are so practical and useful, why is there this resistance?” (Hussey & Smith, 2002, p. 224). 11

References O Caine, R. N., & Caine, G. (1998, May). Building a bridge between the neurosciences and education: Cautions and possibilities. Bulletin, 1-8. O Entwistle, N. (2000). Promoting deep learning through teaching and assessment: Conceptual frameworks and educational contexts. Paper presented at TLRP conference, Leicester, UK, November. O Entwistle, N., Skinner, D., Entwistle, D., & Orr, D. (2000). Conceptions and beliefs about ‘good teaching’: An integration of contrasting research areas. Higher Education Research & Development, 19(1), O Gibbs, G. (2010). The importance of context in understanding teaching and learning: Reflections on thirty five years of pedagogic research. Keynote at the International Society for Scholarship in Teaching and Learning annual conference, Birmingham, UK, October. O Gibbs, G. (1992). Improving the quality of student learning. Bristol, England: TES. O Hubball, H., Gold, N., Mighty, J., & Britnell, J. (2007). Supporting the implementation of externally generated learning outcomes and learning-centred curriculum development: An integrated framework. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 112, O Hussey, T., & Smith, P. (2002). The trouble with learning outcomes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 3(3),

References O Kehm, B. (2010). European education: The influence of the Bologna process. Change: the magazine of higher education, 42(3), O Nicholson, K. (2011). Quality assurance in higher education: A review of the literature. Available online at O Robinson, K. (2010). Changing education paradigms. London: RSAnimate. Available online at O Rust, C., Price, M., & O’Donovan, B. (2003). Improving students’ learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(2), O Sadler, D. R. (2007). Perils in the meticulous specification of goals and assessment criteria. Assessment in Education, 14(3), O Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books. O Scouller, K. (1998). The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, 35, O Simmons, N., Barnard, M., & Fennema, W. (2011). Learning without limits: Perspectives on participatory pedagogy. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 4. 13